03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 1 Erk Jensen, BE-RF CLIC meeting CERN, 03-Apr-2009

from the “Letters of Intent” to the successful start of EuCARD 03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 2

 Summary of LoI’s concerning CLIC: 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 3 Subject Contract Type SpecificTitle Duration [y] Cost [M€] Continuation of Contact CLICI3JRADrive Beam issues35 D. Schulte (CERN) CLICI3JRA Generation And Diagnostics Gear for tiny EmiTtance 45.9 H. Braun (CERN) CLICI3JRA L-band, High Power and High Efficiency Multi Beam RF Amplifier 67 I. Syratchev (CERN) CLICI3JRALuminosity Ensuring Design55.4 D. Schulte (CERN) CLICI3JRAHigh-gradient RF structures55 W. Wuensch (CERN) CLICI3JRA Ka-band Stand-Alone Power Source 47 E. Jensen (CERN) CLICI3JRA CLIC Two-Beam Test-Stand and Post Collision studies 51,5? V. Ziemann (U. Uppsala) CLIC- ILC?JRAPositron Polarized Sources410?A. Variola (LAL) LC- Sources I3JRA-WP Development of various materials (e.g. Mg, Pb) films on Cu substrates 4?CARE/PHIN ?F. Tazzioli (LNF) CLIC-ILCI3WP Infrastructure testing the new technologies concerning the high power-high repetition rate lasers 21,8?A. Variola (LAL) Total48.6+? (target number was 45 M€!)

 The scope was slightly changed, and an Integrating Activity “Novel Accelerator Systems” was planned:  Integrating Activity “Novel Accelerator Systems”:  High Gradient RF Structures (estimate 5.5 M€)  Drive beam issues (estimate 5.0 M€)  LED (Luminosity Ensuring Design, 5.4 M€)  GaDGET (Generation & Diagnostic Gear for tiny emittance, 5.9 M€)  FFAG (estimate 5 M€)  Posipol (estimate 6.0 M€)  High power RF (estimate 8 M€)  Laptech (estimate 6 M€)  Total was then 46.8 M€ !  It became clear that this was too much – we asked for guidance how to reduce! 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 4

 Outcome: Recommendation to reduce to 15 M€ total core + 8 M€ optional (for each of the 3 working groups)!  My proposal for WG “NAS” (WG meeting 30-Jul-2007): 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 5 JRAOldIndicative new coreoptional High Gradient5.5 M€4 M€ EURODrive5 M€2 M€1 M€ LED5.4 M€2 M€1 M€ GADGET5.9 M€3 M€1.5 M€ FFAG5 M€3 M€ Posipol6 M€3.5 M€ HP RF8 M€1 M€ Laptech6 M€ Network+TA1 M€ total46.8 M€15 M€8 M€

 Additional requests from the ILC community (damping ring issues, undulator based positron source, low emittance beam transport, laserwire, beam dumps, crab cavity…)  Numbers had been “direct cost” only – now they were to be understood as “total cost” (effective increase by 60%)  After the “EuroCRAB” DS proposal was rejected by EC, an additional request for around 3.8 M€ had to be included.  “Laptech” – which I cut out, suggesting it should go into “Laserlab II” – was partly forced back in.  This was the status as presented in CLIC meeting on 31-Aug-07 and in ESGARD “OMIA”, 10-Sep /4/2009CLIC Meeting 6

 The accelerator R&D proposals were grouped together.  Jean-Pierre Koutchouk was nominated Coordinator of the Project-to-be “EuCARD”, European Coordination of Accelerator R&D.  The agreed target total cost of EuCARD was 50 M€, with 15 M€ EC request.  “Novel Accelerator Systems” now became a “Work-Package” inside EuCARD – the name became “NCLinac” – the target total was 11.2 M€ with 3.4 M€ EC request. 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 7

 Some fine tuning was done to finish the proposal (DR SC wigglers, positron source, crab cavity, FFAG and Laser plasma acceleration went into other work packages)  The NCLinac budget total in the proposal was 9 M€ total with 2.65 M€ EC request.  The NCLinac proposal contained the following tasks: 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 8

10. NCLinac total EC request 10.1 Coordination and communication G. Blair/RHUL, E. Jensen/CERN 342,256 € 128,000 € 10.2 NC high gradient cavities W. Wuensch/CERN 3,001,516 € 828,250 € 10.3 Linac & FF stabilization A. Jeremie/CNRS (LAPP) 2,109,840 € 633,000 € 10.4 BDS (laser wire) G. Blair/RHUL 1,243,501 € 375,580 € 10.5 Drive beam phase (monitor) F. Marcellini/INFN (LNF) 1,068,920 € 321,800 € 10.6 DR vacuum (coatings, NEG, e-cloud) P. Chiggiato/CERN 1,250,720 € 366,000 € NCLinac total: 9,016,753 € 2,652,630 € 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 9

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 10 Score (15 max) Number of projects name 151EuroFleets (Naval ships) 14.55EmmaService (Biomed), EuCARD, ENES(environment), Mesoaqua(water), Synthesis (Museum) 1420… HP2, … 1312EuroNS, ILIAS, … <1376DevDet (12.5), … 37 out of 125 eligible proposals had to be financed out of 277 M€ foreseen by EC. Ranking:

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 11 Mark: 5.00 This I3 selectively addresses some of the most critical S&T topics for advanced accelerators, thus laying the groundwork for decisions to be made on future European and Global accelerators in the next 5 years. The concept is sound and the quality of the objectives is world leading. The activities in the framework of this proposal are a useful, more technical complement to FAIR-PP, SLHC-PP, ILCPP, Hi-GRAD and EuroNu-DS. The proposal brings together all the leading European laboratories, and will reinforce and expand existing collaborations. The RTD activities will lead to clear progress beyond the state-of-the-art. These include, for example, prototyping next generation accelerator magnets of ~20T field, of a hybrid Nb3Sn + High-Tc superconductor design, which the Panel considered to be the strongest component of the JRA. It is also gratifying to see a concerted effort within this proposal in normal-conducting RF structures, now that CLIC has been redesigned for X-band, thus allowing the considerable technology investment of the world-wide high energy physics community over the past two decades to be leveraged. The proposal methodology is well-tailored to its objective to shape and inform intermediate-term decisions on future accelerators; it reflects the priorities of the CERN Council for high energy physics, and the ESFRI roadmap more broadly for the accelerator needs of nuclear science and light sources. The JRAs were thus selectively chosen and given precedence over NA and TA activities; and the ongoing R&D investments of the participating labs are highly leveraged. …

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 12 Mark: 5.00 Responsibility for the management (WP1) resides with CERN, which has long-standing experience in the organisation of large, international collaborations. The partners are the leading EU accelerator labs plus a number of institutes with experience in the relevant fields or who joined recently in the effort. Especially welcome is the participation of industrial firms. The proponents have reached out and involved a large number of non-EU institutions, which will lay the groundwork for a long-term collaborative relationship, when hopefully some of these future facilities enter project construction phase. The consortium is well above the critical mass. Responsibilities and work are well-distributed over the institutes and the EU.

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 13 Mark: 4.50 A near-term technical impact of this work will be to facilitate the luminosity upgrade of LHC. Later, this work will optimally shape and inform decisions to be made within the time-frame of FP7 about future European and Global accelerator infrastructures. In particular, it may provide a critical catalytic effect for starting the ILC, once the LHC provides some insight about the TeV- scale physics landscape. The impact of this work will also be felt in other fields, particularly x-ray FELs, an increasing number of which are under construction or on the drawing boards around the world. More broadly, this I3 would link nearly all labs in EU which perform accelerator R&D. The large labs have already been well-connected, though this bonding has not been as strong as it could be, as possible synergies have been difficult to discern so far. A number of possible synergies have been taken up within this proposal, apparently under the impetus of the ESGARD Committee. The proposal has the merit to first strengthen the bonding in the fields with potential synergies, and second to include also the smaller institutes and to give them facilitated access to a number of leading-edge facilities, which is important (WP5-7). This will improve the structure in the field of accelerator R&D.

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 14 The Panel recommends that R&D on high-field magnets are given highest priority. There is considerable potential for cost-savings in the superconducting RF work which is requesting the lion's share of the EC funding. There are two non-EU partners in this proposal: The Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute" (RRC KI), which will contribute to studies of materials under thermal shocks; and the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP) that will carry out beam dynamics simulations. The Panel agrees that both these institutes are making unique and high -value contributions to this proposal, and thus their participation is well-justified. This proposal builds upon a successful I3 project under FP6 (CARE). The present proposal makes a clear case that this collaboration should be continued and even expanded. In view of the need to achieve long-term sustainable integration of the infrastructures and services offered, the participants should urgently set out to develop lasting structures based on mutual interest, which will allow them to increase the efficiency of their own scientific activities as well as the services they offer to the user community. Activities with this aim should figure prominently in the description of work to be agreed during negotiation. The EC funding for the current proposal should clearly focus on a sustainable integration and on reaching a stronger commitment of the public authorities linked with the participating institutes and/or user communities, allowing a growing independence of external EC funding.

... in spite of these excellent marks, the upper limit of EC funding request was set to 10 M€!  This meant another reduction by 33 %!  This was tough! Of course I made some enemies during this “negotiation” phase, which ended 6-Feb /4/2009CLIC Meeting 15

 We’re through – we have a Grant Agreement and are finalizing the “Consortium Agreement”! Total “EuCARD”: Total: 31,244,304 €, EC request: 10,000,000 € 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 16 Wrong date!

TRANSNATIONAL ACCESS JOINT RESEARCH ACTIVITIES SLHC-PP ColMat HFM SRF NCLinac ANAC NETWORKING ACTIVITIES External communcation & dissemination (incl. Public information website) External communcation & dissemination (incl. Public information website) AccNet HEP community at large, general public MICE (TA-STFC) Project management and internal communication EUROnu DS Laserlab II FAIR PP ILC- HiGrade-PP (TA-CERN) EuroLumi RFTech NEU /4/2009CLIC Meeting 17

 5-Dec-08: EuCARD Kick-Off Event in the frame of the “CARE08” workshop.  27-Mar-09: NCLinac Kick-Off meeting.  1-Apr-09: The project has started!  Total NCLinac: Total: 6,562,118 €, EC request: 2,001,478 €  Today: 1 st EuCARD SC meeting. 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 18

Work-Package 9 of EuCARD 03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 19

Task 9.1: NCLinac Coordination and Communication Task 9.2: Normal Conducting High Gradient Cavities Task 9.3: Linac & FF Stabilisation Task 9.4: Beam Delivery System Task 9.5: Drive Beam Phase Control 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 20 M0M18M36M48 Planning is being refined!

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 21 #Short nameFull name and hyperlinkCountry 1CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research INO 6CIEMAT Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas Spain 7CNRS/LAPP Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France 17INFN/LNF Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Italy 20PSI Paul Scherrer Institut Switzerland 22RHUL Royal Holloway University of London UK 25STFC/ASTeC Science and Technology Facilities Council UK 28UH Helsingin Yliopisto (University of Helsinki) Finland 33UNIMAN University of Manchester - Cockcroft Institute UK 34UOXF-DL The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford UK 36UU Uppsala Universitet Sweden

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 22 CoordinationHigh GradientStabilisationBDSPhase control CERNJensenRiddoneModena, Hauviller, Mainaud-Durand Sladen, Andersson CIEMATToral CNRS/LAPPJeremie INFN/LNFMarcellini, Franzini PSIDehler RHULBlairBlair, Boogert STFC/ASTECAngal-Kalinin UHÖsterberg, Nordlund, Djurabekova UNIMANJones, D’EliaAppleby UOXF-DLBurrows, Urner UUZiemann, Ruber

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 23 WPName9: NCLinac NCLinac total cost 9.1: Coordination & Communication 9.2: NC High Gradient Cavities 9.3: Linac & FF Stabilization9.4: BDS 9.5: Drive Beam PhaseProject Share CERN204, , ,0401,197,728 CIEMAT0379, CNRS10, , ,034 INFN11, ,880366,848 PSI ,480 RHUL31, , ,616 STFC000222,3370 UH0824, UNIMAN0514, , ,419 UOXF-DL00600,96000 UU0735, Project Share [€]258,5302,453,2561,794,4801,099,452956,4006,562,118

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 24

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 25

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 26  Sub-task 1: Design, manufacture, and validate experimentally a Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) prototype to improve CTF3  F. Toral, D. Carrillo/CIEMAT  Sub-task 2: Explore influence of alignment errors on wake fields, elaborate and demonstrate appropriate High Order Mode (HOM) damping in the presence of alignment errors.  R. Jones, A. D’Elia/Univ. of Manchester  Sub-task 3: Breakdown simulation: Develop and use atomistic simulations of atom migration enhanced by the electric field or by bombarding particles, understand what kind of roughening mechanisms lead to the onset of RF breakdown in high gradient accelerating structures.  F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund/HIP (Univ. Helsinki)  Sub-task 4: Design and build equipment to diagnose the electrons, ions and light emanating from the breakdown event both in the CTF3 Two-Beam Test-Stand at CERN and inside a scanning electron microscope in UU to analyze the surface science relevant to RF-breakdown  R. Ruber, V. Ziemann/Univ. Uppsala  Sub-task 5: Precise assembly: Develop a strategy of assembly for the CLIC accelerating and power extraction structures satisfying the few to 10 micrometer precision requirement of positioning both radial and longitudinal taking into account dynamical effects present during accelerator operation.  K. Österberg/HIP (Univ. Helsinki)

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 27  Sub-task 1: CLIC quadrupole module  A. Jeremie/LAPP, C. Hauviller, H. Mainaud-Durand, M. Modena o Test and evaluate inertial sensors for accelerator environment (magnetic field, radiation, electrical and acoustic noise from accelerator components). o Study vibration isolation for the main linac quadrupole (principle, mock-up, feedback to be adapted to new boundary conditions) and build a test bench. o Study the design and construction of main linac prototype magnet, build a quadrupole mock-up. o Use this mock-up to investigate the performance of the stabilisation equipment, test the compatibility (space, interferences, and complementarities) between the repositioning system and the stabilization system in the real environment of the two beam test stand.  Sub-task 2: Final Focus Test stand  D. Urner, P. Burrows/Univ. Oxford Explore the potential to achieve 0.1 nm stability scale for the final doublet quadrupoles above a few Hz by working on the design, simulation, construction and installation of the support and on the feedback design depending strongly on the final doublet support chosen. Contribute to the development of optimized low-emittance beam transport and feedback for ILC and CLIC by completing an ILC prototype ATF2 intra-train and pulse-pulse feedback and FF system.

 Sub-task 1: ATF Tuning procedures and CLIC IR design  R. Appleby/Uni Manchester, D. Angal-Kalinin/ASTeC o Participation in ATF2 commissioning o Testing of different tuning procedures and knobs o Give design feedback from ATF2 results to ILC/CLIC BDS FFS and IR design o IR design studies for CLIC  Sub-task 2: Precision BPMs  S. Boogert/RHUL At RHUL, high precision BPMs will be developed and tested at the ATF2 with particular emphasis on systems integration. The implications for ILC and CLIC beam diagnostics will be determined via full simulations using these experimental results.  Sub-task 3: Laser-wire at ATF2 and PETRAIII  G. Blair/RHUL At RHUL, Laser-Wire systems will be developed and tested at the ATF2 and PETRAIII with particular emphasis on high-speed operation. The implications for ILC and CLIC beam diagnostics will be determined via full simulations using these experimental results. 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 28

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 29  Sub-task 1: RF monitor  F. Marcellini/LNF, J. Sladen, A. Andersson Electromagnetic design by CERN and INFN. Electronics development and realization by CERN. Monitor prototypes realization by INFN. Test of final version of the system in CTF3.  Sub-task 2: Electro-optical monitor  M. Dehler/PSI PSI will design the system (pickup, laser, e.o. detector and electronics), and will build and test prototypes at the existing facilities at PSI. Common characteristics: o Very low coupling impedance o Filters to reject wake fields and RF noise o Application also in other machines where precise high freq beam phase detection is necessary.

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 30 NCLinac Steering Committee 1 representative from each participating lab Task 9.2: Normal Conducting High Gradient Cavities Task 9.3: Linac & FF Stabilisation Task 9.4: Beam Delivery System Task 9.5: Drive Beam Phase Control Task 9.1: NCLinac Coordination and Communication Publication Board External Advisory Committee

03/4/2009 CLIC Meeting 31

 Task “Crab cavities” in WP “SRF”:  Design, build and test a single LHC and CLIC crab cavity module, including input coupler, mode couplers and tuners.  Design, build and test a LLRF and synchronization system that meets the crab cavity phase and amplitude control specifications for LHC and CLIC.  If the beam time and the necessary hardware become available, validate and test the assembled crab system solutions and LLRF control systems on LHC and CTF3 in 2011; otherwise make performance predictions based on the measured noise characteristics.  Budget (for both): 1.22 M€ total, 364 k€ EC request. 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 32

 Task “Short period helical superconducting undulator” in WP “HFM” (task 7.6):  Design, build and test a prototype helical coil undulator magnet with 11.5 mm period, high peak magnetic field in Nb 3 Sn technology.  This is a key element of a positron source. The request came from ILC.  Total: 539 k€, EC request: 159 k€ 03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 33

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 34 ProjectTypeBeam Type Start date Duration Years Total Cost EC contribution SLHC-ppCNIproton1/1/ M € 5.2 M € ILC-HiGrade pp CNIe +,e - (LC)1/1/08310 M € 5.0 M € EuroNuDSneutrino1/9/ M € 4.0 M € EuCARDIAAll1/4/ M € 10 M € Total67.4 M € 24.2 M €

03/4/2009CLIC Meeting 35 Activity Call 1 ( ) Call 2 ( ) Call 3 ( ) Call 4 ( ) Call 5 ( ) Call 6 ( ) Call 7 ( ) Call 8 (autumn 2010) Call 9 (autumn 2011) Integrating activities XX e-Infrastructures XX Design studies 31X Construction – support to the preparatory phase Construction – support to the implementation phase 20XX Support to policy development and programme implementation XX Budget ( EUR million)