Investigations into Etiology of Breast, Esophageal, and Gastric Cancers: Allele-specific Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Signature Maxwell Lee, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and the Chip on Chip technique. Fredrik Fagerström Billai B E A- Core Facility for Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis.
Advertisements

Most Random Gene Expression Signatures are Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Outcome Venet, et al. PLoS Computational Biology, 2011 Molly Carroll.
Transcriptomics Jiri Zavadil, PhD Molecular Mechanisms and Biomarkers
Regulomics II: Epigenetics and the histone code Jim Noonan GENE760.
Characterization of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks controlling plant cell adaptation to environmental stresses.
Mohamad Ali Najia Summer Fellow, Bioinformatics and Integrative Genomics Program Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology Department of Cancer.
Gene regulation in cancer 11/14/07. Overview The hallmark of cancer is uncontrolled cell proliferation. Oncogenes code for proteins that help to regulate.
Bioinformatics lectures at Rice University Li Zhang Lecture 10: Networks and integrative genomic analysis-2 Genome instability and DNA copy number data.
TCGA(The cancer genome atlas) catalogue genetic mutations responsible for cancer, using genome sequencing and bioinformatics The TCGA is sequencing the.
The origin of metastatic disease: clues from genomics 7/13/2011.
By: Katie Adolphsen, Robin Aldrich, Brandon Hu, Nate Havko.
STAC: A multi-experiment method for analyzing array-based genomic copy number data Sharon J. Diskin, Thomas Eck, Joel P. Greshock, Yael P. Mosse, Tara.
Microarrays and Cancer Segal et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Indiana University Bloomington, IN Junguk Hur Computational Omics Lab School of Informatics Differential location analysis A novel approach to detecting.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH). Outline Introduction to gene copy numbers and CGH technology DNA copy number alterations in breast cancer (Pollack.
MDM2: Oncogene Chan Lee. Discovery of MDM2: starting with tumor suppressor p53.
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
Presented by Karen Xu. Introduction Cancer is commonly referred to as the “disease of the genes” Cancer may be favored by genetic predisposition, but.
Paola CASTAGNOLI Maria FOTI Microarrays. Applicazioni nella genomica funzionale e nel genotyping DIPARTIMENTO DI BIOTECNOLOGIE E BIOSCIENZE.
Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans Highly resistant to DNA damage –Most radiation resistant organism known Multiple genetic elements –2 chromosomes,
A cell and its population of genes :. DNA forms double strands by a process called hybridization:
Amplification of COPS3 in High-grade Osteosarcoma: Relationship to TP53 Mutation and Patient Outcome Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute Mount Sinai Hospital,
Epigenome 1. 2 Background: GWAS Genome-Wide Association Studies 3.
Integrated Studies Of Breast, Esophageal, And Gastric Cancers Using High Throughput Technologies And Computational Analyses Maxwell Lee National Cancer.
Radiogenomics in glioblastoma multiforme
The Center for Medical Genomics facilitates cutting-edge research with state-of-the-art genomic technologies for studying gene expression and genetics,
Genetics-multistep tumorigenesis genomic integrity & cancer Sections from Weinberg’s ‘the biology of Cancer’ Cancer genetics and genomics Selected.
The Effect of BRCA1 on the Progesterone Receptor.
Genomica Funcional Dr. Víctor Treviño A7-421
Investigations into Breast Cancer Etiology: Genomic/Epigenomic Analyses, Novel Oncogenes, and Allele-specific Studies Maxwell Lee National Cancer Institute.
Figure 1. Figure 2 Somatic Mutation Summary A A A98-07-F009a tumor mutant reads > 10 normal mutant read = 0 tumor mutant fraction.
©Edited by Mingrui Zhang, CS Department, Winona State University, 2008 Identifying Lung Cancer Risks.
Microarrays and Their Uses Brad Windle, Ph.D
Doug Brutlag 2011 Genomics, Bioinformatics & Medicine Doug Brutlag Professor Emeritus of.
分 子 病 理 實 驗 室 Molecular Pathology Lab 實驗室主持人:戚謹文, 周德盈 共同主持人 : 李芬瑤.
Gene Expression. Cell Differentiation Cell types are different because genes are expressed differently in them. Causes:  Changes in chromatin structure.
Other genomic arrays: Methylation, chIP on chip… UBio Training Courses.
OMICS International welcomes submissions that are original and technically so as to serve both the developing world and developed countries in the best.
Analysis of protein-DNA interactions with tiling microarrays
Maxwell Lee National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research High-dimension Data Analysis Group March 19, 2014 Integrated Studies Of Breast, Esophageal,
Idea: measure the amount of mRNA to see which genes are being expressed in (used by) the cell. Measuring protein might be more direct, but is currently.
Lecture 11. Topics in Omic Studies (Cancer Genomics, Transcriptomics and Epignomics) The Chinese University of Hong Kong CSCI5050 Bioinformatics and Computational.
Overview of Microarray. 2/71 Gene Expression Gene expression Production of mRNA is very much a reflection of the activity level of gene In the past, looking.
Trends Biomedical Science
CBioPortal Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimentional cancer genomics data.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Epigenetics: from Inheritance to Cancer Maxwell Lee National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research Laboratory of Population Genetics April 21, 2011.
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
Elena Klenova CTCF and BORIS in normal development, epigenetics and tumourigenesis Areas of research: Molecular Oncology Gene regulation Translational.
YEATS4 Is a Novel Oncogene Amplified in Non– Small Cell Lung Cancer That Regulates the p53 Pathway Speaker:Dai-Wei Hsuan Adviser:Dr. Guor-Mour, Her Data:2015/04/22.
Triple negative (TN) vs. positive (TP) breast cancer (BC) analysis with public genomic data yields AGR3 as a biomarker Anita Umesh, Jenny Park, James Shima,
Different microarray applications Rita Holdhus Introduction to microarrays September 2010 microarray.no Aim of lecture: To get some basic knowledge about.
 We investigated for biomarkers that distinguish metastatic or recurring disease with non-metastatic disease, with a particular focus on breast cancer.
Tumor Heterogeneity: From biological concepts to computational methods Bo Li, PhD Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Statistics Department.
1 Finding disease genes: A challenge for Medicine, Mathematics and Computer Science Andrew Collins, Professor of Genetic Epidemiology and Bioinformatics.
An Overview of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
YEATS4 Is a Novel Oncogene Amplified in Non– Small Cell Lung Cancer That Regulates the p53 Pathway Speaker:Dai-Wei Hsuan Adviser:Dr. Guor-Mour, Her Data:2015/04/22.
Molecular Biology of Cancer AND Cancer Informatics (omics) David Boone.
Gene Expression Profiling Brad Windle, Ph.D
Figure 2. DNA methylation mediated MORT gene silencing is linked to luminal, receptor positive breast cancers. (A) MORT expression level plotted versus.
Lecture #8 Date _________
Statistical Applications in Biology and Genetics
Gene Expression.
breast cancer 2, early onsetpro What does this protein make up or do?
What makes a mutant?.
Lecture #8 Date _________
By Michael Fraczek and Caden Boyer
Genomic alterations in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 paediatric leukaemias and solid tumours By: Anh Pham.
PIK3CA somatic mutation and amplification frequency in prostate cancer
Presentation transcript:

Investigations into Etiology of Breast, Esophageal, and Gastric Cancers: Allele-specific Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Signature Maxwell Lee, Ph.D. National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research Laboratory of Population Genetics and Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology May 14, 2013

Part 1 Part 2 Large-scale analyses of allele-specific gene expression and chromatin modifications DNA methylation signatures for tumor classification and tumor progression Part 3 Functional characterization of a novel oncogene identified through our genomic copy number analyses

Analyzing Allele-specific Gene Expression in Large-scale Using Affymetrix SNP Arrays Genomic imprinting X chromosome inactivation cDNA Affymetrix SNP array normal human fetal tissues

Allele-specific Gene Expression and Implication for Genome Wide Association Studies Allele-specific gene expression versus genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation quantitative difference (2-4 fold) 20%~50% of the human genes no parental origin preference Implication of allele-specific gene expression for genome wide association studies SNPs that don’t change amino acid sequence regulatory SNPs 277 genes (46%) equal expression 326 genes (54%) > 2-fold difference Lo et al. Genome Res. 2003

Allele-specific ChIP-on-chip Experimental Design DNA input Pol II H3Ac H3K4 H3K9 H3K27di H3K27tri active inactive control 96 microarray data Genetic background influences the global epigenetic state

Samples cluster by family using allele-specific chromatin-binding activity Family 1Family 2 Kadota et al. PLoS Genet active chromatin marks inactive chromatin marks Genetic background influences the global epigenetic state

Somatic Mutations Identified through RNA-seq 4 pairs of breast tumor and normal 140 millions reads reads map to genome and transcriptome 342 somatic mutations X

Elevated Expression of Mutant Alleles in Breast Tumors cDNA Genomic DNA INO80B cDNA Genomic DNA ARID1B

Implication for identifying driver mutations relative mutant allele intensity in cDNA normalized to genomic DNA Mean = 2.2, p-value = 0.05 Elevated Expression of Mutant Alleles in Breast Tumors

Summary of Functional data for Genes That Displayed Elevated Expression of Somatic Mutations genemutationdescription G3BP2S48T GTPase activating protein (SH3 domain) binding protein 2; oncogene, sequesting TP53 INO80BP306LINO80 complex subunit B; involved in prostate cancer ARID1BY1345N AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like). Its homolog, ARID1A, is frequently mutated in ovarian clear cell carcinoma OSTF1L20Posteoclast stimulating factor 1 GPRC5AS59C G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member A; involved in lung cancer RYBPK217QRING1 and YY1 binding protein; stabilizing TP53

Part 1 Part 2 Large-scale analyses of allele-specific gene expression and chromatin modifications DNA methylation signatures for tumor classification and tumor progression Part 3 Functional characterization of a novel oncogene identified through our genomic copy number analyses

Identification of Novel Oncogenes through Focal Amplification Analysis 161 tumors chromosome 161 breast tumors putative novel oncogenes Affymetrix SNP5 array 1q 8q traditional approach my approach size of focal amplification multiple genes 1 gene frequency of tumors with amplification common high frequency not required but must occur in ≥ 1 tumor

Focal Amplification of TBL1XR1 in Breast Tumors ((() Tumor 1 Tumor 2

TBL1XR1-shRNA Knockdown Suppresses In Vivo Tumor Growth tumor volume (mm 3 ) N=10 N=14implants Kadota et al. Cancer Res Western Blot In collaboration with Lalage Wakefield 9 of 107 of 101 of 14tumor incidence Day 39 p-value = 0.013

Part 1 Part 2 Large-scale analyses of allele-specific gene expression and chromatin modifications DNA methylation signatures for tumor classification and tumor progression Part 3 Functional characterization of a novel oncogene identified through our genomic copy number analyses

An algorithm for methylation and expression index (MEI) Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip Illumina HumanRef-8 v2 Expression BeadChip Differential methylation based on IHC (positive vs. negative for ER, PR, Her2, EGFR, or CK5) 2227 methylation markers in 1162 genes Top 3% most variable gene expression 541 genes 128 methylation markers in 65 genes MEI: the weighted sum of the gene expression where the weights are the negative numbers of the Spearman correlations.

Polish dataset: K-M survival based on MEI p = Survival Probability Year

Polish dataset: K-M survival using MEI for ER+ and ER- samples Survival Probability p = 0.009p = Survival Probability ER+ cases ER- cases Year

Validation: K-M survival using MEI for ER+ samples TCGA ER+GSE6532 ER+ NKI ER+ BT2000 ER+ Year Year Survival ProbabilityOS OSDMFS p = p = p =

Collaborators Lee Lab Mitsutaka Kadota Howard Yang Hailong Wu Beverly Duncan Sheryl Gere Guohong Song Wakefield Lab Misako Sato Lalage Wakefield Buetow Lab Chunhua Yan Michael Edmonson Rich Finney Daoud Meerzaman Ken Buetow Nan HuPhil TaylorAlisa Goldstein Christian AbnetNeal FreedmanSandy Dawsey Jonine FigueroaMark Sherman Junya Fukuoka NCI/CCR Hunter Lab Kent Hunter NCI/DCEG Barbara DunnRonald LubetAsad Umar NCI/DCP Toyama University Jiuping JiJames Doroshow NCI/DCTD Chris Obiora Charles Adisa Abia State University Jun Ren Beijing Cancer Hospital Purdue University Sulma Mohammed Singer Lab Dinah Singer Hewitt Lab Stephen Hewitt