Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2 Joy Nichols, Jennifer Lauer, Doug Morgan, and Beth Sundheim Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Eric Martin Northrop Grumman Space Technology.
Advertisements

EIS/Solar-B: EIS information that was sent to System Side EIS subsystems: EIS consists of three EIS subsystems. (a) STR: Structure, (b) HAR: Harness, (c)
Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.
Astronomers Learn to Work in Space. Technical Challenges Detectors Pointing and Stability Data Storage Contamination Thermal Control Background radiation.
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
Astronomy 101 Section 020 Lecture 6 Optics and Telescopes John T. McGraw, Professor Laurel Ladwig, Planetarium Manager.
Spacecraft Subsystem Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
SNAP ICU ProjectDOE HEP Program Review June 2-4, SLAC Participation in The Supernova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Presentation to the DOE High Energy.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
SDW2005, juin, Taormina The Corot Space instrument.
WFIRST Instrument reference information July 1, 2015.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Super Star Tracker.
Space Frame Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 11/04/04.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
A SEMINAR ON HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE PRESENTED BY: HARI OM ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION REG NO SECTION-C ROLL NO.– 123.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Star Tracker 5000 A low-cost star tracker and attitude determination system.
THEMIS-SCM THM – SCM – CDR – 08-April-2004 in Velizy
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
HESSI Imaging Capability Pre Environmental Review Brian R. Dennis GSFC Tuesday, February 29, 2000.
Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Earth Atmosphere.
SNAP Integration Model V. S14 The SNAP Integration Model Mechanical [ SC4 Breakout ] Robin Lafever LBNL Engineering.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Page 1lOhcO 9 meeting From MDI to HMI Jesper Schou Stanford University
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Progress Report Geo-CAPE Coastal Ecosystem Dynamics Imager (CEDI) IRAD Repackaging Study Jason Budinoff / GSFC Cathy Marx / GSFC May 12, 2011.
DRM1 design description SDT 5/17/12 1. WFIRST DRM candidate design summary At SDT6 2/2-3/2012 consensus for full-up mission, aka “DRM1” was: 1.3m aperture,
1 The slides in this collection are all related and should be useful in preparing a presentation on SIM PlanetQuest. Note, however, that there is some.
Delta II 7925H - 10L Baseline workup Launch Vehicle TheirsOurs Delta II 7925H Launch Vehicle 10L Composite Fairing 10L Stretch Composite Payload Fairing.
Final Version Dick Bolt Code 302 May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Success.
S-17 Reference Model Status Robin Lafever 21 October 2004.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
WFIRST DRM2 candidate design – payload summary At SDT7 3/1-2/2012 consensus for concepts w/out overlap w/ other mission, aka “DRM2” was: 1.1m aperture,
SuperNova / Acceleration Probe System Engineering Mike Roberto and Mike Amato November 16, 2001.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
V3 SLAC DOE Program Review Gunther Haller SLAC June 13, 07 (650) SNAP Electronics.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks. PDR 31 August 2000NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks 2 ISUAL Operations Overview.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
Rose Navarro HMI Lead Thermal Engineer
Wide-Field Imager for Solar PRobe Plus (WISPR)
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
James Webb Space Telescope
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
SLAC DOE Program Review
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Instrument Overview Larry Springer HMI Program Manager
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB SNAP ACS Requirements Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB

The SNAP Observatory Secondary Mirror Hexapod Door Assembly Bonnet Main Baffle Assembly Secondary Metering structure Solar Array, ‘Sun side’ Primary Mirror Optical Bench Solar Array, ‘Dark side’ Instrument Metering Structure Instrument Radiator Tertiary Mirror Instrument Bay Fold-Flat Mirror CCD detectors NIR detectors Spectrograph Focal Plane guiders Cryo/Particle shield Spacecraft ACS CD & H Comm Power Data Solid-state recorders Shutter Hi Gain Antenna H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

Observatory Exploded View showing S/C To the extent possible “Spacecraft” components (including the ACS) will be mounted on the Spacecraft portion of the Observatory. Critical items such as the Star Trackers and the IRU’s will be mounted on the optics bench. Optics Bench with Focal Plane Spacecraft Portion of Observatory ACS Specification January 2003 H. Heetderks

Observatory Mass and Structural Properties Current estimate is 1625 kg Maximum capability of Delta IV to SNAP orbit is 2020 kg C.G. is 1.6 meters above the separation plane Center of (solar) Pressure is approximately 3.3 meters above the separation plane Cross Sectional area is approximately 2.8 x 6.7 meter^2 The principal axis MoIs are: Ixx = 3200 kg-m2 (Sun pointing direction) Iyy = 3400 kg-m2 Izz = 1200 kg-m2 (Optical axis) Structural modal frequencies will meet Delta IV requirements 27 Hertz Axial 10 Hertz Lateral H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

Requirements on the SNAP ACS System Operation of the ACS system will typically consist in keeping the telescope pointed at a fixed target for a period of time and then moving to a new target. 1) For large changes of pointing direction (i.e. of any size), we require the ability to drop the target into 3x3 Arcsec box with a 98% confidence . Change of the telescope pointing direction will be done with the science instrument shutter closed. 2) The time allowed to make the pointing direction change of item 1) is a function of the step size: Step Size Settling Time 3 Arcminutes 30 Seconds 1 Degree 2 Minutes 15 Degrees 6 Minutes 180 Degrees 60 Minutes 3) Once pointed, the shutter on the science instrument will open and the direction must be held constant for a 1000 second exposure per the following jitter specification. Full stabilization must occur within 2 seconds of opening of the shutter: Requirement Goal Yaw and Pitch .02 Arcsec RMS .01 Arcsec RMS Roll .80 Arcsec RMS .40 Arcsec RMS H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

Requirements on the SNAP ACS System 4) To perform dithering we will change the telescope pointing direction by an angle between 0.25 and 1.0 Arcsec. For steps limited to this range we require a relative pointing ability which is tighter than that of item 1) above: Requirement Goal Yaw and Pitch .25 Arcsec RMS .025 Arcsec RMS Roll 8.0 Arcsec RMS 0.8 Arcsec RMS a) The instrument shutter will be closed for approximately 30 seconds during the dither step. b) Within 2 seconds following the opening of the shutter, the telescope must be pointed to within the requirements of item 3) above. H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

Baseline ACS Implementation The following page shows a block diagram of the baseline ACS. Note the following features: 1) The system is fully redundant. 2) The redundant pair of control units is dedicated solely to the ACS task, including: a) Control of the observatory pointing b) Control of the propulsion system c) Implementation of a safe-hold sun referenced mode on first receipt of power. 3) Data interfaces between the ACS controller and the reaction wheels, IRU's, star trackers, and sun sensors will be via a single redundant 1553 bus. Manufacturers and model numbers given only as examples. The ACS contractor may pick different components. 4) Control of the propulsion components by the ASC controller may be via the same 1553 bus, or may be via a set of dedicated hardwired lines, or some combination of techniques. 5) Data communication between the ACS controller and the spacecraft C&DH will be via a separate redundant 1553 bus. (This bus will also handle communications between the C&DH, the spacecraft power system, and the instrument electronics). 6) A separate spacecraft power switching unit will supply separately switched 28 volt +/- 2% power to each of the ACS system components. The ACS controller does not have to control power to these components. However, the ACS system will have to operate individual propellant valves, cat bed heaters, etc. in the propulsion system. H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

SNAP ACS Block Diagram 1553 Bus to other Spacecraft Systems Prime Back-up H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

ACS Support Included in the SNAP Science Instrument Some or all of the items below may be included in the science instrument to assist the ACS task. Discussions between the SNAP Project and the ACS vendor will determine the final list. 1) Fine guiding sensors on the science focal plane of the 2 meter primary mirror SNAP telescope with its 22 meter focal length. These consist of a square pattern one degree on a side of four 1K X 1K CCD’s which image and track the guide star(s). Once a star has been acquired the science instrument tracks it, continuously calculates the position of the centroid, and transmits the position to the ACS controller via the 1553 bus. The update rate will be the maximum which can be supported by the photon statistics of the guide star, up to 35 Hertz. This system will operate continuously while the science instrument shutter is open. This system is expected to be included in the final design. Note that the shutter will typically be closed for 30 seconds during CCD readout following each science exposure. 2) A fine guidance sensor at the cassegrain focus. This system is similar to the one above except that it continues to operate when the shutter is closed, but it has only a single CCD which is located in the center of the field of view of the telescope. This system is more subject to thermal and mechanical drift than the focal plane guider because the optical and mechanical paths differ, and is less able to measure roll aspect due to its limited field of view. H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003

ACS Support Included in the SNAP Science Instrument (continued) 3) An Actively Servoed Secondary Mirror (i.e. an implementation of a fast steering mirror). This could respond more quickly than trying to deliver fine rapid corrections to the entire payload. The working range of correction angle is limited to about one arc second. This system would be used in a scheme in which the entire spacecraft and telescope point to each nominal target field with an accuracy and stability of the order of +/- 0.5 arcsecond using conventional star cameras and gyros. A separate feedback loop in the science payload would use the active secondary telescope mirror and the focal plane guider to reduce the image motion to the required stability. In this system the control bandwidth could increase to a few Hz giving possibly superior attitude control speed and accuracy. This system is limited by the maximum range of movement of the secondary mirror of approximately +/- 0.5 arcsec before the degradation of focus becomes unacceptable. 4) A final possibility we are investigating is an Electrical Clear on our CCD's. This would allow the ACS a period of time to re-acquire pointing after the shutter is opened. Then the Clear Line would be used to erase the blurred image from the CCD prior to start of the science data exposure. H. Heetderks ACS Specification January 2003