Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. www.clearcreeksolutions.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clean Water Its Everybodys Business. From a distance we might get the impression that our planet has an unlimited supply of clean water available to use.
Advertisements

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 AWRA Washington Section January 2007 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Water Too Much or Too Little? Or a Little of Both? URS Group Inc ASFPM National Conference May 2010.
UW LID Workshop Permeable Pavement Modeling June 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.
LID Site Design and Drainage Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
UW LID Workshop Bioretention Flow Control Modeling May 2008
Leah Johanson, Water Environment Services
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Runoff Estimation, and Surface Erosion and Control Ali Fares, PhD NREM 600, Evaluation of Natural Resources Management.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Effective Stormwater Management Through the Use of Low-Impact Development (LID) Techniques Justin Gregory, PE Jones Edmunds & Associates October 3, 2012.
Storm Water Management and Erosion/Sediment Control Storm water management reduces quantity, and improves quality, of runoff in the watershed Site based.
Overview of Urban Drainage Flood Prediction Methods and Approaches J.Y. Chen1 and B.J. Adams2 1. Water Survey Division, Environment Canada 2. Department.
Wake County Stormwater Workshop Guidance on the New Stormwater Ordinance and Design Manual August 29, 2006.
Green Roof Hydrology by Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, WA.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 Vancouver, WA, Workshop October 17, 2007 PM.
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTER MODELING Washington Hydrology Society March 2006 Joe Brascher, President Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
SDHM Hydromodification Overview
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
Stormwater Infrastructure for Water Quality Management Dr. Larry A. Roesner, P.E. CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas, Austin April 8,
Bernie Engel Purdue University. Low-Impact Development (LID) An approach to land development to mimic the pre-development site hydrology to: 1)Reduce.
SUSTAIN Pilot Study April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
 Review/compare effectiveness monitoring categories and approve a set  Review and compare hypotheses-driving questions and provide guidance or approval.
How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?
HYDROMODIFICATION: AN INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Presented by Jeffrey Haltiner, Ph.D., P.E. Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. San Francisco, CA May2006.
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Providing software and consulting services to solve hydrology and stormwater problems throughout the world.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Bay Area Hydrology Model Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
ODOT 2015 Geo-Environmental Conference
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL ISLAND PROJECT Water: The Essential Ingredient & Thoughts for Sustainability ©Town of Chapel Hill Stormwater Management Division.
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Application of GIS and Terrain Analysis to Watershed Model Calibration for the CHIA Project Sam Lamont Robert Eli Jerald Fletcher.
Seattle’s Testing and Application of Low Impact Development BMPs in WWHM3 July 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, James Hunter Purdue University.
Regulatory Developments Affecting Southwest Washington Land Use in Southwestern Washington Law Seminars International Vancouver, WA February 11, 2008 Bill.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Stormwater Management and Elements of Low Impact Development Protecting Our Water Resources – An Ecological Approach to Land.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
Lisa Hair, PE, USEPA 2012 USACE Silver Jackets Workshop.
Purdue Status Report Summer Meeting 2012 Midwest Spatial Decision Support Interest Group EPA Region 5 July 9, 2012 Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, Youn Shik.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Hydromodification Compliance in the Bay Area
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
ASCE LID Conference LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington November 17, 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
WWHM3 LID Stormwater Modeling Snohomish County August 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Module 5: WinSLAMM v 9.1 Model Features Robert Pitt, P.E., Ph.D. Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama John.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, James Hunter
LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
Doug Beyerlein, P.E., Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Western Washington Hydrology Model Presented at the 2005 AWRA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA © Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Clear Creek Solutions’ Hydrology Expertise Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., provides complete range of hydrologic and stormwater modeling services. Clear Creek specializes in continuous simulation hydrologic modeling. We have 30+ years of experience modeling complex hydrologic and stormwater problems. We created WWHM3 for Washington State Department of Ecology and are adapting it to model Bay Area watersheds and facilities. We teach WWHM and HSPF workshops.

Presentation Introduction WWHM Background and Theory WWHM and HSPF WWHM Application Adaptation to Other Regions Questions & Answers

WWHM Introduction Developed for the State of Washington Department of Ecology. Project Manager: Dr. Foroozan Labib Department of Ecology PO Box Olympia, WA (360)

WWHM Introduction Developed for the 19 counties of western Washington. Part of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual

WWHM Introduction Available free from the Washington State Department of Ecology web site:

WWHM Background and Theory Washington State Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual updated in 2001 to comply with:  Federal Clean Water Act  Federal Endangered Species Act  State Water Pollution Control Act

WWHM Background and Theory Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual  Specifies a flow duration standard  Requires the use of Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM)

WWHM Background and Theory Flow duration standard: based on erosive flows.

WWHM Background and Theory Flow Duration Analysis: Percent of time the flow exceeds a specific value. Requires continuous simulation hydrology to compute flow duration.

WWHM Background and Theory Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. Stormwater runoff = surface runoff + interflow.

Where the rain goes: Forest Impervious Evapotranspiration 0% 100% Surface Runoff Interflow Groundwater/Base Flow Land use development

Ponds designed based on a single event are too small.  Single-event flow frequency standards are based on inappropriate assumptions.  The need is to NOT increase flow durations for the range of erosive flows (for Western Washington the range is from 1/2 of the 2-year to 50-year flow event).

Inappropriate assumptions used by single event methods:  Assume stormwater detention facilities are empty at start of a rain event.  Assume too large predevelopment runoff when using SCS Curve Numbers.  Assume matching flow frequencies will result in no increase in erosive flows.

Ponds designed using single- event methods fail because:  The ponds are too small to store the additional runoff.  The number of hours of erosive flows increases even if the flow frequency does not.  The downstream riparian corridor is damaged by the increase of erosive flows.

WWHM Capabilities WWHM uses continuous simulation hydrology to compute stormwater runoff for both predevelopment and post-development conditions. Predevelopment Post-development

WWHM Capabilities  WWHM continuous simulation computations from HSPF (included in WWHM software).  HSPF runs in the background with calibrated parameter values and local meteorological data.  HSPF sponsored and funded by EPA and USGS.

How HSPF works  Drainage areas are divided into pervious land segments based on soil, vegetation, and land slope and impervious land segments.  Pervious and impervious segments are linked to conveyance pathways (pipes, ditches, ponds, streams, rivers, lakes, etc.)  Historic rainfall and evaporation are used as input.

How HSPF works  The entire water cycle is modeled on an hourly or shorter time step for multiple years.  The model computes changes in soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and runoff every time step.  Three types of runoff:  surface runoff  interflow  groundwater/base flow

How HSPF works  Pervious and impervious parameter values are calibrated using observed streamflow data.  Calibration uses multiple years of observed flow data so that the model is calibrated for both dry years and wet years.  We use a number of different statistical tests to judge the accuracy of the calibration.

How WWHM works  Calibrated parameter values are built into WWHM (different calibrated parameter values are used for different climatic regions).  Local precipitation and evaporation data are included in WWHM.

How WWHM works  User locates project on county map, inputs pre- and post-development land use, and proposed mitigation measure(s).  Predevelopment and mitigated flows are compared at Point of Compliance (POC).  Mitigated flows are not allowed to exceed flow duration standards.

How WWHM works  User outputs report file and project file.  Output files can be submitted to the permitting agency for approval.  Permitting agency can load project file and rerun analysis, if needed.  Report file summarizes input data and output results.

How WWHM works  Guidance/help is provided by  User Manual  Training Workshops  CCS Project Book

WWHM Application: Example: Convert forest to suburban residential housing.

WWHM Application: Step 1 User selects land development location and places red dot on map.

WWHM Application: Step 2 User inputs pre- and post-development land use. Pre: Forest Post: roof, street, landscaping, & pond

WWHM Application: Step 2 cont’d. User inputs initial pond specifications or uses AutoPond to optimize pond size.

WWHM Application: Step 3 WWHM computes and compares predevelopment and post-development routed runoff statistics Flow frequency (2-year to 100-year):

WWHM Application: Step 3 cont’d. WWHM compares predevelopment and post-development routed runoff statistics Flow duration (50% of 2-year to 100% of 50-year):

WWHM Application: Step 3 cont’d. WWHM identifies water quality flow rates and volumes for separate treatment facilities based on Washington treatment standard of 91% of total runoff volume:

WWHM Application: Step 4 WWHM output summarizes statistics and whether or not the facility meets Washington State Department of Ecology’s standards:

WWHM Application: Step 4 WWHM designed pond meets Washington State Department of Ecology’s standards:

WWHM: LID Options WWHM includes the following LID options:  Dispersion of impervious surface runoff on adjacent pervious surface (example: roof runoff to lawn)  Infiltration of impervious surface runoff on adjacent pervious surface (soil dependent)  Pervious pavement  PSAT (Puget Sound Action Team) recommends how to represent other LIDs in WWHM

WWHM LID Analysis Tool: WWHM compares different development options selected by the user and shows the runoff distribution: POC 1: Conventional POC 2: Dispersion (20% reduction in pond volume) POC 3: Dispersion and Infiltration (84% reduction in pond volume)

WWHM Adaptation to Other Regions  HSPF model construction/calibration/parameterization  Meteorological data  Interface modification  AutoPond rules  Documentation and user manual  Training workshops  Maintenance and support  Distribution

WWHM Future Enhancements  low impact development/source BMPs  wetland modeling  hydraulic routing  HSPF water quality  3-D graphical interface  your ideas?

Questions? Call Doug Beyerlein Joe Brascher