Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director, Standards Revision and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard One Core Themes & Objectives Objectives.
Advertisements

STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Campus Improvement Plans
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit.
AccreditationEncore New Standards, New Thinking & Next Steps.
The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
EdTPA: Task 1 Support Module Mike Vitale Mark L’Esperance College of Education East Carolina University Introduction edTPA INTERDISCIPLINARY MODULE SERIES.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
New Traditions: NWCCU Standards and Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
NATA Athletic Training Educational Competencies 4th Edition 2006.
Accreditation Briefing August NWCCU Full Scale Accreditation: Introduction Planning has begun for the 2010 Full Scale Accreditation Self Study and.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Institutional Self Study: Examination of Heart, Mind, and Soul Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director, Standards Revision and.
Accreditation Liaison Officer WorkshopFebruary 4, 2011 Accreditation Liaison Officer Workshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities DoubleTree.
Year Three Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 13, 2012 Year Three Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Austin Community College Achieving Excellence Committee November 30, 2007 Zen and the Art of Assessment: A Framework for Effective Practice Based on: Assessment.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 14, 2012 Year Seven Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Revisions to the nwccu accreditation standards: what does it mean for me? Diane E. Waryas.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
edTPA: Task 1 Support Module
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Year-one Report: Principles, Issues, Implications
Year One/Year Three Self Evaluation Workshop
YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director, Standards Revision and Implementation Project

Intention Provide Update Provoke Thought Promote Dialogue

Incongruence Most of us do not look as handsome to others as we do to ourselves. Assiniboine Tribal Proverb

Definition Regional accreditation is a voluntary, non-governmental process of self analysis and peer review that assures educational quality and encourages purposeful improvement through evaluations based on institutional mission, accepted academic standards, and expectations of the public.

Stakeholder Interpretation Accreditation has not served to ensure quality, has not protected the curriculum from serious degradation, and gives students, parents, and public decision- makers almost no useful information about institutions of higher education. Anne D. Neal

Administrative Interpretation [Accreditation] is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy. Ernest Benn

Faculty Interpretation We put the ‘no’ in innovation. Post Shredded Wheat Commercial

Redirection When you discover you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. Dakota Tribal Proverb

Impediment Tradition is the enemy of progress. Wilcomb Washburn (Seen in 1952 on Navajo Nation boarding school)

Substitution What we call ‘progress’ is the exchange of one nuisance for another nuisance. Havelock Ellis

Homo Academicus Most people are in favor of progress; it’s the changes they don’t like. Anonymous

Balance The art of progress is to preserve order amid change and to preserve change amid order. Alfred North Whitehead

Barometer You can judge your age by the amount of pain you feel when you come in contact with a new idea. Pearl Buck

Perspective The challenge is for us to see beyond the innumerable fragments to the whole, stepping back far enough to appreciate how things move and change as a coherent entity. Margaret Wheatley

Methodology 1) Analysis 2) Synthesis Method consists of two correlative and complementary processes: 1) Analysis of complex totalities into their parts; and 2) Synthesis of parts into their totality. However, the two processes by themselves are imperfect and require each other for the full development of knowledge and understanding. Joseph L. Esposito

Characteristics Analysis Reductionistic Take Apart Isolate Knowledge of Function Synthesis Holistic Put Together Correlate Understanding of Purpose

Standard An accreditation standard is a principle- based statement of expectations for institutional practice that concurrently: 1)Functions as an indicator of educational quality and effectiveness by which institutions are evaluated; and 2) Provides guidance for continuous improvement.

New Accreditation Standards Standard One: Mission, Manifestations, and Expectations Standard Two: Resources and Capacity Standard Three: Planning and Implementation Standard Four: Effectiveness and Improvement Standard Five: Mission Fulfillment, Sustainability, and Adaptation

Core Theme A core theme is a manifestation of a fundamental aspect of institutional mission with an overarching common purpose that guides planning for programs and services, development of capacity, and application of resources to fulfill that aspect of the mission.

Integration Communities of Function and Communities of Interest

Distillation Institutional Mission Core Theme Objectives Programs / Services Goals or Intended Outcomes Intentions of Contributing Components

Theme 1 Human Resources Education Resources Student Support Resources Library and Information Resources Financial Resources Physical and Technical Infrastructure Governance Theme 2 Theme 3 Theme 4 Theme N... Human Resources Education Resources Student Support Resources Library and Information Resources Financial Resources Physical and Technical Infrastructure Governance

Discernment Core Theme or Embedded Value

Examples Access Quality Student Success Faith Formation

Enforcement You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Alphonse Capone

Septennial Accreditation Cycle ProcessYear Standard

Year Three Committee Chair Mission, Core Themes, Objectives Governance Evaluator Education Resources Evaluator Student Support Resources Human Resources Evaluator Library and Information Resources Evaluator Financial Resources Physical and Technical Infrastructure

Year Seven Committee Chair Mission Fulfillment Adaptation Sustainability Evaluators One Evaluator for Each Core Theme

Reporting Structure Biennial reports reflect institutional reality throughout the accreditation cycle Approved changes incorporated in next scheduled report with previous chapters modified to reflect those changes Reduced need for interim reports/visits Year Seven report reflects current reality over all standards and provides a foundation for the next cycle

Pilot Institutions Carroll College Columbia Basin College University of Alaska Anchorage Wenatchee Valley College

Calendar for Pilot Institutions

a Institutions scheduled for comprehensive visits in 2009 or 2010 will be evaluated under the current standards and process b For 2011 reports and visits on all standards institutions may elect to be evaluated under the current standards or the revised standards Septennial Schedule Decennial Schedule Conversion Calendar - Accredited Institutions Revised February 12, 2009

Conversion Calendar - Candidate Institutions Septennial Schedule a For Fall 2010 reports and visits, institutions may address the current standards or the revised standards. b Beginning in spring 2011, only the revised standards will be used. Decennial Schedule

Accreditation Events and Cost Comparison *Average ten-year total for institutions with comprehensive visits; Does not include institutions with multiple comprehensive visits. 1 Combined total of progress reports and focused, regular, and comprehensive reports and visits. 2 Combined total of focused, regular, and comprehensive visit evaluators.

Year One Report Title Page Title of Report Institution Name Date Table of Contents Introduction (1 page maximum) Institutional Context (1 page maximum) Preface Brief Update on Institutional Changes Since Last Report Address Topics Requested By the Commission

Year One Report (continued) Section I: Mission (3 Pages Maximum) Mission Statement Mission Core Themes Definition of Fulfillment of Mission and, Within that Definition, Interpretation of an Acceptable Threshold or Extent of Mission Fulfillment. Date and Manner of Most Recent Review of Mission and Core Themes

Year One Report (continued) Section II: Core Themes For each Core Theme: [3 Pages Maximum Per Theme] Title and Description Objectives Indicators of Achievement of Objectives Rationale as to Why the Indicators are Assessable and Meaningful Measures of Achievement Section III: Chapter One Summary (1 Page Maximum)

Year Three Report Update Preface and Expand Year One Report to Include: Chapter Two (Standard Two: Resources and Capacity) Section I: Governance Section II: Human Resources Section III: Education Resources Section IV: Student Support Resources Section V: Library and Information Resources Section VI: Financial Resources Section VII: Physical and Technical Infrastructure Section VIII: Chapter Two Summary Report Summary (Chapters One and Two)

Year Five Report Update Preface and Expand Year Three Report to Include: Chapter Three (Standard Three: Planning and Implementation) Section I: Institutional Planning Section II: Core Theme Planning For each Core Theme: Integration with Strategic Plan Alignment of Resources and Capacity For Educational Programs within Core Theme: Undergraduate Programs Graduate Programs Continuing Education and Non-Credit Programs Section III: Chapter Three Summary

Year Five Report (continued) Update Preface and Expand Year Three Report to Include: Chapter Four (Standard Four: Effectiveness and Improvement) Section I: Assessment - For each Core Theme Alignment of Objectives, Resources, and Capacity Assessment of Achievement Core Theme Objectives and Goals/Outcomes of Programs and Services For Educational Programs Program Assessment Student Learning Assessment Use of Results for Improvement Core Theme Summary Section II: Chapter Four Summary Report Summary (Chapters One, Two, Three, and Four)

Year Seven Report Update Preface and Expand Year Five Report to Include: Chapter Five (Mission Fulfillment, Sustainability, and Adaptation) Section I: Mission Fulfillment Section II: Adaptation and Sustainability Section III: Chapter Five Summary Report Summary (Chapters One, Two, Three, Four, and Five)

Outstanding Issues All requests for 2011 or later ARFE, Progress, Focused, and Regular reports will be rescinded. Each institution will address the subject(s) of those requests as an addendum to its 2011 report under the new standards and process.

Timeline SpringRefine Standards Late SpringPenultimate Draft JulyFinal Board Review SummerFinalize Standards FallRegional Meetings Late FallMembership Vote January 2010Board Ratification January 2011Implementation

Final Thoughts Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore. Judy Garland as Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz (L. Frank Baum) Just when I knew all of life's answers, they changed the questions. Anonymous Change is not made without inconvenience Samuel Johnson If you’re going through hell, keep going. Winston Churchill

General Comments and Questions