Create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Office of Communications create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Columbia Disaster Robiel Ghebrekidan SYSM 6309: Advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Launch Timeline PowerPoint created by Shirley Garrett using Space Camp handout.
Advertisements

Space Shuttles! By Clint, Joseph, Jake The NASA Space program started on April 12, 1981 with the Columbia.
Spaceships By: CJ Miske.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Apollo 13 Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research.
SYSM 6309 Advanced Requirements Engineering By: Paul Wasilewski.
The 2003 Columbia Disaster. Columbia history Milestones – OV102 July 26, 1972Contract Award Nov. 21, 1975Start structural assembly of crew module June.
Manned Space Exploration From Apollo to present. Project Apollo Purpose: Land on the moon & return safely to the Earth Purpose: Land on the moon & return.
Space Shuttle Justin Schultz. Space Shuttle Space Shuttle is the first orbital space craft designed for reuse Delivers payloads and a rotation of crew.
Case 3.5 – The Columbia Shuttle Disaster by Margaret Battin & Gordon Mower.
Faiz Almansour Alemu Azanaw Rachel Downen Timothy Herbig Angie Schneider.
Comprehend the Challenger accident Comprehend the Columbia accident The Space Shuttle Program: Challenger and Columbia Accidents.
The Challenger Disaster By Diana Clarke. The Orbiter Dimensions: 122’ L x 78’ W x 57’ H Dimensions: 122’ L x 78’ W x 57’ H Crew size: Up to 8 people Crew.
STS-107 COLUMBIA ACCIDENT STS-107 COLUMBIA ACCIDENT MISSION,CREW.
Notes on Challenger DisasterChallenger Disaster Stephen Scott March 12, 2003.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Overview and Challenger Case Study Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network.
John F. Kennedy Space Center Florida, USA. Models of the Challenger, Discovery, Apollo, Atlantis, Endeavor.
STS & ISS 17 March Space Shuttle Fletcher and Nixon 1971.
May 01, 2013 Apply (EDP) knowledge to what we learned about space exploration  Remember: Step 1 of the EDP is to identify a need. (1) Identify the needs.
Columbia‘s Final Mission
The Challenger Justin Winslow Science. Early History Fell apart 73 seconds after takeoff. Killed all seven crew members. Devastated the United States.
FAILURES AND CAUSES NASA MISSIONS SYSM Advance Requirements Engineering Dr. Chung Muhammad Ayaz Shaikh 05/19/2012.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
ASSIGNMENT BOOK Unit 9 Part A. Check your concepts Study the following statements. Put a ‘ T ’ in the box against a correct statement and a ‘F’ against.
Unit 4 vocabulary/ page 44 L.1/ What caused the explosion? 1F. Dwaikat.
Columbia Space Shuttle: The Disaster By: Blair Raphael.
Material Properties Engineering Mechanical Laboratory AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING International Program, Chulalongkorn University.
Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration Hazards of Space Exploration Prepared by: Raymond Francis.
How Do Spacecraft Travel to Space Photos March 8, 1994 Cape Canaveral, Florida Kennedy Space Center NASA.
By: Rachel Gambacorta.  Challenger was NASA's second space shuttle  It had 9 successful launches.
The Space Shuttle On January 5, 1972, President Nixon announced that NASA would proceed with the development of a reusable low cost space shuttle system.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
 Space Shuttles allowed astronauts to live in space for up to two weeks to complete experiments or repairs on space equipment.  It lands like an airplane.
The risks and accidents of space travel Tensae Demissie.
The Space Race.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Human Space Flight Trials and Tribulations. Human Space Flight Challenges of Human Space Flight NASATragedy Future of Human Space Flight.
 The launch of the first man-made object to orbit the Earth, the USSR's Sputnik 1, on 4 October 1957EarthSputnik 1  Four years later on April 12, 1961,
Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Discovery Zumdahl, Zumdahl, DeCoste, World of Chemistry  2002, page 238 Right solid rocket booster Left solid rocket booster.
Shuttle Program1 Rockets – The Space Shuttle Ted Spitzmiller.
The Space Shuttle. The Shuttle’s mission  The purpose of the space shuttle is to bring supplies, equipment, and people to the International Space Station.
Learning Goals  I will be able to identify the names of the space shuttles in NASA’s program.  I will be able to identify two shuttle disasters.
EMGT 506 Challenger Case Study Question 2 Group B.
What is it, & what does it do?!
Exploring Space 6.E.1.3 Summarize space exploration and the understandings gained from them.
Thermal Protection for Space Craft The problem of space craft high heating The solution The crash of the Columbia space ship national Alex&TybyNational.
SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER DISASTER By: Nick Clarke.
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
(1) By Tammy Hoover English The Past (2)
 NASA History A look through the years. Beginnings  NASA was created by congress on October 1, 1958 as a way of competing with the Soviet Union at the.
By. Eric nard. 1979,the united states Steve lindsey nicole stott michael barrat alvin drew steve brown and eric doe.
Manned Space Programs.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
The Shuttle Program. Warm Up Questions CPS Questions (1-2) Chapter 7, Lesson 1.
CHALLENGER DISASTER : CASE STUDY
1-3 notes Spacecraft.
By Ahmed Muayad & Saif Abd Al-Hakeem
WELCOME To English Class Cclass
Rockets – The Space Shuttle
Manned Space Exploration
Chapter 16 Section 8 What is the space shuttle?
SPACE SHUTTLES.
Columbia Space Shuttle: The Disaster
Analysis of Two Extreme Gas Dynamic Activities
Space Travel Present & Future
What technology is used to discover objects outside of Earth’s atmosphere? By: chloe de beaupré.
THE MOON LUNA MOND LUNE.
Exploring Space 6.E.1.3 Summarize space exploration and the understandings gained from them.
STS-114 Return to Flight Lessons Learned Bill Parsons
Presentation transcript:

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Office of Communications create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Columbia Disaster Robiel Ghebrekidan SYSM 6309: Advanced Requirements Engineering Summer /22/2013

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Table of Contents 1.Overview 2.Cause of the Failure 3.Corrective Action 4.Requirement Issues

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Columbia Disaster Space shuttle Columbia, re-entering Earth’s atmosphere at 10,000 mph, disintegrates As a result: –All 7 astronauts are killed –$4 billion spacecraft is destroyed –Debris scattered over 2000 sq-miles of Texas –NASA grounds shuttle fleet for 2-1/2 years

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Cause of Failure Insulating foam separates from external tank 81 seconds after lift-off Foam strikes underside of left wing, breaches thermal protection system (TPS) tiles Superheated air enters wing during re-entry, melting aluminum struts Aerodynamic stresses destroy weakened wing

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Cause of Failure Many times chunks of insulating foam broke off at launch and dinged the thermal protection system NASA had observed it so many times on orbiters that did return safely, they didn’t consider it a serious problem

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Cause of Failure Foam strike detected in launch videos on Day 2 Engineers requested inspection by crew or remote photo imagery to check for damage Mission managers discounted foam strike significance No actions were taken to confirm shuttle integrity or prepare contingency plans

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Earlier Shuttles January 28, 1986, the shuttle Challenger explodes 73 seconds into its launch, killing all seven crew members Investigation reveals that a solid rocket booster (SRB) joint failed, allowing flames to impinge on the external fuel tank

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Earlier Shuttles Liquid hydrogen tank explodes, ruptures liquid oxygen tank Resulting massive explosion destroys the shuttle

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Corrective Actions NASA created a contingency plans to launch a rescue for future mission Released a report outlining what it had learned from the Columbia accident with regard to crew safety and survivability for future spaceflight.

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Requirement Issue –Both disasters happened because of both physical and human factors. –Each successful mission reinforced the perception that foam shedding was unavoidable…either unlikely to jeopardize safety or an acceptable risk. –Foam shedding, which violated the shuttle design basis, had been normalized

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Bibliography

create your futurewww.utdallas.edu Questions