Sphericity Lee Pondrom May 9, 2011. References for sphericity and thrust Original application from Spear G. Hanson et al., PRL 35. 1609 (1975). Useful.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch 7.6: Complex Eigenvalues
Advertisements

3D Geometry for Computer Graphics
Feasibility study of measurement of Higgs pair creation in a gamma-gamma collider Shin-ichi Kawada Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University LCWS11.
QUADRATIC EQUATIONS AND FUNCTIONS
18-Jan pp Collisions: Introduction & Kinematics Talking points based on Lectures by Hebbeker (Aachen) & Baden (Maryland) Original Notes + Extra material.
Chapter 3 Determinants and Matrices
MOHAMMAD IMRAN DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED SCIENCES JAHANGIRABAD EDUCATIONAL GROUP OF INSTITUTES.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Tables, Figures, and Equations
Objectives for Class 3 Add, Subtract, Multiply, and Divide Complex Numbers. Solve Quadratic Equations in the Complex Number System.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7.6 The Inverse of a Square Matrix.
SVD(Singular Value Decomposition) and Its Applications
States, operators and matrices Starting with the most basic form of the Schrödinger equation, and the wave function (  ): The state of a quantum mechanical.
Point set alignment Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions Berthold K. P. Horn Department of Electrical Engineering, University.
Section 2-5 Complex Numbers.
1Higher Maths Quadratic Functions. Any function containing an term is called a Quadratic Function. The Graph of a Quadratic Function 2Higher Maths.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
Principal Component Analysis Adapted by Paul Anderson from Tutorial by Doug Raiford.
CSE554AlignmentSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment Fall 2014.
7.1 Scalars and vectors Scalar: a quantity specified by its magnitude, for example: temperature, time, mass, and density Chapter 7 Vector algebra Vector:
Chemistry 330 The Mathematics Behind Quantum Mechanics.
Day 1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
CSE554AlignmentSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 5: Alignment Fall 2011.
Sect 5.4: Eigenvalues of I & Principal Axis Transformation
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
POSITION & ORIENTATION ANALYSIS. This lecture continues the discussion on a body that cannot be treated as a single particle but as a combination of a.
CHAPTER 9 CONIC SECTIONS.
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
27-750, Advanced Characterization and Microstructural Analysis,
Newton’s gravity Spherical systems - Newtons theorems, Gauss theorem - simple sphercal systems: Plummer and others Flattened systems - Plummer-Kuzmin -
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
CSE554AlignmentSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment Fall 2013.
Chapter VII. Classification of Quadric Surfaces 65. Intersection of a quadric and a line. General form and its matrix representation.
GG313 Lecture 14 Coordinate Transformations Strain.
1 Principal stresses/Invariants. 2 In many real situations, some of the components of the stress tensor (Eqn. 4-1) are zero. E.g., Tensile test For most.
Computer Graphics Rendering 2D Geometry CO2409 Computer Graphics Week 2.
Searches for double partons Lee Pondrom University of Wisconsin July 23, 2012.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Stress and Strain ( , 3.14) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components NC State University Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Stress.
April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.
EXTRA HELP WITH SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. SOLVING SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS USING ELIMINATION Steps: 1. Place both equations in Standard Form, Ax + By = C. 2.
ANGULAR CORRELATION OF NEUTRONS EMITTED FROM DECAY OF GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE IN ULTRA-PERIPHERAL COLLISIONS AT RHIC In an ultra peripheral collision the.
Oct. 12, 2007 Imran Younus k T Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized p +p Collisions at PHENIX.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future James R. (Jim) Beaty, PhD - NASA Langley Research Center Vehicle Analysis Branch, Systems Analysis & Concepts.
Lecture 2 - Feynman Diagrams & Experimental Measurements
Transformation methods - Examples
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Sect. 4.5: Cayley-Klein Parameters 3 independent quantities are needed to specify a rigid body orientation. Most often, we choose them to be the Euler.
CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
§ 1.3 Intercepts.
Searches for double partons
Sphericity Lee Pondrom June 13, 2011.
Introduction to Graphing
CSC461: Lecture 23 Shading Computation
Graphing Linear Equations
Nils A. Törnqvist University of Helsinki
Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration
Numerical Analysis Lecture 17.
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
Introduction to Graphing
Standard Factored Vertex
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Tracks and double partons
Tracks and double partons
Presentation transcript:

Sphericity Lee Pondrom May 9, 2011

References for sphericity and thrust Original application from Spear G. Hanson et al., PRL (1975). Useful lecture slides by Steve Mrenna in a description of Pythia: pythia6301/node213.html

Definitions S αβ = Σ i p α i p β i /Σ i p i ². Where the sum is over all particles in the event, and α,β refer to the coordinate axes x,y,z. Gail Hanson uses a definition which interchanges the eigenvalues, namely: T = (1 – S)Σ i p i ². This is the form originally proposed by Bjorken (PRD 1, 1416(1970)). We will use Mrenna’s definition.

Eigenvalues of S Diagonalize S  λ1  S’ = RSR -1 =  λ2 ,  λ3  and order them λ1>λ2>λ3, so λ 1 is the ‘jet axis’. A two body final state would have λ1 = 1, and λ3 = λ2 = 0, which is as jetty as you can get. A spherical event would have λ1 = λ2 = λ3 = 1/3. The sphericity is defined as Sp = 3(λ2 + λ3 )/2, 0<Sp<1.

Some formulas The matrix S is symmetric, so we have to calculate six components: S 11, S 12, S 13, S 22, S 23, and S 33. The trace is an invariant, S 11 + S 22 + S 33 = 1. The diagonalization procedure gives a cubic equation: λ 3 – λ 2 + q λ + r = 0, where q and r are functions of the components of S.

More formulas q=(S 11 S 22 + S 11 S 33 + S 22 S 33 – (S 13 )² - (S 23 )² - (S 12 )²), and r=-S 11 S 22 S 33 – 2S 12 S 13 S 23 + (S 13 )²S 22 + (S 23 )²S 11 + (S 12 )²S 33. The cubic equation may be solved with the substitution λ = x + 1/3. This eliminates the squared term: x 3 + ax + b = 0.

Cubic equation x = λ – 1/3; x 3 + ax + b = 0. a = (3q -1)/3; and b = (-2 +9q +27r)/27. Define K = b²/4 + a 3 /27. If K>0 there are one real and two conjugate imaginary roots. If K=0 there are three real roots, at least two are equal. If K<0 there are three real unequal roots

Solutions to the cubic equation K<0 is the usual case for sphericity Then x n = 2 (-a/3) 1/2 cos((φ + 2πn)/3), for n=0,1,2. cosφ =  (27b 2 /(-4a 3 )) 1/2, + if b<0.

More about the cubic equation It can be written in terms of the trace and determinant of the matrix S λ 3 –Tr(S)λ 2 -.5(Tr(S²)–Tr(S)²)λ–det|S|=0 Here Tr(S)=1, and r=det|S|. If det|S|=0, S is singular, and one root λ 3 =0. The other two roots are λ±=(1±(1-4q).5 )/2, where q=-.5(Tr(S²)- Tr(S)²)

Eigenvectors The cosine of the polar angle of λ 1 was calculated from Sψ = λ 1 ψ, with components of ψ (a,b,c) satisfying a² + b² + c² =1, and the ratios a/c=(S 12 S 23 -S 13 (S 22 -λ 1 ))/denom b/c=(S 12 S 13 -S 23 (S 11 -λ 1 ))/denom denom=(S 11 -λ 1 )(S 22 -λ 1 ) – (S 12 )²

Transverse eigenvector To calculate the azimuthal angle φ the thrust was used in the transverse plane. Thrust = ∑ i |n∙p i |/∑ i |p i |, where n and p are transverse vectors, and n is determined so that Thrust is maximized. ½<Thrust<1.

Simple example Consider a three body decay M->3 , and define x 1 =2E 1 /M, 0<x 1 <1. x 1 +x 2 +x 3 =2. Phase space 0 x1 1 1 x2 0 Allowed

Generate the events Pick x 1 and x 2 and check that the point is inside the allowed triangle. Calculate x 3 and the angles  12  13 in the decay plane. Orient the plane at random relative to the master xyz coordinates with a cartesian rotation (α,β,  ). Calculate 9 momentum components.

Analyze the events The three momentum vectors are coplanar, which means that r=0, and λ 3 =0. The two other roots are λ  = (1  (1-4q) 1/2 )/2, with λ+ = λ 1. The direction cosines of λ 1 give the thrust direction, and λ 2 gives the transverse momentum in the decay plane.

The results for 1000 events generated

Next try it with jet20 data Use calorimeter towers as energy vectors Calculate S for the event, with a tower threshold of 1 GeV. Two problems: 1. cal towers are in detector coordinates (fixable). 2. Events are in the center of mass only on average (also fixable).

10000 jet20 events tower eta distribution Left hand plot is before any cuts. Note the ring of fire. Right hand plot has tower E T >1 GeV and tower |η|<2. Before cuts technical computing4/8/2011

Cal towers jet 20 φ and E T

Cal towers sphericity and λ 1

λ 1 η φ

Jet data from jet20 file E T and η

Jet data φ and Zvertex

Met variables

sumE T and metsig

Met variables Look normal – no cuts applied.

Jet1 compared to λ 1 Δ η Δφ

Delta R=(Δη² + Δφ² ) 1/2

Look at the second jet in the event

Φ resolution for jets and thrust

Transform tower η to the dijet center of mass Define η cm = (ηjet1 + ηjet2)/2 Then tower η cm = tower η – η cm Also correct tower η to the event vertex For CHA use r=154 cm to the iron face, and tanθ = tanθ 0 /(1-z v tanθ 0 /r) For PHA use d = 217 cm from the origin to the iron face, and tanθ=tanθ 0 /(1-z v /d). Not much difference.

Comparison of η cm and tower η sphericity λ 1 η distribution

Δη λ 1 - jet1 ΔR

Jet triggers L1 L2 L3 ST5 (100) CL20 (50) Jet20 ST5 (100) CL40 (1) Jet50 ST10(8) CL60 (1) Jet70 ST20(1) CL90 (1) Jet100 Prescales in parenthesis, from Physics_5_05 trigger table.

Check the lorentz transformation by comparing jets and towers

Definitions for the previous slide labeta = (jet1η +jet2η)/2 ignores jet3 y* =.5*log((1+β*)/(1-β*)) β* = ∑ i p zi / ∑ i E i summed over all towers with E T > 1 GeV.

What about jet3 in the jet20 data?

Compare transverse energy balance, 3 jets and sum towers

Transverse energy balance is not perfect, and is about the same for towers and jets. Longitudinal tower sum energy is sharpened by the lorentz transformation

Nothing really improves things About 90% of the events with jet1E T >15 GeV have a third ‘jet’, which has an average E T ≈ 7 GeV, and cuts off at 3 GeV! Tower sums do not balance in the transverse plane any better than the 3 jets do. Longitudinally (η1+η2)/2 sharpens up the tower sum pz, but it is far from perfect.

Lorentz transformation to the event center of mass Using the towers, define a total momentum vector p tot = ∑ i p xi x + ∑ i p yi y + ∑ i p zi z, where (x,y,z) are unit vectors And a total energy E tot = ∑ I towE i Then β* = p tot /E tot, and L = R -1 L z R, where R is a space rotation placing the z axis along p tot, and L z is a Lorentz transformation along the new z axis.

Total momentum in the event center of mass should vanish, and it does.

And the other two components

So the Lorentz transformation to the event center of mass works

Event c of m and longitudinal Lorentz transformation are close

Compare to jet1 in the event

Two vertex events Analysis so far has been Jet20 triggers gjt1ah (1->4) Aug 04->Sep 05 low luminosity Now run on Jet20 in a later set of runs gjt1bk (14->17) Oct 07->Apr nsec bunch crossing and σ inel =60 mb E32 Pr(0) Pr(1) Pr(>=2) >=2/1data is much less than estimated from

Tower occupancy gjt1bk – cut at ntower=560:63%1v,19%2v.

Ntowers with E T >1 GeV

Events with extra vertices They have lots of extra tower hits: 1 vertex = 518, >=2 vertices = 636. However, a cut on tower E T >1 GeV virtually wipes out the minbias background. 1Vertex =12.3; >=2 vertices =13.4. So the sphericity analysis, which requires towerE T >1 GeV is not affected by extra vertices.

Δvertex gjt1bk

sphericity

Tower sum energy in cm

Thrust axis cm η