Electronic On-Board Recorders The Canadian Perspective August 2011 Darren Christle BA, CITT, P.Log, MCIT Executive Director Motor Carrier Division Province of Manitoba

Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut BC BC - British ColumbiaNB - New Brunswick AB - AlbertaNS - Nova Scotia SK - SaskatchewanPE - Prince Edward Island MB - Manitoba NF - Newfoundland ON - Ontario NT - Northwest Territories QC - Quebec YT - Yukon Territories NU - Nunavut Territories AB SK MB ON QC NF NB PE NS

3

Current Environment CTA concerned & calling for mandatory EOBRs to level playing field CTA concerned & calling for mandatory EOBRs to level playing field 4

CCMTA Review Undertook a literature review Developed a discussion paper Solicited stakeholder input with key considerations  Application and implementation (scope)  Data requirements and privacy  Technically flexible or specific approach  Phase-in period 5

Consultation Input received from:  Carrier Organizations: CTA, Private Motor Truck Council, Motor Coach Canada  Owner Operator Independent Drivers Associations  Canadian Construction Association  Truck Manufacturers Association  Ontario Provincial Police  Manufacturers Input received from:  Carrier Organizations: CTA, Private Motor Truck Council, Motor Coach Canada  Owner Operator Independent Drivers Associations  Canadian Construction Association  Truck Manufacturers Association  Ontario Provincial Police  Manufacturers 6

Option 1 Option 2 Do Nothing – Continue to allow industry to adopt on a voluntary basis  No cost to industry  No requirement to develop standard  Inconsistent with US Develop targeted approach – direct to carriers in non- compliance with Hours of service  Similar to US approach  Targeted toward worst offenders Options 7

Options (cont.) Option 3 Option 4 Develop standard leveraging key aspects of US Rule  Utilizes work undertaken in US  Opportunity for CDN standard  Compatibility with US approach  Implementation can be independent or harmonized with US Develop universal mandate  Increased compliance with Hours of Service  Levels the playing field  Would force carriers to accept costs of EOBRs 8

Important Note Canadian stakeholders divided on universal vs. remedial approach 9

Council of Ministers Approval: Option 3: Develop a Canadian standard for EOBRs leveraging the work already undertaken in the US  Incorporates key elements of US rule  Provides Canada the flexibility to consider compatibility with the US Direct CCMTA to continue to monitor US rulemaking and implementation for Canadian carriers 10

Current Environmental Scan CCMTA has awarded a contract to FP Innovations Ltd. to develop a Canadian National Safety Code (NSC) standard on EOBR’s for CMV use in Canada. $80,000 The RFP referenced four deliverables –Deliverable 1 : Outline key elements of the standard; –Deliverable 2 : Preliminary draft of the standard; –Deliverable 3 : Final draft; –Deliverable 4 : Final standard. 11

12 TaskDeadlineNote RFP out (contingent on Board approval, mid-April) April 21Bid deadline: May 27 Review/evaluationJune 27 Contract developmentJuly 1CCMTA Estimated startJuly 1Consultant work begins Deliverable 1 August 12 Outline of key elements of standard Deliverable 2 September 23Preliminary draft of standard Industry outreach on deliverable 2Sept 30 – October 14 - October CCMTA ReportingMid-SeptemberStatus report to Board CCMTA ReportingSeptember 22Status report to DM Deliverable 3 October 28Draft final standard CCMTA ReportingOctober 25Draft Final tabled with CRA Industry outreach on deliverable 3Nov 18 – December 2 Deliverable 4 DecemberFinal NSC Standard CCMTA ReportingDecember 9 Final tabled with Board (with approval to follow in January) CCMTA ReportingApril 2012Report to DMs

CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MOTOR TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATORS STANDING COMMITTEE ON COMPLIANCE & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 2323 ST. LAURENT BLVD. OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CANADA K1G 4J8 PHONE: FAX: QUESTIONS?