HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup April 18, 2013 9:00 AM– 10:00 AM Eastern.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 5, 2013.
How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Understanding Patient Engagement in Stage 2 MU: Direct, HIPAA, VDT, and Patient Engagement.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families May 1, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Draft – discussion only Consumer Workgroup STAGE 3 Meaningful Use & 2015 VDT Certification NPRM Review Christine Bechtel, chair April 20, 2015.
Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup December 2, 2013.
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 28, 2013.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families May 29, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families June 17, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting March 21, :00 AM– 12:00 PM Eastern.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use: Patient Engagement Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
Patient Engagement Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
HIT Policy Committee Consumer Empowerment Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting March 19, :00 – 4:00 PM Eastern.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
0 HIT Standards Committee Consumer/Patient Engagement Power Team Leslie Kelly Hall, Chair Health IT Standards Committee Meeting April 18, 2012.
HITPC – Meaningful Use Workgroup Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Stage 3 Planning July 27, 2012.
HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup September 3, 2013.
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 24, 2013.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Referral Request and Referral Report Connie Sixta, PhD.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Improving Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Charlene Underwood, Chair September 2012.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families May 13, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
Meaningful Use Workgroup June 24, 2013 Paul Tang, chair George Hripcsak, co-chair 1.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 25, 2012.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
HIT Policy Committee Consumer Empowerment Workgroup June 17, :00 -5:00PM Eastern.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Referral Request and Referral Report
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup April 18, :00 AM– 10:00 AM Eastern

Agenda Welcome ONC Consumer/Patient Activities Continue introductions with activities Standards inventory planning (see Meaningful Use Stage 2 table) Next steps Public comment 1

ONC Consumer/Patient Activities Consumer Engagement Strategy Blue Button Public input on Consumer Engagement Patient-Generated Health Data the Center” 2

Office of Consumer eHealth slides 3

Input on Consumer Engagement via PlanningRoom.org 4

Patient-Generated Health Data ONC asked National eHealth Collaborative to convene a Technical Expert (TEP) Panel to provide input on how to successfully implement patient generated health data (PGHD). Purpose: identify use cases and best practices for integrating PGHD into clinical workflows to produce an evidence-based report that will support the HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup in developing recommendations for Stage 3 Meaningful Use. 5

Patient-Generated Health Data – MU3 Proposed objective 204B Provide 10% of patients with the ability to submit patient- generated health information to improve performance on high priority health conditions, and/or to improve patient engagement in care (e.g. patient experience, pre-visit information, patient created health goals, shared decision making, advance directives, etc.). This could be accomplished through semi-structured questionnaires, and EPs and EHs would choose information that is most relevant for their patients and/or related to high priority health conditions they elect to focus on. 6

PGHD-Related MU3 Proposed objective 204D Provide patients with the ability to request an amendment to their record online (e.g., offer corrections, additions, or updates to the record) through VDT in an obvious manner. Proposed objective 207 Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information 7

TEP PGHD Comments on Stage 3 Suggestions to providers, based on case studies, of “promising practices” for – Preparations – Data of value to providers and patients – Processing PGHD 8

the Center: Vision The power of each individual is unleashed to be active in managing their health and partnering in their health care, enabled by information and technology.  Empowers each individual to be the manager and partner in their health care using health IT tools and resources.  People’s health and quality of life will improve if they have the assistance of information and technology for self-care and shared decision-making with their providers. 9

Continuum of Spheres of Wellness and Health Care 10

Goals 11

Goals 12

Goals 13

Draft Building Blocks 14 Key policy ideas: – Reflect suggested changes to support people as they act within and move between the spheres of wellness and health care. – Illustrate a way to achieve the vision: Game-changing Broad-reaching in scope Support behavior change Make use of health IT and information-sharing

Consumer Technology Workgroup (WG) Members WG Members Brian Ahier, Gorge Health Connect, Inc. Christine Bechtel, National Partnership for Women & Families Brian Carter, Cerner AJ Chen, HHS NPA Region IX Health Equity Council John Derr, Golden Living, LLC Tonya Dorsey, BCBS/South Carolina Arthur Henderson, Affinity Networks, Inc. Susan Hull, Wellspring Consulting Elizabeth Johnson, Tenet Healthcare Corporation Russ Leftwich, TN Office of eHealth Mohit Kaushal, West Health Tom Jones, Tolven Health Holly Miller, MedAllies, Inc. Sally Okun, PatientsLikeMe Yair Rajwan, Visual Science Informatics, LLC John Ritter, HL7 EHR Work Group Anshuman Sharma, Ubiqi Health Fred Trotter, Not Only Dev Ex Officio Members Kim Nazi, Veterans Health Administration Susan Woods, Veterans Health Administration 15

Member Introductions – continued See Workgroup Member/Activity WORD table 16

Patient Engagement Standards Inventory 17 Meaningful Use Objectives for Patient Engagement and Care Coordination Standards Identified for Stage 2 Gaps

Next Steps Homework – Complete table of member activities, related standards, and MU priorities; to – Read and comment on Consumer Strategy (as an individual) by May

Background Slides for Additional Information 19

Charge & Scope Charge: Provide recommendations on standards and interoperability issues and opportunities related to strengthening the ability of consumers, patients, and lay caregivers to manage health and health care for themselves or others. Scope: – Examples of issues to be addressed include portability of patient data, patient access to and generation of their health data, and incorporating patient preferences for a variety of issues, such as care plans. – Important touch points with other workgroups: HITPC Consumer Empowerment Workgroup Meaningful Use Workgroup 20

21 Stage 2 Final Rule EP Objective: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP. EP Measure: 1. More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information 2. More than 5% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) view, download, or transmit to a third party their health information EH Objective: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit information about a hospital admission EH Measure: 1. More than 50% of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge 2. More than 5% of all patients (or their authorized representatives) who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the reporting period Context: Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule Patient & Family Engagement Requirements

22 Stage 1 Final RuleStage 2 Final Rule Provide clinical summaries for >50% of all office visits within 3 business days EP Objective: Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit EP Measure: Clinical summaries provided to patients or patient-authorized representatives within 1 business day for more than 50 percent of office visits. We clarify that the following information (or an indication that there is no information available) is required*: ● Patient name. ● Provider's name and office contact information. ● Date and location of the visit. ● Reason for the office visit. ● Current problem list. ● Current medication list. ● Current medication allergy list. ● Procedures performed during the visit. ● Immunizations or medications administered during the visit. ● Vital signs taken during the visit (or other recent vital signs). ● Laboratory test results. ● List of diagnostic tests pending. ● Clinical instructions. ● Future appointments. ● Referrals to other providers. ● Future scheduled tests. ● Demographic information maintained within CEHRT (sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth, preferred language). ● Smoking status ● Care plan field(s), including goals and instructions. ● Recommended patient decision aids (if applicable to the visit). *an EP could withhold information from the clinical summary if they believe substantial harm may arise from its disclosure through an after-visit clinical summary Context: Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule Patient & Family Engagement Requirements 22

23 Stage 1 Final RuleStage 2 Final Rule MENU: Use certified EHR to identify patient-specific educational resources for >10% of all patients EP/EH Objective: Use Certified EHR Technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient EP CORE Measure: Patient specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10 percent of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period EH CORE Measure: More than 10 percent of all unique patients admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) are provided patient- specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology Context: Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule Patient & Family Engagement Requirements

24 Stage 2 Final Rule EP Objective: Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information EP Measure: A secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of Certified EHR Technology by more than 5 percent of unique patients (or their authorized representatives) seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period Context: Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule Patient & Family Engagement Requirements

Shared Care Plan: Proposed for Future Stage 25 Stage 3 Request for Comment (Proposed for Future Stage) EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/ EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another site of care or refers their patient to another provider of care For each transition of site of care, provide the care plan information, including the following elements as applicable: Medical diagnoses and stages Functional status, including ADLs Relevant social and financial information (free text) Relevant environmental factors impacting patient’s health (free text) Most likely course of illness or condition, in broad terms (free text) Cross-setting care team member list, including the primary contact from each active provider setting, including primary care, relevant specialists, and caregiver The patient’s long-term goal(s) for care, including time frame (not specific to setting) and initial steps toward meeting these goals Specific advance care plan (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST)) and the care setting in which it was executed. For each referral, provide a care plan if one exists Measure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another site of care or provider of care provides the electronic care plan information for 10% of transitions of care to receiving provider and patient/caregiver. Certification Criteria: Develop standards for a shared care plan, as being defined by S&I Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG. Some of the data elements in the shared care plan overlap content represented in the CDA. Adopt standards for the structured recording of other data elements, such as patient goals and related interventions