All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
CDF Operations Bob Wagner, ANL May 09, 2005 All Experimenters’ Meeting.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Far Detector Data Quality Andy Blake Cambridge University.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
Michele Gallinaro, "QCD Results at CDF" - XXXVIII Rencontres de Moriond, March 22-29, QCD Results at CDF Inclusive Jet Cross Section Dijet Mass.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
DØ L1Cal Trigger 10-th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION FOR COLLIDING BEAM PHYSICS Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Siberian Branch of Russian.
7 October All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 DØ Summary - Week of 2002 September 30 – October 6 Luminosity & operating.
13 January All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 January 6-12 We had to sacrifice.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
1 Modelling parameters Jos Vermeulen, 2 June 1999.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Dmitri Denisov D0 Weekly Summary: August 18 to August 24  Delivered Luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered 6.9pb -1 u Recorded 6.0pb -1 (87%)
17 February All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 February Dedicated some.
M. Weber, AEM 4/5/041 Weekly report 3/29-4/4 Delivered:7.7pb -1 Recorded:6.3pb -1 (82%) 12.6M events.
Online Software 8-July-98 Commissioning Working Group DØ Workshop S. Fuess Objective: Define for you, the customers of the Online system, the products.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
Bernhard Schmidt DESY - HH PRC open session, October 30, 2002 HERA-B.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
18 March 2002 All Experimenters’ Meeting Alan L. Stone Louisiana Tech University 1 DØ Status: 03/11 – 03/18 Week integrated luminosity –1.1 pb -1 delivered.
D0 PMG 6/15/00 PMG Agenda June 15, 2000  Overview (Tuts) u Detector status u Reportable milestones u Financial status u Summary  Response to DOE review.
Fermilab Users Meeting June R.J. Tesarek Fermilab CDF 2002 Toward Physics Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration.
D0 Status: 04/01-04/08 u Week integrated luminosity –1.7pb -1 delivered –1.5pb -1 utilized (88%) –1.1pb -1 global runs u Data collection s global data.
FNAL All Experimenters Meeting January 7, Leslie Groer Columbia UniversityDØ Status 1 DØ Status and Progress Dec 17, 2001 – Jan 7, 2002  Reasonably.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of September 9 to September 16 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 4.0pb.
STAR pp Run Summary Carl Gagliardi March 11, 2008.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of September 2 to September 8 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 3.9pb.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
Dmitri Denisov D0 Weekly Summary: May 4th to May 11th  Delivered Luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered 7.3pb -1 u Recorded 6.3pb -1 (86%) 
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June 24, Leslie Groer Columbia UniversityDØ Status 1 DØ Status and Operations June 17 – 24, 2002  Notable “features”
Vienna Group Discussion Meeting on Luminosity CERN, 9 May 2006 Presented by Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Luminosity.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Ted Eltzroth RunII Stop in ttbar & ICD. 06/24/02 Ted Eltzroth Stop direct production qq -> tt ->c Z 1 0.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of December 23 to December 30 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and data taking efficiency u Delivered: 5.8pb.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 22 to July 29 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 3.1pb -1 u Live:
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
Arnd Meyer (RWTH Aachen) Sep 8, 2003Page 1 Integrated Luminosity Total data sample on tape with complete detector > 200pb -1.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
Project definition and organization milestones & work-plan
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded: 1.0pb -1 (~65%)  Major reasons for in-efficiency u Loss of ~6 hours due to Level 1 calorimeter trigger problem during Sunday owl shift u Muon readout stability u CFT/SMT downloading issues  Stable running at twice higher Level 1 and Level 2 accept rates u ~0.2kHz out of Level 1 trigger u ~140Hz out of Level 2 trigger u ~50Hz to tape  Last week operational issues u Loss of LVPS in the muon system s replaced on Sunday access u Commissioning of fiber tracker trigger  Halo rates are back to stable values

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 15 to July 22 D0 Operations  Luminosity detector u Stable  Silicon detector u Power supplies are running well u Quite time used for calibrations  Calorimeter u Noisy trigger towers and cells masking u Calibration of Level 1 trigger energy scale  Muon u loss of serial link communication every ~10minutes s limiting Level 3 data transfer rate s related to running in multibuffer mode s experts are working - more diagnostic tools are needed  Forward proton detector u inserting pots during most stores u request for tunnel access to s fix failures s connect new electronics/hardware

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov D0 Trigger  Trigger framework u Existing prescaler logic could report mis-measured luminosity for prescaled triggers s Plan on how to resolve this problem is developed  L1 trigger u Fiber tracker (CTT) trigger s Implementation for muon triggering is delayed due to higher then specified trigger decision time –Different options of resolving this issue are discussed by experts –Estimated delay is ~6weeks u Calorimeter trigger s Debug recently achieved eta coverage up to 2.4 –Dead and noisy towers, calibration s Missing E t s Extend eta coverage u Muon trigger s Optimize new trigger terms based on scintillator and wire detectors s Re-establish data vs trigger simulator comparison s Attempt to shave 132ns from FPGA logic –To accommodate CTT trigger delay

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov D0 Trigger  Level 2 trigger u Increase processing bandwidth from current ~0.5kHz s Code speedup/max_opt: 1-2 kHz s Multiple Alphas/Betas in crate >2 kHz? u Silicon track trigger s In progress of installation s Expect beam commissioning later this year (fiber tracker trigger needed) u Fiber tracker s Waiting for inputs – expected in September u Calorimeter trigger s Running on-line (/eta/<0.8 for now) s Requires better understanding of efficiency, cuts, rejection u Muon trigger s Well developed: single muon, di-muon s Resolving problems with synhronization of signals coming from hundreds of front- ends –Detailed monitoring of the inputs is needed s Algorithms optimization (geometry for P t cut, etc.) is in progress

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov D0 Trigger  Level 3 trigger u Running on-line for quite a while u Development of fast and efficient algorithms with good rejection is driving the schedule s Tracking Level 3 is coming on-line this week –Improve electron and muon rejection –Vertex for missing E t resolution improvement s Calorimeter is one of the most advanced systems –Efficiently filtering jets and em objects –Coming in p12: missing E t, non-linearity corrections, hot cell killer s Muon –Filtering on limited sub-set of muon triggers –Technical issues with muon geometry, efficiency to be better understood u Level 3 trigger basic philosophy s Develop as much as possible inclusive single e, mu, tau, jet filters s Combine tools into di-muon, muon+jet, etc. filters

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov DAQ  Currently could utilize new DAQ system rate capabilities in a limited way due to complex system of distributed readout and front-end crates u Multi-buffering operation in tracking crates just arrived s Correct “tick and turn” operation to be verified u With estimated DAQ rate capability in the range of ~1kHz we are currently limited to ~140Hz for reliable on-line operation s Current most serious problem is loss of synhronization in muon scintillator crates –Every ~10 minutes at 140Hz s There are other concerns on the horizon –Tracking crates front-end busy fraction at 140Hz is ~4%  DAQ rate “task force” has been organized (chaired by Ron Lipton) u Very well defined goal s Bring experts from different sub-systems together to resolve problems preventing us from running at full DAQ capabilities

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov On-line System and Controls  Key system for data handling/transfer and on-line data quality monitoring u Run II design rate of writing data to tapes at 50Hz has been achieved  Operations u Significant Event System (alarms) s important issue for high quality data collection s active participation from detector/trigger groups is required u improve support of Examines  Applications u deploy run configuration/quality database u introduce global DAQ monitor application

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov D0 Operating Efficiency  Goals u From Run I experience s ~190pb -1 delivered ~120pb -1 recorded (~60%, Main ring vetoes, etc.) s Should do better in Run II –> 90%  Moving target u Major reasons of luminosity loss are changing as more systems come on-line s What was a concern a few months/weeks ago is replaced by new “enemies” s Steady increase in operating efficiency during February/March – “steady state” operation  Recent numbers u ~60% for the last ~2 months (lower before) u ~75% last week (after implementation of mutli-buffer readout)

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov D0 Operating Efficiency  Major components of the inefficiency u Dead time s Sub-system is setting busy signal due to low bandwidth: L1, L2, L3, DAQ s Adjustable and can be set at almost any value by adjusting trigger rates s Due to lack of multi-buffering in tracking crates had to accept relatively large L1 front-end-busy fraction (~20%) to collect decent data sample before June shutdown s Currently running at about 4% front-end-busy fraction (140Hz readout rate) u Downtime s Data collection is stopped (or could not be started) due to failure of a specific component (or components) s Currently issues are –Muon scintillator front-end crates errors –High Voltage trips –Redownloading of “problematic” crates –Begin/end runs –Operator errors s Commissioning activities (prescales selection, trigger studies,…)  Experts are working on resolving all of the above issues u Plan to keep efficiency at the ~70% level while new sub-systems are introduced u Our steady state operating efficiency should be in the range of ~90% s Reachable – D0 had ~85% operating efficiency during some of the recent stores

All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Summary  D0 is progressing well with collecting data and finishing commissioning of trigger and readout systems  No serious short term problems with detector, trigger, DAQ  D0 will be showing at ICHEP02 for the first time physics results using Run II data u W and Z production cross sections and ratio at 2TeV u b lifetime u several limits for new phenomena searches  A summary of the most recent results from D0 will be presented at a W&C seminar on Friday, July 26