Option – 5m Undulators What is the optimum length for an LCLS undulator?  XFEL is using 5m undulator segments.  Is this optimum?  What are the advantages.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ultimate Storage Rings PEP-X and SPring-8 II R. Hettel for the PEP-X design team and T. Watanabe et al., SPring-8 FLS 2012 JNAL March 7, 2012.
Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
DELTA Project Overview Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader Presented at LCLS-II Physics Meeting Tuesday, October 11, 2011.
SCUs for the LCLS-II HXR FEL SCUs for the LCLS-II HXR FEL P. Emma, et. al. July 9, 2014 Hard X-Ray (HXR) FEL for LCLS-II must cover 1-5 keV (4-GeV) SASE.
XFEL Undulator Efforts at DESY and Thoughts on LCLS-II H.-D. Nuhn June 30, 2010.
ESTB Test Beam Upgrades Hadrons Shorter bunch length Carsten Hast March 17 th 2011.
1 Enhancements to the Linac Coherent Light Source.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Keith Jobe May 1999 Damping Ring Kicker Development.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
J. Welch Talk MMF 10/14/04 LCLS Magnetic Measurement Facility Requirements Functional Temperature Vibration Earth's.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Birth of the X-Ray Laser and a New Era of Science Joachim Stohr
Status of LCLS A. Brachmann, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
AGS Polarized Proton Development toward Run-9 Oct. 3, 2008 Haixin Huang.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
SuperConducting Undulator (SCU) R&D Motivation and Status P. Emma For the SCU R&D collaboration: ANL, LBNL, SLAC June 27, 2014.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Cost Estimate Marion White (Argonne) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
LCLS-II Magnetic Structure Design Review Steve Marks 7/6/11 1.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
LCLS-II Physics Meeting, May 08, 2013 LCLS-II Undulator Tolerances Heinz-Dieter Nuhn LCLS-II Undulator Physics Manager May 8, 2013.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Harmonic lasing in the LCLS-II (a work in progress…) G. Marcus, et al. 03/11/2014.
State-of-the-art devices for compact light sources Finn O’Shea RadiaBeam Technologies October 15, 2015 Cryogenic Short Period Undulators.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting, Dec. 16, 2014 SCU Presentations Today Intro. & Performance Motivations (P. Emma, SLAC, 20+5) Conceptual Cryostat Design: Option-A.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
FEL Simulations: Undulator Modeling Sven Reiche Start-end Workshop DESY-Zeuthen 08/20/03.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
Design and Measurement Results for the Permanent Magnet Undulators for the Linac Coherent Light Source Facility II D. Arbelaez BeMa2014, 01/02/2014.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
G. Penn SLAC 25 September 2013 Comments on LCLS-IISC Design.
LCLS-II Project Overview David Schultz LCLS-II Deputy Project Director March 19, 2012.
Harmonic lasing in the LCLSII SXR beamline G. Marcus, Y. Ding, Z. Huang 11/21/2013.
Spin Tracking at the ILC Positron Source with PPS-Sim POSIPOL’11 V.Kovalenko POSIPOL’11 V. Kovalenko 1, G. Moortgat-Pick 1, S. Riemann 2, A. Ushakov 1.
LCLS-II Lattice 26FEB16: updates in the areas from bypass to dump
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Optimum cryomodule length at the ESS
Phase Adjustments: K vs
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Undulators Subgroup Summary April FAC Review K. Robinson, J
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
Undulator Alternatives
SCU Phase Shifter Meeting
LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements
Presentation transcript:

Option – 5m Undulators What is the optimum length for an LCLS undulator?  XFEL is using 5m undulator segments.  Is this optimum?  What are the advantages and disadvantages of long (or short) undulators. Slide 1Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

XFEL Undulators Joachim Pflueger claims 5m devices are more cost effective than short undulators.  A quick and crude calculation for 5m undulator for LCLS- II is a savings on the order of $12M.  Undulator costs based on Pflueger’s reported costs.  Requires 34 vs. 50 segments.  The saving is in the reduced number of inter-space quads and phase shifters. Slide 2Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

Technical Differences LCLS-II:XFEL LCLS-II undulators must go to smaller gap:  7.2mm vs. 10mm. SXR undulator longer period:  55mm vs. 48mm. There is debate at XFEL about their SXR undulator parameters so do not know what there current SASE-3 plans are. Both lead to larger force at minimum gap. Recommend more prototyping for 5m device to reduce risk.  This would cost in ~$2M for addition generation of prototype.  Add ~one year on to schedule. Slide 3Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

Technical Differences (cont.) The SXR undulator is calculated for 8m  :  Would have to increase  for beam based alignment down to 4.3GeV.  Increased  lightly lower performance  Or limit operations to higher energies The converse is also true: Setting a higher limit to low energy operation and keeping 3.4m segments could allow slightly improved performance. Aligning longer devices will take less effort:  Similar layout possible with fewer monuments and fewer set ups => faster process. Slide 4Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

5m XFEL Undulator The XFEL undulator is a highly engineered device. It is operating at near the limits of tolerances. Might not extrapolate to the higher LCLS-II forces. Slide 5Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen, Point Support System - reduces deflection of beam – less rotational stable. Rotational stabilizers.

Other Potential Costs The $12M does NOT include Costs of:  Longer vacuum system. Not calculated, but likely to increase with length.  Larger Magnetic Measurement Facilities. To expand MMF at SLAC to accommodate 5m segments $+5M, vs. $1-2M to expand for 3.4m devices. (rough estimate) As LBNL is starting fresh on an MMF the incremental costs would be less. Both plan to do MMF upgrades off project. –Higher off project costs might not be acceptable. Hall probe benches ~$1M vs. $700k.  Stiffer beams and large drive systems for larger forces. Probably could be achieved at some higher cost, say 10%, or ~$1.7M. Slide 6Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

Summary Technical:  Risk is higher with long device & due to the larger forces.  Have to modify the  on the SXR undulator line slightly. Cost:  5m devices should save on alignment (not calculated).  MMF cost for 5m devices is significantly higher (~$3M). Not on project, but still an issue.  Increased bench costs ~$900k.  Additional prototyping ~$2M.  Increased cost in undulators ~$1.7M  Delaying the schedule 1 year +$?M. Slide 7Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

3 factors indicate that 5m is too long for LCLS-II. 1.MMF’s for 5m devices would cost significantly more at SLAC. 2.5m devices are higher risk. 3.5m devices will take longer to develop if risk is to be minimized. Slide 8Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,

Conclusion $3-8M in savings are not a strong driver to go to 5m undulator segments. To reduce risk it will take ~1 year longer to develop. Stick with shorter devices:  It is not clear what the exact optimum length for LCLS-II undulator segments is.  It does not have to be 3.4m. Slide 9Undulator Alternatives- 5m, M. Rowen,