CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information Edoardo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.
Advertisements

Report on the activities of the Digital Soil Mapping Working Group Endre Dobos.
VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra - February 6-7, 2006.
1 A Schneider Electric Software for Pre-Design of Industrial and Tertiary Building Electrical Distribution.
INDICATOR EVALUATION An indicator of appropriate fertilization practices must fulfill some criteria (SAFE) : No Discriminating power time and space >
Anita M. Baker, Ed.D. Jamie Bassell Evaluation Services Program Evaluation Essentials Evaluation Support 2.0 Session 2 Bruner Foundation Rochester, New.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World
Chapter 8: Evaluating Alternatives for Requirements, Environment, and Implementation.
M.D.2.I. M anagement, D éveloppement I nternational & I nformatique SARA EDF PE PRESENTATION Introduction SARA: Special Account Régie d’Avance Budget accounting.
TRIM Workshop Arco van Strien Wildlife statistics Statistics Netherlands (CBS)
Soil Mapping and Erosion
What Makes Soil Good ò Analysis of soils assists an agricultural land brokerage professional estimate the economic potential of the land 3-1.
The Experience Factory May 2004 Leonardo Vaccaro.
Search Engines and Information Retrieval
Chapter 3: System design. System design Creating system components Three primary components – designing data structure and content – create software –
1 Chapter 2 Reviewing Tables and Queries. 2 Chapter Objectives Identify the steps required to develop an Access application Specify the characteristics.
Statistics and Data for Marketing Data Library, Rutherford North 1 st Floor Chuck Humphrey Data Library October 27, 2008.
EAS 293 Data Library, Rutherford North 1 st Floor Chuck Humphrey Data Library October 14, 2008.
National Soil Survey Center
Version 4 for Windows NEX T. Welcome to SphinxSurvey Version 4,4, the integrated solution for all your survey needs... Question list Questionnaire Design.
Experiences with WRB in the 1:250,000 mapping in Italy Institutional Framework and Soil Classification Systems Numerous authorities are active in many.
UML Class Diagrams: Basic Concepts. Objects –The purpose of class modeling is to describe objects. –An object is a concept, abstraction or thing that.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
Pag 1 Agenzia delle Entrate – Largo Leopardi, – Roma Consistency and completeness of cadastral data in the perspective of an integrated real.
Development of Evaluation Instruments based on ICT Skills Standards for Teachers (ISST) 7th May, 2014.
September 18-19, 2006 – Denver, Colorado Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as.
FCM Quality of Life Reporting System Metadata By: Acacia Consulting and Research June 2002.
NASIS NATIONAL SOIL INFORMATION SYSTEM -- AN OVERVIEW.
Search Engines and Information Retrieval Chapter 1.
1 SCNR State Cadastres of Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Vended Authority Control --Procedures and issues.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
Applied Research Center Abraham S. Fischler School of Education Summer Conference 2012 Chapter 5 Summary, Conclusions, Discussions, & Recommendations.
JRC-AL: WORKSHOP, DATE DNDC-EUROPE Adrian Leip, Joint Research Centre 1.DNDC-EUROPE: quick description of concept and status 2.Improvement of HSMU-layer.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Evaluating a Research Report
Assessing Quality for Integration Based Data M. Denk, W. Grossmann Institute for Scientific Computing.
Building a EUROPEAN DATABASE SOTER 1:5M from the EUROPEAN DATABASE EUSIS 1:1M An example of generalization of a soil geographical database (1) INRA Soil.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
LIFE08 ENV/IT/ THE SURVEY ACTIVITY WILL CONSIST OF THE SPADE DIGGING OF AT LEAST 75 MINIPITS, WHICH WILL BE DESCRIBED UP TO 0.5 M AND FURTHER MANUALLY-AUGERED.
National adaptations to main survey instruments and layout verification National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
The pilot area approach as a basis to develop a network Meeting on Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC Ispra 1-2 July 2004 Ialina Vinci and.
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
6. Evaluation of measuring tools: validity Psychometrics. 2012/13. Group A (English)
1 STAT 500 – Statistics for Managers STAT 500 Statistics for Managers.
Application of Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques to Predict Ground Water Vulnerability B. Dixon, Ph.D. University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Florida 33701,
Statistik.atSeite 1 Norbert Rainer Quality Reporting and Quality Indicators for Statistical Business Registers European Conference on Quality in Official.
Soil Mapping/Sample Collection
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Managing Data Processing Section B.
Intro to Soils Chapter 3 Soil Surveys And Land Capability Classes.
Soil Classification and Survey
Chapter 6: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
WERST – Methodology Group
1 Which came first – terminology or models? Contributed Paper No. 28 Miroslava Brchanova.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Quaternary Stratigraphy and Dynamic Soil Properties of Loess Derived Soils in Southeastern Iowa Brad Oneal,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
Methods of soil study I. The lithosphere and the soil as power equipment and hazard 8.
Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit Incontro tecnico su Indicatori e metodologie a supporto della strategia tematica per il suolo: Studi Pilota in.
-gSSURGO- Using the Soil Data Management Toolbox Steve Peaslee USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska March.
Vision for Laboratory Data Distribution April 9, 2015 How Much of the Vision Has Been Realized since 2012 National Soil Survey Center Soil Survey Laboratory.
FIZZ Database General presentation.
The ecopedological map of the alpine territory the pilot area of the Veneto Region Ispra February 2005 Ialina Vinci and Silvia Obber Agency for.
UML Class Diagrams: Basic Concepts
Application of Dublin Core and XML/RDF standards in the KIKERES
Tabulations and Statistics
Personal Software Process Software Estimation
Parallel Session: BR maintenance Quality in maintenance of a BR:
ESRM 250/CFR 520 Autumn 2009 Phil Hurvitz
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Presentation transcript:

CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information Edoardo A.C. Costantini, Ferdinando Urbano, Roberto Barbetti - Istituto Sperimentale per lo Studio e la Difesa del Suolo, Firenze, Italy, 2003 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meetings, Denver, Colorado, November 2-6. Session: Soil Resources, Characterization, and Databases TYPOLOGICAL UNIT CODE SUBUNIT CODE FUNCTIONAL HORIZON CODE … ATTRIBUTES … ∞ ∞ HORIZON SURVEY CODE OBSERVATION TYPE OBSERVATION NUMBER HORIZON NUMBER … ATTRIBUTES … ROUTINARY ANALYSIS SURVEY CODE OBSERVATION TYPE OBSERVATION NUMBER HORIZON NUMBER ROUTIN. ANALYSIS NUMBER … ATTRIBUTES … EXTRA ANALYSIS SURVEY CODE OBSERVATION TYPE OBSERVATION NUMBER HORIZON NUMBER EXTRA ANALYSIS NUMBER … ATTRIBUTES … SITE SURVEY CODE OBSERVATION TYPE OBSERVATION NUMBER … TYPOLOGICAL UNIT CODE … ATTRIBUTES … TYPOLOGICAL UNITS TYPOLOGICAL UNIT CODE … ATTRIBUTES … TYPOLOGICAL SUBUNIT TYPOLOGICAL UNIT CODE SUBUNIT CODE … ATTRIBUTES … FUNCTIONAL HORIZON ∞ ∞ 1 ∞ SCHEMATIC DATABASE STRUCTURE (1) CORRELATOR-Management of soil data: Soil form_site qualities CORRELATOR has been developed using the MSAccess database. It offers all the main functions to create and manage a soil observation database. The software has a complete set of form for storing and viewing soil observation data. In the soil form mask, the field “functional qualities to be used in the correlation” explicates the most important characters of the soil. (2) CORRELATOR-Management of soil data: Horizons_data 1 CORRELATOR masks offer multiple choice menus and a coding system to support data entry. The attributes describe all the most important information for both site characteristics and qualities and soil description and analysis. In the horizon mask, the field “functional hor.” qualifies the horizon as a functional horizon, to be grouped with others of similar functional characteristics. (4) CORRELATOR–Definition of Typological Units: characters 1 (3) CORRELATOR–Print output: Soil description CORRELATOR can generate special reports for a paper format output. Reports summarize all the relevant information in a prosaic description. Reports available are: soil profile, typological units and typological subunits. Typological units mask describes the environment of the typologies and their modal profile. It is linked to the soil descriptions by the attribute “CODE STU”. Each typological unit has the list of all the subunit belonging to it. (5) CORRELATOR–Definition of Subunits: functional horizons The subunit mask allows to describe the main characteristics of the subunits belonging to the same typological unit. Horizons are grouped in functional horizons. CORRELATOR calculates functional horizon statistics of the most important parameters. The standard deviation of these parameters indicates how many profiles of the subunit are consistent. Introduction Soil profile information is usually correlated, by means of both expert judgment and national or international soil classifications, to create soil typological units (STU) and subunits (STS). In case of trans-national or trans-regional soil mapping, this activity becomes difficult, if different classification systems are used and expert judgment has not been recorded and it is no more available. CORRELATOR is a software conceived to store soil information and facilitate its correlation regionally and among different soil classification systems. Materials and Methods The application uses the MSAccess database manager software. It has been produced taking into account Soil Taxonomy and WRB soil classifications, the USDA NRCS field book for describing and sampling soils, and the manual of procedures of the georeferenced soil database of Europe. It also contains the original attributes proposed by the project “Soil map of Italy at 1:250,000 scale” and the formalization of the criteria used in the expert judgment. What CORRELATOR can do In addition to guide data entry and store data, CORRELATOR calculates basic statistics of: i) soil characteristics of the functional horizon, ii) soil qualities of the site. CORRELATOR has a series of facilities: it allows to visualize how many data are used to calculate the statistics, how many observations each STU and STS has, what are the functional horizons of a STS. CORRELATOR can provide a printout of profile description and analysis, as well as of STU and STS. The correlation process The correlation needs that every soil horizon is coded as “functional horizon”. A functional horizon can be a genetic horizon, or a part of it, and it ought to have a management importance, e.g. an Ap1 horizon is different from an Ap2 if its organic matter content is significantly higher. Every soil quality that are deemed characteristics of the profile must be stored and the choice of those which are deemed important, i.e. functional, for the correlation must be made explicit. Functional characteristics and qualities are those that are both relevant for the management and geographically recurrent. STS are thought to be the basic brick of the land evaluation. They are created grouping soils homogeneous in terms of i) environment (geology, morphology and land use), ii) main genetic processes, properties and materials, iii) soil management and conservation, and iv) functional qualities. Basic statistics of properties and qualities of sites and functional horizons are automatically calculated for each STS. The standard deviation of properties and qualities that have been chosen for the correlation must be rather low, while it can be high for the others. A STU groups STS at a more generalized level, usually for a more geographically wider soil characterization. STU can also be created when few profiles are available, as soon as a link between soil profiles and a landscape has been discovered. CORRELATOR’s availability CORRELATOR has an Italian and an English version and it is freely distributed by the Italian National Centre of Soil Cartography on request to References Soil Survey Staff Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd ed. USDA-NRCS Agric. Handb U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC. Finke, P., R. Hartwich, R. Dudal, J. Ibanez, M. Jamagne, D. King, L. Montanarella, and N. Yassoglu Georeferenced soil database for Europe. EUR 18092, Ispra, Italy. Wolf U., Carnicelli St., Ferrari G.A Guida di rilevamento in campagna. (6) CORRELATOR Print output: Typological unit The typological unit report is automatically generated by CORRELATOR. It shows all the characteristics of the unit, its modal soil and the soil conservation and management problems. A brief description of all the subunits is given, too. (3) CORRELATOR–Print output: Subunit description and statistics The subunit report visualizes all the information linked to the subunit. It is made up of two parts: a general description of the subunit and a statistical report. For all the main site and horizon parameters (slope, rock depth, texture, bulk density, …), CORRELATOR computes mean and standard variation of all the soil observations belonging to the subunit. Horizons are grouped according to their functional horizon code. These statistics can be update anytime. They are a very strong instrument to verify the real correlation of the observations. The standard deviation is a direct measure of the consistency of the subunit: according to it, soil observation can be added to the sub unit or deleted.