A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL TOBACCO CONTROL 1. PREVENT TOBACCO USE AMONG YOUTH 2. REDUCE NUMBERS OF SMOKERS REDUCE TOBACCO CONSUMPTION 3. LIMIT ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE.
Advertisements

Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Tobacco Control: A Winnable Battle U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
The STAKE Act B & P Code ( Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act) u Statewide law that prohibits the sale or provision of tobacco products.
The Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age for Purchasing Tobacco Products Eric N. Lindblom Director, Office of Policy Center for Tobacco Products,
Arizona Adult Tobacco Survey Response to Health Professional Query Behavior Richard S. Porter, MS Bob Leischow, MPH Arizona Department of Health Services.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Texas Tobacco Laws. Senate Bill Texas Legislature Tobacco-Free Schools Sec TOBACCO ON SCHOOL PROPERTY The Board of Trustees of a school.
Kansas Tobacco-Related Data Resources and Performance Measures Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Tobacco Compliance Education Tobacco Retailers and Merchants Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Tobacco Enforcement Program
Why Focus on Stores? Stores are used as the main channel of communication by tobacco companies to reach new and current customers.
Think Health. Act Now!. CITY OF MILWAUKEE HEALTH DEPARTMENT A Community-Based Approach for Health Education City of Milwaukee Tobacco-Free Sports Program.
Tobacco’s continuing impact on Health Care Costs.
Ban Forms of Tobacco Advertising. Background Misuse and Abuse of Tobacco Increase rates of cancer – Lung cancer Heart disease Poor circulation – asthma.
Ban Forms of Tobacco Advertising. Background Misuse and Abuse of Tobacco Increase rates of cancer – Lung cancer Heart disease Poor circulation – asthma.
It’s Their Future Let’s Work to Create Healthy, Safe, and Livable Communities for Our Children Presented by the Santa Clara County Public Health Department.
Underage Drinking: Retail Access Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Maine’s Environmental Substance Abuse Prevention Center (MESAP)
The Effect of Prices, Programs, and Smoke-free Homes on Smoking Behavior in the 1990s Evidence from Population Surveys John Pierce, UC San Diego Wael Al.
Action to cut smoking rates and reduce tobacco use needs to take place locally, nationally and regionally if we are to have the most cost effective policies.
Washington Communities for Tobacco Prevention Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health September 27, 2012.
Edward Anselm, MD Medical Director Public Health Perspectives of Accountable Care: Opportunities for Alignment.
Students Working Against Tobacco SWAT 101. SWAT is Florida's statewide youth organization working to mobilize, educate and equip Florida youth to revolt.
Effective Youth Tobacco Access Laws: A Comprehensive Approach Alejandro Arias, Ed.D. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
New Pathways, New Connections: Tobacco and Behavioral Health Frances M. Harding, Director SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Conference.
CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Jerelyn Jordan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health.
Eliminating Tobacco Disparities Health Disparities Council July 16, 2012.
Public Health Informatics – New Opportunities for Public Health Practitioners The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Seventh Annual Mid- Atlantic Healthcare.
Enforcement. Sponsored by the California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section Why Is Enforcement Important? Getting A Local Policy Passed.
Ban Forms of Tobacco Advertising
1 PUBLIC HEALTH FUNDING IN WISCONSIN PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL Dr. Sheri Johnson, State Health Officer Wisconsin Division of Public Health April 13, 2007.
Economics of Tobacco Use and Help-Seeking Behavior Bishwa Adhikari, Ph.D., Economist Office on Smoking and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B What Is the Impact of Tobacco Tax Increases in Thailand?
Mesa Police Department October 16,  Underage Drinking  Underage drinking is a public health risk and a behavior detrimental to the health and.
TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM Mike Maples, Assistant Commissioner Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Youth Access to Tobacco. Youth Access Preventing Tobacco Use Initiation.
Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,
The Tobacco Tax A WIN, WIN, WIN for KENTUCKY Political Win Fiscal Win Health Win.
Protecting Children through Los Angeles’ Tobacco Enforcement Program Nora Manzanilla Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO TOBACCO.
Tobacco Education for Court Personnel Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Tobacco Enforcement Program www. txtobaccoenforcement.com.
Tobacco Sales To Youth Presented to { } by { } Date.
Wisconsin’s Effort M. Raina Zwadzich Julia Sherman.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
“Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” “Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” THE MARYLAND.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Why Indicators Matter Using Outcome Indicators to Plan and Evaluate Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Todd Rogers, PhD California Tobacco Control.
“High School Students Take Anti-Tobacco Message Outside the Box”
Texas Tobacco Laws – for Schools AISD Policy and Student Code of Conduct Compliance, Education & Enforcement.
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003 April Roeseler STORE Training Call July 2005.
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
Maryland’s Cigarette Restitution Program Georges C. Benjamin, MD FACP, Secretary Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene November 2000 Protecting.
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services – Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery - PRI One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B ASSIST Evaluation.
Tobacco 101. Evolution of Tobacco Evolution of Tobacco.
Health Care For All Governor Doyle’s Roadmap to Universal Access to Health Insurance for all Wisconsinites July, 2009.
CDC Recommendations for Comprehensive Programs. Comprehensive Programs CDC, Office on Smoking and Health.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Changing Clinical Norms: Tobacco Intervention in Pediatric Care Settings Shann Hauck Wyoming Department of Health Substance Abuse Division 2003 National.
El Paso/Ciudad Juarez Tobacco Network Texas Department of State Health Services Tobacco Prevention & Control Program Penny Harmonson, Manager April 9,
100% Tobacco-Free Schools Proven Policies to Promise a Healthy Future.
Find out more online: Healthy Lives, Healthy People: A Tobacco Control Plan for England Department of Health, March 2011 Julia.
TOBACCO Control: Progress and Priorities Charles Gardner, MD, CCFP, MHSc, FRCPC MOH, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit March, 2014.
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
Kentucky Tobacco Tax Facts 2014
Proposition 64 County Behavioral Health Directors Association
Addressing the Federal Legalization of Cannabis Briefing to Standing Committee on Priorities and Planning June 7, 2017.
Environmental Prevention Strategies
Tobacco Use Prevention Funding
Proposition 64 County Behavioral Health Directors Association
Presentation transcript:

A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention Division of Tobacco Prevention & Control Pennsylvania Department of Health December 11, 2003

Presentation Outline: Goals of the Pennsylvania tobacco control program Goals of the Pennsylvania tobacco control program History and allocation of MSA funding History and allocation of MSA funding Illegal tobacco sale rates to youth in PA Illegal tobacco sale rates to youth in PA Development and implementation of a comprehensive approach Development and implementation of a comprehensive approach Results – rate of illegal sales to youth Results – rate of illegal sales to youth Final thoughts Final thoughts

The Big Picture: Pennsylvania’s Goals Program goals support Healthy People 2010 objectives: Program goals support Healthy People 2010 objectives: Change community norms through state- advised, community-driven systems that create environments where it is uncommon to see, use, and be negatively impacted by tobacco products and tobacco smoke pollution Change community norms through state- advised, community-driven systems that create environments where it is uncommon to see, use, and be negatively impacted by tobacco products and tobacco smoke pollution Reduce consumption of tobacco products to youth and adults in Pennsylvania to less than 12% by 2010 Reduce consumption of tobacco products to youth and adults in Pennsylvania to less than 12% by 2010

CDC Best Practices Community-based programs Community-based programs Reduction of the chronic disease burden Reduction of the chronic disease burden School programs School programs Enforcement Enforcement Statewide programs Statewide programs Counter-marketing Counter-marketing Cessation programs Cessation programs Surveillance & evaluation Surveillance & evaluation Administration & management Administration & management State and local initiatives follow national best practices for building comprehensive tobacco control programs

Funding Levels in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania will receive $11.4 billion over 25 years as a result of the tobacco MSA. Pennsylvania will receive $11.4 billion over 25 years as a result of the tobacco MSA. Funding legislation (Act 77) appropriates 12% of the annual payment to the Division of Tobacco Prevention & Control Funding legislation (Act 77) appropriates 12% of the annual payment to the Division of Tobacco Prevention & Control $41.4 million SFY $41.4 million SFY $52.0 million SFY $52.0 million SFY $51.8 million SFY $51.8 million SFY

Funding Distribution: Prevention & Cessation SFY Funding $41,402,000 SFY Funding $52,023,000 70% - $28,981,400 70% - $36,416,100 30% - $12,420,600 30% - $15,606,900

Primary Contractors: Identified 51 primary contractors to build comprehensive tobacco prevention and cessation programs in PA’s 67 counties Identified 51 primary contractors to build comprehensive tobacco prevention and cessation programs in PA’s 67 counties Required to coordinate a minimum of 3 enforcement checks on every tobacco retail outlet within their service area yearly Required to coordinate a minimum of 3 enforcement checks on every tobacco retail outlet within their service area yearly Engage retailers at the local level Engage retailers at the local level

Pennsylvania Synar Survey Results

A Comprehensive Campaign Increase in cigarette excise tax Increase in cigarette excise tax Ongoing enforcement checks of tobacco retail outlets Ongoing enforcement checks of tobacco retail outlets Compliance Alliance: youth-led initiative Compliance Alliance: youth-led initiative Statewide media campaign Statewide media campaign Act 112 legislation Act 112 legislation Community-based retailer education forums Community-based retailer education forums

Increased Cigarette Excise Tax Original cigarette excise tax of 31¢ / pack in place for 10+ years Original cigarette excise tax of 31¢ / pack in place for 10+ years Proposal to increase tax by 69¢ to $1.00 / pack Proposal to increase tax by 69¢ to $1.00 / pack 10%  in price = 7%  in youth smoking prevalence 10%  in price = 7%  in youth smoking prevalence 10%  in price = 5%  in young adult smoking prevalence 10%  in price = 5%  in young adult smoking prevalence 10%  in price = 7%  in smoking among pregnant women 10%  in price = 7%  in smoking among pregnant women

Increased Cigarette Excise Tax Cigarette tax raised to $1.00 / pack in June 2002 Cigarette tax raised to $1.00 / pack in June 2002 Revenue increased from $267 million to $846 million (217%  ) Revenue increased from $267 million to $846 million (217%  ) Cigarette sales (in packs) decreased from 1.07 billion to 918 million (16.5%  ) Cigarette sales (in packs) decreased from 1.07 billion to 918 million (16.5%  ) Ranked 12 th in nation (tied with Alaska, District of Columbia, Maine, & Maryland) Ranked 12 th in nation (tied with Alaska, District of Columbia, Maine, & Maryland) No excise tax presently on smokeless tobacco products in PA No excise tax presently on smokeless tobacco products in PA

Increase in Enforcement Checks Between October 2001 and June 2002, over 4600 enforcement checks were conducted Between October 2001 and June 2002, over 4600 enforcement checks were conducted Primary contractors under contract in May 2002 – more than 25,000 enforcement checks performed in SFY Primary contractors under contract in May 2002 – more than 25,000 enforcement checks performed in SFY Generated a significant increase in media at the local level Generated a significant increase in media at the local level

Youth-led, anti-tobacco movement in PA Youth-led, anti-tobacco movement in PA Focus on exposing the manipulative and deceptive marketing practices that Big Tobacco uses to target teens Focus on exposing the manipulative and deceptive marketing practices that Big Tobacco uses to target teens Supported by primary contractors and their service providers (subcontractors) Supported by primary contractors and their service providers (subcontractors)

Compliance Alliance: Summer 2002 First major initiative of BUSTED! First major initiative of BUSTED! Youth attempt to purchase tobacco products, interrupt the buy, and educate the retailer on PA youth access to tobacco laws Youth attempt to purchase tobacco products, interrupt the buy, and educate the retailer on PA youth access to tobacco laws Statewide media campaign created to support Compliance Alliance Statewide media campaign created to support Compliance Alliance

Statewide Media Campaign Developed through focus group research with: Developed through focus group research with: Retail store owners Retail store owners Clerks Clerks Law enforcement agents Law enforcement agents Youth under age 18 who smoke Youth under age 18 who smoke Parents of youth who smoke Parents of youth who smoke Included statewide media buy & series of 3 interactive retailer mailings Included statewide media buy & series of 3 interactive retailer mailings

Community-Based Initiatives Tobacco retailer luncheons held: Tobacco retailer luncheons held: 28 luncheons throughout Pennsylvania 28 luncheons throughout Pennsylvania total attendees reached total attendees reached Engaged owners & clerks of retail store chains, “Mom & Pop” stores, Hispanic bodegas, and other population groups Engaged owners & clerks of retail store chains, “Mom & Pop” stores, Hispanic bodegas, and other population groups Evolution of innovative partnerships Evolution of innovative partnerships Primary contractors partner with retailers to educate about and enhance store policies Primary contractors partner with retailers to educate about and enhance store policies Youth & primary contractors partner to educate retailers Youth & primary contractors partner to educate retailers

Act 112: Major Provisions Restricts placement of vending machines Restricts placement of vending machines Establishes a separate fine structure for clerks and retailers Establishes a separate fine structure for clerks and retailers Restricts displaying or offering for sale a cigarette out of a pack of cigarettes Restricts displaying or offering for sale a cigarette out of a pack of cigarettes Expands enforcement authority Expands enforcement authority Authorizes youth ages 14 to 17 to participate in compliance checks Authorizes youth ages 14 to 17 to participate in compliance checks Establishes youth penalties for purchase or attempt to purchase of a tobacco product Establishes youth penalties for purchase or attempt to purchase of a tobacco product

Increased Fines Previous fines- $25-$300 Previous fines- $25-$300 New fine structure: New fine structure: Clerks $100-$250 1 st offense$100-$250 1 st offense $250-$500 2 nd offense$250-$500 2 nd offense $500-$ rd and subsequent offenses$500-$ rd and subsequent offenses Retailers $100-$500 1 st offense$100-$500 1 st offense $500-$ nd offense$500-$ nd offense $1000-$ rd offense and license suspension for 30 days$1000-$ rd offense and license suspension for 30 days $3000-$ th offense and license revocation for 60 days$3000-$ th offense and license revocation for 60 days

Youth Penalties Youth under age 18 who purchase or attempt to purchase tobacco are subject to: Youth under age 18 who purchase or attempt to purchase tobacco are subject to: Up to 75 hours of community service and/or Up to 75 hours of community service and/or Completion of a tobacco prevention and cessation program approved by the Department of Health and/or Completion of a tobacco prevention and cessation program approved by the Department of Health and/or A fine up to $200 and/or A fine up to $200 and/or 30 day suspension of driver’s license 30 day suspension of driver’s license

Additional Provisions of Act 112 Affirmative Defense Affirmative Defense Retailers may use an affirmative defense 3 times in a 24 month period Retailers may use an affirmative defense 3 times in a 24 month period Provides incentive for retailers to run a “tight ship” Provides incentive for retailers to run a “tight ship” Compliance checks no more than once every 30 days Compliance checks no more than once every 30 days No prohibition on law enforcement No prohibition on law enforcement

Did The Approach Work? 14.5% 10.8%

Take-Home Message #1 Retailer and community education combined with ongoing enforcement of youth access to tobacco laws are important components of a comprehensive tobacco control program that can effectively change community norms.

Take-Home Message #2 Integration of a statewide media retailer education campaign with initiatives that engage local communities through customized retailer and community- specific youth access education works!

Take-Home Message #3 Involvement of youth in retailer and community education is a WIN / WIN !!!

Take-Home Message #4 Innovative partnerships at the local Level are cost-effective in reducing the illegal sale of tobacco products to youth. It takes a village to change community norms!

Questions will be answered after the next presentation. Thank you for your consideration!