LBS Drafting Group Session #63 Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2136 Date Submitted: Source: Jose PuthenkulamVoice: Intel LBS DG Chair Venue: Jeju, South Korea Base Contribution: None Purpose: For discussion in TGm Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: and. Further information is located at and.
Location Based Services Drafting Group Report Jose Puthenkulam DG Chair
LBS DG this week Timeslot: Tue 7-10PM We had 20 attendees Total Comments: 17 –LBS specific : 11 –Indirectly related to LBS: 6 LBS Input Contributions: 10 We discussed –DG Plans, comments & contributions –Detailed key opens and scope of our work –Created plans for offline harmonization and completion of Draft text by Hawaii session
LBS DG High Level Plan Jeju –Review LBS Letter Ballot Comments –Review Input Contributions –Scope of LBS features/Prioritization of features discussion Between Meetings –Draft ToC based on input contributions –Organize two teleconference calls for LBS DG discussions –Develop draft output text Hawaii –Develop resolution recommendations for LBS LB Comments –Develop final draft output text –Recommend final output text to TGm for adoption –Recommend LBS comment resolutions to TGm for adoption
LBS Comments & Contributions Comment Number Commenter First Name Commenter Last NameContribution #Recommendations 275*YoungkyoBaek TGm should reserve "AMS location privacy" term for LBS use. Maybe "AMS Identity Privacy" is a way to address the comment. 375KiseonRyu *BaoweiJi LBS measurement mentioned 862EunkyungKim *MarkusMuck Location aspects mentioned 1407*zhaohualu1755* Location aspects mentioned 1409*zhaohualu1751* Location aspects mentioned 1428*Kun-YiLin Location aspects mentioned 1547Yih-ShenChen JinsooChoi1996r1 1575MarkusMuck 1577RonaldMurias 1585MuthaiahVenkatachalam LeiZhou LeiZhou LeiZhou Chun-YenHsu1827r1 TBDAlexeyK2086
Scope of LBS Features Basic LBS Features (Higher priority): –Reference signals for location determination same as ie Preamble, Ranging Sequence –Measurement parameters of Reference signals same as : RTD, RD, RSSI, CINR –Location triggers and measurement procedures: RD for DL-TDOA, RTD for UL-TOA –LBS-Adv Message supported –LBS capability negotiation Enhanced LBS Features (Lower priority): –New Reference signals for location determination –New Measurements of Reference signals –New Location triggers and measurement procedures –New LBS MAC Management messages –Negotiation of enhanced LBS capabilities
Key Opens LBS Request/Response Messages: 3 options: –1: New Layer 2 LBS-REQ/RSP MAC Management messages –2: New Layer 3 (L2 Transfer) LBS-REQ/RSP MAC Management messages –3: Re-use SCAN-REQ/RSP/REP or RNG-RSP messages from with LBS specific modifications Do we need enhanced LBS to meet the E-911 requirements? Need simulations to determine this. –Network based requirements –Mobile Station based requirements Reference Signals for Enhanced LBS: –SA-Preamble, DL-Pilots etc. LBS operation in Idle Mode
Detailed Action Plan DG Chair to create list for discussions Conference calls will be announced on the reflector By first conference call (Sept 9, 8-9:30 PM Pacific): –Finalize Table of Contents –Simulation Criteria/Assumptions for the E-911 requirements – Alexey K, Kanghee Kim, Lei Zhou –Decide on the LBS-Request/Response message option (not details) By second conf call (Sept 16, 8-9:30 PM Pacific): –Complete simulations. –Harmonize Location Reference signals –Harmonize Measurement Procedures Text –Harmonize LBS-Request/Response message details
Attendees Kiseon Ryu Zheng Zhao Lei Zhou Sangheon Kim Eunkyung Kim Hangyu Cho Jinsoo Choi Kunmin Yeo Kanghee Kim Alexander Maltsev Alexey Khoryaev Byungwan Yoon Jian (James) Xu Youngchul Oh Ray-Guang Cheng Fang-Ching Ren Yih-Shen Chen Chun-Yen Hsu Kamran Etemad Jose Puthenkulam