ROCKENBACH, M. 1; DAL LAGO, A. 2; MUNAKATA, K. 3; KATO, C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
Advertisements

Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
North-West University, Potchefstroom November 18, 2011 Ground-Based Cosmic Ray Detectors for Space Weather Applications John W Bieber University of Delaware,
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
A New Look at the Heliosphere and Solar Modulation
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Precursor signatures of storm sudden commencement observed by a network of muon detectors C. R. BRAGA 1, A. DAL LAGO 1, M. ROCKENBACH 2, N. J. SCHUCH 3,
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather Erwin O. Flückiger Laurent Desorgher, Rolf Bütikofer, Benoît Pirard Physikalisches Institut University of Bern
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Cosmic rays in solar system By: Tiva Sharifi. Cosmic ray The earth atmosphere is bombarded with the energetic particles originating from the outer space.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Gravitational waves LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory ) in Louisiana. A laser beam is.
Paul Evenson January Low Energy Electron Observations (LEE, AESOP and the Historical Context) Paul Evenson and John Clem University of Delaware.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Efficacy of Muon Detection for Solar Flare Early Warning Canadian Muon Workshop St-Émile-de-Suffolk, Québec, Canada October 17-19, 2011 NRCan DND Carleton.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
CME-GEOMETRY AND COSMIC-RAY ANISOTROPY OBSERVED BY A PROTOTYPE MUON DETECTOR NETWORK K. Munakata 1, T. Kuwabara 1, J. W. Bieber 2, P. Evenson 2, R. Pyle.
North-south anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays observed with the Global Muon Detector Network 34 th ICRC (August 4, 2015, Den Hague) SH07 ID117 K. Munakata.
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
SHINE Meeting, July 31 – August 4, 2006 Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Ground Level Enhancement John W. Bieber 1, John Clem 1, Paul.
Spring 2004 AGU Meeting, Montreal SH33A-02 UNUSUAL FEATURES OF THE OCTOBER 28, 2003 GROUND LEVEL ENHANCEMENT John W. Bieber 1, Paul Evenson 1, Roger Pyle.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.
Response of the Polar Cusp and the Magnetotail to CIRs Studied by a Multispacecraft Wavelet Analysis Axel Korth 1, Ezequiel Echer 2, Fernando L. Guarnieri.
Detection of cosmic rays in the SKALTA experiment Marek Bombara (P. J. Šafárik University Košice), Kysak, August 2011.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
02-06 Dec 2013CHPC-Cape town1 A study of the global heliospheric modulation of galactic Carbon M. D. Ngobeni, M. S. Potgieter Centre for Space Research,
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
CME trajectory deduced from cosmic ray measurements K. Munakata, T. Kuwabara and J. W. Bieber.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT.
Extreme Space Weather Project, Ottawa October 17-19, 2011 Ground-Based Cosmic Ray Detectors for Space Weather Applications John W Bieber University of.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH – INPE/MCT SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/CIE/INPE - MCT SOUTHERN SPACE OBSERVATORY– SSO/CRS/CIE/INPE.
Cosmic Ray flux modulation in different timescales observed with the CARPET detector between 2006 and 2012 (CASLEO, 2550 m, Rc = 9.65 GV) J.-P. Raulin,
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
High-Energy Ground Level Events Measured with Neutron Monitors and the Milagro Instrument James M. Ryan University of New Hampshire and the Milagro Collaboration.
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database Karl-Ludwig Klein, for the NMDB consortium.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
MuSTAnG – Muon Spaceweather Telescope for Anisotropies at Greifswald * Poster Content Space Weather Physics behind Cosmic Ray Muon Anisotropy MuSTAnG Consortium.
SN 1987A as a Possible Source of Cosmic Rays with E 0 < eV by Yakutsk EAS Array Data A.V. Glushkov, L.T. Ksenofontov, M.I. Pravdin Yu.G. Shafer Institute.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
39 th COSPAR Scientific Assembly Mysore, INDIA July 14-22, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal.
1 Seasonal variations of the m flux seen by the muon super telescope MuSTAnG Ganeva 1 M., Peglow 1 S., Hippler 1 R., Berkova.
Centenary Symposium 2012 University of Denver June 26-28, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal 4.
Rainer HipplerMuSTAnG1 Muon Spaceweather Telescope for Anisotropies Greifswald - MuSTAnG -
Fall 2004 AGU Meeting, San Francisco SH31B-07 GROUND-BASED COSMIC RAY DETECTORS FOR SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL RESEARCH AND SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING John W. Bieber.
Spectral Analysis of Decimetric Solar Bursts Variability R. R. Rosa 2, F. C. R. Fernandes 1, M. J. A. Bolzan 1, H. S. Sawant 3 and M. Karlický 4 1 Instituto.
Cosmic Rays at 1 AU Over the Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24 Cosmic Ray Transport in the Helioshealth: The View from Voyager AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco,
Mike Lockwood (Southampton University & Space Science and Technology Department, STFC/Rutherford Appleton Laboratory ) Open solar flux and irradiance during.
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
1 Cosmic Ray Modulation Over the 22 Year Magnetic Cycle Observed by Neutron Monitors Pierre-Simon Mangeard 1,2, David Ruffolo 2,3, Alejandro Sáiz 2,3,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
COSMIC RAYS. At the Earth’ Surface We see cascades from CR primaries interacting with the atmosphere. Need to correct for that to understand their astronomical.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber.
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Presenter: Paul Evenson
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
M. D Ngobeni*,1, M. S. Potgieter1
32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing
Detection of Solar Neutrons and Protons by the ground level detectors
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
Examine solar cycle variations (11/22 yrs.) of DA in SO & SI times.
Presentation transcript:

Geomagnetic storm’s precursors observed with the Global Muon Detector Network – GMDN ROCKENBACH, M.1; DAL LAGO, A.2; MUNAKATA, K.3; KATO, C.3; KUWABARA, T.4; BIEBER, J.4; SCHUCH, N.J.5; DULDIG, M.L.6; HUMBLE, J.E.6; AL JASSAR, H.K.7; SHARMA, M.M.7 and SABBAH, I.8,9 1Instituto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos - SP, Brazil; 2National Institute for Space Research (INPE-MCT), São José dos Campos – SP, Brazil; 3Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan; 4Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, USA; 5Southern Regional Space Research Center (CRS/CCR/INPE-MCT), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; 6School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia; 7Physics Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait 13060.; 8Department of Natural Sciences, Collage of Health Sciences, the Public Authority of Applied Education and Training, Kuwait; 9Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.

Solar activity cycle & GCR

Anchordoqui, L., et al., IJMP (2003) Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) Bending here is due to the solar modulation which varies in solar cycle ~85 % protons ~10 % helium nuclei a few % heavier nuclei ~1 % electrons Observables Energy spectrum Elementary & isotopic compositions Isotropic intensity (GCR density) Anisotropy (GCR streaming)  E-2.7 Anchordoqui, L., et al., IJMP (2003)

Cosmic ray observations with muon detector & neutron monitor Ground-based detectors measure byproducts of the interaction of primary cosmic rays (mostly protons) with Earth’s atmosphere. Neutron monitor detects neutrons produced by elastic scattering from atmospheric nuclei. Muon detector measures muons produced by inelastic (strong) interaction. E1ry (GeV) = 50~100, 1~30 observations of inner heliosphere & space weather Air shower array Muon detector Neutron monitor

(omnidirectional intensity) GCR transport equation (Parker 1965) : GCR density (omnidirectional intensity) SW convection diffusion Adiabatic cooling Anisotropy ( ) tells us the spatial gradient ( ) which reflects the magnetic field geometry : streaming : anisotropy

Drift effect on the GCR transport Difusion tensor drift velocity curvature drift gradient drift drift streaming Reverses with B polarity  22y variation, T/A dependence

Drift model (Jokipii et al., ApJ, 213, 1977) Solar wind V B Neutral Sheet (Current sheet) Solar wind source surface Away Toward   A T V/ ~ 5AU Wavy neutral sheet Ballerina’s skirt

Drift model (Jokipii et al., ApJ, 213, 1977) A>0 (Positive) Ω M TS NS A<0 (Negative) Ω M TS NS

Drift model predictions (Kota & Jokipii, 265, 573, 1983) Reproduces the solar cycle variation of GCR density from the variation of NS tilt-angle. Predicts local minimum (maximum) of GCR density on the NS for A>0 (A<0). A < 0 A > 0 Toward Away G neutral sheet neutral sheet G Away Toward

Solar activity cycle & GCR (solar magnetic dipole reverses every 11 years) N S However, this is only the variation of GCR density. GCR wind also tells us the GCR gradient in 3D as a function of time.

Global Muon Detector Network (GMDN) Kaz. Munakata1, C. Kato1, S. Yasue1, J. W. Bieber2, P. Evenson 2, T. Kuwabara 2, M. Rockenbach3, A. Dal Lago 4, N. J. Schuch 5, M. Tokumaru 6, M. L. Duldig 7, J. E. Humble 7, I. Sabbah 8,9, H. K. Al Jassar 10, M. M. Sharma 10 GMDN collaboration 1 Shinshu University, JAPAN 2 Bartol Research Institute, USA 3 UNIVAP, BRAZIL 4 INPE, BRAZIL 5 CRS/INPE, BRAZIL 6 STE Laboratory, JAPAN 7 University of Tasmania, AUSTRALIA 8 College of Health Science, KUWAIT 9 Alexandria University, EGYPT 10 Kuwait University, KUWAIT 15 researchers from 10 institutes in 6 countries working with 4 muon detectors in operation at…

Global Muon Detector Network 30 proportional counters (GMDN) Kuwait (2006) 30 proportional counters 5m length 10cm diameter 9m2, 13,1h, 0,32 Nagoya (1969) 36m2 17 1h 0,15 Hobart(1992) 9m2 13 1h 0,3 São Martinho da Serra Prototipe (2001) Expansion I (2005) Expansion II (2012) 4m2 28m2 36m2 9 17 1h 1, 10 e 60 min 0,34 0,2 0,15

○□△display the asymptotic viewing directions of median energy cosmic rays corrected for the geomagnetic bending. Thin lines indicate the spread of viewing direction for the central 80 % of the energy response to primary CRs.

GMDN data – October 29, 2003

Deriving first order anisotropy vector (1) Barometric effect correction; (2) Normalization Data are normalized in relation to Nagoya vertical channel. : 24 hour running average for jth channel of ith detector : 24 hour running average for Nagoya (i=1), Vertical channel (j=1) (3) Best-fit for cosmic ray density and anisotropy vector. Cosmic Ray Density Anisotropy vector : coupling coefficient We derive which minimize ….

GMDN data – October 29, 2003 11%

“Loss-cone” precursor Cosmic ray Precursors (%) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 248 250 252 254 256 Nagoya V (60GeV) Misato V (145GeV) Sakashita V (331GeV) SSC (01:39UT 9/9 1992) Doy of 1992 “Loss-cone” precursor (Nagashima et al., 1992)

“Loss-cone” precursor Cosmic ray Precursors “Loss-cone” precursor (Nagashima et al., 1992) Dorman et al. (2003)

Cosmic ray Precursors Dorman et al. (2003)

Cosmic ray Precursors

Cosmic ray Precursors December 14, 2006

Cosmic ray Precursors December 14, 2006

Cosmic ray Precursors Rockenbach et al. GRL, 38, 2011 Loss cone (deficit) Enhanced Variance shock reflection (excess) CR cylinder Magnetic flux rope

Summary Muon detectors measure muons produced by the interaction of high-energy (E > 1 GeV) primary cosmic rays (CRs) with the atmospheric nuclei. Due to the high longitudinal momentum transfer to muons, their incident directions well preserve the incident direction of primary CRs ⇒ the multidirectional muon detector. GMDN is a network of four muon detectors in Japan, Brazil, Australia, Kuwait, and capable for measuring CR intensities from many directions simultaneously.

Summary We measure the CR streaming and CR precursors accurately with the GMDN and deduce the large-scale magnetic structure in the Space Weather: The precursor is seen as the deficit intensity of CRs arriving from the sunward IMF: loss-cone (LC) precursor CRs reflected and accelerated by the approaching shock are also observed as an excess intensity: enhanced variance precursory excess. This is an alternative study, where we can estimate the arrival time of ICME using ground-based measurements.

Thank you!