Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
TESLA R&D: LCAL/LAT Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UCL London Dubna.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Analysis C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.
Time development of showers in a Tungsten-HCAL Calice Collaboration Meeting – Casablanca 2010 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
About L* i.e. the distance between the end of the last quadrupole “QD0” and the IP Until now, L* has been different for SiD and ILD, -> due to detector.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
Reducing the occupancies in the calorimeter endcaps of the CLIC detector Suzanne van Dam Supervisor: André Sailer CERN, 6 March 2014.
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung work by summer students  Gunnar Klämke (U Jena, 01)  Marko Ternick (TU Cottbus, 02)  Magdalena Luz (HU Berlin, 03)
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
Hongbo Zhu, Qinglei Xiu, Xinchou Lou (IHEP) On behalf of the CEPC study group ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop: Higgs Factory (HF2014) 9-12 October.
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung new work by summer students  Magdalena Luz (HU)  Regina Kwee (HU) Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen 10.Oct.2003 LumiCal BeamCal.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Dominik Dannheim (CERN), André Sailer (HU Berlin / CERN) Beam-induced backgrounds in the CLIC detector models ALCPG Workshop March 2011 Eugene,
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Fast and Precise Luminosity Measurement at the ILC Ch.Grah LCWS 2006 Bangalore.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
Background studies for the ILD vertex detector Rita De Masi IPHC-Strasbourg.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
SiD MDI Update Topics for Discussion Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 15 May 2007.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
The Interaction Region
Summary of the FCAL Workshop Cracow, February 12-13
Other beam-induced background at the IP
ECAL – CLIC_ILD vs. CLICdet_2015
1 TeV pair backgrounds with ILD_O1_v02
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
GLD IR optimization and background study
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 2 Content Beam-Beam Simulation with GuineaPig CLIC_ILD Detector and Forward Region Background Simulation in the Detector with Mokka Background rate in the Vertex Detector Non perfect beam collisions and background 2

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 3 Beam-Beam Simulation with GuineaPig Using C version of GuineaPig Input particle distributions – Non Gaussian tails – Simulation of Accelerator and BDS – 312 file pairs (1 bunch train) provided by B. Dalena Nominal CLIC Beam parameters: – Horizontal size: 45 nm – Vertical size: 1nm – Bunch separation 0.5 ns (312 per Train) 3 Beamprofiles for CLIC. Black lines are Gaussian fits

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 4 CLIC Beam Crossing “Sideways” view of CLIC bunch crossing No Offset Focusing, Pinch, Deflection 4 Animation of Bunch crossing simulated with GuineaPig. NB: Axis scales differ by factor 1000

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 5 Incoherent Pairs: – 310k / BX with E > 5MeV – Peaking at low energy Coherent Pairs: – O(10^8) particles, but smaller production angle  Make outgoing beam pipe large enough – Peaking at higher energy – (Coherent Pairs simulated as Macroparticles) Beam-Beam-Background at CLIC

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 6 CLIC01_ILD Detector Model Based on ILD00 But – 20 mrad crossing angle – 4 Tesla solenoid field – No AntiDID, (A-DID causes ~20 % lumi loss) – Tungsten HCal barrel – Iron endcap  Longer detector – Vertex detector double layers at 31, 46 and 61mm all 25cm long 6

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 7 Forward Region Based on ILD00(fwp01) But – Moved QD0 to 3.5 m (Will be moved back again) – Moved BeamCal to 2.8m Increased inner radius 40 Layers Had to drop LHCal – LumiCal Inner radius: 10 cm 40 Layers – Intra train feedback components: BPM & Kicker – Changes to the vacuum tubes ILD_00fwp01 CLIC01_ILDfwp m3.5 m Beam Position Monitor Kicker LumiCal BeamCal QD0 LHCal 7

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 8 Background Hits from Incoherent Pairs Simulation – RangeCut mm – Physics List: QGSP_BERT_HP – Counting Monte Carlo SimTrackerHits (no Digitization) Incoherent pairs produce hits in all tracking detectors Main back-scattering surface for pairs is BeamCal E.g. hits in the Endcap Tracking Disk (ETD) at T~28ns 8 Time of hits in all Tracking detectors (cumulative)

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 9 Hits in the Vertex Detector (VXD) Now focusing only on Hits in the Vertex Detector Because of 0.5 ns BX spacing background of several BX will overlap Clear separation between direct and back-scattered Hits 2/3 coming from back- scatters  somewhat reducible with forward region design 9 Hits for 312 BX counted without taking bunch arrival time into consideration (cumulative)

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 10 Hit Density in VXD Overlapping hits A few clean ns, before hits from back-scatters set in Need fast readout to limit integration time For a full bunch train: – 1 st : 5.4/mm 2 – 2 nd : 1.0/mm 2 – 3 rd : 0.3/mm 2 ILC_RDR (ILD): ~6/mm²/312BX – See Talk by K. Wichmann 10

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 11 XY Distribution in VXD Inhomogeneous distribution of hits in phi for the first layer of the VXD Reminder: Not using AntiDID Highest hit rate limits detector lifetime 11 Hits for 312 BX

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 12 Phi Distribution in 1st layer of VXD Clearly due to back- scattered particles With origin from BeamCal and vacuum tube inside/behind BeamCal 12

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 13 Along the length of the VXD Distribution of direct hits flat/slightly higher in the center, not touching Sqrt(z) envelope of pairs Increased at the edge of the vertex detector for back-scattering particles – Low energy back- scatters absorbed 13

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 14 Non perfect beam collisions Animation on the right with 10nm offset (NB: scales differ) Due to jitter in accelerator, BDS, QD0 not all collision happen perfectly head on (though should be much smaller than 10nm) 14

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 15 Non Perfect Beam Collisions Number of incoherent pairs decreases – Photons see less real particles – For small offsets < 1nm only slight decrease Number of Coherent Pairs increases – Field still very strong Luminosity much smaller for offsets, but are (coherent) pairs a problem for the mask? 15

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 16 Background rate from incoherent Pairs Plotting Pt vs. Theta angle of incoherent Pairs – Not taking crossing angle or detailed field into account Lines representing position of Detector Elements – Vertex, LumiCal, BeamCal, Beam pipe Thanks to Mikael Berggren (Desy) 16

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 17 Background Rate No increase or decrease in background rate can be expected from these figures Mostly no change for 1nm offset Larger fluctuations at the edge of the distribution 17

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 18 Coherent Pairs and Offset From 0 to 1 nm offset, very small change in maximum angle for coherent pairs Need higher statistics and look at larger offset to confirm 18

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 19 Summary & Outlook Simulated a full bunchtrain of background in the CLIC_ILD detector Average hit density in 1 st double layer of VXD is 5.4/mm 2 per bunch train b ut large inhomogeneity in Phi – How does this affect pattern recognition, and what are the requirements for time stamping? Non Perfect Beam collisions – Number of pairs only slightly reduced for small offsets – No change in background rate expected – Coherent pairs should still not be an issue Updating Forward Region with QD0 position Simulate with Intra Train Feedback parts 19

Backup

March 29, 2010 A. Sailer - LCWS/ILC10 - BeamBeamBackgroundAtCLIC 21 Coherent Pairs and Offset II