Reporting the Forest Ecological Integrity of Northeastern National Parks Geri Tierney SUNY-ESF Brian Mitchell NPS Don Faber-Langendoen NatureServe James.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Historical Creation of Early Seral Habitat: Fire, Wind, Bugs …
Advertisements

Long-term monitoring of large, remote areas with minimal funding: hope and encouragement for natural area managers Steven Fancy National Monitoring Program.
Investigating the relationship between species richness and wilderness in the coastal temperate rainforest of Southeast Alaska. This poster represents.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
“Nature always wears the colors of the spirit” – EMERSON Designing a state-wide volunteer monitoring program Paul C West--August, 2003—Citizen Monitoring.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
LTER Planning Process Science Task Force (STF) Report to NSF September 2005.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Interagency Whitebark Pine Health Monitoring Program for the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Cooperating Organizations: USDA Forest Service Greater Yellowstone.
NE-FIA Annual Forest Inventory Chip Scott Program Manager Forest Inventory and Analysis USFS Northeastern Research Station Newtown Square, PA.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
Tom Gittings 1, George Smith 2, Mark Wilson 1, Laura French 2, Anne Oxbrough 1, Saoirse O’Donoghue 2, Josephine Pithon 1, Vicki O’Donnell 3, Anne-Marie.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network Natural Resource Monitoring.
Introduction Evaluating Population-Habitat Relationships of Forest Breeding Birds at Multiple Scales Using Forest Inventory and Analysis Data Todd M. Fearer.
Impact of Climate Change on Plant Community Composition and Ecosystem Function in MOJN Parks Seth Munson, Jayne Belnap, Robert Webb (USGS) Nita Tallent.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Tuesday 11:00 – 1:50 Thursday 11:00 – 1:50 Instructor: Nancy Wheat Ecology Bio 47 Spring 2015.
Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
An Overview of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program.
Spatial Statistics Jonathan Bossenbroek, PhD Dept of Env. Sciences Lake Erie Center University of Toledo.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
Research programmes in ecology Jacques Baudry 1, Françoise Burel 2, and Agnès Ricroch 3 1 INRA of Rennes, 2 University of Rennes/CNRS, 3 University of.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Ecological Integrity as a Model for Understanding and Managing Parks and Protected Areas Stephen Woodley, PhD Chief Scientist Parks Canada.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Evaluation of sampling alternatives to quantify stand structure in riparian areas of Western Oregon forests Theresa Marquardt Oregon State University Paul.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Southeast Alaska Network Inventory and Monitoring Program Long-Term Ecological Monitoring in Glacier Bay.
March 11, 2010 Planning for Priority Species and Vegetation: Monitoring Framework A Systematic Framework to Plan for Biological Resources In the BLM’s.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Ecological Site Descriptions and State-and-Transition models of the Caldenal.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
2012 User’s Group Meeting Data Collection Group Topic: Incorporating Flexibilities in FIA Data Collection Effort Bob Ilgenfritz – Data Collection Group.
Using existing landscape monitoring programmes for monitoring and reporting on the Habitats directive PEER Nature2000 workshop, April 2007 Hans Gardfjell,
~~~~~~~~~~ Johan Abenius Environmental Monitoring Swedish Environmental Protection Agency SE Stockholm tel fax
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Examples of Management Applications Jim Comiskey, Mid-Atlantic Network John Paul Schmit, National Capital Network.
Reconsidering the concepts of ecological quality Achim Paetzold.
The role of climate in sugar maple health: Historical relationships and future projections.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Temperate Network Fred Dieffenbach.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect Fred Dieffenbach, Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Appalachian National Scenic Trail National.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Ecology --- primary definition The scientific study of how organisms interact with the natural world.
Monitoring and Estimating Species Richness Paul F. Doherty, Jr. Fishery and Wildlife Biology Department Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO.
U.S Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Designing an Integrated Monitoring Program for Coniferous Forests: beyond the forest and the trees.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Applications of Regional Forest Monitoring Data Jim Comiskey, Mid-Atlantic Network John Paul Schmit, National.
Multiple Season Study Design. 2 Recap All of the issues discussed with respect to single season designs are still pertinent.  why, what and how  how.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Ungrazed deep grassland
Additional Data Collection in 2017
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
Long-Term Forest Health Monitoring in Eastern National Parks
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Reporting the Forest Ecological Integrity of Northeastern National Parks Geri Tierney SUNY-ESF Brian Mitchell NPS Don Faber-Langendoen NatureServe James Gibbs SUNY-ESF

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Natural Resource Challenge Inventory and Monitoring Program Vital Signs Monitoring

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Vital Signs Monitoring Plan Protocols:  Forest Health  Lakes and Streams  Forest/Grassland Birds  Wetlands  Rocky Intertidal  Coastal Birds

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Monitor trends in structure, function, and composition of forested ecosystems, including soils and key stressors Interpret and report condition (ecological integrity) of forested systems Forest Monitoring Goals

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Ecosystem structure, composition and function in relation to natural or historical variation and perturbations imposed by natural or anthropogenic agents of change (Karr and Dudley 1981) Dominant ecological characteristics occurring within natural ranges of variation and able to withstand and recover from most perturbations imposed by natural dynamics or human disruptions (Parrish et al. 2003) What is “Ecological Integrity”?

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network A set of measures of ecosystem structure, function, and composition Reference to the range of natural variation and resistance to perturbation Ensure links with management needs What is “Ecological Integrity”?

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Conceptual Model: Conceptual understanding of system that identifies important characteristics, processes, and stresses Steps to EI Reporting

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Metric Selection: Choose key structural, functional, and compositional attributes that are informative, have low response variability, and are cheap to collect Steps to EI Reporting

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Define Levels: Base levels on existing literature, pilot testing, or first years of monitoring Levels should separate acceptable from undesired conditions Assign confidence to levels to assist interpretation Levels can vary by habitat or location Consider developing a complementary management goals report Steps to EI Reporting

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Generate Report: Convey status and trend of key parameters in a meaningful way Steps to EI Reporting

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Defined for structural, functional, and composition metrics at multiple scales (landscape, stand, tree) Forest Monitoring Objectives For example: Functional metric: Soil chemistry (acid stress) Objective: Determine trend in Ca:Al ratio Unacceptable Level: Molar ratio below one indicates significant acid stress

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Population: All upland forests and woodlands within park boundaries Sample Size: 350 permanent plots (10 to 176 per park) Site Selection: By park, GRTS (spatially balanced and randomized) Temporal Schedule: 4 rotating panels (4 years for complete cycle) Sampling Design

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Plot Sampling S3S3 S4S4 S5S5 15 m (ACAD); 20 m (NHP) 2 m UL ML MR BL BR UR 1 m 2 m Upslope or N Figure 1: NETN plot layout showing square tree plot with 3 nested 2-m radius regeneration microplots, 8 1-m 2 veg quadrats, and 3 15-m CWD transects. S x is location of soil sample. 15 m CWD 15 m CWD 15 m CWD 4 m UC BC 4 m S1S1 S2S2 B Measures: Stand structure Snag abundance CWD Canopy Closure Tree condition Tree growth Tree mortality Tree regeneration Understory diversity Biotic homogenization Soil chemistry Landscape context

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Status: Snapshot of metrics during each 4-year interval for each park Trend: Linear trends of metrics using GLM or hierarchical models (investigating other methods, including non-linear models) Ecological Integrity: Summary reports for managers that present metrics and interpret their meaning for ecosystem structure, function, and composition Data Analysis y ij = b 0 + b 1 (t j - t 0 ) + η i + ε ij y (i + n),j = b 0 + b 1 (t (i + n),j - t ij ) + b 2 (x (i + n),j - x jj ) + b 3 (t (i + n),j - t ij )(x (i + n),j - x ij ) + η ij + ε ij

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Composition: Invasive Exotic Plant Indicator Species Detection of 20 priority exotic species, based on eight 1-m 2 quadrats and a 15 minute timed search of the plot Good: < 0.5 species per plot Caution: >= 0.5 and < 3.5 species per plot Significant Concern: >= 3.5 species per plot Examples with 2006 Data ParkACADMABISARA 0.0 (0.3)0.6 (0.2)3.0 (0.2) Sample Size 38 (ACAD) 12 (MABI) 16 (SARA)

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Structure: Snag Abundance Abundance of snags by park or habitat Good: >= 10% standing trees and >= 10% med-lg trees are snags Caution: < 10% standing trees or large snags under-represented Significant Concern: < 5 med-lg snags per ha Examples with 2006 Data ParkACADMABISARA % standing (SE)16 (2)7 (2)22 (3) % >= 30 cm dbh N >= 30 cm dbh per ha 10 (2) 8 (4) 1 (1) 2 (2) 5 (4) 5 (3)

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Function: Soil Chemistry (Acid Stress) Minimum molar Ca:Al ratio of O and A horizons, measured at one site per plot (composite of 3 samples) Good: Ratio >= 4 Caution: Ratio >= 1 and < 4 Significant Concern: Ratio < 1 Examples with 2006 Data ParkACADMABISARA 3.7 (0.6)110 (37)200 (48) Sample Size 38 (ACAD) 12 (MABI) 16 (SARA)

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Function: Soil Chemistry (Nitrogen Saturation) Minimum C:N ratio of O and A horizons, measured at one site per plot (composite of 3 samples) Good: Ratio >= 25 Caution: Ratio >= 20 and < 25 Significant Concern: Ratio < 20 Examples with 2006 Data ParkACADMABISARA 32.2 (1.5)15.8 (0.9)14.0 (0.8) Sample Size 38 (ACAD) 12 (MABI) 16 (SARA)

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Landscape: Forest Patch Size Size (hectares) of contiguous forest patch surrounding each plot Good: >= 50 ha Caution: < 50 ha Significant Concern: Not defined Examples with 2006 Data ParkACADSARA 1660 (157)21 (9.2)

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network “At-a-glance” summary of each metric Results could be post- stratified by geography or ecosystem type Scorecard report includes details and interpretation Acadia NP 2006 EI Report

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network 2006 & 2007 Field Work: 86 (2006) and 83 (2007) plots Review of EI Methods: EI reporting documents ready for external review EI Manuscript: In draft form NPS Collaboration: Working with eastern NPS programs on monitoring and reporting Other Collaboration: Working with state and federal agencies on regional efforts Current Status

Inventory & Monitoring Program Northeast Temperate Network Science Based: Our Ecological Integrity report is scientifically sound, flexible, and transparent Interpretive: Simple summary format is helpful for non-technical audiences Not a Replacement: Still need rigorous trend and other analyses of raw metrics Conclusions