ID1 THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY** The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Findings from the 2008 National Demographic and Health Survey ESA/STAT/AC.219/33 NSO.
Advertisements

Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Eastern Europe: Selected Findings From Reproductive Health (RH) Surveys Florina Serbanescu, MD Centers for Disease Control.
Redbridge Action Against Domestic Abuse 3-5 Balfour Road Ilford Essex IG1 4DU
Dating Violence Mrs. Gennaro.
ASSAULTIVE BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT COMPILED BY JOHN-NWANKWO, JANE C. RN, MSN.
The Evolution of Measuring Violence Against Women at Statistics Canada UN Global Forum on Gender Statistics December 10-12, 2007 Presented by Heather Dryburgh.
Domestic Violence National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3)
Power and Violence in Marriages and Families
Chapter 4: Preventing Violence and Abuse $100 $200 $300 $400 $100$100$100 $200 $300 $400 Cycle of Violence Sex AbuseChild AbuseAggression FINAL ROUND.
Human Sexuality Sexual Coercion, Aggression, and Abuse.
1 Violence Against Women Surveys in Finland Markku Heiskanen European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI)
February, Offenders: Myths and Realities – Overview.
Disclaimer: The contents of this presentation are general in nature. Please use your discretion while following them. The author does not guarantee legal.
Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Women and Men: A Multinational Study of University Students Denise A. Hines Clark University Department of Psychology.
Sexual Violence Prevention Family Life & Sexual Health.
CTS401 ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA FROM THE REVISED CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES AND THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY Murray A. Straus Family Research.
What is Domestic Violence? Physical Pushing, Slapping, Punching Sexual Unwanted sexual coercion Emotional Frightening/Threatening.
VF Gender Difference1 THE CONTRAVERSY OVER GENDER DIFFEENCES IN PARTNER VIOLENCE PREVALENCE RATES – Assaults – Stalking – Homicides – Why the rates differ.
Lab 3 CP & IPV1 LAB 4. NEGLECT AS A CHILD AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “Macro” level research. Also called “societal level” research if the units are societies.
Lab 3 CP & IPV1 LAB 3. NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “Macro” level research. Also called “societal level” research.
Lab CPI1 Soc 695 Family Violence Research In World Perspective Murray A. Straus LAB CPI. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING VIOLENCE - INDIVIDUAL LEVEL DATA.
Work Session on Gender Statistics, Geneva, 18–20 October 2004 International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS) Sami Nevala European Institute for Crime.
The relationship of childhood physical and sexual abuse with depression in young adulthood Ellen Jamieson, Harriet MacMillan, Yvonne Racine, Michael Boyle.
World Health Organization Gender and Women’s Health Toward a common set of indicators to measure violence against women Henrica A.F.M. Jansen, WHO UNECE.
ID411 DOMINANCE AND SYMMETRY IN PARTNER VIOLENCE BY MALE AND FEMALE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN 32 NATIONS Murray A. Straus Family Research Laboratory, University.
Nationwide Survey on Domestic Violence against Women Republic of ArmeniaRepublic of Armenia National Statistical ServiceNational Statistical Service UNFPA.
Healthy Relationships Freshman Guidance. Types of Relationships Parent/Child Student/Teacher Coach/Player Friends Classmates Acquaintances Romantic Teammates.
Abusive Relationships Lesson 1

International experience with data collection: 1. Results from the countries using WHO multi- country study methodology 2. Results from Serbia on factors.
Data from the Violence Against Children Surveys. Percentage of individuals years old who experienced sexual violence prior to age 18 * Only girls.
Lab B1 LAB B (A)SCORING THE CTS SCALE FOR MINOR VIOLENCE (B)CROSS TABULATION TO TEST THE HYPOTHESIS THAT CORPORAL PUNISHMENT IS A RISK FACTOR FOR HITTING.
17-18 February 2011 Revision of the module on violence.
CJ 333 Unit 6. Since 1993, the rate of nonfatal intimate partner violence has declined. Why? –Improved services for victims –Hotlines, shelters –Criminalization.
Dating Violence Adapted from the LINA curriculum and Barren River Area Safe Space.
Abuse :Improper treatment or usage; application to a wrong or bad purpose; misuse; perversion.
DR GINNA BABCOCK HISTORY OF VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILY CHAPTER 2.
WHAT IS DATING VIOLENCE? Dating violence is the sexual, physical, or emotional abuse of one partner by the other in a dating relationship where the couple.
Sami Nevala 11 September 2006 Report of the UNECE Task Force on Measuring Violence against Women ECE/CES/GE.30/2006/6.
Course focus1 Soc 695 RESEARCH ON FAMILY VIOLENCE IN WORLD PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY What the course covers Objectives of the course Define violence.
By the end of the workshop, participants will: Define gender based violence; Understand the myths and realities surrounding gender-based violence; Discuss.
Healthy Relationships SDUSD Sex Ed. Respectful Relationships What are some characteristics of respectful relationships?
International Workshop on Social Statistics Beijing, China 22 – 26 November 2010 Violence against Women Questionnaire Interregional Project on Eradicating.
Lab CPM1 LAB CPM. NATIONAL CONTEXT DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “An example of “macro” level research. Also called “societal.
Intimate Partner Violence Epidemiology. Why screen for IPV? One of the nation’s “Most Pressing Public Health Problems” Women are more likely to be repeatedly.
IDV study1 The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. A STUDY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint® Lecture Slide Presentation prepared by Michael Hall Violence and.
Chapter 10: Adult Relationships. Friendships « Adult Process acquaintanceship buildup continuation deterioration ending.
Co-authors : Elizabeth Asiedu Department of Economics University of Kansas Tatenda Zinyemba School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University.
IDV study1 The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. A STUDY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS.
Introduction to Sociology
Approve viol1 Lab NPV. TO WHAT EXTENT DO ATTITUDES APPROVING PARTNER VIOLENCE EXPLAIN HITTING A DATING PARTNER? DOES THIS THIS APPLY TO WOMEN AS WELL AS.
EXPLORING MARRIAGES AND FAMILY, 2ND EDITION Karen Seccombe
Approve viol1 Lab 7. TO WHAT EXTENT DO ATTITUDE AND CULTURAL NORMS EXPLAIN PARNER VIOLENCE, AND IS THE RELATIONSHIP DIFFERENT FOR MEN AND WOMEN? The Research.
The Dark Side of the Family. Domestic Abuse When a family member, partner or ex-partner attempts to physically, or psychologically dominate another.
Lab CPM1 LAB CPM. NATIONAL CONTEXT DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “An example of “macro” level research. Also called “societal.
Course focus1 Soc 695 RESEARCH ON FAMILY VIOLENCE IN WORLD PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVES OF FOR TODAY What the course covers Objectives of the course Define violence.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.  Violence or physical abuse ________________________________ ____________________ usually violence by men against women.  When a.
Partner violence among young adults in the Philippines: The role of intergenerational transmission and gender Jessica A. Fehringer Michelle J. Hindin Department.
Addressing Dating Violence
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE MEASURED AND THE TO BE MEASURED
Department of Gender, Women and Health World Health Organization
Joanne Pavao, MPH Study for Health & Employment
VIOLENCE & RELATIONSHIP VIOLENCE
Relationships: Abusive Relationships
Relationship Power and Violence
Do You Feel Safe in Your Home?
Domestic violence by Erica Williams
Authors: Jelena Otović, Anđelija Otović
Libertad González (Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona GSE)
Presentation transcript:

ID1 THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY** The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. A STUDY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN 34 COUNTRIES

ID2

3

4

5 PURPOSE 2: TEST THEORIES ABOUT THE CAUSESOF VIOLENCE AGAINST PARTNERS EXAMPLES ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY ALCOHOL ABUSE ANGER MANAGEMENT SKILL DOMINANCE OF ONE PARTNER COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS CRIMINALITY GENDER HOSTILITY GENDER INEQUALITY SOCIAL INTEGRATION SOCIAL STRESS VIOLENT CHILD REARING VIOLENT CULTURAL NORMS

ID6 SOME FINDINGS ON RATES OF ASSULT AND INJURY

ID7 MEASURE OF PHYSICAL ASSAULT Minor Physical Assault:  Threw something at partner that could hurt  Twisted my partner’s arm or hair  Pushed or shoved my partner  Grabbed my partner  Slapped my partner Severe Physical Assault:  Used knife or gun on partner on my partner  Punched or hit my partner with something that could hurt  Choked my partner  Slammed my partner against a wall  Beat up my partner  Burned or scalded my partner  Kicked my partner coefficient of reliability =.86.

ID8 North AmericaLatin America EuropeAsia & Middle East

ID9 North AmericaLatin America EuropeAsia & Middle East

ID10 CTS2

ID11

ID12 CTS2

ID13 North AmericaLatin America EuropeAsia & Middle East

ID14 North AmericaLatin America EuropeAsia & Middle East

ID15 CONCLUSIONS HIGH RATES OF ASSAULT AND SEXUAL COERCION IN ALL COUNTRIES THE INJURY DATA SHOWS THAT MANY ASSAULTS ARE NOT TRIVIAL RATES OF PERPETRATION BY WOMEN AND MEN ARE SIMILAR, EXCEPT MEN CAUSE MORE INJURY MORE MEN PHYSICALLY FORCE SEX RESULTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER STUDIES OF STUDENTS CULTURAL DIFFERENCES ARE PRESENT BUT NOT USUALLY VERY LARGE

ID16 SOME FINDINGS ON RISK FACTORS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST A DATING PARTNER

ID17

ID18

ID19

ID20

ID21

ID22

ID23

ID24

ID25 RISK FACTORS FOR PSYSYCHOLOGICAL AGGRESSION (VERBAL ATTACKS) * RISK FACTORSARE SIMILAR TO RISK FACTORS FOR PHYSICAL ASSAULT * PROBABLY BECAUSE PSYCHOLGICAL AND PHYSICAL ATTACKS ARE HIGHLY CORRELATED

ID26 CTS2

ID27

ID28 CONCLUSIONS VIOLENCE AGAINST DATING PARTNERS HAS MANY “CAUSES” (“RISK FACTORS”) THE “CAUSES” OF VIOLENCE AGAINST PARTNERS ARE SIMILAR FOR MEN AND WOMEN EACH ADDITONAL RISK FACTOR INCREASE THE PROBABILITY OF VIOLENCE, BUT NONE GUARANTEE IT MOST OF THE RISK FACTORS ARE THINGS THAT CAN BE CHANGED

ID29

ID30 ST0P

ID31

ID32

ID33

ID34 THE CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES PHYSICAL ASSAULT INJ

ID35

RELIABILITY OF THE PRP MEAN ALPHA COEFFICIENT 437 STUDENTS= OFFENDERS = 69 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF ALPHA COEFFICIENTS FOR STUDENT AND OFFENDER SAMPLES ALPHASTUDENTSOFFENDERS < %.60 TO.6929%40%.70 TO.7938%40%.80 TO.8733% 7% MEAN.74.69