Single-Dish Continuum Brian Mason (NRAO) NRAO/NAIC Single-Dish Summer School July 13, 2009 Basics Issues Confusion gain fluctuations atmosphere Receiver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wide Field VLBI Imaging I (Background) Indra Bains.
Advertisements

Arecibo 40th Anniversary Workshop--R. L. Brown The Arecibo Astrometric/Timing Array Robert L. Brown.
NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Arecibo, July 2005
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2009 Jan. 12.
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
Observing Techniques with Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank November 2012.
HARP-B/ACSIS on the JCMT: spatially resolved chemistry of warm gas John Richer (Cavendish, Cambridge) On behalf of HARP and ACSIS teams.
Introduction to Radio Astronomy Updated February 2009.
Submillimeter Data for SINGS George J. Bendo & Robert D. Joseph (A ''George's Adventures in Learning OpenOffice'' Presentation)
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
HI from z ~ 0 – 1 with FAST D.J. Pisano West Virginia University NRAO.
Radio Telescopes Large metal dish acts as a mirror for radio waves. Radio receiver at prime focus. Surface accuracy not so important, so easy to make.
The Green Bank Telescope a powerful instrument for enhancing ALMA science Unblocked Aperture Low sidelobes gives high dynamic range Resistance to Interference.
Radio Astronomy Overview 9 May 2005 F.Briggs, RSAA/ATNF Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
Direction-detection spectrometer concepts the CCAT Matt Bradford + others 24 October 2006, in progress.
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
The Future of the Past Harvard University Astronomy 218 Concluding Lecture, May 4, 2000.
STAR FORMATION STUDIES with the CORNELL-CALTECH ATACAMA TELESCOPE Star Formation/ISM Working Group Paul F. Goldsmith (Cornell) & Neal. J. Evans II (Univ.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Mapping the COSMOS at 1 mm using Bolocam James Aguirre University of Colorado, Boulder H. Aussel (2), A. Blain (3), J. Bock (4), C. Borys (3), S. Eales.
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
Definitive Science with Band 3 adapted from the ALMA Design Reference Science Plan (
Radio Telescopes. Jansky’s Telescope Karl Jansky built a radio antenna in –Polarized array –Study lightning noise Detected noise that shifted 4.
SCUBA Polarization results: Jane Greaves, Joint Astronomy Centre, Hawaii with special thanks to: Wayne Holland, Tim Jenness, David Berry and.
Lecture 1 By Tom Wilson.
Title Here Probing the Epoch of Reionization with the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment (TIME) Jamie Bock Caltech / JPL CCAT Workshop, Boulder.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
HARP / ACSIS A B-Band Survey “Camera” (Sub)Millimetre Observing Techniques Russell O. Redman.
130 cMpc ~ 1 o z~ = 7.3 Lidz et al ‘Inverse’ views of evolution of large scale structure during reionization Neutral intergalactic medium via HI.
Lecture 3 By Tom Wilson. Summary of Lecture 1 Noise in a Receiver time on source Receiver itself, atmosphere,ground and source Analying bandwidth (for.
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank July 2009.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Sensitivity Joan Wrobel.
What is Millimetre-Wave Astronomy and why is it different? Michael Burton University of New South Wales.
Radio Astronomy ASTR 3010 Lecture 25. Intro to Radio Astronomy Concepts - Amplifiers - Mixers (down-conversion) - Principles of Radar - Radio Astronomy.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Bolometer Camera Plans at MPIfR, Bonn E. Kreysa, Kaustuv moni Basu, H.-P. Gemünd, G. Siringo, A. Kovacs, F. Schuller, A. Weiß, K. Menten Max-Planck-Institute.
The Galactic Center at Low Radio Frequencies Namir Kassim (NRL) Crystal Brogan (IfA) J. Lazio (NRL), Ted LaRosa (Kennesaw State), M. Nord (NRL/UNM), W.
Atacama Large Millimeter Array October 2004DUSTY041 Scientific requirements of ALMA, and its capabilities for key-projects: extragalactic Carlos.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Extragalactic Source.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Extragalactic Absorption Lines Observed from Arecibo Chris Salter (National Astronomy & Ionosphere Center, Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico)
Arecibo Frontiers – 12 Sep Beyond the Frontiers: The Road From Arecibo to The Radio Synoptic Survey Telescope (RSST) Steven T. Myers National Radio.
The JCMT in the ALMA Era Surveying the Sub-millimetre Sky (Canada / Netherlands / Great Britain) Doug Johnstone NRC/HIA.
Molecular Clouds in in the LMC at High Resolution: The Importance of Short ALMA Baselines T. Wong 1,2,4, J. B. Whiteoak 1, M. Hunt 2, J. Ott 1, Y.-N. Chin.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy AMiBA SZ Science AMiBA Team NTU Physics Figure 4. Simulated AMiBA deep surveys of a 1deg 2 field (no primary.
E-MERLIN : a pathfinder for the SKA (a summary of the e-MERLIN talk given at the Berkeley SKA meeting) e-MERLIN : a pathfinder for the SKA (a summary of.
Large Area Surveys - I Large area surveys can answer fundamental questions about the distribution of gas in galaxy clusters, how gas cycles in and out.
Continuum: flux integrated over a range in wavelength line: spectral resolution (Petitpas et al.) Whitmore et al HST 850 μ m Continuum Observing in the.
Centimeter Receiver Design Considerations with a look to the future Steven White National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
Jan URSI1 Fast Switching Phase Compensation for ALMA Mark Holdaway NRAO/Tucson Other Fast Switching Contributors: Frazer Owen Michael Rupen Chris.
GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band Jagadheep D. Pandian Cornell University.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
Brent WilloughbyEVLA Front-End CDR – WVR Option 24 April EVLA Front-End CDR Water Vapor Radiometer Option.
APEX stuff – 4 Feb 2003 Martin White Department of Physics Department of Astronomy UC Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
Single Dish Summer School, Green Bank 2007 Things to do with Single Dish: VLBI Tapasi Ghosh NAIC/Arecibo Observatory Outline: Interferometry Basic.
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Observing and Data Reduction
Science from Surveys Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville.
Welcome to the 4th NAIC-NRAO School on Single Dish Radio Astronomy
KFPA CDR R. Norrod Feb 27, 2008.
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy
Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT)
Presentation transcript:

Single-Dish Continuum Brian Mason (NRAO) NRAO/NAIC Single-Dish Summer School July 13, 2009 Basics Issues Confusion gain fluctuations atmosphere Receiver architectures & observing strategies The future: large arrays

Flux Density (Jy) ZSPEC (Caltech Submillimeter Observatory) Rotational Transitions Of CO Thermal emission from dust CCH, HCN…

M82 See Condon (1992, ARA&A) Stellar death Magnetic fields Stellar birth dust synchrotron Thermal BB Free-Free

Dust emission from galaxies at at high redshift HDF-- Hughes et al. (1998) Discovered an abundant population of submm galaxies at z~ hr map with the JCMT at 850  m, confusion limited

The Sky Isn’t Empty: Confusion NVSS (45 arcsec FWHM) grayscale GB6 300’ (12 arcmin FWHM) contours

The confusion amplitude P(D) distribution [for n(s) = dN/ds=kS -2.1 ] D = image brightness (e.g., Jy/beam) Condon (1974); Scheuer (1956) Euclidean:

The confusion amplitude P(D) distribution [for n(s) = dN/ds=kS -2.1 ] D = 0 mean is not a good baseline; use running median instead Long tail --> use at least 5 sigma threshold (src/30 beams) Euclidean:

The 5σ extragalactic confusion limits for Arecibo (d = 220 m) and the GBT (d = 100 m). Gets much weaker with increasing frequency: The noise level won’t go below this if you integrate for longer.

NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS): 1.4 GHz GB6: old 300’+7-beam receiver, 5 GHz BUT!

A Simple Picture of Gain Fluctuations Extra Noise Term (Contributes to baseline ripple for S.L.) Suppose T SRC << T RX

Flux Density (Jy) A Simple Picture of Gain Fluctuations DC Offset (e.g., Tsys)

Stability requirement in order that gain fluctuations cause smaller changes in the output than thermal noise: (1 sec, 1 GHz bw) - too small to be accurately measured each second --> mitigate with instrument design Why not calibrate the fluctuations away?

Atmospheric Emission How fast do G(t), T ATM (t) vary? Sky emission often adds noise to continuum measurements, so you need to measure your noise instead of assuming the radiometer equation or formal uncertainties!

Postdetection power spectrum of the receiver output νkνk Gaussian, uncorrelated Noise (Radiometer Equation): White (flat) power spectrum Atmosphere & gain Fluctuations: 1/f Power spectrum

How does k depend on bandwidth? νkνk νkνk Less bandwidth More bandwidth Eliminate bad fluctuating signals by independently measuring the bad signal on some timescale  or shorter. Use  < 1/(2πν k ): Dicke switching, chopping, multi pixel, etc..

Characteristic Timescales for Broadband Measurements Gain fluct. For coherent amplifiers: 100+ Hz – receiver architecture incoherent (bolometer) detectors: Hz Atmosphere 0.1-few Hz – chopping or rapid scanning – common mode subtraction for imaging arrays

Dicke-Switching Receiver Rapidly alternate between feed horns to achieve theoretical noise performance. (old-fashioned receiver architecture but good illustration, & same principle as “chopping”) For T SRC <<T SYS gain fluctuations don’t contribute significantly to the noise

Dicke-Switching Receiver Rapidly alternate between feed horns to achieve theoretical noise performance Penalty: –Differential sky measurement –2x higher thermal noise

?

Dicke-Switching Receiver What happens if the feeds see slightly different things? Components before the switch must be as identical + well matched as possible.

An Easier Way?

Primarily you switch to suppress receiver effects. Switch must be before active (unstable) components

Correlation Receiver Receiver noise is uncorrelated and drops out. Always looking at both source & reference: only lose one sqrt(2) for differencing

Correlation Polarimeter See talk by Carl Heiles

Higher-Order Differences: Symmetric Nodding For sensitive photometry, one level of differencing is usually not enough –Gradient in sky emission, or with time –Dual-feed systems: Slight differences in feedhorn gains or losses

Bolometers Bolometer detectors Incoherent ; measure total power Very broad bandwidths possible; approach quantum - limited noise. Can be built in very large-format arrays! MUSTANG (  18 GHz)

Bolometers θ adjacent pixels 4″4″98 % 40km Across array 32″98 % 5km (principle also applies to dual pixel heterodyne receivers & FPAs) MUSTANG (  18 GHz)

Array Receivers

ALFA ALFA on Arecibo 7-element λ = 21 cm coherent array, 3 arcmin resolution GALFACTS:full-Stokes, sensitive, high-resolution survey of 12,000 deg^2 Galactic magnetic fields, ISM, SNR, HII regions, molecular clouds …

Large Format Heterodyne Arrays QUIET 91 pixels I,Q,U 90 GHz integrated, mass- producable “receiver on a chip” (MMIC) T. Gaier (JPL)

Large Format Heterodyne Arrays QUIET 91 pixels I,Q,U 90 GHz integrated, mass- producable “receiver on a chip” (MMIC) OCRA 1-cm Receiver Array Under construction at Jodrell Bank, initially for Torun 30m telescope SZ surveys + imaging 16 --> 100 pixels correlation architecture T. Gaier (JPL)

Millimeter Bolocam/AZTEC 1-2 mm 144 pixels CSO (10m) & LMT (50m) Also IRAM 30m, APEX ACT (6m), SPT (10M) 1-2 mm Large Area Surveys (SZ) s of deg^2 few 1000 detectors

Sub-millimeter SCUBA-2 JCMT (15m) ~10,000 pixels! SQUID-MUX’d TES bolometers (CCD-like) Under commissioning now Also: SHARC-II on CSO, 384 pixels at 350 um

MUSTANG GBT 3.3mm Bolometer Array Prototype for a 1000-pixel class camera Maping Speed >15x ALMA Thermal Dust + Free-Free Emission In Orion KL/Integral Filament Region.

MUSTANG GBT 3.3mm Bolometer Array Prototype for a 1000-pixel class camera SZE in RXJ User instruments Maping Speed >15x ALMA

END

Performance Measures From before: An effective aperture of 2760 m 2 is required to give a sensitivity of 1.0 K/Jy. Gain Units of 1/Janskys. You sometimes see The System-Equivalent Flux Density, SEFD (small is good) “Mapping Speed” commonly defined as: These are single-pixel measures. For mapping, increase by Nfeeds.

Gain Effects: deviations from linearity Input Power Output Power Ideal Gain compression/ saturation T Rx Integrated power is what usually matters (RFI)

Gain Effects: deviations from linearity Input Power Output Power Ideal Gain compression/ saturation Be aware of the limitations of the instrument You’re using & calibrate at a similar total power Level to what your science observations will see. T Rx Integrated power is what usually matters (RFI)

Gain Effects: fluctuations Gain drifts over the course of an observing Session(s) easily removed with instrumental Calibrators (e.g., noise diodes) Short term gain fluctuations can be more Problematic. (see continuum lecture)

Sampling/Quantization & Dynamic Range: Postdetection Diode or square law detector: Turns E-field into some output Proportional to power (E 2 ) A/D 2 N levels (N~14) Common for continuum systems. Robust & simple (large dynamic range) A/D sample time ~1 level

Sampling/Quantization & Dynamic Range: Predetection Sample the E-field itself. Samplers must be much faster and sample much more corasely (typically just a few levels) Dynamic range limitations more important One usually requires variable attenuators to get it right (“Balancing”). Small # of levels increases the noise level. (K-factor in Radiometer equation) More levels -> greater dynamic range (RFI robustness), greater sensitivity Monitor levels through your observation.

Nonthermal Emission around Sgr A* LaRosa, Brogan et al. (2005) 75 MHz, VLA: 330 MHz, GBT:

BOOMERAnG map of CMB Anisotropies