G. Steinbrück 11-October-2002 1 The DØ Silicon Track Trigger Georg Steinbrück Columbia University, New York Collaboration Meeting 10/11/2002  Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Oct 14, 2003Vivek Jain – BNL Beauty Recent Results from D0 Vivek Jain Brookhaven National Lab (D0 Collaboration) Beauty 2003.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Status of Eric Kajfasz CPPM/Fermilab GDR-Susy, Lyon - 26 novembre 2001.
L2 Silicon Track Trigger All D0 Meeting 11 January 2002 Ulrich Heintz Boston University.
1 Level1 Central Track Trigger Physics Justification Proposed Implementation Costs and Schedule Meenakshi Narain Boston University / Dzero Collaboration.
1 DØ trigger system 3 levels L1 deadtimeless L1 deadtimeless L2 100  s L2 100  s L3 farm, 50 Hz L3 farm, 50 Hz Brown involvement L2 STT L2 STT L1CTT.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
G. Steinbrück 7-November The DØ Silicon Track Trigger Georg Steinbrück Columbia University, New York On behalf of the DØ collaboration Vertex 2002.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Cluster Finder Report Laura Sartori (INFN Pisa) For the L2Cal Team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue.
Online Calibration of the D0 Vertex Detector Initialization Procedure and Database Usage Harald Fox D0 Experiment Northwestern University.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
1 Online Calibration of Calorimeter Mrinmoy Bhattacharjee SUNY, Stony Brook Thanks to: D. Schamberger, L. Groer, U. Bassler, B. Olivier, M. Thioye Institutions:
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas From Detector to Ntuples: Muons Steven Doulas Northeastern University Boston, MA D0 Muon Upgrade Group.
The DØ Silicon Track Trigger Bill Lee Florida State University 27 October 2003  Introduction + Motivation  Design  Status
Sep. 10, 2004Hobbs1 STT Fitting and Luminosity Fitting hardware description Current situation –Processing time –Instantaneous Lumi Dependence Possible.
17 February All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 February Dedicated some.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded:
The Online Central Tracker of D0
STT simulations (Horst Wahl, 25 February 2000) l trigger simulation  (Silvia Tentindo-Repond, Sailesh Chopra, John Hobbs with help from Brian Connolly,
System-On-a-Programmable-Chip (SOPC) Implementation of the Silicon Track Card (STC) Thesis Defense By Arvindh-kumar Lalam Department of Electrical and.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
Silicon Track Trigger Status report 7 Oct (Horst D Wahl) l funding l ongoing activities l what next? l schedule l Webpage of STT group: –
Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring
New L2cal hardware and CPU timing Laura Sartori. - System overview - Hardware Configuration: a set of Pulsar boards receives, preprocess and merges the.
L2mu System - Status SLICs Track Finding (main data processing) Next: SLIC Upstream and Downstream DONE UPSTREAM; CICs and SFOs CIC crate; hooked into.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Pulsar Status For Peter. L2 decision crate L1L1 TRACKTRACK SVTSVT CLUSTERCLUSTER PHOTONPHOTON MUONMUON Magic Bus α CPU Technical requirement: need a FAST.
The DØ Silicon Track Trigger Wendy Taylor IEEE NSS 2000 Lyon, France October 17, 2000  Introduction  Overview of STT  STT Hardware Design u Motherboard.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June 24, Leslie Groer Columbia UniversityDØ Status 1 DØ Status and Operations June 17 – 24, 2002  Notable “features”
D0 PMG February 15, 2001 PMG Agenda February 15, 2001  Overview (Weerts) u Detector status u Reportable milestones u Summary  Operations Organization.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
First physics results with the Silicon Vertex Trigger at CDF-II 2 nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity triangle. April 5 th -9 th IPPP Durham, England, UK.
L2 Silicon Track Trigger D0 Trigger Workshop 22 April 2002 Ulrich Heintz Boston University.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
STT In-Crate CPU Bill Lee 28 April STT In-Crate CPU -- Bill Lee2 CPU Motorola Power PC Running VxWorks 5.3d EPICS Does not communicate with TCC.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
20 April 2002Bill Lee APS 1 The D0 Silicon Track Trigger Bill Lee Florida State University.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
NIPHAD meeting, Jan by Sascha Caron How do we trigger beauty ? The Silicon Track Trigger at D0 The Silicon Track Trigger at D0 and ideas for ATLAS.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Need for HI/LO PS Thresholds
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
More technical description:
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
L1FW: towers, tracks, correlations
STT Simulator Status and To Do List
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
G. Steinbrück STT meeting
Wendy Taylor STT Meeting Fermilab September 28, 2001
Presentation transcript:

G. Steinbrück 11-October The DØ Silicon Track Trigger Georg Steinbrück Columbia University, New York Collaboration Meeting 10/11/2002  Introduction  Design  Status  Schedule

G. Steinbrück 11-October Physics Motivation  Increase inclusive bb production yield six-fold with low enough threshold to see Z  bb signal  Control sample for b-jet energy calibration, bb mass resolution, b trigger and tagging efficiencies  Top quark physics  Factor of 2 improvement in top mass resolution due to improved jet energy scale calibration  Heavy bb resonances for Higgs searches  Double trigger efficiency for ZH  ( )(bb) by rejecting QCD gluons and light-quark jets  b-quark physics  Lower p T threshold on single lepton and dilepton triggers (B O  , B s mixing, etc.)  Increase B d o  J/  K S yield by 50% (CP violation)

G. Steinbrück 11-October STT Overview CFT H layer  1-mm road SMT barrels CFT A layer L2FW:Combined objects (e, , j) L1FW: towers, tracks, correlations L1CAL L2STT L2Global L2CFT L2PS L2Cal L1 CTT L2 Muon L1 Muon L1FPD Detector L1 TriggerL2 Trigger 7 MHz5 kHz CAL PS CFT SMT Muon FPD 1000 Hz

G. Steinbrück 11-October Contributing Institutions  Boston University  U. Heintz, M. Narain, E. Popkov (PD), L. Sonnenschein (PD), J. Wittlin (PD), K. Black (GS), S. Fatakia (GS), A. Zabi (GS), Amitabha Das (GS), W. Earle (Eng), E. Hazen (Eng), S. Wu (Eng)  Columbia University  H. Evans, G. Steinbrück (PD), T. Bose (GS), A. Qi (Eng)  Florida State University  H. Wahl, H. Prosper, S. Linn, T. Adams, B. Lee (PD), S. Tentindo Repond (PD), S. Singupta (GS), J. Lazoflores (GS)  SUNY Stony Brook  J. Hobbs, W. Taylor (PD), H. Dong (GS), C. Pancake (Eng), B. Smart (Eng), J. Wu (Eng)  Manchester University  Michiel Sanders (PD)

G. Steinbrück 11-October STT Design Sector 1 Sector 2 L2 Global 6 Identical Crates with 1 Fiber Road Card 9 Silicon Trigger Cards 2 Track Fit Cards Partially filled crates in racks in MCH2

G. Steinbrück 11-October Motherboard and Communication Links  Boston University  9Ux400 mm VME64x- compatible  3 33-MHz PCI busses for on- board communications  Data communicated between cards via point-to-point links (LVDS) (LTB and LRB cards)  Control signals sent over backplane using dedicated lines  VME bus used for Level 3 readout and initialization/monitoring

G. Steinbrück 11-October Fiber Road Card (FRC) Design  Columbia University  Receives tracks from L1CTT  Communicates with trigger framework via SCL receiver card  Transmits tracks and trigger info to other cards  Manages L3 buffering and readout via Buffer Controller (BC) daughter cards on each motherboard FRC Buffer controller Buffer controller

G. Steinbrück 11-October Silicon Trigger Card (STC) Design  Boston University  Performs SMT clustering and cluster-road matching  Clusters Neighbouring SMT hits (axial and stereo)  Each STC processes 8 HDI inputs simultaneously  Axial clusters are matched to ±1mm-wide roads around each CFT track via precomputed LUT  Mask bad strips and apply pedestal/gain corrections (via LUTs)

G. Steinbrück 11-October Track Fit Card (TFC) Design  SUNY Stony Brook  Performs final SMT cluster filtering and track fitting  Receives 2 CFT hits and axial SMT clusters in CFT road  Lookup table used to convert hardware to physical coordinates  Selects clusters closest to road center and performs linearized track fit using precomputed matrix elements stored in on-board LUT  Require only 3 hits out of 4  Output to L2CTT via Hotlink cards

G. Steinbrück 11-October Hardware Status All Boards at hand

G. Steinbrück 11-October Downloading and Monitoring  Florida State University and Boston University  STT Crate Initialization  Controlled via Power PC at power-up  Downloads lookup tables and DSP code to STT cards  Existing test-mode uses Python; conversion to C for final system done for STC and TFC, in progress for FRC  EPICS STT board support package  Downloads via COMICS trigger initialization parameters  Gathers information from cards for monitoring purposes  First pass exists  Needs to be extended  Need to implement Interrupt Service Routine to react to monitoring request via SCL  FRC  CPU

G. Steinbrück 11-October L2STTCTTWorker  Boston University  Online package (on alpha/ beta) that receives L2 STT output  Formats and orders it appropriately  combines the inputs from the 12 tfcs into 1 ordered list of ctt or stt+ctt tracks (depending on if there's a stt fit)  sorts by pt, does a few conversions (phi bins, pt bins, etc)  Transmits it to L2 Global for final L2 decision  has been successfully tested with both 1 and 2 tfc's in standalone mode  has been tested with full card chain for mult. Events  Integrated into trigger simulator in p13

G. Steinbrück 11-October STT Trigger Simulator  Florida State, Stony Brook and Boston University  Exact DSP fitting code used in tsim_l2stt  Some ongoing development to improve the emulation of the hardware/firmware  Has been instrumental in developing the fitting algorithm  Produces test vectors for all cards  Stand-alone package tsim_l2stt  Very recently Integrated into d0trigsim  Can be used by the general (DØ) public for physics studies!  Can be used with worker for physics studies.

G. Steinbrück 11-October STT Performance  = 20  m 50 GeV muons No beam spot

G. Steinbrück 11-October Beamspot Monitoring  Manchester University  Use vertex examine to determine beam spot and vertices online  Use gtr_l3 and Offline vertexing: Beam position from dca vs phi  Write beam position to text file:  Beam Monitor: (to do)  connected to Vertex examine, SES for alarms, Lumi system to get info  lumi db and acnet for feedback of beam spot to MCR  MCR could implement automatic beam adjustment  Writes beamspot to pickle file (updated every ~5 min)  TFC picks up beamspot from pickle file  Picked up on start of new run (not yet)  If beam moves too much  Alarm, stop run, start new run (new beam spot)  Beam spot in beg of store: TBD  ~10 min to get measurement  Or: Special run with all L3 dedicated to tracking  thanks to Lorenzo and Suyong (beam_tilt / examine)

G. Steinbrück 11-October x y xz yz Beamspot Monitoring Critical for the STT!

G. Steinbrück 11-October Integration Tests  Used fake data sender (tracks to FRC and hits to STC) to verify transfers between all 3 types of boards  Fake data sender triggered by L1 accepts: Have started to test integration of FRC with SCL signals J  Next step: tick and turn number in fake CTT data  Loaded FRC and STC with test vectors and sent multiple events through FRC->STC->TFC->L2 alpha chain J  Ongoing: Rate tests using fake data sender  L3 readout involving FRC  BC communication in progress  Real CTT tracks and Silicon hits will be used as soon as L1CTT tracks available!

G. Steinbrück 11-October ° Sector test  Instrumenting a 30° sector:  One FRC, 6 STC’s, one TFC  Full track reconstruction  parasitic operation  Output to L3 and private DAQ for L2  Status: All hardware at hand at FNAL  Transition from Integration tests to sector test ongoing  Work on L3 readout ongoing

G. Steinbrück 11-October Schedule  Production  Installation 1 week (beg of November) No access needed.  Now-November: complete 30° sector  parasitic operation  full track reconstruction  output to L3 and private DAQ for L2  Without L1CTT: Need to rely on test vectors/ fake data sender  Limitations: Less realistic, hard to exercise the whole system (track fits with real SMT hits), timing, data volume, L2 and L3 readout  With L1CTT: Easier, Faster  Full commissioning of the STT will start after installation is complete and all L1CTT inputs are available

G. Steinbrück 11-October Run 2B Silicon Track Trigger  Run 2B STT can process hit information from 5 of the 6 Run 2B SMT layers  Achieved by adding 1 STC 2 Track Fit Cards per crate

G. Steinbrück 11-October Conclusions  Great progress in board production since Oklahoma  All boards for Run 2a at hand!  Lots of progress in integrating the various pieces  Sector test in progress  All of this made possible by a dedicated STT group  Final System Commissioning coupled to L1CTT schedule.  Run 2b upgrades involve additional STC and TFC boards.