1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, 2006 15 slides.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Advertisements

Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015 Southeast Florida Status of Model Developments Model Coordinators D4: Min-Tang Li D6: Phil Steinmiller.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Before-and-After Studies – Examples Session 12 Interstate MAX LRT in Portland Joe Recker,
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
2012 Citilabs Asia User Conference
1 Florida Model Task Force Cube Base dynamic bandwidths, node/point, colors dynamic intersection displays model status geoprocessing to calculate.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
Florida Statewide Model Task Force November 12-13, 2003 Orlando, FL.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Bill Davidson | PB | | Dawn McKinstry | PB | | Marie-Elsie Dowell | PB |
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Technical Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 12 th, slides.
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion & Support Survey Model Task Force Meeting December 2006.
Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Survey Applied Research.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
A Simple Methodology to Evaluate the Disproportionate Impacts of Fare and Service Changes on Protected Populations in a Fixed Guide-way System By Vijay.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
1 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting.
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Analytical Reporting of Travel Forecasts Using Summit Nazrul Islam Office of Planning & Environment Federal Transit Administration.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.
December 12, 2006 Florida Model Task Force CORRADINO 1 Treasure Coast Southeast Florida Regional Planning Models In Cube Voyager.
TPB Travel Forecasting Model, Version 2.3: Specification, Validation, and User’s Guide (Draft Report) Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
1 Florida’s New Transit Modeling System Huiwei Shen, Yongqiang Wu & Dave Schmitt 11 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Daytona Beach, Florida May.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
1 A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Approach to Planning for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports (TO ) (Quarterly Meeting)
Use of Journey Levels for Hierarchical Transit Assignment
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Travel Modelling Group Technical Advisory Committee
Travel Modelling Group
Transit Path-Building: “To Multipath or Not to Multipath”
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
presented to MTF Transit Committee
Transit Survey White Paper
  Use of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in FSUTMS in Support of Transportation Planning in Florida FDOT Research #BDK80 Task Work Order No June.
Presentation transcript:

1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides

2 Transit Path-Builders Two types: single-path & multi-path Two types: single-path & multi-path Single-path Single-path Exclusively available in Tranplan, Minutp & TP+ Exclusively available in Tranplan, Minutp & TP+ Dominant path-builder in Florida & US Dominant path-builder in Florida & US Multi-path Multi-path Available in TransCAD & Cube-Voyager (PT) Available in TransCAD & Cube-Voyager (PT) Becoming more prevalent Becoming more prevalent

3 Multi-Path vs. Single-Path OD Local Bus Rail/Shuttle Express Bus Path Weighted Time Single-Path Skim Values Multi-Path Skim Values Rail/Shuttle 55 min 100%45% Local Bus 90 min --20% Express Bus 65 min --35% Also loading percentages!

4 Recommended Strategy Short-term (next 2-5 years) Short-term (next 2-5 years) Using PT ‘best-path’ Using PT ‘best-path’ Two levels of modeling guidelines Two levels of modeling guidelines General – for ‘everyday’ modeling (e.g., LRTPs) General – for ‘everyday’ modeling (e.g., LRTPs) New/Small Starts – for specialized studies (e.g., FTA-related AAs) New/Small Starts – for specialized studies (e.g., FTA-related AAs) Long-term Long-term Migrate to PT multi-path model design Migrate to PT multi-path model design Between short- & long-term Between short- & long-term Coordinate with Citilabs & FTA to test new versions of PT & discuss New Starts issues Coordinate with Citilabs & FTA to test new versions of PT & discuss New Starts issues

5 Status / Next Steps Developed “framework” documents to summarize key points Developed “framework” documents to summarize key points Theoretical – coordination of individual parts Theoretical – coordination of individual parts Application – parameter settings, technical details Application – parameter settings, technical details Both available on Both available on FDOT gathering feedback FDOT gathering feedback Will continue to finalize details & procedures Will continue to finalize details & procedures Need for more speed/delay studies and local transit on- board studies Need for more speed/delay studies and local transit on- board studies Transit model training workshop: June 4-7, 2007 Transit model training workshop: June 4-7, 2007

6 Guidelines – Tiers Tier Transit Service Data Availability Examples A Local service only; no park-and-rides System-wide boardings & transfer rates Polk County, SunTran B Local & express service; some park-and-rides System-wide boardings & transfer rates; May have recent on-board survey Votran, Spacecoast C Recent on-board survey; system-wide boardings & transfer rates Jacksonville, Orlando, Tampa D Many different types of service; extensive park-and-ride system; potential major fixed-guideway system Recent on-board survey for all modes; detailed boarding & transfer rate information Southeast Florida

7 Transit Access Type New Guideline Zonal Use single ½ mile “can/cannot walk” buffer Compute percent walks in GIS, CUBE 4.2/5.0 Walk 2 types of connectors: zone-stop, zone-station Use PT to develop connectors Use program to coordinate percent walks & connectors Drive Use revised AUTOCON to develop connectors Sidewalk/ Transfer 3 types of connectors: stop-rail platform, rail platform-stop, stop- stop in CBD areas Use PT to develop connectors

8 Network/System Coding New system data & fare files New system data & fare files Maintain all transit lines in single file Maintain all transit lines in single file Take advantage of advanced coding features Take advantage of advanced coding features Code these elements in transportation network Code these elements in transportation network Transit-only links Transit-only links Micro-code fixed-guideway stations Micro-code fixed-guideway stations PNR/Station data PNR/Station data Use new mode definitions Use new mode definitions

9 Path-Building/Mode Choice (1 of 3) Tier A Areas Tier A Areas Local service only Local service only No park-and-rides No park-and-rides Limited data available Limited data available Build “walk-transit” & “drive-transit” paths per period Build “walk-transit” & “drive-transit” paths per period Paths include all modes Paths include all modes

10 Path-Building/Mode Choice (2 of 3) Tier B/C Areas Tier B/C Areas Local & express service Local & express service At least some park-and-rides At least some park-and-rides At least system-wide boardings, but on-board survey likely At least system-wide boardings, but on-board survey likely May be planning for New/Small Start project in near future May be planning for New/Small Start project in near future Build 4 paths per period Build 4 paths per period Walk-bus Walk-bus Walk-project/premium Walk-project/premium Auto-bus Auto-bus Auto-project/premium Auto-project/premium

11 Path-Building/Mode Choice (3 of 3) SERPM (Tier D Areas) SERPM (Tier D Areas) Many types of service Many types of service Extensive park-and-ride system Extensive park-and-ride system Detailed boarding & rider data available Detailed boarding & rider data available Can be planning for New/Small Start project in near future Can be planning for New/Small Start project in near future Build 8 paths per period Build 8 paths per period Walk-bus Walk-bus Walk-project/premium Walk-project/premium Walk-MetroRail Walk-MetroRail Walk-TriRail Walk-TriRail Auto-bus Auto-bus Auto-project/premium Auto-project/premium Auto-MetroRail Auto-MetroRail Auto-TriRail Auto-TriRail

12 Mode Choice Calibration & Transit Validation Mode choice calibration Mode choice calibration Use new coefficients Use new coefficients Script mode choice model where sensible Script mode choice model where sensible Transit validation steps Transit validation steps * Review trip distribution * Review trip distribution * Calibrate bus travel times end-to-end * Calibrate bus travel times end-to-end Calibrate mode choice model Calibrate mode choice model Validate boardings by mode and/or operator Validate boardings by mode and/or operator ± 20% within each category ± 20% within each category * - New/Small Starts projects only

13 Highway Modeling Impacts Standard highway model practice has strong impacts on transit modeling Standard highway model practice has strong impacts on transit modeling SPDCAP table adjustments SPDCAP table adjustments Distribution corrections (e.g., k-factors, etc.) Distribution corrections (e.g., k-factors, etc.) 0-car household impedances 0-car household impedances New transit model stresses need for: New transit model stresses need for: Refraining from strong SPDCAP table modifications Refraining from strong SPDCAP table modifications Validating trip distribution Validating trip distribution Also Also Code transit-only links & transit station data on highway network Code transit-only links & transit station data on highway network Stability of highway-assignment results Stability of highway-assignment results

14 Outstanding Issues Updating auto-bus speed relationships Updating auto-bus speed relationships Develop procedures/programs: Develop procedures/programs: Walk- & drive-access connector programs Walk- & drive-access connector programs Transit assignment reporting program Transit assignment reporting program Path-building script templates Path-building script templates Some issues will require coordination with Citilabs Some issues will require coordination with Citilabs

15 Thank you! Thank you!