Heliospheric Observations during October – November 2003 Hari Om Vats Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad 380009 INDIA ICRC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Weather Effects over EGNOS Performance in the North of Europe 11 th SWW, Liege, 17 th November 2014 Presenter author: Pedro Pintor Authors: R. Roldán,
Advertisements

An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Periodicities of the Solar Wind, Global Electron Power, and Other Indices in 2005 in HSS Barbara A. Emery (NCAR), Ian G. Richardson (GSFC), David S. Evans.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
From Maunder Minimum to the recent Grand Solar Maximum 11:45 Tuesday November 18 auditorium Roger Session: 6. Key solar observables for assessing long-term.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Exploration Physics International, Inc. HAF: An Operational, Event-driven Solar Wind Forecast Model 1 Murray Dryer
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Magnetic Storm Generation by Various Types of Solar Wind: Event Catalog, Modeling and Prediction N. S. Nikolaeva, Yu.I. Yermolaev, and I. G. Lodkina Space.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Software Engineering Division Overview of Significant SWx Events.
Response of the Polar Cusp and the Magnetotail to CIRs Studied by a Multispacecraft Wavelet Analysis Axel Korth 1, Ezequiel Echer 2, Fernando L. Guarnieri.
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Intense Poynting flux at very high latitudes during magnetic storms: GITM simulation results Yue Deng 1 Cheng Sheng 1, Manqi Shi 1, Yanshi Huang 2, Cheryl.
STUDY OF TROPOSPHERIC GRAVITY WAVES AT EQUATORIAL LATITUDE, INDIA M. LAL EQUATORIAL GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY INDIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOMAGNETIC TIRUNELVELI.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
The Thermosphere/Ionosphere Response to Solar Activity During the October/November 2003 Storms P. R. Straus 1, G. Crowley 2, R. R. Meier 3, L. J. Paxton.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
ORIGIN OF THE SLOW SOLAR WIND K. Fujiki , T. Ohmi, M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University and K. Hakamada Department.
WSM Whole Sun Month Sarah Gibson If the Sun is so quiet, why is the Earth still ringing?
29 ICRC, Pune, India, 2005 Geomagnetic effects on cosmic rays during the very strong magnetic storms in November 2003 and November 2004 Belov (a), L. Baisultanova.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
MDI Global Field & Solar Wind
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
SIDC Space Weather briefing
The properties of CMEs embedded in extreme solar wind
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Heliospheric Observations during October – November 2003 Hari Om Vats Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad INDIA ICRC meeting, 3 – 10 August 2005, Pune, INDIA Session: SH.3.5

October – November 2003 Ap and Dst indicies show evidence of strong geomagnetic activity Bz is largely positive It remains so during strong geomagnetic activity

October – November 2003

Bastille day event 14 July 2000 Dst is +ve or low –ve for most of the - Bz Dst is highly –ve for + Bz Ap is high and low for - Bz

Bastille day event 14 July 2000

May 4 – (solar wind disappearance event; May 11 – 12)

Conclusions Sunspot number, area, radio flux and flare index show a distinct enhancement during Oct. – Nov Sunspot number, area, radio flux and flare index show a distinct enhancement during Oct. – Nov No apparent correlation with –ve Bz seenNo apparent correlation with –ve Bz seen Log of solar wind pressure gives largely linear relation with Kp Index.Log of solar wind pressure gives largely linear relation with Kp Index. The slopes of log (nPa) and Kp plotsThe slopes of log (nPa) and Kp plots 6 Oct.- Nov most active period 6 Oct.- Nov most active period 4 14 July 2000) Bastille day 4 14 July 2000) Bastille day 2 May 11 – SW disappearance 2 May 11 – SW disappearance

Thank you very much

October-November, 2003 Bastille day event July 14, 2000 Dst seems to have no dependence of solar wind pressure

Flare Coronal Hole High speed streams Characteristcs Duration Vmax Flare Coronal Hole Similar Vats 1992a Catalogue Mavromichalaki et. al 1988

Flare Generated Streams with – and + IMF both seem to generate big geomagnetic storms. Coronal hole associated Stream with – IMF seems to generate a mild geomagnetic storm to generate a mild geomagnetic storm.

Coronal hole associated Streams with – and + IMF generate a mild to Strong geomagnetic storms. Flare Generated Stream with – IMF generate a strong geomagnetic Storm.

Streams with – and + IMF generate geomagnetic storm. Vp and Ap enhamcement plot has two slopes with a threshold at ~850 km/sec. Geomagnetic activity enhancement rate (GAER) is defined as an average increase in Ap value per unit average increase in the peak solar wind velocity (Vp) during the stream. GAER for Vp >850 km/s 0.73 and 0.53 for + and – IMF respectively GAER for Vp <850 km/s 0.08 and 0.09 for + and – IMF respectively

Coronal Hole Flare Coronal Hole Flare Geomagnetic effects Storm duration and Magnitude Associated with flare and Coronal Hole are quite different. Flares produce 2.7 times stronger storms. Coronal holes produce longer (1.5 times) duration storms Vats (1992b) G = 0.64 S – 0.15 G = 0.42 S – 0.35 GAER = 0.58 GAER = 0.12 GAER = 0.07

Conclusions HSS (Flares and coronal holes) enhance geomagnetic activity irrespective of IMF polarity.HSS (Flares and coronal holes) enhance geomagnetic activity irrespective of IMF polarity. HSS >850 km/s GAER 0.73 and 0.53 for + and – IMF resply.HSS >850 km/s GAER 0.73 and 0.53 for + and – IMF resply. HSS <850 km/s GAER 0.08 and 0.09 for + and – IMF resply.HSS <850 km/s GAER 0.08 and 0.09 for + and – IMF resply. HSS (Flares) produce 2.7 times stronger storms.HSS (Flares) produce 2.7 times stronger storms. Coronal holes produce longer (1.5 times) duration storms.Coronal holes produce longer (1.5 times) duration storms. Sunspot number, area, radio flux and flare index show a distinct enhancement during Oct. – Nov Sunspot number, area, radio flux and flare index show a distinct enhancement during Oct. – Nov No correlation with –ve Bz seenNo correlation with –ve Bz seen Log of solar wind pressure gives largely linear relation with Kp Index.Log of solar wind pressure gives largely linear relation with Kp Index. The slope is more (1.5 times) steep during Oct.- Nov than that during Bastille day (14 July 2000)The slope is more (1.5 times) steep during Oct.- Nov than that during Bastille day (14 July 2000)