CDER Drug Safety Oversight Board Douglas C. Throckmorton, M.D. Deputy Director, CDER Food and Drug Administration November 5, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD Public meeting July 19, 2010
Advertisements

Innovations in Education Regulation Committee Susan Odom, RN, PhD Chair, Idaho BON Innovations Committee Chair.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
5th Annual PBM Pharmacy Informatics Conference
Safety Committee Orientation Environmental Energy Technologies Division November 18, 2011.
Draft Action Plan Update – Agenda Item No. 5D Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
REMS Update NORD Corporate Council Meeting May 14, 2013
FDA and Communication about Regulated Products Nancy M. Ostrove, PhD Senior Advisor for Risk Communication Risk Communication Advisory Committee August.
CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee September 6, 2006 ODAC and the FDA Arms-Length or Arm-In-Arm? Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Objectives Why we need DHCPL Situations that call for a DHCPL Definitions DHCPL itself–content, presentation, process Target audience Current and future.
Assessing the Impact of a Toll-Free Number for Reporting Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Ads: Proposed Study Design Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D.
Proprietary Names and the Drug Approval Process John K. Jenkins, M.D., F.C.C.P. Director, Officer of New Drugs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board Update DIA Annual Meeting Philadelphia, PA June 21 st, 2006 Susan K. Cummins, MD, MPH Executive Director Drug Safety Oversight.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
1 Update on Nanotechnology Activities in CDER and FDA Keith O. Webber, Ph.D. Deputy Director OPS/CDER/FDA ACPS Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2008.
FDA Science Board Drug Safety Initiative April 15, 2005 Rockville, MD RADM Steven Galson, MD, MPH Acting Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs.
Research Peer-Review at CDER Past and Present Jerry M. Collins, Ph.D. Director, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, OTR Acting Director, Division of Applied.
1 Best Practices in Stakeholder Involvement Paul J. Seligman, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Director, Safety Policy & Communication Center for Drug Evaluation.
Communication of Drug Safety Information Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Public Hearing December 8, 2005.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Dr. Susan Lockwood SSA Executive Director June 18, 2010.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
Over-the-Counter Drug Products Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug products are those drugs that are available to consumers without a prescription. There.
FDAAA – Report on DTC Advertising Kristin Davis, J.D. Deputy Director, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications Office of Medical Policy,
FDA Science Board CDER Drug Safety Update November 6, 2005 Rockville, MD Steven Galson, MD, MPH Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
July 15, Postmarketing Safety Evaluation of Approved Drugs and Risk Management Victor F. C. Raczkowski, MD, MS Director, Office of Drug Safety July.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board: Recent Activities FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting March 31 st, 2006 Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
1 Estimating CDER Resources Devoted to Safety Theresa M. Mullin, Ph.D. Office of Planning, Office of Commissioner April 15, 2005 Presentation to: FDA Science.
Applying New Science to Drug Safety Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations April 15, 2005.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
Risk Management, Risk Communication, and Drug Safety: The U.S. Experience Geoffrey Levitt Chief Regulatory Counsel Wyeth August 23, 2007.
FDA Risk Communication Nancy M. Ostrove, PhD Senior Advisor for Risk Communication Risk Communication Advisory Committee February 28, 2008.
Washington State Work Zone Rule  Work Zone Rule Implementation  New Work Zone Policy Cathy Nicholas, FHWA - WA Division Office Frank Newboles, WSDOT.
1 FDA’s Communication of Drug Safety Steven Galson, MD, MPH Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research December 7-8, 2005 Welcome – Opening Remarks.
FDA’s Patient Advocacy Programs: Patient Representative Program & Patient Network Andrea Furia-Helms, MPH James Valentine, MHS Office of Special Health.
Abuse-Deterrent Opioids: FDA’s Role and Emerging Challenges Jeanne Ireland Principal, Ireland Strategies, LLC 2015 CWAG Annual Meeting.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Office of Pharmaceutical Science OPS Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER FDA Food and Drug Administration HHS Health and Human Services 1 Advisory.
Version: 27 May 2007 New Models for Collaboration: Patients as Drivers and Partners in Neurological Research Integrating Patient Input Within the Drug.
Making Programs Make more Systematic use of Evaluations and
Board Roles & Responsibilities
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Update on the National Postmarket Surveillance System
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Research Program Strategic Plan
National Governing and Leadership Structure
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
FDA Oversight Of Drug Safety: What Works, What Doesn’t
Presentation transcript:

CDER Drug Safety Oversight Board Douglas C. Throckmorton, M.D. Deputy Director, CDER Food and Drug Administration November 5, 2005

Outline Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSOB, Board) membership and charge Summary of Board meetings Topics discussed Challenges for the Board Ongoing assessments of Board function and activity

DSOB Membership Chair – Deputy Director, CDER Executive Director –Susan Cummins, MD, MPH Membership - representatives from CDER offices, CBER, CDRH, NIH, VAH Consumer or patient representatives and advisory committee members as consultants

DSOB Charge Will provide independent oversight and advice to the CDER Center Director on management of: Important drug safety issues and policies Dissemination of certain safety information through FDA’s website to healthcare professionals and patients

DSOB Activities (from MaPP) Identify, track and oversee management of important drug safety issues Adjudicated organizational disputes concerning management of drug safety issues Select drugs to be placed on Drug Watch and update their status as appropriate Establish policies regarding management of drug safety issues in CDER

DSOB Activities (from MaPP) (cont) Oversee the development of patient and professional information sheets in CDER Track important emerging safety issues and ensure they are resolved in a timely manner Ensure CDER decisions about a drug’s safety benefit from the input and perspective or experts within and outside FDA who have not conducted the primary review or served as a deciding official in the ongoing pre-market evaluation or post-market surveillance activities with respect to the drug

DSOB Staff Mary Mease, RPh, MPH Toni Marie Nearing-Crowley Lee Zwanziger, PhD Work with the CDER Divisions to write the Public Health Advisories, and write the Patient and Professionals Information Sheets

Themes from the Four DSOB Meetings to Date Didactic sessions on drug safety Oversight of CDER safety issues Pre-decisional Make recommendations for ongoing CDER activities Post-decisional Review of decisions about safety communications Policy development Discussion today limited by commercial confidential nature of the data used in many of the discussions

Didactic Sessions Familiarize members from outside CDER with extensive safety activities ongoing in CDER Sessions on: Detection, assessment and management of safety issues in Office of Drug Safety (ODS) and Office of New Drugs (OND) Newly-issued Guidances related to safety: Guidance on risk management programs (ODS)

Oversight of CDER Safety Issues: Predecisional Intent: Provide full picture of the data as we know it Extensive background data in advance Presentations by knowledgeable CDER review staff Solicit specific suggestions for actions Reality: Many safety issues are time-sensitive May limit DSOB role here to complex, evolving issues Board has asked for fuller discussion of ongoing work in the Center about safety

Predecisional Oversight of CDER Safety Issues: Transdermal Patches Containing Fentanyl Issue: ODS report of patient deaths and possible fentanyl overdoses when using patch CDER Actions: Review of safety data Initial evaluation of manufacturing and pharmacokinetic data for sources of variability Patient/ HCP sheets highlighting need to follow label carefully Issue for Board: Additional Risk Management

FDA ALERT [7/2005]: Narcotic Overdose and Death FDA is looking into reports of death and other serious side effects from overdoses of the narcotic fentanyl in patients using the fentanyl transdermal skin patches for pain control. Directions for using the fentanyl skin patch must be followed exactly to prevent death or other severe side effects that can happen from using too much (overdosing) fentanyl. These directions are provided in the patient package insert.patient package insert

Predecisional Oversight of CDER Safety Issues: Transdermal Patches Containing Fentanyl (cont) Board Recommendation: Need to more evaluate fully the sources of variability of drug delivery for these complex drug delivery systems, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows Risk Management strategies should be developed with this evaluation in mind, including the use of Medication Guides Action Item for CDER: After evaluation bring issue back to Board for fu discussion and questions

Oversight of CDER safety issues: Postdecisional Many of the safety issues time-sensitive Post-decisional oversight important part of DSOB role DSOB meetings include: Review of all postings on proposed Drug Watch web page Postings sent to all members via MedWatch Each action summarized at meeting Members asked about action taken, whether other steps need to be considered Feedback has been variable, but frank

Postdecisional Oversight of CDER Safety Issues: Withdrawal of Palladone Issue: decision to withdraw palladone from the market for ‘dose-dumping’ in EtOH CDER Actions: Reviewed in vitro and in vivo data on dose-dumping Discussed alternative therapies, concluded withdrawal of product best Started evaluation of other products for similar effect Board Recommendation: Agreed with appropriateness of withdrawal Recommended standard chemistry review of similar products prior to approval Action Item for CDER: FU on chemistry review process

Policy Discussions DSOB and the new forms of safety communication (e.g., Patient Information Sheets) are new ways for CDER to address safety: Need to define its role in the larger effort to address safety in CDER Avoid duplication of efforts

Policy Discussions: Issues ‘Threshold’ for communication: When should the DSOB recommend communicating publicly about an emerging safety issue? Board has identified set of circumstances that could influence the need to say something public, including: Gross credibility of data Plausibility (model) Other relevant data from related drugs Severity/reversability of adverse effect Public health impact of adverse effect

Policy Discussions: Issue & Challenge for the Board ‘Oversight’ function of the Board What is effective oversight? How to conduct effective oversight? New group within CDER with unique mix of expertise Need to conduct oversight over many diverse groups in CDER at work on safety Need to assure timely implementation of recommendation once accepted by Dr. Galson First step: need to understand breadth of safety issues in CDER and how they are handled

Policy Discussions: Issue & Challenge (cont) ‘Oversight’ Function Action Items: Board review of ways CDER identifies and handles safety issues, including canvassing by Board staff to understand full scope of safety activities Complimentary to ongoing safety tracking in CDER Board discussion to translate this review into clearer vision of how to conduct safety oversight Implementation of a Quality Assurance program to develop and track metrics of success for the Board Two meetings have been held Look for additional comments at upcoming Part 15 Hearing

Summary DSOB has broad set of challenges it is tasked with managing: All important Providing effective and timely oversight a critical task identified by the Board Board members are taking their responsibility very seriously, and have provided feedback to CDER that has: Added new, fresh voice on safety in CDER Changed the tone of the safety discussions in CDER Changed the approaches taken by CDER on specific safety issues

Question for Science Board Based on your understanding of the safety system in CDER, how would you prioritize the 7 goals identified for the DSOB?

Board Activities (from MaPP) Identify, track and oversee management of important drug safety issues Adjudicated organizational disputes concerning management of drug safety issues Select drugs to be placed on Drug Watch and update their status as appropriate Establish policies regarding management of drug safety issues in CDER Oversee the development of patient and professional information sheets in CDER Track important emerging safety issues and ensure they are resolved in a timely manner Ensure CDER decisions about a drug’s safety benefit from the input and perspective or experts within and outside FDA who have not conducted the primary review or served as a deciding official in the ongoing pre-market evaluation or post-market surveillance activities with respect to the drug