Playing by the Local Rules Ben Macfarlane (www.finnross.com)www.finnross.com Clark Zhou (www.yatsonlaw.com)www.yatsonlaw.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
Advertisements

CHARTERERS DEFAULT - LIEN OVER CARGO BY IAN GOULSON.
Presented by: Attorney Laurence W. Getman Historical Overview Two or more persons engaged in unlawful enterprise are jointly and severally liable. No.
1 THINK GLOBAL, THINK Hong Kong Huen Wong Immediate Past President The Law Society of Hong Kong Tokyo and Osaka 15 & 17 May 2012.
SEADOCC SCMA Expedited Arbitral Determination of Collision Claims Singapore 25 th November 2013 Andrew Gray and Tony Goldsmith.
ROME II & INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS A CASE STUDY Silina Pavlakis Pavlakis-Moschos & Associates Piraeus, Greece.
Minimizing potential losses in forwarding activities in Russia: legal view Polina Kondratyuk for ACEX Conference September 2014 Law bureau.
Law I Chapter 18.
Legal Issues Final Review. Multiple Choice What is the situation in which a lawyer sues another lawyer for a serious error that caused a client to lose.
Border crossing and IMO antiterrorist measures Legal aspects.
1 Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes VenueNovotel Bauhinia Shenzhen Hotel, China Date15 October 2008 Presented by Charmaine KOO Partner, Intellectual.
Introduction, International Law, and Naval Operations By LT Fullan.
Maritime Law Case Study A.2 Federal Court Workshop William T. Cahill Cox & Palmer St. John’s, NL.
Jurisdiction Over Vessels   Nationality of Vessels   Problem of Registration of Convenience or lack of registration.   All states have the right.
1/06/2015Copyright, Dan Svantesson Law 105 Communication and the law.
1 HNSC: Insurers and Insurance Certificates Professor Erik Røsæg Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law, Oslo Tel
Chapter 18.  Criminal Law: crime against the state  Civil Law: person commits a wrong, not always a violation of law  Plaintiff-the harmed individual,
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 08 OCTOBER 2013.
Maritime Claims An Underwriter ’ s Perspective Eamonn Magee LLB. BL.
CHARTERERS’ DEFAULT: Security and Discovery in the U.S. By Charlotte Valentin.
LLOYD’S OPEN FORM LOF 2011 The most widely used form of salvage contract in the world A long history – LOF has been in existence for over 100 years.
September 29-30, Access to Justice for the Victims of Fraud – The Finance of Complex Fraud Recovery Investigations and Litigation Martin Kenney.
SBZL IP LAW FIRM We bring IP Patent & Trademark Protection in CHINA.
Chapter 15.2 Types of Laws. Criminal and Civil Law Criminal laws seek to prevent people from deliberately or recklessly harming each other or each other’s.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
Protecting Aircraft Assets Following Default Integrated Aviation Finance School. Jackson Chow & Judy Tan, 12 January 2015, Shenzhen.
IMPACTS AND CONCERNS Dr K Sumser-Lupson Capt. J Titahena
Piracy, Armed Guards & BIMCO GUARDCON Naples 8 October 2012 Christopher South.
John R. Keough, Partner The People’s Republic of China’s Enterprise Income Tax Regulation on Non-Resident Taxpayers Engaged in International Transportation.
London Hong Kong Greenwich New York Geneva Milan New Haven Enforcing foreign judgments: the position in England & Wales Christopher Coffin, Partner and.
Privatized bankruptcy A study of shipping financial distress Julian Franks, Oren Sussman and Vikrant Vig A study of shipping financial distress Privatized.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Tilde Publishing and Distribution ISBN: Import/Export Mapping International Trade for Australian Business Cargo Insurance.
Introduction Marine pollution by ships The extent of compensation by the polluter The consequences when not fully compensated Four areas of discussion.
What happens next An educational comedy in one act 1.
Thursday, 2 March 2006 EU CLASS ACTIONS: A PRACTITIONER’S VIEWPOINT Presented by Paul Llewellyn.
MEMBER MEETING 13 & 16 DECEMBER 2014 OSLO & BERGEN.
华南国际经济贸易仲裁委员会(深圳国际仲裁院). Recent Development of Arbitration In China June 26, 2014 Latvia Recent Development of Arbitration In China Ms. ZHOU Juan Arbitrator,
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 30 JULY 2013.
TORTS: A Civil Wrong. Fairplay.org What is a Tort? A civil wrong A breach of some obligation Causing harm or injury to someone –Negligence –Libel Plaintiff.
Unit 2 Chapter 5 Legal Environments of Business (LEB)
CASE 11-6 The Chinese Seamen’s Foreign Technical Services Co.v. Soto Grande Shipping Corp., Sa.
P.R.I.M.E. Finance Panel of Recognized International Market Experts in Finance The role of experts in complex financial cases: DIFC Court case study (Al.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
Contracts of carriage by sea involve an international dimension. The carriage of goods across nations separated by sea are often done by shipping lines.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
Patent Enforcement & Forum Shopping in China Liu, Shen & Associates: Jun Qiu September 2014.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
CHAPTER 18 PART I Torts: A Civil Wrong. A Civil Wrong In criminal law, when someone commits a wrong, we call it a crime. In civil law, when someone commits.
Chapter 5 Maritime Lien. 一、 Definition of maritime liens(ML) : CMC Art. 21 A maritime lien is the right of the claimant, subject to the provisions of.
Debts Recovery in Romania. INTRODUCTION Recovering a debt can be a complex process everywhere, for every business, regardless of the industry. The Romanian.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
MOST FAVORED NATION TREATMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS & INVESTMENT ARBITRATION IN CHINA.
Maritime Arbitration as an effective tool in resolving cross-border shipping disputes in Sub-Sahara Africa by Andrew Pike, Head of the Ports, Terminals.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 2.
5 th International Cargo Recovery Conference “Practical aspects and new developments in Chinese recovery law” 17 June 2016, New York 20 June 2016, Montreal.
SUNDKROGSGADE 5, DK-2100 KØBENHAVN ØCVR. NR: DK TH INTERNATIONAL CARGO CONFERENCE PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF DANISH AND SCANDINAVIAN RECOVERY LAW.
Input costs to Explode A NO GO ZONE
A Leading PRC Law Firm Foreign Investment Dispute Resolution Between Chinese and European Parties Peiming Yang
5TH ANNUAL CARGO RECOVERY CONFERENCE – MONTRÉAL, QC
Enforcement in China.
Liens and mortgages Professor Erik Røsæg
MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION
Maritime Law General introduction Chapter1.
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
Corporate governance enforcement in Hong Kong
Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Action
Private/Civil Law:.
Benefits of the 2019 HCCH Judgments Convention
Presentation transcript:

Playing by the Local Rules Ben Macfarlane ( Clark Zhou (

The Scenarios  There is a collision between MV” Hong Kong” (16,200 T) and MV “Guangzhou” (35,000T) in the South China Seas in Chinese territorial waters  Each vessel was 50% to blame for the collision  The P and I Clubs for both vessels are English. Both vessels are registered in Panama

The Scenarios 2.Each vessel was 50% to blame for the collision. The MV Hong Kong Loss or Claims Bill: 1.Vessel damage: USD 5M 2.Hire: USD 2M 3.Cargo damage: USD 10M 4.Coastguard Salvage & Clean-Up: USD 10M TOTAL: USD 27M

The Scenarios MV Guangzhou Loss or Claims Bill: 1.Vessel damage: USD 8M 2.Hire: USD 5M 3.Cargo damage: USD 16M TOTAL: USD 29M

The Scenarios In one scenario the parties agree to litigate in England. In the other, the Guangzhou is arrested at her next port of call in China and the proceedings begin in China

What is the time limit for bringing these claims both in England and China? The Questions

Can that limit be extended by agreement? The Questions

How do you stop the time limit from running (by issuing or serving the Claim Form)? The Questions

How is the limitation of liability (Ship’s Limitation) calculated both under English and Chinese law? China: 167,000 SDR (300 to 500T) 167 SDR (501 to 30k T) 125 SDR (30,001 to 70k T) 83 SDR (70,001 T Up) England: Post ,510,000 SDR (up to 2k T) 604 SDR (2001 to 30k T) 453 SDR (30,001 to 70k T) 302 SDR (70,001 T Up) The Questions

If Coast Guard claims MV Hong Kong for salvage and clean-up costs, MV Hong Kong cannot limit liability, but when MV Hong Kong takes recovery claim against MV Guangzhou, MV Guangzhou can limit liability China: Yes England: Yes

The Questions Where there are cross-claims as in this case, how are they calculated and at what stage is limitation applied? China: (1) Calculate total loss (27m+29m= 56m) (2) Each Party’s share of Liability = 50% = 28m (3) Deduct loss from Liability= “HK”: 28m-27m=1m “GZ”: 28m-29m=-1m (4) “HK” Pays 1m “GZ” receives 1m (5) Apply Ship’s Limitation for the “HK” to the balance (1m) England: Same

The Questions Can I engage a lawyer for this case, on “no cure no pay” or “contingency fee” in England v. in China?

The Questions What law will be applied to Collisions in England and China? China: Normally law of place of collision but if both from same flag state then law of flag state England: Normally law of place of tort (China) but in this case English law would normally be agreed with English Jurisdiction. Hence the 1910 Collision Regulations would apply

How will the evidence be presented in England and China? Does particular evidence hold greater weight with the Court? What about expert evidence? The Questions

Cultural aspects of managing the cases in England and China, how do they differ?

The Questions Assuming no security has been given but that there are assets of the paying party either in England or China, how easy will it be to enforce an English Judgment in China or a Chinese Judgment in England?

Thank You General guidance only. Seek legal opinion when issue arises