Using Data Effectively ABE Directors’ Meeting October 9th and 10th, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements


Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Partners Think of how you as a parent and/or staff member partner with others. (Ex: life partners, school partners, community partners.) 1. Introduce yourself.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
PROGRAMMATIC MONITORING Adult Education & Literacy.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
New York State School-Based Comprehensive Oral Health Services Project Collaboration with North Country Family Health Center A Program to Promote Quality.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
The National Reporting System: Foundations Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education.
Developing Policy to Improve Practice in an Adult Basic Education Transition System Judith A. Alamprese, Abt Associates Chrys Limardo, Kratos Learning.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
EL-Civics Application Remember! If in a consortium: –Must complete Budget Detail page for each consortium member EL-Civics Application.
Oregon Pathways for Adult Basic Skills Transition to Education and Work (OPABS) Initiative.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Change…Challenge… Choice… Debra Jones Administrator, Adult.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Getting Started with the State Pre-Planning Process.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Building Infrastructures: Supporting School-Based Mental Health Services.
Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions for Title I, Part D Nicholas Read and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC Jeff Breshears, California Department of Education.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
School Site Council / WASC Institutional Committee Meeting November 18, 2009 Presented by Martha Rankin.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
The National Reporting System: Foundations Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
A State Staff Guide for Managing Statewide Initiatives Presented by Dr. Lennox McLendon.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 FOR ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY Anson Green Director Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission.
Performance Standards for Community Adult Learning Centers Donna Cornellier, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Minnesota’s Disability Employment Initiative (DEI): Partners for Youth Third Round of DEI Grants October 2013.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
TOPSpro Special Topics V: Meeting Federal Accountability Requirements.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Outcomes, Goals, and Objectives
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Using Data Effectively ABE Directors’ Meeting October 9th and 10th, 2002

AGENDA Current Use of Data What Types of Data Can Be Used Improving Your Program: Current Practices A Model for Program Improvement Case Study Next Steps: Develop a Program Improvement Plan Evaluation

Current Use of Data What two statistics (e.g., attendance hours, enrollment rates) do you use frequently or would you like to use?

What Types of Data Can Be Used Learner Data - Demographic / background characteristics - Labor force status - Educational gains - Education and employment outcomes - Class participation - Community participation - Family outcomes - Learners’ perceptions of instructional services

Staff Data - Background of instructional staff - Staffs’ employment and training experience - Characteristics of instructional approaches

Program Operations Program Operations - Recruitment - Learner intake - Learner placement - Structure and hours of instruction - Assessment instruments and procedures - Support services - Learner transition - Fiscal management - Program management - Interagency collaboration - Data management

Improving Your Program: Current Practices What internal and external priorities have prompted changes or improvements? What types of data do you collect? How do you use these data? What actions have you taken, or what changes have you made based on the analysis of data?

A Model for Program Improvement Analyze current data and determine questions to ask Identify areas for improvement Design a program improvement plan Document and monitor use of the new practice Evaluate implementation and outcomes

Analyze Current Data and Determine Questions to Ask Identify trends in data that raise questions Analyze data related to an issue or question that has prompted interest Identify and review additional information that can be examined to confirm or clarify results of data analysis Define preliminary issues or problems that need to be addressed

Identify Areas for Improvement Use benchmarks to assess extent of problem and target population Determine area for change based on importance of problem and other factors Create team to identify new practice / process for target population; promote effort Access information about practices from online systems, websites, reports, other programs/states

Design a Program Improvement Plan Determine new practice Specify learners, classes, or sites for pilot Develop communication networks / new policies Identify training and technical assistance Determine resources / staff Set timeline for training and pilot testing the practice Specify data collection Review the change process

Document and Monitor Use of New Practice Collect information about implementation of practice Specify materials, staff, and resources Chart time for implementing Identify barriers to use Identify aspects of practice or use that appear to be successful Identify factors affecting use Chart unexpected outcomes

Evaluate Implementation and Outcomes Analyze data to identify elements of the practice implemented and not implemented Assess what worked, what didn’t, and why Identify missing elements in practice Describe outcomes from using practice Refine practice and its use

Case Study Funder: Local Education Agency (LEA) Services Funded: ABE, ESOL, Family Literacy, Workplace Sites: Five sites - three sites provide ABE and ESOL services, one site provides Even Start, and the other site provides workplace literacy Total Enrollments: 524 * approximately 50% of the students are ESOL - of those 30% are Brazilian * approximately 10% of the ABE students entered at the beginning literacy level, 20% were at the ABE/Pre ASE level, and 20% were at the ASE level Assessment to Measure Educational Gain: * For ESOL students, last year the program used a program-developed tool with a rubric developed by one ESOL teacher. This year the program will use BEST and REEP. * For Beginning Literacy ABE students, last year the program used a home grown tool translated into Spanish. They will continue to use that tool this year. * For ABE, Pre ASE, and ASE students, last year the program used TABE 5 Level M for all students. This year the program will use TABE 7 and 8. Assessments for Class Placement: * For ESOL students, the program uses a program-developed instrument which includes an oral and writing section. * For all ABE students, the program uses the TABE Locator.

Instructional Methods: The delivery of instruction has not been an emphasis in professional development in recent years. Each teacher uses methods that he/she feels comfortable with. There is no formal curriculum in place and the program does not use the Curriculum Frameworks. The ASE classes are totally individualized and student attendance is sporadic. The ESOL attendance is high yet the % completing a level is low. On the Federal Report Table 4, the overall percent for completing the educational levels is 20.56% for one site and Cognos shows that the overall percent for class attendance for one of the sites is 54%. Program and Staff Development: The program development is determined by the Program Coordinator who assigns hours equally to all staff members. Staff development is decided by each staff person with no plan in place. Counseling: Counseling hours are allotted to each ESOL teacher, and the Program Coordinator provides counseling to ABE/ASE students. Staffing: All staff are white. One teacher is bilingual in Spanish. All staff are part time and are paid $20/hour with no benefits. They are not compensated for prep time. They are allotted additional paid hours for assessment and follow-up.

Next Steps: Develop a Program Improvement Plan Analyze current data and determine questions to ask Identify areas for improvement Design a program improvement plan Document and monitor use of the new practice Evaluate implementation and outcomes