J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC 07.08.2012,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Advertisements

Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment Muon Collider Design Workshop BNL December 3-7, 2007.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Simulation Study Results Study: Replace LiH-based cooler with gas-filled transport and rf cavities Results: Beam Cooling is significantly improved. Final.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
Bright muon sources Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab August 29, 2014.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer May 31, Initial Design Overview For design purposes, the following is assumed –H - beam comes from PIP II and follow-on.
Proton Beam for PRISM Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab 5 th Workshop Project X Physics – Muons November 8, 2010.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
WP3: The Neutrino Factory Costing Status Ajit Kurup CERN Costing Workshop 8 th December 2011.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
, UKNF Meetin, Imperial College J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
, IDS Meeting, Fermilab J. Pasternak Challenges of muon FFAG: injection/extraction, beam dynamics and injection/extraction hardware design studies.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
+-- Collider Front end- Balbekov version
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Large Booster and Collider Ring
for the Neutrino Factory
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Presentation transcript:

J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC , Target meeting

J. Pasternak Outline Introduction. Proton Driver and Target Station. Choice of the initial and final conditions. Beam Window considerations. Preliminary layout. Towards optics. Summary and future plans.

J. Pasternak X Modifications Effects of large θ 13 on the baseline: Only one decay ring needed with reduced energy/circumference/cost. Modifications in the muon acceleration scheme (only 10 GeV needed). Status of the Neutrino Factory Baseline after the discovery of the large θ 13 As you can see the Proton Driver is not connected to the target, why?

Project X layout accumulator+compressor 5 mA Fermilab Solution CERN Solution RAL Solution Proton Driver Solutions

J. Pasternak Status of the beam transport from PD to target (up to my knowledge) Needs more definitions!

Target Baseline based on the Mercury jet. Validated by MERIT experiment at CERN. Alternatives include solid target options and powder jet. Substantial redesign in order to mitigate the energy deposition in SC coils. Cooling system based on (WC beads+water). Recent new idea: Gallium target! To be done: - Final focus. - Beam window. - Beam dump. - and much more! Target module concept

Target System Baseline Target type Free mercury jet Jet diameter 8 mm Jet velocity 20 m/s Jet/Solenoid Axis Angle 96 mrad Proton Beam/Solenoid Axis Angle 96 mrad Proton Beam/Jet Angle 27 mrad Capture Solenoid Field Strength 20 T From H. Kirk’s talk at IDS meeting at VT, October 2011

Jet/Solenoid/Protons geometry J. Pasternak The mercury jet target geometry. The proton beam and mercury jet cross at z=-37.5 cm.

Starting condition , nufact'11, Geneva J. Pasternak ParametersValues Circumference m Number of Superperiods6 Injection/Extraction Energy3.2/9.6 GeV Gamma transition13.37 Harmonic number17 RF frequency MHz Bunch Intensity5.208 x protons Number of Cavities91 Energy gain per cavity40.4 keV I shall use RAL solution as an example, but any other may be used.

Focused Incident Proton Beam at 8 GeV (X. Ding’s talk, MAP meeting, March 2012) 10 It looks, it is not good to over-focus the beam! But we should not make the beam larger then the target. Corrent assumptions: β * = β x = β y =0.65 m, Geometrical rms emittance Smaller than 5 π μm.

J. Pasternak Beam Window Design for 5 MW beam of ESS (M. Butzek’s talk, May 2011) Rescaling the beam power to 4 MW and assuming the round beam: beam radius is 5.5 cm. Let’s take β x = β y =~600 m (to be updated).

J. Pasternak Simple optical solution-triplet similar to the RCS lattice cell to be used in the Beam transport to the channel, with only exceptions of the final focus and other matching sections. Lattice Building Blocks

J. Pasternak Septum RCS or Compressor Matching Beam dump Collimation Arc to manipulate the longitudinal dynamics via controlling eta (to maintain the bunch compression without the RF system). Target Final focus Beam Window Preliminary Layout Of the beam transport to the target 230 m Better idea would be to set the dump as a default configuration so an additional kicker system would be required to send the beam to the target.

J. Pasternak Layout of the arc section, dispersion matching to one regular cell Quads Dipoles Space for collimation All magnets are of a room-temperature type, with not very high fields!

J. Pasternak Optics from the RCS to the end of ARC (small mismatch in horizontal plane)

J. Pasternak Dispersion from the RCS to the end of the Arc ARC

J. Pasternak Beam Window Position Target Position Optics in the Final Focus, for β * of 0.65 m (However, β * = 0.3 m may be preferred.) Final focus consists of 4 room-temperature quads!

J. Pasternak The optics in the beam transport and the final focus is dictated by the beam sizes at the target (1.2 mm rms) and at the beam window (5.5 cm - ??). Space is needed for the potential emergency beam dump and the collimation. To maintain the bunch compression the control of eta is required, which can be done in the dedicated arc (longer for 8 GeV at the Project-X, shorter for 9.6 GeV at RAL, CERN solution still to be studied). Preliminary geometry and optics has been drafted. Engineering of the beam window may influence the optics. More details on the beam window would be highly desirable! Summary