Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social psychology Concerned with how others influence the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the individual Social thinking When something unexpected.
Advertisements

RESEARCH ETHICS Research Methods. Research Ethics Marketplace of ideas--no scientific misconduct  Research fraud = falsification of data  Plagiarism.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment A study into the effects of prison life.
The Stanford Prison Experiment Max Rowe. The Purpose The Stanford prison experiment was a study of the psychological effect of becoming a prisoner or.
Social Psychology Social psychology studies the beliefs and behaviors of the individual (the self) within a group (others). Humans are social animals:
Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students.
Ethical issues in human research
Helen Harton, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of Northern Iowa.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Power of the Situation (cont.)
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Born March 23, 1933; in New York Professor at Stanford University Majors in anthropology, psychology, & Sociology from Brooklyn College in 1954 He completed.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “Do You Know the Enemy” Green Day “Change is Gonna Come” Adam Lambert.
Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
 Think about a time when you did what the group did just because you were part of the group.  Describe the situation.  Now look back at it objectively.
“Ordinary People” Doing Evil
Philip Zimbardo By: Steph Cataline. Who is Philip Zimbardo? The “voice and face of contemporary American psychology”. Presently, an Emeritus professor.
What is a better explanation of what happens to people (prisoners and guards) who are incarcerated --- a “situational” model or the role of individual.
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment College students on summer break recruited through a newspaper ad for a two week experiment being paid $15/day.
Reicher & Haslam Rethinking The Psychology of Tyranny Background.
Zimbardo recap. Participants were assigned to each condition… 1.Based on age 2.Based on health 3.Randomly 4.Based on ethnicity.
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “He Got Game” Public Enemy.
Zambardo Induction and Result. Purpose of the Study Study aimed to answer the question: – “Are the state of prisons due to the dispositional or internal.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
What does An Anthropologist do? Lesson 2: Anthropological research & methods.
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
 Participants are formally asked to indicate their agreement to participate  They should be informed on the purpose of the experiment and their rights.
Social Psychology The tremendous power of the situation....
Social Thinking and Social Influence. Introduction.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
Social Psychology Social psychology studies the beliefs and behaviors of the individual (the self) within a group (others). Humans are social animals:
PHILIP ZIMBARDO & THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT AJ Malisheski.
Group Processes. The Nature of Groups  The Nature of Groups Group - two or more people who influence each other Group - two or more people who influence.
Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment. Volunteers More than 70 applicants answered ad & were given interviews & personality tests to eliminate candidates.
The Power of the Situation
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Effects of status and social power within groups
Welcome to the Fuller Adolescent Detention Center
In what ways are prisons brutal places?
Zimbardo Prison Study- AICE AS Level Psychology
“The Psychology Of Evil”
Chapter 3, 4.
Groups and Obedience The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Values A principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable What’s more important to you: Alaska’s environment or money you could save.

Stanford Prison Experiment
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior
Conformity and Adolescence
Obedience to Authority & the Psychology of Evil

Research and Ethics.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
The Stanford Prison Experiment
How would you answer this question??
Rayat Shikshan Sanstha's S. M. Joshi College, Hadapsar, Pune-28
Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Psychology Overview— UCLA Demonstration, Milgram, & Stanford
Unit 13 Social Psychology Social Influence pt. 2
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
The Stanford prison experiment
Presentation transcript:

Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park

Philip Zimbardo Psychologist NYU professor Stanford Univ. Professor President of American Psychological Association Founder of the Shyness clinic Led the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment

Stanford Prison Experiment Conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo and a team of researchers. ‘Prison’ was in the basement of the Stanford Psychology Department. Known as very infamous Issued because of its ethnical problem.

Hypothesis Self-selecting of a certain disposition that would naturally lead to poor conditions. Zimbardo looked for participants disorientation, depersonalization and deindividuation. Human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both authorities and inmates in prison.

Setting of the Experiment Recruited people through newspaper ad and paid $15 per day($77). 24 people were selected from 75 respondents (3 of them did not participate) All 21 people were divided into two groups: Guards and Prisoners.

Guards  Dressed in military style uniform  Wooden batons were given  They could go home when they are off  Mirrored Sunglasses  Later, guars stayed longer than their assigned time even though they did not get paid.

Prisoners  Kept in prison  No underwear  Muslin smock  Rubber thong sandals  Referred by number  Forced to wear tight pantyhose caps  Always chained around ankles

Process – 1 st day Guards had a brief meeting  No specific guidelines (no physical violence)  “You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can created a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they’ll have no privacy…We’re going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we’ll have all the power and they’ll have none.” – The Stanford Prison Study video

Prisoners were told to be waiting at home Arrested by the actual Palo Alto police department (cooperated) without any warning All prisoners went through a full booking procedure, including fingerprinting, mug shots, and personal information

Both guards and prisoners adopted themselves quickly in their roles Guards ordered prisoners to do things such as push-ups and singing

A riot broke out  Guards stopped them with fire extinguishers w/ out supervision  Long hours of forced exercise as a punishment Filthy surroundings – not allowed to go bathroom Some were forced to clean toilets with bare hands Forced nudity & sexual humiliation

Many guards became sadistic 1/3 of the guards exhibited ‘genuine’ sadistic tendencies Prisoner 416  Went on a hunger strike  Considered as a ‘troublemaker’  Blanket vs. Solitary confinement Zimbardo concluded the experiment early when Christina Maslach mentioned about morality of this experiment.

Conclusion The prisoners internalized their roles  They did not quit the experiment although they did not get paid. Situational vs. Dispositional Changes in behavior of guards and prisoners were sort of adaptation rather than innate personalities