J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Status of the LHC optics T. Persson on behalf of the OMC-team.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner Hector Garcia Morales 25 th of January.
Trajectory Correction and Tuning James Jones Anthony Scarfe.
1 Experience at ATF To get a low emittance beam Junji Urakawa KEK Circumference: m Arc Cell Type: FOBO Number of Arc Cells: 36 Energy: GeV.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
Beam Tests of DFS & WFS at FACET Andrea Latina, J. Pfingstner, D. Schulte, D. Pellegrini (CERN), E. Adli (Univ. of Oslo) With the help of F.J. Decker,
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Technical Board ATF2 GM FF progress report A.Jeremie ATF2 GM System team: K.Artoos, C.Charrondière, A.Jeremie, J.Pfingstner (a lot of figures from him),
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
CERN, BE-ABP-CC3 Jürgen Pfingstner Verification of the Design of the Beam-based Controller Jürgen Pfingstner 2. June 2009.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 15 th of.
ATF DR Overview Introduction Low emittance history Present status S.Kuroda ( KEK ) GDE Review 3rd Apr.2013.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
J. Pfingstner, LCWS13 Jitter and ground motion studies November 13, 2013 Beam jitter at ATF2: A. Source localisation and B. Ground motion correlation Jürgen.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
1 Update on Tuning Studies for the ILC and Application to the ATF2 James Jones ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 12 th of.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
ATF Damping Ring in 2010 autumn Multibunch instability study Measurement (S. Kuroda, T. Naito and K. Kubo) and Calculation of ion trapping (Kubo)
Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault, Brossard, P. Bambade (LAL) Main goal : - Try to improve.
Vibrations studies for the nominal optics and the ultra-low beta optics Benoît BOLZON 1 B. Bolzon, A. Jeremie (LAPP) P. Bambade, Y. Renier (LAL) A. Seryi.
Ground motion studies at ATF2 June 11, 2014 Orbit jitter source identification via ground motion studies at ATF2 (Results of the June run) Marcin Patecki,
FJPPL-FKPPL ATF2 Workshop Jitter studies March 18, 2014 Beam jitter localization and identification at ATF2 Marcin Patecki Jürgen Pfingstner 18 th of March.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
APEX Studies: Accelerating w. Near 3 rd Order Resonance Vincent, Al, Michiko, Steve, Don, Yun, Guillaume, Mei, Todd, Wolfram, Greg, …
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
APEX RUN-11 APEX Schedule May 11, 2011 Injection 12am8am BBA Minty, Jordan, Liu, Rob, Rob, Kevin, … Spin Flipper Bai, Pablo, Oddo, Craig, Kevin IPM calibration.
AGS FY11 Summary RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 5/6/11.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
M. Woodley ATF Studies Meeting (April 30, 2008) 1 QM7R Vertical Bump Study March 14, 2008.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Beam jitter experiment of exchanging power supplies
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Status of the ASTRID2 facility
Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Tuning and Alignment of the ATF2
The new 7BA design of BAPS
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
BI cont. *** Summary Matching Monitor test *** We only had ~15minutes of inject and dump, but managed to see a profile with ~9e9 p (!)
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Presentation transcript:

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Introduction and method

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Motivation Errors due to beta functions due the field errors result in beta beating. This deviation from the perfect beta function can lead to: -Problems at injection and extraction (matching and losses). -Blow up of the extracted emittance. The vertical emittance in a damping ring is mainly determined by the coupling between horizontal and vertical plane. Coupling correction is important to lower the vertical emittance. Therefore: Beta function and coupling correction can lower especially the vertical emittance! In this work we try to correct the beta function first.

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Measurement of tune and beta functions with NAF Turn-by-turn measurement 1.Tune measurement FFT of injection oscillations Optimised FFT used (SUSSIX/NAF) Info about form of spectrum (spikes) is included in estimation 2. Beta function Relative beta functions can be inferred from relative amplitude of BPM data. Absolute scale, by normalising size to model beta functions Principle: Interpolated FFT FFT

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Beta function correction 1.Trim correctors on quadrupoles are used to change optics. 2.Change of beta and tune for unit chance is recorded (R measurement). 3.Calculate corrector changes Δc so that target beta function is created. Therefor solve: 1.Additionally weights are used for different compoents (degrees of freedom)

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Results in June

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Beta function measurement at XSR location Calculate the emittance in the ring from beta function and beam size measurement at XSR monitor location Extracted emittance has not been measured

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Results in November

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Problem with certain BPMs Due to the varying measurement results in certain BPMs, the raw data were plotted There was a problem in BPMs 13, 22, 41, 42, 47, 77, 87, 88 BPM 5 BPM 77 turn reading

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Improvements of Software robustness Problems with response matrix measurement: Try to measure the response matrix of the beta function and tune due to change of trim coils of all 99 quadrupoles Beam was lost several times, which caused warnings/errors in measurement program After 2 1/2 hours (of 3 hours) measurement program crashed Correction could not be applied Improvements in Software (error handling): In case too many BPMs are noisy in one run (e.g. beam loss): user is asked if measurement should be repeated If the specified current values for the trim coils are out of bound they are automatically limited. After each corrector, results are stored so that the measurement can be resumed at any time. Still want to implement that if too much current is lost in the DR during the measurement the step size is automatically reduced.

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Correction of the beta functions With improvements R measurement worked. Now all correctors and BPMs that have been detected to have problems at one measurement are not used for the correction Correction: -During the first correction attempt, the beam was lost. -The main cause was that the tune was strongly changed by the corrector changes -After putting a higher weight on the tune, the beam current in the DR stayed mainly the same and beta functions were corrected (see next slide) -Emittance was not reduced and stayed around 13pm -The correction was not very stable and dependent on the actual BPM measurement

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Beta function before correction Measured optics functions (red) fitted quite well with the model (blue) Emittance was 13.3 pm BPM index beta x [m] beta y [m]

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Beta function after correction Good correction in x, but not much change in y Emittance was 12.8 pm BPM index beta x [m] beta y [m]

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Conclusions Got started with the use of the software Some changes to make the scripts more robust have been implemented The response matrix was measured The corrections corrected the beta function, but could not lower the emittance below 13pm Future work Still some open degrees of freedom in the scaling (x vs. y) Some ideas how the correction could be made more robust (matrix conditioning) Include coupling correction Graphical interface Beta function measurement function is already regularly used by operators

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Thank you for your attention!