2 nd Annual FFT Symposium, April 23 & 24, 2009 Cricket Mitchell, PhD Research Associate, Child and Families Team, CIMH California FFT Outcome Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Skagit Wraparound Data and Statistics. Client Demographics Total of 28 youth and their families. One (1) youth was a readmission which results in an actual.
Advertisements

Background: The low retention rates among African Americans in substance abuse treatment (Milligan et al., 2004) combined with the limited number of treatments.
The National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Matthew D. Kliethermes Ph.D. 1, Steven E. Bruce Ph.D.
The Catalyst Group, LLC Adolescent Residential Treatment Initiative I Mua Mau Ohana Project Preliminary Findings Richard Kim, Ph.D. 03/03/2005 Funded by.
Site Dev Highlighted article or topic – Transport Findings Update and Summary _____________________________________ Website: Pre Sonja Schoenwald, Ph.D.
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant CiMH Palette of Measures Evaluation Training: How I Think Questionnaire (HIT)
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Keeping Kids in School:
The Effect of Music, Visual Imagery, and Guided Imagery on a Pain Pressure Task J. Jordan Hamson-Utley, PhD, ATC/LAT, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah.
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CiMH Senior Associate
11 Triple P Outcomes in California Arizona Child Trauma Summit April 9, 2013 Cricket Mitchell, PhD Senior Associate, CiMH.
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant
Evaluation of HCHD community behavior health program Evaluators: - Charles Begley - Scott Hickey - Britta Ostermeyer - Ann Teske - Thien Vu.
The Learning Behaviors Scale
Nursing Care Makes A Difference The Application of Omaha Documentation System on Clients with Mental Illness.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
1 Predictors of Retention in Care Among HIV+ and At-Risk Youth Sion Kim Harris, PhD Cathryn L. Samples, MD, MPH Peter Keenan, RN, C-PNP Durrell J. Fox,
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant CiMH Palette of Measures Evaluation Training: Center for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D)
Research Day Sustainable TeleHealthcare delivery model for diverse socio-economic communities in New York City.
New Mexico Asian Family Center FY12 Client Demographics July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012.
Overview of Phase I Data: Approach and Findings Gary Bess Associates April 15, 2009.
FFT in California: Evaluation Outcomes Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Consultant April 3, 2008.
ADCANP/CTF Program Evaluation: RFP Training April 6 – 9, 2010 M. Felicia Woerner, MA Debra Nelson-Gardell, Ph.D., LCSW The University of Alabama School.
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant CiMH Palette of Measures Evaluation Training: Youth Outcome Questionnaires (YOQs)
Delaware Birth to Three Early Intervention System Evaluation: Child Outcomes July 15, 2004 Conference Call Series: Measuring Child Outcomes “Examples of.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
ABSTRACT The current study identified the factors related to exercisers’ self-talk and exercise adherence. Hardy (2006) defined self-talk as “(a) verbalizations.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of NAMI’s In Our Own Voice (IOOV) Education Program Amy L. Wood, Ph.D. George Mason University NAMI Convention Presentation.
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant CiMH Palette of Measures Evaluation Training: Skill Streaming Checklists.
MARY GUINTU ANUSHA GUMMADI NABIL MONTEZ JENNIFER ZELAYA Physical Activity and It Effects on Mood.
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
A Systems Approach to Improving Substance Abuse Treatment for Latino Youth: Latino Caucus of the APHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2006 URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER.
Wraparound in Washington State: Coordinating Care and Why it Matters Skagit Results: Dawn Scott and Terrance Ellison Pilot Site Results: Ericka Wiggins.
Patient and Staff Satisfaction in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Programs A. Kulaga 1, B. McClure 1, J. Rotrosen 1, P. Crits-Christoph 2, S. Ring-Kurtz.
1 Evaluating the Orange County School Mobile Assessment and Response Team (SMART) Association for Criminal Justice Research, California 63rd Semi-Annual.
Western Heights Public Schools February 15, 2013 A District’s Implementation of Cohort-Based Accountability: Tracking Academic Performance and Non-Academic.
Early Adolescent Behaviors in Disagreement with Best Friend Predictive of Later Emotional Repair Abilities Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S.
Edward F. Garrido, Ph.D. and Heather N. Taussig, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of.
CEACEA CENTROCENTRO DE ESTUDIOS EN ADICCION Testing an Intervention Model to Reduce HIV/AIDS Among Hispanic Drug Users Residing in Puerto Rico Robles RR,
ISES Presentation Slides. Context & Background Approximately 46,000 children are assessed two times per year This data is used to support Indicator 7.
An exploratory analysis of Latino risk and protective health factors in a community sample Julie Gast, PhD, MSCHES, Terry Peak, MSW, PhD, & Jason J. Leiker,
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Building the NCSC Summative Assessment: Towards a Stage- Adaptive Design Sarah Hagge, Ph.D., and Anne Davidson, Ed.D. McGraw-Hill Education CTB CCSSO New.
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
 1,001 adolescent boys (47%) and girls (53%)  Fairly diverse: 58% Caucasian; 23% African American,12% Hispanic, 2% Asian, 5% Other  Age Range:
Cricket Mitchell, PhD CIMH Evaluation Consultant CiMH Palette of Measures Evaluation Training: Aggression Questionnaire (AQ)
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
February,  2002 – CalSWEC, RTAs/IUC began development of CC training  Part of an overall strategic plan for child welfare training evaluation.
Faculty Demographics Faculty Demographics Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*
Conclusions  These results suggest that the relationship between mother pain catastrophizing and the provision of negative attention and activity restriction.
Spring ABOUT THE CHKS  SPONSOR California Department of Education  Anonymous, voluntary, confidential student self- report, comprehensive health.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research Child and Youth Data Laboratory CYDL Project One Symposium K-12 and Post-Secondary Educational.
Effect of Fresh Fruit Availability at Worksites on the Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Low-Wage Employees Curtis Granger Network for a Healthy California—Worksite.
Stress Management Groups: A Method for Reaching More Patients and Resident Education Rebekah Pershing, Psy.D. Theresa Lengerich, Psy.D. Angela N. Fellner,
FUNCTIONAL FAMILY THERAPY ADMINISTRATORS Tracye Jones, LMFT, MBA SHIELDS for Families, Inc. FFT State Consultant.
The Clinical Services Systems – our tool to evaluate services
Indiana (8 Counties, Southeastern)
What is a Research Clinic?
EBP Symposium April 27, 2012 Cricket Mitchell, PhD
Examination of the Relationship Between Nutrition Media Literacy and Soft Drink Consumption Among Adolescents – Preliminary Findings Martin H. Evans*,
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
First 5 Sonoma County Triple P Implementation & Evaluation
Arely M. Hurtado1,2, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Deanna L. Stammer1
Presentation transcript:

2 nd Annual FFT Symposium, April 23 & 24, 2009 Cricket Mitchell, PhD Research Associate, Child and Families Team, CIMH California FFT Outcome Evaluation

2 Overview of Symposium Recent FFT Community Development Team Dashboard ReportRecent FFT Community Development Team Dashboard Report –Spring 2009 –Estimated distribution: May 2008 ElementsElements –Who’s served –Service delivery information –Program outcomes

3 Recent FFT Outcome Evaluation Dashboard Report (handout)

Spring 2009 Outcome Evaluation Dashboard Report CSS data download February 2009CSS data download February 2009 –Reflecting youth served from each program’s inception thru 1/31/09 29 sites29 sites 133 active therapists133 active therapists –Active at the time of the CSS data download 4

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Who is Served Table 1: FFT StatusTable 1: FFT Status –“Entry Rate” The proportion of youth referred for FFT who have at least one session. –“Dropout Rate” The proportion of youth who started FFT and did not advance to the generalization phase. 5

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Who is Served 6 Table 1. FFT Status – Clients Referred to Active FFT Therapists (N=2473) Entry RateDropout Rate 94.5% (n=2337) 36.3% (n=849)

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Who is Served 7 Table 2. Client Demographics – Youth Served by Active Therapists Who Entered FFT (n=2337) GenderEthnicity Age (in years) Female Male African- American Asian/ Pacific Islander Biracial Caucasian Hispanic/ Latino Other 14.3 n= % n= % n= % n= % n=23 5.9% n= % n= % n= % n=38

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Service Delivery Information Table 3: FFT Process DataTable 3: FFT Process Data –Families with at least one session in Behavior Change At least one pre-FFT YOQ (youth self-report, mother, and/or father) At least one CPQ completed in Engagement & Motivation and/or Behavior Change (youth self- report, mother, and/or father) –Indicates therapist adherence to FFT protocol 8

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Service Delivery Information 9 Table 3. FFT Process Data – Youth Served by Active Therapists Who Had At Least One Session in the Behavior Change Phase (n=1647) Families With At Least One Completed Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) Prior to FFT (Pre-YOQ) Families With At Least One Completed Counseling Process Questionnaire (CPQ) in Engagement & Motivation and/or Behavior Change 76.6% (n=1262) 65.3% (n=1076)

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Service Delivery Information Table 4: FFT Process Data (slide 1 of 2)Table 4: FFT Process Data (slide 1 of 2) –“Completed FFT” At least one session in Generalization AND At least one outcome measure (TOM, COMs, YOQs, any informant) 10

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Service Delivery Information Table 4: FFT Process Data (slide 2 of 2)Table 4: FFT Process Data (slide 2 of 2) –For youth who have Completed FFT Average number of sessions in each phase CPQ data, by informant, for the Generalization Phase –Average score for core items 1-16 (7-point Likert scale) –The percent improvement in scores from item 17 to 18 (“How good or bad were things when you first started coming” compared to “How good or bad are things now”) 11

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Service Delivery Information 12 Table 4. FFT Process Data – Youth Served by Active Therapists Who Completed FFT (n=884) Average Number of Sessions Counseling Process Questionnaire (CPQ) Data: Generalization Phase TotalE & MB. C.Gen. Mother ReportFather ReportYouth Report Avg 1-16 % ↑ Avg 1-16 % ↑ Avg 1-16 % ↑ %5.9141%6.0138%

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Program Outcomes Table 5: FFT Outcome DataTable 5: FFT Outcome Data –For youth who have Completed FFT Percent improvement in YOQ & YOQ-SR total scores from pre- to post-FFT (mother, father, youth client) Possible YOQ/YOQ-SR total scores range -16 to 240 Clinical cutpoint YOQ = 47 Clinical cutpoint YOQ-SR = 46 13

FFT Dashboard Report Spring 2009 Program Outcomes 14 Table 5. FFT Outcome Data – Youth Served by Active Therapists Who Completed FFT (n=884) Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) – Percent Improvement Pre/Post MotherFatherYouth 27.0%** (n=536) [pre=65.6] 19.4%** (n=163) [pre=64.0] 21.1%** (n=620) [pre=52.2] **A statistically significant improvement, p<.01.

Interpreting FFT Outcomes Reported in Spring 2009 On average, for youth who participate in California’s FFT programs…On average, for youth who participate in California’s FFT programs… – Mothers report a 27% improvement and fathers report a 19% improvement in their overall mental health functioning (as assessed by the Youth Outcome Questionnaire © ). 15

Interpreting FFT Outcomes Reported in Spring 2009 On average, youth who participate in California’s FFT programs…On average, youth who participate in California’s FFT programs… –Self-report a 21% improvement in their overall mental health functioning (as assessed by the Youth Outcome Questionnaire–Self-Report © ). 16

Interpreting FFT Outcomes Reported in Spring 2009 FFT is performing equally well across gender and ethnicity in California’s programsFFT is performing equally well across gender and ethnicity in California’s programs –Follow-up analyses of aggregate data revealed no significant differences in FFT entry rate, dropout rate, or program outcomes by gender or ethnicity 17

18 Questions & Discussion

19 The End For More Information Contact Cricket Mitchell, PhDContact Cricket Mitchell, PhD Cell phone: