Tyrone Manufacturing Company. Management Survey Tom Mitchell & Aron Thune.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Coaching and Discipline Without Punishment
Advertisements

Team Development Presented by Scialfa Ruth H Mora.
Performance Coaching For Salespeople Charles Warner.
Time Management By Zahira Gonzalez.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Give Our Library Student Workers a Chance to Voice Their Opinions Zheng Ye (Lan) Yang Director of Direct Services Texas A&M University Library.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Leadership Habit 1: Be Proactive
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Embedding Enterprise in the Curriculum CEC 202 A Sense of Place School of English Second Year Approved Module.
Chapter Learning Objectives
Preview Excerpts “Women in Technology Report 2007” to be included & interpreted: WITI Webinar Two Sessions: May 15 and May 29, 2007.
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
“I can tell you who I am, what I think, feel, believe, want to do, and have done, without getting anxious or worrying about what you may think about.
Managing Conflict.
The Manager as Leader 3.1 The Importance of Leadership
Teamwork 101.
Leadership.
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Organizational Behavior MBA-542 Instructor: Erlan Bakiev, Ph.D.
1 Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Elder Care.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Unit 250 Developing Yourself as a Team Leader
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
March 2010Developed by Agency Human Resource Services, DHRM1 Organization Assessment Example of an Organizational Design Review and Recommendations.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation
Working as Individuals and in Teams. Work as Individuals & Teams Individual 1.Specific role or task 2.Solely responsible for work 3. Purpose, tasks given.
4 Basic Qualities of a Healthy Relationship
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Basic Concepts in Management. Manager Someone who coordinates and oversee the work of other people so that organizational goal can be achieved.
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT CRITERIA UNIT II. Effective managers lead to business success 1. Know what is going on. Be aware of what is happening in your sector,
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
Lessons learned in the Japanese-American Workplace Understanding Trust Mentoring Communication Delegation Five Pillars of Successful Multicultural Management.
TEAMWORK.
TEAMWORK Training the Programme Developers. Teamwork: why do we need it? Responsibility, potential and delegation Your optimal potential Resposibility.
7 Chapter Organizational Structures pp
Types of Directive Leadership Behavior
Reducing Turnover and Increasing Retention Tips and Tactics for Supervisors.
Effective Groups and Teams
10/25/2015 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG Lecture 08 Teaming and Effective Meetings.
PERSONAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Effective Teams. CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS 
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Understanding Groups & Teams Ch 15. Understanding Groups Group Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular.
Conclusions – Final Statements “Unfortunately, one of the reasons that the vast majority of engineers studied engineering was because they were more comfortable.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Path-Goal Approach to Leadership. Path-Goal Theory Goal - To enhance employee performance and satisfaction by focusing on employee motivation Motivational.
MADE BY: Shalini Prakash….(018) Monisha Gautam..(026)
The Manager as a Leader Chapter 12. The Importance of Leadership Definition: Leadership is the ability to influence individuals and groups to cooperatively.
Working in Groups The Overview. Dealing with Difficult Group Members 1. Don’t placate the troublemaker. 2. Refuse to be goaded into a reciprocal pattern.
IMPLEMENTING SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP: BUILDING COMMITMENTS.
Assessing the Assessment: Studying our Student Climate Survey What statistics and students have to say about WCSD’s Annual Student Climate Survey.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
1 The 7 Elements of a High Performance Healthcare Team Cohesiveness Healthy Climate Team Members’ Contribution.
Connecting K-12 Schools Nationwide to Support Sustainable School Improvement October 2008 “We” Survey Suite with Linda Lucey
Leadership & Teamwork. QUALITIES OF A GOOD TEAM Shared Vision Roles and Responsibilities well defined Good Communication Trust, Confidentiality, and Respect.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
Family Matters: The Effects of Adolescents’ Exposure to Political Discussion in the Home David E. Campbell University of Notre Dame.
Planning and Organizing Chapter 13. The Planning Function Planning for a business should stem from the company’s Business Plan – The business plan sets.
Build Supportive & Diverse Relationships Chapter 12.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
SUNY Oswego Survey Employee Comments-Snapshot
Items in red require your input
1. I have the final say over decisions made within my group.
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Building Team Relationships
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 3rd Edition Section 35
Presentation transcript:

Tyrone Manufacturing Company. Management Survey Tom Mitchell & Aron Thune

Overview Respondents Survey Results of Survey Summary of Findings

Respondents Total 70 of 83 Managers (85 %) New Jersey 34 Elkton 33 Other locations 3

Managers’ Tenure

Survey (total 99 items) Communication with –Other Managers (25) – Associates (25) Organizational Frustration (23) Role Ambiguity (5) Role Conflict (6) Job Related Tension (15)

Comments Offered 55 comments from 27 respondents 5 content categories –Communication –Silo Mentality –Leadership –Recommendations –Work

Survey Findings from: Communication with –Other Managers – Associates

Who initiates with other mgrs? 70% equally

One on one…who listens most? 72% About same

Other mgrs understand my viewpoint? 70% usually/always

Provide relevant information to other mgrs 40% a lot 46% some “There isn't a consistent mechanism for middle managers to receive information. I think these things are discussed at upper levels but don't get communicated down.”

Others mgrs consult with me before making a commitment… 60 %Most or all the time 20%Almost never

Associates used as intermediaries to deal with conflict 40 % Occasionally / frequently 60 % Rarely / Never !!

…feel put in middle of conflict between two other mgrs 45 % Occasionally / frequently 50% Almost never

After being denied…go over my head 8% frequently 40% occasionally 52% rarely / never

Other mgrs …work with me in an open and honest way 60% frequently 9% rarely

Prompt return of phone calls 80% few hours / same day

Quality of Interactions Hostile………………..Friendly Adversarial………….. Cooperative Guarded (closed)….….Frank (open) One way………….…..Two way Unproductive……..…..Productive Blaming ………………Problem solving Ambiguous……………Clear Silo……………………Team mentality

Communication with other mgrs

Manager Interactions 84 % (4 &5)

Manager Interactions 50 % (4 &5) “TMC has given way to a partisan mentality of ‘My Business Unit at all costs – I can’t be concerned with yours’.”

Asked: Why mgrs don’t involve other mgrs with problems they have Have enough expertise themselves Mgrs are overly confident in their abilities Don’t know capabilities of others Don’t respect the capabilities of others Bosses discourage them seeking help Don’t feel comfortable asking for help

Why they don’t involve other mgrs because… Don’t know their capability –50% Agreed Don’t respect their capability –41% Agreed Don’t feel comfortable asking them for help –45% Agreed

Summary of Mgr to Mgr Communication… Positive findings: –Initiate communication equally –Listen well to one another –Responsive to each other –Understand one another –Friendly and get along well –Open and honest with each other

Summary of Mgr to Mgr Communication…(cont) Need improvement in… – Confronting others directly Avoid end runs and using intermediaries Consult and share information more Move more from silo to team approach Seek other’s input and opinions before deciding Learn more about others’ capabilities

Recommend Establish structured mechanisms for: –sharing information and –seeking others’ input Develop more of a cross-functional team approach Learn to confront each other amicably Using problem solving strategy / not emotional response Learn to ask for input Even when certain / explore other options Learn to feel comfortable disclosing uncertainty

Survey Findings from: Communication with –Other Managers – Associates

Communication Managers v. Associates Similar on all questions but: –…Having viewpoint understood –…Working in open and honest way –…Involvement of others in problems –…Quality of interactions

“…viewpoint understood by…” “… usually, always” …Other Managers 70% …Associates 91%

“…work in open and honest way” “…frequently ” Among managers 60% With associates 86 % –“The associates at TMC try to work together to achieve what are perceived to be the most important goals.”

“… Less likely to involve other managers as opposed to associates” Because they… –Don’t know their capabilities –Don’t respect their capabilities –Don’t feel comfortable asking them for help

Quality of interactions … with other TMC mgrs v. Associates No difference on –Hostile…………………Friendly Associates viewed more favorably on: –Adversarial…………….Cooperative –Guarded (closed)………Frank (open) –One way……………….Two way –Unproductive…………..Productive –Blaming ……………….Problem solving –Ambiguous…………….Clear –Silo…………………….Team mentality

Summary: Other Managers v. Associates on Communication Equally friendly to both mgrs and associates Less likely to involve other managers than their associates Less confident in capabilities of other managers compared to confidence in associates Less comfortable involving other managers than their associates

TMC Work Environment Scales Organizational Frustration (23) (Spector, ‘75) Role Ambiguity (5) (Rizzo, House, Lirtzman, ‘70) Role Conflict (6) (Rizzo, House, Lirtzman, ‘70) Job Related Tension (15) (Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn & Snoek, ’64)

Org Frustration

Highest frustration Some are incompetent –52% Agree/Strongly Agree Run ragged… –55% Agree/Strongly Agree Too much work… –47%Agree/Strongly Agree

Lowest Frustration Supervisor trusts me –88%Agree/Strongly Agree Job is not boring –92% Agree/Strongly Agree Work is worthwhile –92%Agree/Strongly Agree –“Overall, I am very satisfied with the type of work I do.”

Role Ambiguity Percent unclear on… 24% “Authority I have” 19% “Goals and objectives for my job” 16% “What’s expected of me” 10% “How to divide my time” 8% “My responsibilities”

Role Conflict Percent agree/agree strongly that… 40% Do something accepted by one but not others –“…projects get slowed down because one department feels it should be done differently, but never gives input until the final review.” 30% Receive assignments –without adequate manpower and resources 27% Receive incompatible requests

Role Conflict Most is probably due to lack of close communication among managers Mgr interactions and Mgr involvement

Job Tension Is…a person’s Adverse physical or emotional reactions caused by work related factors Such as… Role conflict / Role ambiguity Work overload Interpersonal conflict Perceived control over decisions (autonomy/participative)

Salient Tension Items Percent …often/nearly all the time –34 % …job interferes with family life –20 % …not knowing promo/advancement opportunities –13 % …not enough authority to carry out responsibilities

Causes for Tension Largest contributor: –Organizational frustration Some are incompetent Run ragged… Too much work… Other factors that contribute: –Role Conflict (indirectly) –Role Ambiguity (indirectly) –Mgr w/ Mgr and Mgr w/ Assoc interactions

Causal path Mgr InteractionMgr Involvement Role Conflict Frustration Job Tension

Conclusions Common climate for NJ & Elkton Communication (among managers) –Generally quite favorable Mgrs communicate well, understand one another Open and honest, and friendly Improvements needed –Use positive confrontation more often Sharing / asking for others’ input –(as they do with associates)

Conclusions (cont’) Job Tension …Moderate level stemming from… Frustration –Perceived incompetence of some others –High work demand Role Conflict –Lack of coordination and sharing

Recommendations Develop action plans to –Increase meaningful interaction among managers on job related issues –Encourage mgrs to solicit fellow managers’ input and share ideas –Assist mgrs in how to better communicate to higher management their Resource needs and Constraints on meeting objectives