Accessibility David Levinson Why Cities Form? Why does the Twin Cities exist? Why are the Twin Cities larger than Duluth or Fargo? Why is Chicago more.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Associating David Levinson Questions How do people find jobs? Does land use pattern matter? How should JH Balance be measured? Jobs Housing Balance does.
Place and Plexus: The 5Cs David Levinson Agents What is an agent? What are the classes of agents: We look at –individuals, –firms (developers, locators),
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Travel and Transportation © Allen C. Goodman, 2009.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
The Evolution and Effects of Suburbanization By Carley Page.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
Motion along a straight line
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
The Northeast Megaregion in a National Infrastructure Plan
Accessibility David Levinson. Why Do Cities Form? Why does the Twin Cities exist? Why are the Twin Cities larger than Duluth or Fargo? Why is Chicago.
Abstract This paper develops a positive theory of network connectivity, seeking to explain the micro- foundations of alternative network topologies as.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
An independent view of the transport issues Malcolm Buchanan Colin Buchanan and Partners.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
Lecture 4 Transport Network and Flows. Mobility, Space and Place Transport is the vector by which movement and mobility is facilitated. It represents.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Time and Space David Levinson Accessibility David Levinson.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Transportation Concurrency The provision of “adequate transportation facilities” Integrating land use and transportation.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Location, Relocation and the Journey to Work by David Levinson University of California at Berkeley Department of Civil Engineering/ Institute of Transportation.
Professor: Keren Mertens Horn Office: Wheatley 5-78B Office Hours: TR 2:30-4:00 pm ECONOMICS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA 212G,
Healthy Places: The Community of Tomorrow. USA Population 2000 –275 million people –Median age: 35.8 yrs 2030 –351 million people –Median age: 39 yrs.
Understanding Activity Patterns and Trends David Levinson.
Assembly David Levinson. Induced Travel S1: Supply before S2: Supply after Price of Travel Quantity of Travel (VMT) Q1 Q2 P1 P2 Demand.
Colby Brown, Citilabs Dennis Farmer, Metropolitan Council
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Development Part 4: Streetcar Era David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Results to Date of The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study February 8, 2006.
Residential Location David Levinson. Push and Pull Pull - advantages of locating near specific things Push - disadvantages of locating near specific things.
Fostering Mobility in a Compact City – Hong Kong’s Experience Professor Anthony B.L. Cheung Secretary for Transport and Housing Hong Kong, China.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
MULTIMODAL ACCESSBILITY PHYSICS OF CITIES – SCIENCE OF ACCESSIBILITY 2 2 A NEW ACCESSIBILITY FRAMEWORK 3 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW ACCESSIBILITY.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Transportation Complete the notes page provided for you over Ch. 26.
2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.
Linear or 1-Dimensional Motion  Mechanics (Physics) = Study of motion of objects, and the related concepts of force and energy.  Kinematics = Description.
Sustainable Urban Mobility plans and Accessible and Inclusive transport Rob Jeuring GIAT 2015, Istanbul, 8 October 2015.
ACCESS TO DESTINATION: DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES Ahmed M. El-Geneidy David M. Levinson University of Minnesota.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Perspectives on Efficiency in Transportation David Levinson.
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Building healthy liveable cities: are we there yet?
Marron Institute of Urban Management,
Citilabs’ Sugar Analyst – Measuring Accessibility
The UK’s changing cultural influence through media and food .
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Travel patterns in a city
visualizing job accessibility with
Travel patterns in a city
אמצעי מדיניות להפחתת זיהום אוויר במרכזי הערים
Presentation transcript:

Accessibility David Levinson

Why Cities Form? Why does the Twin Cities exist? Why are the Twin Cities larger than Duluth or Fargo? Why is Chicago more important than St. Louis? What is inevitable, what is chance?

Accessibility A measure that relates the transportation network to the pattern of activities that comprise land use. It measures the ease of reaching valued destinations. Accessibility “is perhaps the most important concept in defining and explaining regional form and function.” (Wachs and Kumagai 1973)

LeCorbusier LeCorbusier, the controversial twentieth century Swiss architect and planner once said “A house is a machine for living in” Villa Savoye, 1928

Machine for Access Transportation is “The Machine for Mobility” Our legs, our wheels, our tracks, our roads, our wings help us move. We know that since the buildout of the Interstate, mobility has been decreasing (due to congestion) But we cannot assess the system as a whole unless we know what we are moving to. The City is “The Machine for Access” The formation of the city allows us to reach more things in less time. Transportation is necessary, but so are the activities,(located at places) to be reached. Change in land use may mean that despite increasing congestion, we still have rising accessibility

Mobility vs. Accessibility Manitoba High Speeds Few Destinations High Mobility Manhattan Low Speeds Many Destinations High Accessibility

Measuring Point Accessibility Where: A i = accessibility at point i P j = some measure of activity at point j (for example jobs) C ij = the cost to travel between i and j (for example travel time by auto).

f (C ij ) For auto: For transit: Where: C ija = peak hour auto travel time between zones i and j; and C ijt = peak hour transit travel time between zones i and j.

Isochron: How Far Can You Go in a Given Time Multiply by number of things in each ring See how it changes over time. Works for individual points. Need to see region as a whole.

Metropolitan Accessibility where: A = Accessibility W i = Workers at origin i Ej = Employment at destination j f(Cij) = function of the travel cost (time and money) between i and j.

Relative vs. Absolute Change Or do people value the relative change (I will pay twice as much for a network that is covers twice the percentage of the market)? Do people value the absolute increase (each person I am connected to adds the same value)?

Absolute vs. Relative Accessibility A transportation improvement reduces the travel time between two places. What happens? The absolute accessibility of the entire region increases. The pie increases The relative accessibility of the two places increases at a greater rate than the rest of the region. The slice of the pie going to those two places increases even more. Why does this matter?

Accessibility and Land Use

Coruscant

Constraints If the model is correct, why don’t we live on Coruscant? –Time - we just don’t live there yet –We do, visit New York, Tokyo, Hong Kong –Congestion and related costs to density limit the accessibility machine –Population, food, energy are constraints Or maybe it is just this guy

Access By Mode & Distance (DC 1988)

Journey to Work Time and Home Value by Ring (DC 1988, 1991)

Project: Phase 1 Review Literature on Performance Measures, System Data Characteristics, and Accessibility. Define Performance Measures for Accessibility. Illustrate Performance Measures using hypothetical or limited available data for “proof of concept”.

Ultimate Aim: Multi-Modal & Multi-Purpose Accessibility Over Time JobsLaborShopsPlayOther Auto Transit Walk Bike

Requirements Point to Point travel times for all points –On limited access freeways (and ramp meters), –linking roads (signalized arterials) and –local roads, –by transit, walking, biking Land uses / Activities for all points in region

Questions