U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Rivers Component of the National Monitoring Network Jerad Bales National Monitoring Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries National Water Quality Monitoring Council October 31, 2006.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
1 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 26, 2006 Needs for Indicators.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
"Developing statistically-valid and -defensible frameworks to assess status and trends of ecosystem condition at national scales" "Developing statistically-valid.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Recent Activities and Accomplishments: An Update for ACWI September, 2004.
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
Water Quality Vital Signs: Developing Protocols and SOPs Presented by Barry Long Water Resources Division National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries Presentation for _______ August 28, 2007.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Water for America Initiative Eric J. Evenson Advisory Committee on Water Information February 20, 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
Overview of National Monitoring Network (NMN) Project Update for NWQMC April 12, 2005.
Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System SCCOOS me? –You want input from the users? –What products will help EPA with its mission? Relationship.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Nitrate and Groundwater Flow to Springs in the Upper Floridan aquifer, Lower ACF—Chipola Basin by.
A Framework for Monitoring March 26, Mission: Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and scientifically defensible methods and strategies.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jim Nicholas, Center Director USGS Michigan Water Science Center U.S. Department of the Interior.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and Their Tributaries Briefing For IOOS EXCOM September 13, 2005.
Design Group Meeting Full National Water Quality Monitoring Council Overview Presented yesterday Extended context to bring to today’s discussions Next.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Integration of Earth Observing Systems and the U.S. Geological Survey.
Streamgaging Task Force Summary Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia September 10, 2003.
USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Update on A National Water Census * Part of the Initiative U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey MACOORA 4 th Annual Meeting Understanding the Coastal Ocean: Partnerships for a Changing World--
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SWOT and the USGS: Some Areas of Mutual Interest, USGS Resources, and Random Thoughts Jerad Bales.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
19-Aug-2003MWMC presentation to NWQMC1 Long Term Ground Water Level Monitoring Integrated Hydrologic Monitoring 2003 Annual Conference.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Annual Snow Pack Effect on Lake Powell
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Rivers Component of the National Monitoring Network Jerad Bales National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA May 10, 2006

Motivation Chapter 15: Recommendations for Creating a National Monitoring Network (NMN) 15-1: Develop a NMN that coordinates and expands existing efforts... Federal backbone... to assess long-term trends and conditions... [and] regional characteristics Ensure adequate coverage in coastal areas and upland areas... and is linked to IOOS. 15-3: Ensure that the NMN has clear goals [and] specifies core variables and appropriate sampling framework... determine regional and local information needs.

Monitoring Network Objectives 1.Define status and trends on a nationwide basis. 2.Provide data to determine when and where goals, standards and resource management objectives are met or not met. 3.Provide data to identify emerging problems. 4.Provide data to support coastal oceanographic and hydrologic research. 5.Provide data for use in interpretive reports and educational materials.

Approach Steering Committee – NWQMC members providing oversight and some guidance. Design Committee  31 individuals from 19 organizations.  Monitoring design for all compartments.  Weekly teleconferences.  Two meetings concurrent with NWQMC meetings.  One 2-day working meeting.  Steering committee provided final approval

River Monitoring Design Fixed stations Monitoring primarily at the HUC-6 scale Integrated with estuarine monitoring Goals:  Measure 90% of flux from each HUC-6.  Measure 90% of flux into each of 149 NMN estuaries.  Measure 90% of flux from U.S. to coastal ocean.

River Monitoring Design Measurements:  Continuous flow  Water chemistry (12 – 15 samples / year)  Bottom sediment chemistry (annually)  Biological conditions (annually)  Adaptive sampling program

Tar River at Greenville, 05/02/2001 – 02/27/2003

Summary of Stream Gage Needs No. of HUC-6 basins Total no. of monitoring sites Entirely new stream gages Stage gages converted to stream gages Inactive gages to be reactivated Inland Hydrologic Accounting Units Coastal Hydrologic Accounting Units Great Lakes Hydrologic Accounting Units TOTAL

Great Lakes drainage monitoring network

Example of Adequacy of Network Accounting Unit No. of Gages Percent of HUC Measured Upper Susq W. Br. Susq.198 Lower Susq.196 Upper Ches.316 Potomac181 Lower Ches.124 James278 TOTAL975

Example of Adequacy of Network NMN EstuaryRiver (NMN Site) Ches. BaySusquehanna Patuxent Tangier & Pocomoke Nanticoke & Pocomoke Choptank Chester Chincoteague BayNone MD BaysNone Delaware BaysNone Potomac Rappahannock YorkPamunkey, Mattaponi JamesJames, App.

Measurement of Inflows to Estuaries More than 97% of freshwater flow from conterminous U.S. will be monitored. Based on estuary surface area, inflows to more than 75% of NMN estuaries will be measured

River Conditions Representative sampling in large rivers to assess national conditions  Build on US EPA Great Rivers and USGS BEST Programs  Consistent with estuarine conditions sampling. River segments with mean flow > 25,000 cfs, or drainage area > 5,000 sq mi

Summary The Rivers component of the NMN will provide data and information for  calculation of flows and loads at HUC-6 level  estimation of trends in flows and loads  computation of more than 90 percent of fluxes from U.S.  calculation of fluxes into greater than 90 percent of NMN estuaries (as measured by total inflow)  linkage with and incorporation into IOOS

Summary The Rivers component of the NMN will not  replace compliance or use attainment (305b and 303d) monitoring.  specifically address drinking water issues.  address specific issues in small basins, streams, and lakes.  replace all existing monitoring.  provide information on river conditions (i.e. 23% of large rivers have summertime dissolved-oxygen concentrations less than 5 mg/L), although future expansion may include this activity.

For More Information Jerad Bales U.S. Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Raleigh, NC ph: National Water Quality Monitoring Council monitoring/network/index.html