CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
Advertisements

Chemical Analysis of Water
Final Construction Stormwater General Permit Issued November 16, 2005 Jeff Killelea Department of Ecology.
The Study on Water Quality of the Return Flow in Lower Tap Salao Irrigation Project Hungspreug N. 1 Chooaksorn W. 2 and Sudcha P. 3 Department of Environmental.
TEAM ORGANIZATION Education and Water Monitoring Action Group ( EWAG)
Water Chemistry Testing. We have been investigating the “health” of the Ramsey Brook in the following ways: Mapping Imperviousness Surveying Macroinvertebrates.
Low Impact Development Pollutant Detections In Runoff From California Neighborhoods Loren Oki UC Davis, Plant Sciences Darren Haver UC Cooperative Extension,
SUSANNA SCOTT MIAMI UNIVERSITY Ecosystem Metabolism: Response to Storm Events.
Water Quality Monitoring of Lake St. Joseph Watershed Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard, Ph.D. Co-Principal Investigators: James Hendrix Donnie Miller,
Water Quality Data Assessment of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary Alison Astalos, Mike Kennish Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Introduction Methods.
Effects of Different Properties in Water on Plant Growth and Production of Fruit By Cynthia Drake.
Effective Policy Based on Sparse Data TMDLs in the San Joaquin River Basin, California Leslie F. Grober.
Multi-parameter Water-Quality Probes (YSI/Hydrolab) Lecture 5.
Water were does it come from and why do we need it!
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Data Analysis 101. Overview Basic Statistics Basic Statistics Reporting variability and error Reporting variability and error Summarizing Data Summarizing.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Background & Instructions for Water Testing with World Water Monitoring Challenge Testing Kits Information presented here is taken and supplemented from.
To determine how a manmade structure, an overpass, effects aspects of stream water quality and discharge.
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Water quality determination Kuruvunga springs Catalina Marambio Jones SEE-LA GK12 program March 20 th, 2013.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF LIS WATER. DISSOLVED OXYGEN What do organisms need oxygen for? How do organisms get oxygen out of the water?
National Monitoring Conference May 10, 2006 Westchester County Department of Planning Westchester County Citizens’
From the Rivers to the Oceans – Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Coastal Zone Management Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Environment.
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Lake Pontchartrain Water Quality Monitoring March – May 2008 Bonnet Carre Spillway Opening Andrea Bourgeois-Calvin Program Coordinator Bonnet Carre Workshop.
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling Gated access to harbor.
Project: D/O. Background Info Salmon require a D/O of more than 9 mg/l. 5 mg/l is considered very poor. 3mg/l and the organism suffer greatly.
NAPA PLANT SITE RESTORATION PROJECT SOUTH UNIT BREACH 2010 Water Quality Monitoring.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Figure 2. (upper) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow (measured in inches of runoff at Foster Park) varied from.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Background As number of species varies with volume (Taylor, 1997, and others), how is assemblage stability affected when isolated pools shrink during summer?
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Water Quality in the Alaskan Arctic By Kaylan Duthie December 1, 2005.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
Cycles of Change: Part II The Ventura River: before and after the big storm In the three weeks following Christmas, the South Coast was hit with a series.
Analysis of Mechanisms of Nutrient Cycling in Floodplain Lakes of the Lower Mississippi River By Alex Dominguez.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Rush Creek 2012 EmmaBeccaCassidy Feat. Guido Temperature The purpose of the temperature test was to check the temperature of the river to make sure the.
B-WET Arroyo Colorado Professional Development Workshop for Teachers Funded by NOAA.
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
MARINE BIOLOGY: INFO SESSION 1 Some of the types of equipment oceanographers use to do research.
Whitefish River and Riverside Pond Water Quality Monitoring and Management Barrett Gray Mr. Spangler Whitefish High School Advanced Chemistry.
January 2009 Phase IVB Construction Photographs by Brent Anderson.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Highlights of the New NPDES Permit
Biogeochemistry of Tempe Town Lake
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Exhibit A: Monitoring well and surface water sampling locations.
Water Quality By Mrs. Darden.
Salinity of Oceans.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
Water Quality Monitoring
A Public Friendly Approach to Sharing Water Quality Data
Hydrogeologic Investigations of the Silver Lake Wetland

Middle Cache River Monitoring
Total Maximum Daily Loads
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
By: Maureen Gregory Emily Waldt
Marco island water quality monitoring
How Do You Know an Ecosystem is Healthy?
Presentation transcript:

CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit

Napa Plant Site – Central Unit Project Location

Major Design Elements

Construction Photos Channel Excavation

Construction Photos South Perimeter Levee Lowering

Public Access Features Construction Photos

Barge Channel Breach Construction Photos

MONITORING AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Napa Plant Site Central Unit

Water Quality Monitoring Water quality parameters: salinity, turbidity, temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO). Time: Data collected during an ebbing tide Frequency: –Within 3 days prior to breaching –Once during the first 24 hrs after breaching and again within 5 days after breaching –Weekly for the first month after breaching –Monthly until water quality objectives have been met for 3 consecutive months Per California Regional Water Quality Control Board

Sampling Locations 6 locations for Central Unit Breach. Shown on map as yellow dots NR-3 - Napa River, location 3 CUB-DS Central Unit Breach Downstream 150 ft CUB - Central Unit Breach CUB-US Central Unit Breach Upstream 150 ft NR-2 - Napa River, location 2 NR-1 - Napa River, location 1 Additionally sampled at the North Unit Breach (not included on following charts for clarity)

Salinity Performance Standard – Outflow from site will increase by no more than 5 ppt during any tide cycle. Results – Within performance standards BREACH 9/29/09

Turbidity Performance Standard – Outflow from site will not increase turbidity by more than 5 NTU during any tide cycle or by more than 10% if background is > 50 NTU. Results – Turbidity spikes in the first few days but returned to performance standards after 1 week. BREACH 9/29/09

Temperature Performance Standard – Outflow from site will not increase temperature by more than 2.8 o C in the wet season and 5.6 o C in the dry season during any tide cycle. Result – Within performance standards BREACH 9/29/09

pH Performance Standard – Outflow from site will not cause changes greater than 0.5 units of pH during any tide cycle. Results – Within performance standards BREACH 9/29/09

Dissolved Oxygen Performance Standard – Outflow from site will not decrease DO to a concentration lower than 5.0 mg/L during any tide cycle. Results – Within performance standards BREACH 9/29/09