Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford (CBIS) Survey Department of Radiology March 4, 2008

2 Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford Within Stanford University, the CBIS will be one of three strategic centers forming a matrix with the five Stanford Institutes of Medicine  Strategic Centers: Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford: planned Stanford Center for Clinical Informatics: existing Stanford Genomics Center: planned  Institutes of Medicine: The Neuroscience Institute at Stanford Stanford Cancer Center Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Stanford Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine The centers enhance the linkage between basic science and clinical medicine, and thereby, foster Translating Discoveries, as defined by the School of Medicine strategic plan

3 Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford The success of the center depends on its ability to reach broadly across the campus to develop leadership, collaboration, and participation in the center CBIS is designed to cut across departments, institutes, and schools lines, as indicated in the adjacent modified Venn diagram As its primary goal, CBIS strives to provide educational and networking opportunities for all groups on campus that use or have interest in biomedical imaging applications The education and networking goals of CBIS will increase knowledge in biomedical imaging, improve access to imaging resources, and facilitate translational research, in keeping with the SoM strategic plan

4 Center for Biomedical Imaging at Stanford To improve human health and advance the field of biomedical imaging, CBIS will  Foster multidisciplinary research programs  Build industry-academic partnerships  Host seminars and conferences  Work with faculty to develop training opportunities  Provide information resources  Participate in community efforts beyond the Stanford campus To achieve the goals of education and networking, the CBIS strongly encourages active participation from across the University, including, but not limited to, the Schools of Medicine, Engineering, and Humanities and Sciences

5 Survey Overview Surveys sent to 1,306 faculty in 5 schools (46 departments) 27% response rate  354 faculty in 5 schools (45 departments) Recurring themes:  Access to clinical imaging (MRI, PET)  Access to research imaging (all modalities but especially MRI and PET)  Potential for CBIS in education  Health care costs & imaging  Modeling and simulation  Pediatric imaging

6 Respondent Distribution by School N=354 [total respondents]

7 Response Rate by School

8 Response Rate by Department: School of Medicine 27 Departments

9 Response Rate by Department: Outside of SoM 19 Departments

10 Rate your Interest in the CBIS: “ Strong Interest” + “Moderate Interest” responses N=354 [total respondents]

11 Rate your Interest in the CBIS 28 comments  6 discussed the educational potential for the CBIS  Access to imaging resources  Collaboration

12 Rate your Interest in the Following Features of the CBIS: “ Strong Interest” + “Moderate Interest” responses N=354 [total respondents]

13 Rate your Interest in the Following Imaging Functions: “ Strong Interest” + “Moderate Interest” responses N=354 [total respondents]

14 Rate your Interest in the Following Imaging Scales: “ Strong Interest” + “Moderate Interest” responses N=354 [total respondents]

15 Imaging Scales and Technologies in Which you Have Interest N=354 [total respondents]

16 Imaging Scales and Technologies you Use N=354 [total respondents]

17 Source of Biomedical Imaging Instrumentation you Use N=354 [total respondents]

18 Do you Have a Need for Biomedical Imaging Resources that are Either Unavailable or not Sufficiently Available? N=354 [total respondents]

19 What Percentage of your FTE is Devoted to: N=354 [total respondents] Clinical ServiceResearch Efforts

20 Biomedical Imaging Resources or Access Needed [chart depicts the number of times an item was defined as a need]

21 45 Faculty Identified Relevant Website Addresses for Inclusion on the CBIS Website Russ Altman Annelise E. Barron Daniel Bernstein Matthew Bogyo Steven Boxer Anna Bruckner Mark A. Cappelli Gunnar Carlsson Chris Constantinou Reinhold Dauskardt Scott Delp Abbas El Gamal Sanjiv Gambhir Sabine Girod Giorgio Gratta Harry Greenberg James Harris Leonore A. Herzenberg Susan Holmes Mark Kay B. (Pierre) Khuri-Yakub Peter K. Kitanidis Brian Knutson Eric Kool Amy Ladd Craig Levin Sharon Long Henry Lowe Deirdre Lyell Sean Mackey Gordon Matheson Michael V. McConnell Uel Jackson Mcmahan Vinod Menon Mary Beth Mudgett Sandy Napel John M. Pauly Andrew Quon Natalie Rasgon Mark Schnitzer Baba Shiv Lawrence M. Shuer Daniel Spielman Charles Taylor Brian Wandell

22 Conclusion Good response rate: 27% of faculty, 98% of departments Interest in the CBIS (“strong” + “moderate” responses)  Research: 76% School of Medicine: 212 individuals outside of SoM: 56 individuals  Clinical: 50% School of Medicine: 156 individuals outside of SoM: 20 individuals Broad homogenous interest for all aspects of biomedical imaging. No defined area of low interest. Strong recruitment base for advisory and/or scientific board 32% of the respondents reported a need for increased resources or access to biomedical imaging