Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass 1 Utarbeidet av Luftrom & Flyplass For å endre bunntekst og dato, velg «Vis» - «Topptekst og bunntekst» Multilateration and satellite based services from a military perspective Colonel Bjørn E. Stai Chief Air Combat Support Systems Inspectorate of Air Operations

2 Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass The Military in SES (Mil aviation exempt from SES regulations) The military role is complex –protect their national territory including airspace –Constant military presence and daily access to airspace Including cross border (NATO/EU/Coalitions) and outside Europe –Military roles; Airspace Users, Air Navigation Service Providers (not Norway), Airports operators, Regulators (MAA) and Policy Makers (MoD) Two major airspace users; civil and State aviation –Military aviation responsible for operations and training in order to deliver security and defence. –States must safeguard both civil and military aviation requirements. –Cooperation between Military and Civil aviation is essential to meet SES goals –Any development in ATM must take military requirements fully into account

3 Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass Military use of WAM and GNS (use and “Pros”) Mil use: Navigation, Surveillance and Weapons (Air/Ground) Cost effective: Simple ground infrastructure compared to current technology Low maintenance cost Flexible: Can be used both as surveillance and navigation service Easy to establish service at new location/base Accurate: Services are accurate world-wide Services can be used to verify/update navigation accuracy Mil use when deemed beneficial to meet military requirements and civil integration needs (safety)

4 Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass Vulnerable: Services can be put out of commission “very easy” Aircraft battle damage can make services unavailable to that user Interdependencies: Use of services dictates strict standards of equipment (duplication civ/mil systems) Aircraft navigation accuracy is part of surveillance accuracy (safety) Non-cooperative targets: Depends of cooperative targets for surveillance services (Security) Primary radar(PSR) and other sensors will still have to be used Military use of WAM and GNS (Cons) Mil limited use due to need for secure, resilient and robust ATM system to guarantee the efficient conduct of security and defence missions

5 Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass Ensure early cooperation in development of regulations (EASA, CAA/MAA, MoT/MoD etc) Establish Common Military Positions (CMP) in Europe (NATO, Eurocontrol, EDA) Plan and invest in new (SES) technology: Ensure that Military will be “as military as required, as civil as possible” –This means that Military will be as compliant as possible but ensure military needs (Security, OPS requirements), but; –may seek to use equivalent performance levels (mil systems recognized as equivalent) –or exemptions when deemed necessary. Mil strategy for SES/SESAR The aim is to ensure that Military aviation can operate safely and effectively alongside the regulations of SES (both GAT and OAT)

Luftforsvaret Luftoperativt inspektorat Luftrom & Flyplass 6 Utarbeidet av Luftrom & Flyplass For å endre bunntekst og dato, velg «Vis» - «Topptekst og bunntekst» Questions and discussion