U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
American Water Raw Water Quality Not Textbook? Just Pilot! Iron Removal with High pH Raw Water March 27, 2008 Sandy Kutzing, P.E., CDM Eric Hahn, P.E.,
Advertisements

Tertiary Treatment of Domestic Wastewater By
Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
TREATMENT OF WATER The available raw water has to be treated to make it fit. It should satisfy the physical, chemical and bacteriological standards. The.
Gregory Korshin and Steve Reiber Gregory Korshin and Steve Reiber (partly based on materials prepared for the American.
IX1 Arsenic Removal by Ion Exchange Joe Chwirka - Camp Dresser & McKee Bruce Thomson - University of New Mexico
Environmental Engineering Lecture 8. Disinfection  As practiced in water treatment, disinfection refers to operations aimed at killing or rendering harmless,
ARSENIC REMOVAL Case History Milos Markovic. Arsenic removal m3/day Plant in Subotica-SERBIA.
Energy Advisory Board Water Treatment Rifle, Colorado - March 1, 2007.
Water Treatment Part 3 Groundwater Treatment
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 5: Water Treatment (2) Coagulation and flocculation Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of.
Lecture # 2 Water Quality Standards ParameterConcentration (mg/L) Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 ) Ammonia (NH 3 -N unionized)
How nutrients, soil particles and chemistry fit together
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
Water treatment processes ENV H 440/ENV H 545 John Scott Meschke Office: Suite 2249, 4225 Roosevelt Phone:
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
Filtration A “polishing” solid/liquid separation step Intended to remove particles Other impacts –biodegradation –organics adsorption (especially to GAC)
1 Virginia Water Treatment Plant under construction
RSSCT Adsorptive Media Compare RSSCT = Rapid Small Scale Column Testing  days test duration  Up to 5 medias / columns  Equipment available.
Environmental Engineering Field Session Water Treatment Module May 22 – May 29, 2015.
JEFF VANSTEENBURG IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Arsenic Removal/Reduction at the Point of Use in Small Water Systems.
OXIDATION PROCESSES IN DRINKING WATER TREATMENT
Waupun Utilities Water Treatment Facility. Treatment Processes Source Water Pretreatment System Reverse Osmosis System Post Treatment System Distribution.
Fundamentals of Radium and Uranium Removal from Drinking Water Supplies Dennis Clifford University of Houston.
COLOR REMOVAL Why? and How?. WHERE DOES “COLOR”COME FROM?  For the purpose of this discussion, we will stick totally to organic color, since organics.
Iron and Manganese Removal
POU Arsenic Removal Team DHMO Justin Ferrentino Barry Schnorr Haixian Huang David Harrison.
KEITH ALLEN, P.E., BCEE WATER/WASTEWATER AUGUST 6, 2015 Groundwater.
Control of Nitrification at Willmar, MN. John T. O’Connor Bart Murphy Tom O’Connor.
Treatment Options Part 1 Tom Sorg Darren Lytle Water Supply and Water Resources Division Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection.
USEPA Regulations By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant Presented to Entrepreneurs Association of Bari.
IV. Water Chemistry A. pH, hardness, and other ionic compounds and gases affecting water quality.
CTC 450 Review Water processing.
Depending on the Size of the S&R Program, Additional Facilities May Be Required Groundwater Production Wells Imported Water Treatment Plant Capacity Wellhead.
Water Conditioning Process
New Jersey American Water Springfield Water Treatment Plant Planning and Design.
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 3: Water Treatment Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of Civil Engineering First Semester,
1 Waste Treatment, Chemical ENVE Why Treat Waste Have a RCRA Waste –TSDS –Treat instead of disposal, landfill –Treat before disposal Or treat in.
Technologies for Radon & Radionuclide Removal Tom Sorg U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Sourcewater coag/settling filtration storage elevated tank consumer Optimizing the chemistry in a water treatment plant.
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
1 Feasibility of Water Treatment Technologies for Arsenic and Fluoride Removal 9 th Annual Joint Services Environmental Management Conference Brian C.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
ENVR 403 Introduction to Environmental Chemistry Philip C. Singer Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Environmental Engineering Lecture 7 Dr. Hasan Hamouda.
Arsenic Treatment Technologies Christopher A. Impellitteri USEPA/ORD/WSWRD/WQMB Water Technologies for Rural Texas Tuesday, December 2, 2003.
DISINFECTION CE326 PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Iowa State University Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Tim Ellis,
WTP Operator Training: Water Chemistry Missouri Water and Wastewater Conference Dr. John T. O’Connor, PE Tom O’Connor, PE.
DISINFECTION CE326 PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
The Water Cycle. What are some things that you think are in your water?
Water Treatment: Disinfection Processes Current Technology vs. Alternatives.
CEE 160L – Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Lecture 9 Drinking Water.
HOUSEHOLD WATER TREATMENT. Water Quality Problems Recommendations New source Pollution control Maintenance + inspection Treatment Explore all of them.
Lecture3_water purification, ChemEng, KKU, M.Thabuot MEMBRANE: Microfiltration Simple screening mechanism Pore size 0.01 μm - 10 μm  P  0.01 to 0.5 MPa.
USEPA Arsenic Technology Demonstration Program
CTC 450 Review Water processing.
Water Treatment Basics
Boiler System Make-up Water Primary Secondary Pretreatment
WATER QUALITY (Chapter 22)
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
Particle separation: Chemical precipitation
Private Homeowner Drinking Water Issues
Methodology and Processes for Mine Water Treatment February 25, 2015
TERTIARY TREATMENT METHODS
General Definition Membrane Processes include a broad range of seperation processes from filtration to ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis. A semi-permeable.
Ecologically Effective Metals Adsorption Sorbster® Media Wastewater, leachates, ground water, process water, and ponds.
Sea water Reverse Osmosis
ENG421 (4c) – Water Quality Management
Water Treatment Processes
Arsenic Lisa Miller Water Quality Engineer Golden State Water Company
Presentation transcript:

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Technologies for Arsenic Removal Tom Sorg U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Arsenic Chemistry Two primary valence states As (III) As (V)

Arsenic III H3AsO30 H2AsO3-1 HAsO3-2

Arsenic V H3AsO40 H2AsO4-1 HAsO4-2 AsO4-3

As V more effectively removed Why is arsenic form important? Final Answer! As V more effectively removed by ALL technologies

Example! Treatment Process Percent Removal As III As V Iron Coag/Filt - pH 7 55 97 Alum Coag/Filt - pH 7 18 95

Example! Ion exchange treatment As III - 0 percent removal As V - 98+ percent removal

Arsenic Occurrence Surface waters predominantly As(V) Ground waters generally As(III), but not always

Arsenic Speciation Method On site anion exchange separation As III, As V As V As V retained on resin column As III passes through column As III

Arsenic Speciation - Anion separation of AsIII/AsV

As III easily oxidized to As V Good News! As III easily oxidized to As V by several oxidants

As III Oxidation Study Dr. Dennis Clifford Univ. of Houston Oxidants Studied 1. Free Chlorine 2. Chloramine 3. Ozone 4. Chlorine Dioxide 5. UV Radiation 6. Potassium Permanganate 7. Oxidizing Media

Arsenic Removal Processes Precipitative processes Adsorption processes Ion Exchange process Iron Removal processes Membrane processes POU/POE devices

Arsenic Removal Processes Emerging processes Iron coagulation with microfiltration Iron based adsorption media

Precipitative Processes Process Removal Coagulation/ 95 % Filtration Lime softening 85+ %

Adsorption Processes Processes Removal Activated Alumina 90+ % Iron Media 90+ %

Ion Exchange 95 + % removal

Iron Removal Processes Process Removal Oxidation/filtration 80+ % Manganese greensand 80+ % (Dependent on amount of Fe)

Membrane Processes Process Removal Reverse osmosis (RO) 90+ % Nanofiltration (NF) 65-90 % Ultrafiltration (UF) 35-75 %

Arsenic Removal Processes Large Systems Using Surface Waters Coagulation/filtration Direct filtration Lime softening

Arsenic Removal Processes Large Systems Using Ground Waters Lime softening Membrane Separation Processes -reverse osmosis (RO) -ultrafiltration (UF -electrodialysis reversal (EDR) Iron Removal processes - oxidation/filtration

Arsenic Removal Processes Small Systems Using Surface Waters Coagulation/filtration package plants Iron Removal processes - oxidation/filtration Lime softening package plants

Arsenic Removal Processes Small Systems Using Ground Waters Anion Exchange Activated Alumina adsorption Iron Removal processes - oxid/filt. Membrane Separation Processes -reverse osmosis (RO) -ultrafiltration (UF) -electrodialysis reversal (EDR)

Arsenic Removal Processes Very Small Community Option Point-of-use systems -RO, AA Point-of-entry systems -RO, Ion Exchange

Evaluation of Treatment Plant Performance Investigator - Battelle, Columbus, OH Processes - 5 Conventional Coag. -- 2 Systems Lime Softening ------- 1 System Iron Removal ----------2 Systems Anion Exchange -------2 Systems Activated Alumina ----2 Systems

AA System - Source Water Quality (Avg) Analysis - ug/L CS (30) Total As 63 Particulate As 2 Soluble As 66 As III <1 As V 66 (100%) pH - Units 8.4 Hardness – mg/L 37 Sulfate – mg/L 14 Alkalinity - mg/L 57

Activated Alumina System - New Hampshire Non regeneration system A A Roughing filter Polishing filter B B

Activated Alumina System, 20 gpm - NH

Activated Alumina System, NH

IE System - Source Water Quality (Avg) Analysis - ug/L MMA (45) Total As 57 Particulate As <1 Soluble As 57 As III <1 As V 57 (100%) pH - Units 8.3 Hardness – mg/L 38 Sulfate – mg/L 45 Alkalinity - mg/L 64

Ion Exchange System, ME A B Mixed bed resin Oxidizing filter media KMnO4 regeneration A B Mixed bed resin

Ion Exchange System with Oxidizing Filter, ME 2 gpm

Ion Exchange System, ME

Iron Media System, MI Source Water Quality Parameter Concentration - mg/L Arsenic 0.025 - 0.041 As III 85 % As V 15 % Calcium 80 - 90 Magnesium 34 - 35 Iron 1.06 - 1.35 Manganese 0.02 - 0.03 Sulfate 21 - 30 Silica 19 - 20 pH 7.1 - 7.2

Iron Media System, MI Distribution system Well Tank 1A Tank 2A Tank 3A Cl2 Acid Tank 1B Tank 2B Tank 3B Softener Distribution system

Iron Media System, MI

Iron Media System, MI

As V is dominant in oxygenated waters SUMMARY Soluble arsenic occurs in natural water in the As III and As V oxidation states. As V is dominant in oxygenated waters As III is dominant in anoxic water

Treatment processes remove As V more effectively than As III SUMMARY Treatment processes remove As V more effectively than As III As III can be converted to As V with strong oxidants

SUMMARY Most conventional treatment processes have capability to reduce arsenic to less than 10 ug/L, many to to 5 ug/L or less.

Tom Sorg USEPA Cincinnati, OH 45268 513-569-7370 sorg.thomas@epa.gov