Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

UNIT 3 THE VEHICLE AND ITS COMPONENTS USE OF BASIC VEHICLE COMPONENTS
Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
Abs.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Legal issues addressed in the EU funded AdaptIVe project
Definition for Levels of Automation
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
UNIT 10 RESPECT AND RESPONSIBILTY RESPONDING TO EMERGENCIES
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
Supporting document for Informal document No. GRRF Presentation summary Background New applications involving the brake system are constantly approaching.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
SENSOTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
What is SBC ? Sensotronic Brake Control (SBC) is the name given to an innovative electronically controlled brake system which will fit to future passenger.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
The Insiders Guide To Traction Control.
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
PRESENTED BY:BHABESH RANJAN MAHAKUD
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Performing Basic Vehicle Maneuvers
What is SBC ? Sensotronic Brake Control (SBC) is the name given to an innovative electronically controlled brake system which will fit to future passenger.
Informal document GRRF-86-36
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Safety Distance to the front
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Submitted by the expert from OICA
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Maximum allowable Override Force
Emergency Steering Function
Informal document GRRF-78-41
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Performing Basic Vehicle Maneuvers
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Remote Control Parking (RCP) Informal document GRRF-80-18 80th GRRF, 15-18 September 2015, Agenda item 8(b) Remote Control Parking (RCP) A safe and comfortable parking solution Submitted by the Experts of OICA 80th GRRF, Geneva, 2015

Outline Motivation Functional/system description The technical concept Legal Aspects 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 2 of 8

Motivation for RCP Benefits Automated parking on public parking space or in private garages Comfortable, because it is easy to get in and off the car The driver controls the manoeuvre by actuating a dedicated control on the key/smartphone, while continuously monitoring the manoeuvre (direct view) from a close distance The vehicle preforms the parking manoeuvre using its own sensors only if control signal is received from the key/smartphone The vehicle will be brought to an immediate halt when the control signal is no longer being received (e.g. driver stops actuating the control, the remote controller is not in proximity of the vehicle) Relief, especially for persons with reduced mobility Driver has an extensive overview of the parking scenario and can better overlook the situation Avoidance of parking damages (e.g. when opening the door) 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 3 of 8

Functional Description Automated parking by actuation of a control on a remote control Driver does not exercise steering control (e.g. joystick). Vehicle only follows automatically the on-board generated trajectory by using its own sensors. Driver is in control at all times Permanent control by the driver is required and necessary Vehicle stops as soon as the control is released Driver is outside of the vehicle and must remain in close proximity around the vehicle as to monitor the parking manoeuvre permanently Low vehicle speed (< 10 km/h) Due to low speed, the minimal risk condition (vehicle comes to a halt) is reached immediately 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 4 of 8

Example for the Technical Concept / System Description Measuring the parking lot and monitoring the vehicle’s close surrounding by a suitable sensor technology Remote control as the interface and access authority for the RCP-function Remote control Control unit(s) for remote parking Driving authority as parallel process Automatic gearbox with shift-by-wire and electromechanical parking lock Electromechanical parking brake ESC/ brake Electronic Throttle Pedal Electromechanical Power Steering 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 5 of 8

UN-R Regulations for RCP UN-R 79 fulfilled: The driver remains permanently in primary control of the vehicle (see 2.3.4) ACSF - the speed of 10 km/h is not exceeded (see 5.1.6.1) The requirements defined in Annex 6 („special regulations for the safety aspect of complex electronic vehicle control system“) are fulfilled UN-R 13-H fulfilled The requirements defined in Annex 8 („special regulations for the safety aspect of complex electronic vehicle control system“) are fulfilled Other UN-Regulations are not specifically related to the function Remote Control Parking ü ü ü 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 6 of 8

Traffic Regulations / Vienna Convention Vienna Convention Article 8 Para. 1 Every moving vehicle or combination of vehicles shall have a driver. Conformity: Driver is not required to be seated inside the vehicle. In case of RCP the driver „drives“ from outside the vehicle. Para. 5 Every driver shall at all times be able to control his vehicle or to guide his animals. Conformity: Driver can at all times immediately stop the parking manoeuvre by releasing the control. Analogy: Lead a horse from X to Y. Vienna Convention Article 13 Para. 1 Every driver of a vehicle shall in all circumstances have his vehicle under control so as to be able to exercise due and proper care and to be at all times in a position to perform all manoeuvres required of him.[…] Conformity: see Art. 8.5 – Driver is able to have his vehicle under control at all times during parking manoeuvres. ü ü ü 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 7 of 8

Summary The function Remote Control Parking is safe and offers a significant benefit to the driver All existing regulations are complied with The function is attractive and requested by customers 80th GRRF, Geneva, September 2015 Slide 8 of 8