Analysis of FLLLEX-Radar Oran Doherty RPL and WBL Facilitator at LYIT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Stakeholders Forum on EU cooperation in Education and Training 2009 EUROPEAN YEAR OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION Report of the workshops February.
Advertisements

Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Office of the DVC (S&E) Students as Change Agents Dr Cassandra Saunders Student Evaluation, Review and Reporting Unit (SERRU) Students Matter Forum 2013.
Promoting Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities at the Local Level Sean O’Riordain Faculty of Geography National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
The North Carolina Stakeholder Engagement Group Initiative
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
From Objectives to Methods (d) Research methods A/Prof Rob Cavanagh April 7, 2010.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Scrutiny Scrutiny is a major tool for evaluating and then effecting change. Reviewing and evaluating what is done and measuring its success is key to better.
December 16 th, 2014 Webinar outline Eloise Tan and Terry Maguire, National Forum Preview the findings and proposals from the upcoming report, “Mapping.
Introductory Courses and Integration for Migrants A European Perspective.
What GI education do we need in Europe? AGIT2008 – Learning with Geoinformation, Herodot Forum, University of Salzburg, July 4, 2008 Tino Johansson Department.
F LLL EX The Impact of LifeLong Learning Strategies on Profession-oriented Higher Education in Europe.
Problem Analysis Intelligence Step 2 - Problem Analysis Developing solutions to complex population nutrition problems (such as obesity or food insecurity)
‘FLLLEX-Radar as a tool for measuring lifelong learning: experiences of 8 HEI’s across Europe’ Rob Mark Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of Strathclyde,
F LLL EX FLLLEX Radar The self-assessment tool on institutional strategies for Lifelong Learning: Purpose and content 22 nd EURASHE Annual Conference,
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
The Development of a Higher Level Apprenticeship in Construction Operations Management and an Integrated Foundation Degree.
Welcome Assessment Centres David Phillips Senior Assessment Partner DfT Resourcing Group.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Portfolio based assessment - options for the new CGEA.
Linking theory and practice with Work Based Learning (WBL) Oran Doherty Letterkenny Institute of Technology.
Towards a EQF – Exchanging the Stakeholders' views and experiences.
F LLL EX How to use the FLLLEX-Radar in your institution EURASHE 22nd annual conference Riga – 10/11 May Margriet de Jong FLLLEX coordination team.
INTERIM MEETING/ VIENNA PART 1 THE STATUS of the PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.
COMMUNITY AWARENESS / EMERGENCY RESPONSE BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES AND TOOLS David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council May 31,
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
FLLLEX – Final Evaluation
EPortfolios. Ambition in Action ePortfolios /What is an ePortfolio /Examples of ePortfolios /RPL & ePortfolios /What is digital evidence?
Why do we need to assess our fitness levels? Allows you to identify our strengths & weakness Provides objective, accurate and reliable information about.
/VB Listening to People with Dementia Avril Easton The Alzheimer Society of Ireland June 2013.
Development with Disabled Network Mainstreaming Disability into Community Governance System Asitha Weweldeniya, Weweldenige, Development with Disabled.
December 2010iTEC - Designing the future classroom1 אלף כיתות משתתפות במיזם לעיצוב כיתת הלימוד העתידית – iTEC דב וינר iTEC – Designing the future classroom.
The European Credit system The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET)
RPPS Education Development Process Debbie Bender.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
1 Implementation of the Dutch national Qualifiation Framework, the NLQF June 17, 2010 Karin van der Sanden Projectleader NLQF Dutch Ministry of Education.
Unpacking and Implementing Training Packages Linda Hopkins.
COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS. WHY DO ASSESSMENTS? “The long term development of a community rests on its ability to uncover and build on the strengths.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
EIAReview11.07(Gajaseni, 2007)1 Reviewing. 2 Reviewing is the process of EIA report assessment produced during EIA process is concerned with assessing.
Gertrudes Macueve1 GIS for District-level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities (Walsham and Sahay 1999) Conducting Empirical Work.
1 PP 7.2 CORE COMPETENCIES FOR RIVER BASIN PLANNERS.
The industrial relations in the Commerce sector EU Social dialogue: education, training and skill needs Ilaria Savoini Riga, 9 May 2012.
Continuous Professional Development for Adaptation Bill Dougherty Stockholm Environment Institute – Boston Center Manila April 2004 An overview of the.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 CABIN CREW CRM TRAINING BEST PRACTICE Aviation House 29 January 2009.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
CAREER MANAGEMENT SKILLS – POLICY IMPLEMENTATION Miha Lovšin Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for VET International Forum on Educational Guidance.
1 WG-MISD Release of Radioactive Material (RRM) Work Stream Colin Hord, UK CAA Nigel Gait UK Met Office.
IB Business & Management Topic 6 – Strategy HL ONLY.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
The evaluation system for the assessment of teaching and teachers at the University of Luxembourg Fernand Anton Marian van der Meulen.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Inspiring Impact NI. Background to Inspiring Impact Collaborative UK wide programme Ten-year vision Challenging economic context Change in funding requirements.
1 Key Roles of River Basin Planners Integrators of Knowledge and People Trade-offs analysts and presenters Communicators and Facilitators CORE COMPETENCIES.
1 1 Global assessments/peer reviews – some issues seen from an assessor Jan Byfuglien Statistics Norway 5.1.
INTRODUCING THE SPTF UNIVERSAL STANDARDS INTO MFIS JUNE 26, 2013 Microfinance CEO Working Group.
The benefits of providing an effective programme and project support function Whied Latif Andrew Platt.
Proposed Process for Development of a Health Research Agenda in Kenya Dr. Charles M. Nzioka, Head, DHR&D Ministry of Health 21 st June 2014.
Special Education/Learning Support Title: The New Zealand Curriculum and the IEP Author: Rosemary Mirams address:
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Project funded with support from the European Commission. This presentation reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible.
Training programme MODULE I Project number BE02-KA
Civic Engagement in Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of FLLLEX-Radar Oran Doherty RPL and WBL Facilitator at LYIT

 LYIT FLLLEX representative first viewed FLLLEX-Radar in January  Original thoughts: – Quantity of questions contained in the tool; – In depth nature of the questions; – Organising focus groups (would they agree to participate…..); – Would focus groups understand questions; – Writing the report to represent focus group findings. Background to the Self Assessment Tool

 It was agreed that 4 focus groups would be used to gather information: –Focus Group 1:LLL decision makers; –Focus Group 2: Lecturers; –Focus Group 3:Learners; –Focus Group 4: Employers.  Introductory presentation developed explaining FLLLEX Project, LLL at LYIT, LLL in Ireland and internationally and objectives of the tool.

Focus Group 1  Focus Group 1 subsequently met 4 times to answer the questions posed in FLLLEX-Radar.  Provided a good forum for discussing LLL and for determining current situation at LYIT  In the first meeting we identified the composition of each focus group.  This was important to establish early in order to organise focus groups.

Positive Elements of the Tool  Wide Range of information gathered. –Current situation of LLL locally, nationally and internationally. –Identification of various stakeholders –RPL –Promotion of LLL  Inclusion of numerous stakeholders  Acts like a checklist  Can be externally assessed once completed.

Possible areas for improvement  Reduce Content –Due to number of questions and in-depth nature of some questions, this is a very time consuming exercise. –Organising 4 focus groups also challenging  Different set of questions for different focus groups.  More emphasis on future as opposed to past and present.

LYIT’s reaction to FLLLEX-Radar.  A very useful exercise.  The project ensured that the Head of Development, LLL Coordinator and WBL/RPL Facilitator sat down and formally discussed LLL. Provided good structure for discussing LLL.  Better understanding as to our current situation.  Good to get the views and opinions of several stakeholders and make comparisons.  Great getting the views and opinions of the expert panel in relation to LYIT and LLL.

Recommendations for other HE providers using FLLLEX-Radar  Do no underestimate the work load involved.  Plan ahead – especially in relation to composition of focus groups.  Develop an introductory presentation explaining: –FLLLEX; –FLLLEX-Radar –LLL in Europe; –LLL in the provider’s county; –LLL at the host institute.  Ensure the key LLL personnel are involved  Act on the findings and make a list of “to do’s” afterwards