An Overview of the 2007 Mojave Network Meeting June 28, 2007 Lake Mead National Recreation Area National Park Service Mojave Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Advertisements

National Park Service Critical Loads:
Organ Pipe Cactus N.M. © D. Liggett Natural Resource Challenge I&M Program Update Revitalize and expand the natural resource program within the park service.
Revitalize and expand the natural resource program within the park service and improve park management through greater reliance on scientific knowledge.
Great Basin Restoration Initiative GBRI Field Office to On-the Ground Project.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Towards Sustainable Statistical Capacity Building : Uganda’s Experience By John B. Male-Mukasa Executive Director Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)
Draft Action Plan Update – Agenda Item No. 5D Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Jennifer Stingelin Keefer, Penn State Jen Fox, Stacy Holt NPSpecies Clean-up and Certification Progress Update MOJN Technical Committee Meeting September.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Jennifer Gimbel, ACWI Chair Acting Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior.
In just a few short years, the I&M networks have become known as a key source and supplier of reliable, organized, and retrievable information about parks.
State of the I&M Program 10 th Anniversary Progress Report Chaco Culture Natl. Historical Park Steve Fancy I&M Program Leader National Park Service March.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Brent Frakes, Functional Analyst.  Need to discover, share, have access to large holdings of data and information to address rapid climate change  e.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin UNDP/Sida United Nations Development Programme Swedish International Development Cooperation.
4 4 By: A. Shukr, M. Alnouri. Many new project managers have trouble looking at the “big picture” and want to focus on too many details. Project managers.
Biological Resource Management Division Science and Conservation in National Parks Loyal A. Mehrhoff.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
SPRNCA: Maintaining Riparian/Wetland Function. What does that mean today? Isn’t SPRNCA already “protected and enhanced?” When will it be “good enough”?
Park Management Informed by Scientific Information – Key Aspects of Network Approach to Monitoring Monitoring plays a key, central role in natural resource.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Impact of Climate Change on Plant Community Composition and Ecosystem Function in MOJN Parks Seth Munson, Jayne Belnap, Robert Webb (USGS) Nita Tallent.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
NRCS Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 16, 2013 Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center and.
Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
UN/CS/RAI/USAA/DB01/ Development of a Strategic Plan for a Digital Archives Programme Common Services Working Group on Archives and Records.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
How the National Park Service, “the most decentralized agency in the U.S. government”, Successfully Designed and Implemented a Natural Resource Inventory.
By Gary Rosenlieb and Barry Long National Park Service Water Resources Division National Water Quality Monitoring Council 5 th National Monitoring Conference.
Key Elements for Successful Collaboration: Examples from TBEP Holly Greening Tampa Bay Estuary Program July 2014.
Neno Kukuric - IGRAC Almaty - July 2014 The framework, the content and the objectives.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
MOJN – June 2007 DM Presentation 1 Data Management; Yesterday and Today The Mojave Network from the Data Management Perspective –Data Management; Tabular.
Mammal Inventory of the Mojave Network Parks and Charles Drost and Jan Hart USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Colorado Plateau Research Station.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
IW SCS Impact Evaluation Phases and Products Aaron Zazueta Reference Group Meeting Bangkok, Thailand September 27, 2010.
North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Temperate Network Fred Dieffenbach.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase III. Looking back to think ahead Policy Dialogue Background Materials Ministerial agreement Capacity building.
Kirsten Gallo (CHDN), Andy Hubbard (SODN) & Nita Tallent-Halsell (MOJN)
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect Fred Dieffenbach, Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Appalachian National Scenic Trail National.
Natural Resource Program Center Benthic Habitat Mapping Workshop June, 2008 Inventory and Monitoring Where do we go from here?
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
Mojave Network Data Mining Jean VonSchriltz June 28, 2007 Mojave Inventory & Monitoring Network Annual Meeting Data Mining Presentation Courtesy of Jean.
Preparation of Drought Vulnerability Assessment Study to Develop Iraq National Framework for Integrated Drought Risk Management (DRM) PAVING THE WAY FOR.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
ICP Integrated Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Ecosystems -
Thirtieth meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling
Integrated Data Management.
Chapter 1 (pages 4-9); Overview of SDLC
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the 2007 Mojave Network Meeting June 28, 2007 Lake Mead National Recreation Area National Park Service Mojave Network

Morning (8am-12pm) Overview of NPS I&M program Mojave Network activities (Inventory,Phase I & II) –Inventories –Data mining –Conceptual models Cooperators- Inventory Results –Biological –Springs Past & present data mining activities National Park Service Mojave Network

Afternoon (1:20-3:00pm) Update on 12 basic inventories, data management, GIS Conceptual models for MOJN Description of MOJN Phase III (’07 on) How will monitoring info be used & reported? Approach to water quality & vital sign monitoring National Park Service Mojave Network

Afternoon (3:15 - 4:30pm) Meetings & Workgroups MOJN Data Management & GIS meeting MOJN Water Resources Workgroup USGS Great Basin Integrated Landscape Monitoring National Park Service Mojave Network

Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information Overview of the Inventory & Monitoring Program

Development of the I&M program 1978 Management policies call for scientific data to support resources planning & mgt 1987 Inventory and Monitoring Initiative (Evison Report) 1990 Hester Task Force 1998 NPS Omnibus Management Act “Parks for Science” 2000 Natural Resource Challenge Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

“The Secretary shall undertake a program of inventory and monitoring of National Park System resources to establish baseline information and to provide information on the long-term trends in the condition of National Park System resources…” “The Secretary shall … assure the full and proper utilization of the results of scientific studies for park management decisions.” NATIONAL PARKS OMNIBUS MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1998 Title II – Section 204. Inventory and Monitoring Program THE LAW Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

Development of the I&M program 1978 Management policies call for scientific data to support resources planning & mgt 1987 Inventory and Monitoring Initiative (Evison Report) 1990 Hester Task Force 1998 NPS Omnibus Management Act “Parks for Science” 2000 Natural Resource Challenge Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

National Park Service Natural Resource Challenge NPS will create networks of parks… to facilitate collaboration, information sharing, and economies of scale in natural resource management. NPS will accomplish natural resource inventory needs and monitor park vital signs.

NPS 2001 Management Policies “Natural systems in the national park system, and the human influences upon them, will be monitored to detect change. The Service will use the results of monitoring and research to understand the detected change and to develop appropriate management actions.” “The Service will: Identify, acquire, and interpret needed inventory, monitoring, and research, including applicable traditional knowledge, to obtain information and data that will help park managers accomplish park management objectives provided for in law and planning documents.” Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information To establish a natural resource inventory and monitoring as a standard practice that transcends traditional program, activity, and funding boundaries. To inventory natural resources and park ecosystems and determine their nature & status To monitor park ecosystems to better understand their dynamic nature and condition To integrate natural resources inventory & monitoring information into NPS planning, management, and decision making. Goals:

Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

 Death Valley NP  Great Basin NP  Joshua Tree NP  Lake Mead NRA  Manzanar NHS  Mojave Natl Preserve  Parashant Natl Mon.

Mojave Network Organizational Structure Network Coordinator Technical Committee 5 Resource Chiefs & 2 park reps Science Advisor MOJN NC Superintendent liaison Board of Directors 7 Superintendents MOJN NC, PWR RC NRAC rep, GB-CESU PWR I&M Coordinator WASO I&M National Park Service Mojave Network Data Manager –6 Data miners 2 SCAs & 1 Admin. Asst. Ecologist GIS specialist (term) programmer (term)

Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information To establish a natural resource inventory and monitoring as a standard practice that transcends traditional program, activity, and funding boundaries. To inventory natural resources and park ecosystems and determine their nature & status To monitor park ecosystems to better understand their dynamic nature and condition To integrate natural resources inventory & monitoring information into NPS planning, management, and decision making. Goals:

 Base cartography  Geology map  Soils map  Vegetation map  Meteorological data  Air quality related values  Air quality data  Water body location and classification  Water quality data  Natural resource bibliography  Species list of vertebrates and vascular plants  Species distribution and status of vertebrates and vascular plants of management concern 12 Basic Inventories Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information

Servicewide I&M Program Park Management Informed by Scientific Information To establish a natural resource inventory and monitoring as a standard practice that transcends traditional program, activity, and funding boundaries. To inventory natural resources and park ecosystems and determine their nature & status To monitor park ecosystems to better understand their dynamic nature and condition To integrate natural resources inventory & monitoring information into NPS planning, management, and decision making. Goals:

National Park Service Mojave Network What are Vital Signs? Key elements that indicate the health of an ecosystem. Vital signs can be any measurable feature of the environment that provides insights into the state of the ecosystem and can occur at any level of organization

The intent of vital signs monitoring is to track the status and trends in a subset of physical, chemical, and biological components and processes that represent the overall condition of park resources

Goals of Vital Signs Monitoring Determine status and trends in selected indicators of ecosystem health to allow managers to make better- informed decisions Provide early warning of situations that may require intervention or mitigation Understand the dynamic nature and condition of park ecosystems and define normal limits of variation Provide data to meet legal and Congressional mandates related to natural resource protection and visitor enjoyment. Provide a means of measuring progress towards performance goals

National Park Service Mojave Network Vital Signs Monitoring Program 3 Phase Process Phase 1: Conduct background work identify & synthesize existing data (data mining) draft conceptual models hold Park Vital Signs Workshop(s) Phase 2: Select and prioritize vital signs update and expand upon Phase I work select vital signs Phase 3: Develop draft monitoring plan

National Park Service Mojave Network The Mojave Network: Biological & Spring inventories (& 12 basic inventories) Phase 1: Conduct background work identify & synthesize existing data (data mining) draft conceptual models hold Park Vital Signs Workshop(s) Phase 2: Select and prioritize vital signs update and expand upon Phase I work select vital signs Phase 3: Develop draft monitoring plan

Timeline for Inventory & Monitoring Activities Planning and Design Steps Information gathering and data cataloging XXXXXXXX- Inventories to support monitoring -XXXXX--- Park scoping workshops ---XXX--- Vital Sign prioritization and selection ----XX--- Conceptual modeling ----XXX-- Protocol development X- Monitoring plan development X- Implement monitoring protocols X Refine monitoring protocols X Monitoring plan due dates Ph. I Sep ’05 Ph. II Sep ‘06 Ph. III Dec ‘07 Final Sep ‘08 Staffing timeline NCNetwork Coordinator (Heister)NC (MacChung) Data Manager (Truitt)Data Manager (Palmer) Ecologist National Park Service Mojave Network

Year I&M Program Biological Inventory NPS-WRD WQ Monitoring I&M Program VS Monitoring FY2000$ 95,565$0 FY2001$100,000$0 FY2002$233,800$0 FY2003$218,579$0$150,000 FY2004$132,700$0$150,000 FY2005$0$80,000$225,300 FY2006$0$80,000$850,400 FY2007$0$80,000$850,400 Inventory & Phase I II III National Park Service Mojave Network

National Park Service Mojave Network  Initially based on assessment of inventory completeness for vascular plants and vertebrate taxa  Then prioritized taxa groups based on discussion with park staff and on-going activities  Evaluated distribution information and identified priority inventory areas within each park Prioritization of Inventory Needs

Cooperators USGS – Southwest Biol. Science Center USGS – Corvallis office & Menlo Park office Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center University of Nevada, Las Vegas Desert Research Institute- UNR University of California – Riverside Utah Museum of Natural History Great Basin Institute University of Idaho National Park Service Mojave Network