C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning Standard n Students must demonstrate the math skills needed to enter the working world right out of high school or.
Advertisements

A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
The Open Ended Response
HELPING YOUR CHILD WITH NUMERACY: ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION.
Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation.
What values are parents communicating to their children about war and peace? Ruby Pentsil-Bukari and Judith A. Myers-Walls Purdue University.
Common Core How changes to the learning standards affect your child….
WHERE ARE THE COOKIES? A presentation by Jessica Hill.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Introduction to the OSSLT (FORMAT OF THE TEST ; language & KEY WORDS)
FALs and MDC. Before the Collaborative Activity: Meet as a grade level to collaboratively plan in advance the administration of the pre- assessment As.
A Formative Assessment Cycle involves: 1.Teaching a lesson to achieve objectives. The lesson includes a planned assessment to check if the objective has.
Teaching Mathematics for Elementary Teachers through Problem Solving Martha VanCleave MathFest 2000 UCLA August 5, 2000.
The Learning Cycle Lesson
Math /Algebra Talks: Mental Math Strategies
Fractions and Decimals
Lesson 4: Percentage of Amounts.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Mairead Murphy, Kevin Carey, Pat Brennan Second year Junior Certificate Taxation: Does your answer make sense?
Mathematic Problem Solving Learning to solve problems is the principal reason for studying mathematics. (National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Building Mental Math and Reasoning
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Welcome to MM212! Unit 1 Seminar To resize your pods: Place your mouse here. Left mouse click and hold. Drag to the right to enlarge the pod. To maximize.
PERCENTAGE AS RELATIONAL SCHEME: PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A.F. Díaz-Cárdenas, H.A. Díaz-Furlong, A. Díaz-Furlong, M.R. Sankey-García.
Common Core Where have we been and where we are going…
Minimizing Perceptual Mismatches Laura Beech Aubrey Devine Kerry Litwinski Whitney Rantz.
Information Literacy in the workplace: implications for trainers By Dr. Mark Hepworth Department of Information Science Loughborough University.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING FOR PLTL HOPE J. HARTMAN, PH.D. PLTL INSTITUTE CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK JULY 10, 2012.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
Enhancing Student Mathematical Thinking through Conversation LISET GONZALEZ ACOSTA MANDY BREITENSTEIN.
Elizabeth Jean Bingham Central Elementary
Science and Questions The Scientific Method. What do you mean by “science”? Science is the process of gathering knowledge about the natural world. –which.
Putting Ideas Into Practice Assessment For Learning Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, Wiliam A Practical Application of Formative Assessment.
ADDING DECIMALS Theresa Seeley-Bartlett. Behavioral Objectives: Students will be able to: Restate the rules of adding decimals. Identify where the decimal.
GMU COMPLETE Center Candy Dilemma A VDOE SPONSORED MSP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY THROUGH GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Cyndi Madden Mona SamahaPatricia.
KU122 Unit 2 Seminar Fraction Notation KU Introduction to Math Skills and Strategies Seminars: Wednesdays at 8:00 PM ET Instructor: Tammy Mata
Lack of Learning or Lack of Studying? An Inquiry into Low Exam Scores Katherine M. Sauer Metropolitan State College of Denver February.
Multi-digit Numerical Long Division 1 © 2013 Meredith S. Moody.
C R E S S T / U C L A 1 Productive Collaborative Problem Solving: Noreen Webb and Ann Mastergeorge Responsibilities of Teachers and Students.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Supporting argumentation as an everyday event Verbal Written.
The Effects of Teacher Discourse on Collaborative Student Problem Solving Noreen Webb, Marsha Ing, Nicole Kersting, Kariane Nemer UCLA Graduate School.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
Evaluation of Shoreline Science Jia Wang & Joan Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation,
PROBLEM AREAS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION By C.K. Chamasese.
Teaching Improvement Program Labs, Students, and Teaching – Oh My! January 17, 2008.
Second Language Classroom Research (Nunan, D. 1990) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sehnaz Sahinkarakas.
Sight Word List.
Practical Coach Discussion Session #60. Learning Objectives To understand the value of coaching in a manager’s work To learn how to determine when to.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Long and Short Term Goals To develop a responsible and positive attitude we chose Respect for Self, Others and Learning for the long term goal. Our students.
By Edward Lim 8.7. What? Today, we continued our research on our chosen Cornerstone Piece, we got our learning journals up to date, we made sure all our.
Developing Questions That Matter
How Students Learn College Teaching Institute Presenter: Monica McCrory The Graduate School.
THE HOMEWORK... WHAT’S THE POINT?. GOT TO DO HOMEWORK? Because it’s assigned by the teacher, and will be corrected/graded Because quizzes/exams are kind.
What does it mean to be a ‘good’ maths student? [ AND WHERE DO THESE PERCEPTIONS COME FROM ] Glenda Anthony Oct 2013 Using findings from Learners’ Perspective.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
5th Grade Module 2 – Lesson 3
+ Multiplying Fractions by Whole Numbers 5 th Grade Mathematics Amber Wiley.
TfR Seminar: Session 4 Mathematics in Science. Do Now! Do Now! (3 min) Take out all session 4 Handouts, please! Select Handouts 3.17 and 3.18: Strategy.
Assessment Workshop A Holistic Approach How Assessments Demonstrate Student Understanding and Inform Instruction November 4, 2008.
¡Bienvenidos! → Vámonos Assigned seats will start later this week. Just make sure you have something to write with and something to write on. Verbally.
Designing a Research Question Learning Objectives – To select a research topic – Develop and write a research question.
7 th Grade Big6 Project Assignment: Make a children’s informational book (It can be in graphic novel format or regular picture-book format)
Russell & Jamieson chapter Evaluation Steps 15. Evaluation Steps Step 1: Preparing an Evaluation Proposal Step 2: Designing the Study Step 3: Selecting.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2016.
The Role of a Teacher.
Physics POL (Make a creative title)
Presentation transcript:

C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Understanding Collaborative Learning Environments: The Development of Students’ Mathematical Understanding Noreen M. Webb and Ann M. Mastergeorge Annual CRESST Conference September 15, 2000 UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

C R E S S T / U C L A Issues Guiding this Study The promise of collaborative learning environments - Students can learn by:  Co-constructing new knowledge, skills, understanding  Explaining and justifying their positions  Seeking and receiving elaborated help from others  Recognizing and resolving conflicts and disagreements

C R E S S T / U C L A Issues Guiding this Study (con’t) Receiving help is not always beneficial for learning—students are more likely to learn when : Receiving help is not always beneficial for learning—students are more likely to learn when :  Explanations are detailed, elaborated and relevant to a student’s misconception  Students use the help received in a dynamic way to try to solve problems without assistance

C R E S S T / U C L A Questions of this Study  What processes help students make the transition from misconception to correct conception?  What are the group dynamics that facilitate or hinder those processes?

C R E S S T / U C L A Method  Sample Four 7th grade general mathematics classes worked in cooperative groups for four weeks  Preparation for group work Inclusion activities (learning classmates’ names, interests, backgrounds) Developing communication skills (norms for group behavior, social skills, helping behavior)

C R E S S T / U C L A Method (con’t) Topic  Operations with decimals Data Collected  Audiotapes of all groups for class period on cost of telephone calls  Pretest and posttest on general mathematics skills and cost of telephone calls

C R E S S T / U C L A Method (con’t) Sample Problem  Find the cost of a 30-minute telephone call to prefix 771 (first minute costs $0.22; each additional minute costs $0.13)

C R E S S T / U C L A Coding of Group Work: The Steps in the Problem Six steps for solving the problem: 1. Identify the first-minute cost ($0.22) 2. Identify the additional -minute cost ($0.13) 3. Determine the number of additional minutes ( = 29) 4. Determine the correct cost for the number of additional minutes ($0.13*29=$3.77) 5. Add the cost for the first minute (+$0.22) 6. Determine the final answer ($ $0.22 = $3.99)

C R E S S T / U C L A Coding of Group Work: Levels of Help Given or Received

C R E S S T / U C L A Coding of Group Work: Levels of Student Response to Help Received

C R E S S T / U C L A A Simple Solution

C R E S S T / U C L A What Actually Happened

C R E S S T / U C L A

Questions Driving Microgenetic and Qualitative Analyses Why were some students able to obtain high-level help while others were not? Student-level factors  Persistence in asking questions  Nature of questions asked  Nature of errors made

C R E S S T / U C L A Questions Driving Microgenetic and Qualitative Analyses (con’t) Group-level factors:  Willingness to give help  Sufficient competence to help  Perception of the task (task completion vs. conceptual understanding)  Attitudes toward students needing help

C R E S S T / U C L A Questions Driving Microgenetic and Qualitative Analyses (con’t) Why did some students who received high-level help go on to solve problems without assistance while others did not? Adequacy, completeness, and relevance of the help received Comprehension of the help received Persistence in seeking understandable and relevant help Response of group to repeated help-seeking

C R E S S T / U C L A Three Categories of Students Receiving High Level of Help (Correct Post Test) (1.) Persistent In Understanding Reasons For The Numerical Procedures (2.)Persistent And When Did Not Understand Turned To Teacher For Assistance (3.)Received Explanations They Understood And Then Gave Explanations Of The Process To Other Students

C R E S S T / U C L A Examples of Students Who Received High Level Help and Performed Posttest Correctly: Persistent in Seeking Help 1 ( ) I don’t get this. 2I don’t know how to do it myself. 4Ok, see, like. Ok. See, like, right here it says 771. So you look for minutes, 22 cents per minute. 2Oh, hold on. 1( ) I don’t know. Could you ( ) repeat that again? 4It says 22 minutes per minute. 2For the first minute, it’s 22 cents. 4Yeah. And then, it’s 13 cents for each additional minute. So, 13 times, times 29. 1I don’t know how to do it. (6,20)

C R E S S T / U C L A Persistent in Seeking Help (con’t) 4 You didn’t understand? 1 None! Ok. Let me get this straight. Okay, it’s a 30 minute call to 771 prefix so look--771 right here and this is 30 minutes. So why do you…. 4 There is the first minute 22 cents, now multiply 13 cents times 29 because 29 minutes are left from the first minute. 1 Well, it’s minutes. But you are saying do what? 4 Multiply 29 times 13 cents. 1 29? Why 29? This is Because they already go a minute. That’s the first minute. 1 Thank you.

C R E S S T / U C L A Examples of Students Who Received High Level Help and Performed Posttest Incorrectly Persistent in Seeking Help 3What did you get? I made my answer the same, I don’t care. 3No, look! You see? Look. She told us the price for the first minutes is 13 cents. 13 times 29 minutes. 4Where did you get 29 from? 3Because it is 30 minutes, and the first minute is 22 cents. 4Uh-huh (yes). 3And then the next minute is 13 cents. 4Uh-huh (yes). 3Then you go 13 times 29, then you get the answer plus 22 cents. 4I got it.

C R E S S T / U C L A Two Categories of Students Who Received High Level of Help (Incorrect Post test) (1) Students asked questions that suggested that they were trying to solve the problem, and when did not understand resorted to copying. (2) Students did not respond or responded minimally to the explanation they received.

C R E S S T / U C L A Explanation of Problem Solving Process to Other Students 1It’s 79 cents. (25, 15) 4No, it’s 67. 1It’s 12 times 5, which is 60. 4No, that will be 12 times 4. 1( ) 12 cents in 5 minutes, right? Right? 4Yeah, but… 1And then, and then plus 19. 4But it will be 4 times 12, because there’s one minute away. 1(Whispering) 4Understand? 4Look it, look it. Look, if you do… 3I got 79. 1No, it’s 12 times 4. I did it wrong. 3Where’d you get 4 at? 14 minutes and the additional minute is 19 cents. I got minute call, umm… Where’d you 4…? 1Look, look. Ok, 12 times 4, right? And then the minute, that’s the 19 cents is the extra minute, which makes it 5. ?Uh-huh. 1Because it says after each additional minute, so that means it will be 12 times 4. And then you add 19 cents, which is the additional time. 1Yeah. 167 cents. I get it now

C R E S S T / U C L A Four Categories of Students Who Did Not Receive High-Level Help (Incorrect Post Test) (1) Students asked for help were only given the calculation without explanation of where the numbers came from. (2) Some students asked for help and were told to copy others work. (3) Some students asked for help were were ignored. (4) Some students were confused but did not seek help.

C R E S S T / U C L A Willingness of Students to Give Help TWhat did you get for number 10? 1I didn’t do it. I don’t understand it. 4Look it. Let me show you. …Ok, look it, here’s what you can do. Look, right here. Look. Ok, 756. Is that 756? Yeah, Ok, then right. So you put 12 times 5. Yeah, put 12 times 5 up there. 12 times 5 And then look it. Time it together, and then get the answer, Ok?

C R E S S T / U C L A Willingness of Students to Give Help 3What did you get? I made my answer the same, I don’t care. 3No, look! You see? Look. She told us the price for the first minutes is 13 cents. 13 times 29 minutes. 4Where did you get 29 from? 3Because it is 30 minutes, and the first minute is 22 cents. 4Uh-huh (yes). 3And then the next minute is 13 cents. 4Uh-huh (yes). 3Then you go 13 times 29, then you get the answer plus 22 cents. 4I got it.

C R E S S T / U C L A Examples of Students Who Did Not Receive High- Level Help and Did Not Perform Posttest Correctly Requested Help and Told to Copy 2Which telephone call cost more? 7-minute call to…Oh man! Oh, Ok, I get it. 1I don’t. 3What do you want? 1I don’t understand it. 3We are supposed to discuss this among ourselves. 3Today is Thursday, ( ) Did you do it? Did you do your class work? Did you do it? 1I didn’t do the page. I can’t understand it. 3You should just copy it.

C R E S S T / U C L A Requested Help and Ignored 1How much you get? What’d you get? 3I don’t know. 1Why are you doing all of it? 3I don’t understand. 1Don’t worry. 3What do you have for 7? (9,13) 1Don’t worry about it. A dollar 15. 3What do you have for 7? A dollar 15? 1Yes!

C R E S S T / U C L A Requested Help and Ignored 3 You go 13 times 11, right? 2No, 10. 3How could it be 10? 1Because you got to take away 1. 2You are supposed to take away 1 and then add it. 1Yeah, you got to multiply it. 2Add 22 then. Look at the problem. 3Oh. Here. So you go 13 times 10? 2Yeah. 1You are doing it right, just that you don’t know how to multiply it right.

C R E S S T / U C L A Confused and Did Not Seek Help TAh-ha. How did you get, wait a minute, how do you get 128? 3I multiplied. TThe first one is 19 cents and then what? 3And that’s ( ) each additional minute was 12 cents. TAnd how many additional minutes are there? 312. TNo. Can’t be…. It costs 12 cents, but how many minutes were there? 3There are 6, I mean 7 minutes. TTotal. 7 minutes total. First was 19, then you have to multiply 12 times what? 37. TYou already took away the first minute. How many do you have left? 312. TNo. Minutes. Minutes. 3Oh. So you have no minutes. T7 minutes, the first minute is how much? 3First minute is 19 cents. TOK, how many minutes do I have left now? 36. TAnd they cost 12 cents each. How much is that? 36 times 12? TMmm (yes). 6 dozen eggs. 3Ah, 6 times… TMultiply it out….Yeah. Then you have to find the difference T72, then you have to add it up with 19. 3So, I add 72 with 19 cents. TThat’s right.

C R E S S T / U C L A Microgenetic Analysis Examples Level of Assistance Received and Frequency of Occurrence

C R E S S T / U C L A Microgenetic Analysis Examples (con’t) Level of Assistance and Frequency of Response for Problem 1, Component 1.

C R E S S T / U C L A Microgenetic Analysis Examples (con’t) Level of Assistance and Frequency of Response for Problem 2, Component 1.

C R E S S T / U C L A Microgenetic Analysis Examples (con’t) Level of Assistance and Frequency of Response for Problem 3, Component 1.

C R E S S T / U C L A Microgenetic Analysis Examples (con’t) Level of Assistance for Problem 1, Students 1, 2 and 3.

C R E S S T / U C L A Conclusion  Quantitative Results and Predictors of Performance Level of Assistance  Implications of Qualitative Analyses In Cooperative Group Learning: The Macro and Micro Genesis of Problem-Solving Mediated group dynamics Mediated group discourse

C R E S S T / U C L A Conclusion (con’t)  The Role of Apprenticeship In Collaborative Environments Role of Effective Scaffolding Role of Teacher Feedback Parameters of Peer Learning

C R E S S T / U C L A Conclusion (con’t)  Paths of Variability: Understanding Change (or No Change) in Context “Seeing” students’ thinking Process of variability in understanding problem-solving contexts The conceptual-procedural divide The pedagogical divide

C R E S S T / U C L A Next Steps  Systematic Quantitative Analysis of Concept Maps  Qualitative Analyses of Amount and Type of Difficulty on Problem Components  In-Depth Qualitative Analyses of Student Questions  In-Depth Microgenetic Analysis of Student Performance  Strategies Across Problems and Components  Student Reflections on Group Experiences  Hypothetical and Ideal Explanations From Student and Teacher Perspective

C R E S S T / U C L A Website: Ann M. Mastergeorge : Noreen M. Webb :