Unit 2 PROJECT EVALUATION. Syllabus Strategic Assessment Technical Assessment Cost Benefit Analysis Cash Flow forecasting Cost Benefit Evaluation techniques.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2012 Jones et al: Strategic Managerial Accounting: Hospitality, Tourism & Events Applications 6thedition, Goodfellow Publishers Chapter 14 Capital Investment.
Advertisements

Capital Budgeting.
Presentation for Company x
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
Project Selection (Ch 4)
3.2 Investment Appraisal Chapter 19. Investment To purchase capital goods  Equipment  Vehicles  New buildings  Improving existing fixed assets.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis.
B280F Introduction to Financial Management
ICS 442 Software Project Management
Preparing the Systems Proposal CIS458. Last Class Project outline –Documents and reports Database Application Lifecycle –Database planning, system definition,
Chapter 3 Program Management and Project Evaluation Professor Hossein Saiedian McGraw-Hill Education ISBN
INVESTMENT APPRAISAL NON DISCOUNTING By Lucky Yona.
1 Investment Appraisal Geoff Leese Sept 1999 revised Sept 2001, Jan 2003, Jan 2006, Jan 2007, Jan 2008, Dec 2008 (special thanks to Geoff Leese)
Chapter 9 INVESTMENT CRITERIA Pr. Zoubida SAMLAL GF 200.
Chapter 4. Economic Factors in Design The basis of design decisions will be economics. Designing a technically safe and sound system will be only part.
Investment Appraisal Techniques
Capital Budgeting Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Chapter 11 Capital Budgeting.
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis.
Capital Budgeting Evaluation Technique Pertemuan 7-10 Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
CAPITAL BUDGETING AND CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES FOR ENTERPRISE Chapter 5.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. May 31 Capital Budgeting Decisions.
Moving from Analysis to Design
PROJECT EVALUATION. Introduction Evaluation  comparing a proposed project with alternatives and deciding whether to proceed with it Normally carried.
Economic Aspects of Information Systems Updated 2015 MIS 2000 Information Systems for Management Instructor: Bob Travica.
Capital Budgeting Chapter 11.
Business cost and revenue
4 C H A P T E R Capital Investment Decisions.
Capital Budgeting and Investment Analysis
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
Capital expenditure decisions: an introduction
©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Chapter 11 Capital Budgeting.
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 3 COMM02 Project Evaluation Unit 3.
Chapter 21 Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis. Project and Time Dimensions of Capital Budgeting.
CHAPTER 9 Capital Investment Decision Basics
Chapter 5 Presented by Group 6
10-1 The Basics of Capital Budgeting Should we build this plant?
Long-Term (Capital Investment) Decisions
Software Project Management 4th Edition
Software Project Management
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Capital Budgeting Chapter 11.
Duration 1 hour 30 mins Investment Analysis. Topics to be covered Review of last session Investment background Capital budgeting Methods.
Financial Project Metrics in Feasibility Study
Pro Forma Income Statement Projected or “future” financial statements. The idea is to write down a sequence of financial statements that represent expectations.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Moving from Analysis to Design.
Investment Appraisal Techniques
Feasibility Study.
CHAPTER NO. 4 CAPITAL BUDGETING. 2 Capital and Capital Budgeting Capital: is the stock of assets that will generate a flow of income in the future. Capital.
Software Project Management
Capital Budgeting. Typical Capital Budgeting Decisions Capital budgeting tends to fall into two broad categories...  Screening decisions. Does a proposed.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Capital Budgeting Chapter 11.
IT Project Management MS Sumayya Ajaz Lecture 9. Programme Management Individual projects as components of a programme within the organization. Programme.
UNIT No. 3 Capital Budgeting Nature Significance Technique of Capital Budgeting Pay back Method Accounting Rate of Return Net Present Value Profitability.
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Investment Decision-making Learning Outcomes To be able to perform investment appraisal calculations (E) To be able to analyse the investment appraisal.
Capital Budgeting Tools and Technique. What is Capital Budgeting In “Capital budgeting” capital relates to the total funds employs in an enterprise as.
Part I Project Initiation.
Project Evaluation and Programme Management
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
Cost Benefit Evaluation Techniques
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
Investment Appraisal - Is it worth it?
Capital Budgeting 2 2.
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
Lecture # 4 Software Development Project Management
Unit 6 Finance Knowledge Organiser 6 The Role of the Finance Function
Capital Investment Appraisal: Appraisal process and methods
Presentation transcript:

Unit 2 PROJECT EVALUATION

Syllabus Strategic Assessment Technical Assessment Cost Benefit Analysis Cash Flow forecasting Cost Benefit Evaluation techniques Risk evaluation

Introduction How project is selected ? –Evaluation process Strategy of the business organization Technical viability Financial viability (Both investments and returns) and Risk factors

Strategic Assessment Organizations has ‘organisational goals’ –Profit / product / domain leader etc… Directs / focuses activities towards achieving these goals Multiple projects are taken up to stay competitive ~ “Program” (interdependant, managed in a coordinated way) ‘Project portfolio’ - group of projects carried out under a management resources are scarce full use of the available resources in multiple projects cost effective Dev process manageable ( use of reusable components)

Portfolio models Market driven portfolio model –Adhoc projects taken based on need of the market e.g. Y2K Economic – Return model –Profit alone is the motive ( may switch businesses) e.g Computer business to cinema business ! Cost Benefit model –Relative benefit of each project, under the portfolio ( so that one gain compensates for one loss) Market Research model –New products based on market survey ( e.g digital teaching)

Project Portfolio Management (PPM) ~ collectively analyzing and managing a group of current or proposed projects Goal - to determine the optimal mix and sequencing of proposed projects to best achieve the organization's overall goals

PPM objective Organisational Goal Goal of portfolio of projects Goal of project 1Goal of project 2Goal of project N ……….

Strategic Assessment … Coexistence with other existing SW products Effect of the SW on the organisation’s structure / working practice ( resistance must be managed) How the output of the proposed system would enhance the decision making process of the top management ? How morale of the employee will affect by the proposed system Will the customer feel at home ?

Strategic Assessment … Strategic Assessment Fit of the proposed system into existing information - coexistance Organisation’s objective Enhancement to MIS Employee’s skill development and morale Customer’s image on organisation Effects on organizational structure

Who takes strategic assessment ? Investor Top management –MD / GM / CEO / CFO / CIO / CTO / COO Senior Management –VP ( marketing) –VP ( technical) –VP (HR)

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Evaluate the various –Functionalities to be built, –Required expertise –Knowledge –Required hardware and –Required software / Tools –Availability –Required training –Update knowledge / skill

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT… Constraints –standardized on a specific hardware/software infrastructure –use available technologies, not be futuristic –Integrations between technologies –high end technology requiring high investment Cost benefit analysis must be done

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS Basic concept –Income and benefit must exceed the investment to make the project worth while taking up. Steps for cost benefit analysis –Step 1: Identify costs –Step 2: Identify Benefits –Step 3: Compare both

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS… Step 1: Identify costs –Development cost salaries, employee benefit costs and all associated costs ( PF, Health Insurance, LTA, Car allowance) –Set up cost hardware Software Installation ancillary equipment data taken on/ data conversion. –Training cost cost of trainer, equipments and other needs of training –Operating cost Help desk hands on training maintenance

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS… Step 2: Identify Benefits –Direct cost savings Bottom line Profit Reduction in cost due to procurement of goods, employing new recruits –Indirect cost savings Diff. bet earlier and current working environment ( e.g overtime, less maintenance, saving on electricity bcos of no overtime etc..) –Intangible benefits, which cannot be quantified (E.g. improvement in morale of an employee)

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS… Step 3: Compare both –Express both cost and benefits in a common unit ( so that comparison is easy) –What is the most common unit ? MONEY.

Types of benefits Quantified and valued – direct financial benefit Quantified but not valued –decrease in number of complaints –Reduction in AR collection time Identified but not easily quantified –satisfying the mandatory government’s new regulations

CASH FLOW FORECASTING What is ~ ? –How much and when money is required ? Initial stage ( cash out flow) –salaries, purchase of capital goods, training etc.. –Source of funds - company’s assets or bank loan or VC funds Operational stage ( cash inflow) –when and how much money is expected ? Decommissioning stage ( cash outflow) –Data conversion programs –Parallel Run –Corrections in new software

Typical product life cycle cash flow Income Expenditure  Time

COST BENEFIT EVALUATION TECHNIQUES Project evaluation from economic perspective Techniques used –Net profit –Payback period –Return on investment (ROI) –Net present value (NPV) –Internal rate of return (IRR)

Example cash flow YearProject 1 (Rs)Project 2 (Rs) Initial investment (100,000) 130,00020, ,00020, ,00020, ,00020, ,00075,000

Net profit Definition –Net profit of a project is the difference between the total costs (cash outflow) and the total income (cash inflow) –Net profit (Project 1) = cash inflow – cash outflow Rs.1,50,000 – Rs.1,00,000= Rs.50,000 - Net profit (Project 1) = Rs 55,000 Conclusion : Project is positive ( profitable)

Net profit … Advantages –simple subtraction …very easy to calculate Disadvantages –does not take care of the timing of the cash inflow ( e.g in proj 2 wait for 5 years to get a sizable profit- distant future ? )

Payback period Definition –Payback period is the time taken to breakeven i.e. in other words, getback the initial investment. –Proj 1 -- payback in 4 years ( net profit = Rs. 50,000) –Proj 2 -- payback in 5 years ( net profit = Rs. 55,000)

Payback period… Advantages –simple, very easy to calculate –Small errors do not greatly affect Disadvantages –ignores the profitability of the project

Return of investment (ROI) Definition –Return on investment is the percentage of the ratio of average annual profit to total investment

Return of investment (ROI)… Project 1, gives a ROI as below For project 2,

Return of investment (ROI)… Advantages –Simple and easy to calculate ( only one formula) Disadvantages It does not take care of the timing of the cash flow. For example, if the same money is invested in bank, then for the number of years, Bank provides cumulative rate of interest. This aspect is not considered in the above formula for ROI.

Net Present Value (NPV) Definition where r is the rate (also called discount rate) expressed in decimal value (0.1 here) and t is the number of years into the future the cash flow occurs.

NPV … Assume we have Rs.100 now and we put that in a bank which gives an interest of 10% a year. So, next year the amount accrued will be Rs.110. In different words, Rs.110 received next year, would have a present value of Rs.100 with a discount rate of 10%.

NPV … Here t = 1 year r = 10% i.e. (r expressed in decimal value) »= Rs.100

NPV … Advantage –NPV take care of both profitability and the timing of the cash flow. Disadvantage –Does not take care of other investment avenues –Choosing the the most appropriate ‘discount rate’ The parameters which would affect the discount factor are –Financial risk ( global US$ fluctuation) –Market risk ( more time taken- value goes down- competition would have entered and profitted)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) IRR gives a profitability measure as a percentage return that is directly comparable with other investment avenues (E.g. bank interest rate on fixed deposit). Explained in simple terms, if a software project yields a return of 15%, then, we can invest in it if –The investment for the project is borrowable from a source at a rate less than 15%. –Our money cannot yield 15% income in any other investment.

IRR … Advantages –Simple percentage, so it is easy to compare the IRR of a software project with that of other investments (E.g. Bank interest) –MS Excel has a function to calculate IRR Disadvantage –a percentage and not absolute value Invest Rs.100 and get a return of Rs120. The IRR in this case is 20% and Absolute value is Rs.20. Invest Rs.1000 and get a return of Rs the IRR in this case is 10% but the absolute value is Rs.100.

DCF methods Discounted Cash Flow methods –NPV –IRR

Conclusions No single technique can indicate whether our investment on a software project is worth or not. Multiple factors must be considered –The cash flow to pay back interest and principal from the borrowed source, + paying salaries to employees. –We are investing now and expecting return in future, and future is very uncertain. We must add also some additional percentage on return to cover the risk. –Technical evaluation, and financial evaluation only might not be enough to decide on investment. One must also consider our competence before actually putting our money into any project.

RISK EVALUATION What is Risk ? –Risks are future uncertain events in a project with a probability of occurrence and a potential for loss Take calculated risk after evaluating risk Risk evaluation process –Risk identification –Risk ranking (magnitude of impact on the project) –Risk quantification

Risk Matrix Risk = Probability of occurrence * Impact Three levels of Risk –Low –Medium –High

Risk Identification Checklist –previous experiences –discuss with project peers,team members, seniors –Reading prev proj dB example  Risk Details 1 Unavailability of a specific domain experts 2 Unavailability of key resources from customer side. 3 Risk of a delay in delivery of a specific hardware/software/tool 4 Project completion within the given budget 5 Demands of the over enthused customer with respect to performance.

Risk Ranking Rank risk to assess its likelihood of occurrence –scale of zero to 5 –low/medium/high/unlikely Example Unavailability of a specific domain experts - Ranking2 Unavailability of a specific domain expert --- Importance – High Likelihood - Low

Risk Quantification 2 methods –NPV –Probable average expected value ( leading to decision tree)

Risk Quantification NPV method –Based on single cash flow statement –Give Numeric value, easy for comparing 2 projects –Risk value of 2%, 4%, 6% (discount factor) are arbitrary but parameters applied uniformly across all projects gives correct relative judgement –what is required is the ‘relative judgment’ and not an ‘absolute estimate’!

Probable Average Expected Value Method Considers multiple cash flow, each with a probability factor E.g the sale of a product in a year market situation government policy Etc –Cannot predict exactly

Probable Average Expected Value Method… Assume 3 different situations Bright sale, Average sale and Dull sale. Guestimate the probability of such situation –Result - three different cash flows Take sum of all these 3 This reduces the risk of our estimate (compared to NPV method Accuracy depends on the guestimates ( experience helps)

Probable Average Expected Value Method … Example : Investment = 1L ; profit / Loss ? Rain forecastSale value in Rs. (V) Probability factor (P) Expected sale in Rs (ES = V * P) Heavy 70, ,000 Average 100, ,000 No 200, ,000 Most probable sale value 149,000

Decision Tree Definition –A decision tree is a decision support tool that uses a tree like graph model of decisions and their possible consequences, including chance event outcome, resource cost and utility

Decision Tree… Our product sale depends on –Market looking really ‘Bright’ - probability 0.2. –Market remains ‘Average’ - probability 0.5. –Market becoming ‘Dull’ - probability 0.3 –If market is ‘Bright’, the probability of a revenue generation of Rs.30 lakhs is 0.3 and Rs.50 lakhs is 0.7. –If the market is ‘Average’, the probability of a revenue generation of Rs.5 lakhs is 0.8 and Rs.10 lakhs is 0.2. –If the market is ‘Dull’, the probability of a revenue generation of Rs.15 lakhs is 0.9 and Rs.20 lakhs is 0.1.

Decision Tree… Market = Bright (0.2) Market = DULL (0.3) Market = Average (0.5) PR = 50L (0.7) PR = 5L (0.8) PR = 10L (0.2) PR = 15L (0.9) PR = 20L (0.1) RAR = 0.2*0.3*30L = 1.8L RAR = 0.2*0.7*50L = 7L RAR = 0.3*0.8*5L = 1.2L RAR = 0.3*0.2*10 = 0.6L RAR = 0.5*0.9*15L = 6.75L RAR = 0.5*0.1*20 = 1L PR = 30L(0.3)

Decision Tree… RAR gives expected revenue under the assumed probabilities of the various events Various scenarios are analysed Easy to make a more informed judgment whether to develop the product or not Accuracy of the RAR depends on –various probability factors and –projected revenue under various circumstances.

End Unit 2