ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, April 14, 2009 End Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems Begin Chapter 6: Multi-degree of Freedom Systems © Dan Negrut,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AERSP 301 Finite Element Method
Advertisements

Kjell Simonsson 1 Vibrations in linear 1-degree of freedom systems; I. undamped systems (last updated )
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 February 2, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “My own business always bores me to death;
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Inverse Dynamics Equilibrium Analysis Various Odd Ends March 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 February 9, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “In England, if you commit a crime, the.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations
PHY 301: MATH AND NUM TECH Chapter 6: Eigenvalue Problems 1.Motivation 2.Differential Equations 3.Other Equations.
Motion Analysis Slides are from RPI Registration Class.
Kjell Simonsson 1 Vibrations in linear 1-dof systems; III. damped systems (last updated )
Fundamentals of Linear Vibrations
Modal Testing and Analysis
Free Vibrations – concept checklist You should be able to: 1.Understand simple harmonic motion (amplitude, period, frequency, phase) 2.Identify # DOF (and.
TWO DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEM. INTRODUCTION Systems that require two independent coordinates to describe their motion; Two masses in the system X two possible.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a Point fixed in a Ref Frame – 2.6 Absolute vs.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a point fixed in.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 September 13, 2011 Dan Negrut University of Wisconsin-Madison © Dan Negrut,
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 January 28, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “Age is an issue of mind over matter.
Differential Equations
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, Feb. 17, 2009 Section 2.5 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
Basic structural dynamics II
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Sept. 08 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
Sect. 6.5: Forced Vibrations & Dissipative Effects
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, Feb. 5, 2009 Section 2.2 and 2.6 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 09 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 11, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451,
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, March 26, 2009 Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Tu, Sept. 07 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, Feb. 10, 2009 Sections 2.6, 2.7 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 September 06, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, March 10, 2009 Chapter 4: Vibration Under General Forcing Conditions © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Vel. And Acc. of a Fixed Point in Moving Frame Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics February.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, January 29, 2009 Section 1.11 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 October 19, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Differential Calculus 2.5, 2.6 September 11, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, January 27, 2009 Sections 1.10 & 1.11 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems March 31, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison Quote.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 10, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, March 3, 2009 Single DOF Harmonic Excitation © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
Ch11: Normal Modes 1. Review diagonalization and eigenvalue problem 2. Normal modes of Coupled oscillators (3 springs, 2 masses) 3. Case of Weakly coupled.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, Feb. 26, 2009 Single DOF Harmonic Excitation © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems May 07, 2009 EOM in non-Cartesian Reference Frames ~ not in textbook~ Quote.
Phy 303: Classical Mechanics (2) Chapter 3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, April 16, 2009 Chapter 6: Multi-degree of Freedom (MDOF) Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison Quote of the Day:
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 08, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 16, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 6, 2011 Equilibrium Analysis & Inverse Dynamics Analysis ME451 Wrap.
Vibrations of Multi Degree of Freedom Systems A Two Degree of Freedom System: Equation of Motion:
Dynamics Primer Lectures Dermot O’Dwyer. Objectives Need some theory to inderstand general dynamics Need more theory understand the implementation of.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 February 26, 2009 © Dan Negrut,
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, Feb. 3, 2009 Sections , © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, April 2, 2009 Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison Quote of the Day: It is a miracle.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Jan. 22 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison.
Sect. 4.5: Cayley-Klein Parameters 3 independent quantities are needed to specify a rigid body orientation. Most often, we choose them to be the Euler.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 4, 2010 Chapter 6 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations
OSE801 Engineering System Identification Spring 2010
Chapter 4 Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
MULTI DEGREE OF FREEDOM (M-DOF)
November 5, 2002 SE 180 Final Project.
Presentation transcript:

ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, April 14, 2009 End Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems Begin Chapter 6: Multi-degree of Freedom Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison Quote of the Day: Do what you can with what you've got wherever you are. - Theodore Roosevelt

Before we get started… Last Time: Matrix-Vector approach to 2 DOF problem EOM decoupling Principal coordinates Today: Example, Matrix-Vector approach Start Chapter 6, multi-degree of freedom vibration No HW Assigned (Expo week) Looking ahead, please keep in mind: Thursday, April 16, we’ll meet in our old room in Engineering Hall Our current room is going to be used for the Expo week on Thursday Next Tuesday, April 21, I will be out of town Professor Engelstad (rightful “owner” of the ME440 course) will cover There will be a demo of vibration modes, draws on Chapter 5 Class meets in the usual room in ME building 2

3 [AO] Example

[AO] Example: MATLAB Implementation and Results clear m = 1.0 k = 1.0 Mmat = [ 5/2*m -m/2 ; -m/2 3/2*m] Kmat = [ 3*k -2*k ; -2*k 2*k] invMmat = inv(Mmat) Pmat = invMmat*Kmat [Umat, Omegamat] = eig(Pmat) UmatNormalized = [Umat(:,1)/Umat(1,1) Umat(:,2)/Umat(1,2)] firstNatFreq = sqrt(Omegamat(1,1)) secondNatFreq = sqrt(Omegamat(2,2)) Mmat = Kmat = invMmat = Pmat = Umat = Omegamat = UmatNormalized = firstNatFreq = secondNatFreq =

End Chapter 4: Vibration Under General Forcing Conditions Begin Chapter 5: Two Degree of Freedom Systems 5

Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems 6 Why bother? Multi-degree of freedom systems are the usual way one deals with infinite dimensional problems Mathematical formulations are used to express the original problem as an “equivalent” one having only a finite number of DOFs The poster child: the Finite Element Method Example: imagine a vibrating bridge System has an infinite number of degrees of freedom You approximate the vibration of the structure by invoking only a finite number of degrees of freedom used to characterize the motion (vibration) of the bridge If you understand the material covered in chapter 5, particularly the matrix- vector approach to solving the problem, chapter 6 is going to be an incremental step along the same path The jump was big from 1 to 2 DOF system. The latter provided the excuse to introduce matrix-vector notation The jump is small from 2 to 29,882 DOF systems. The latter relies on exactly the same matrix-vector approach

Multi-DOF System: The Fundamental Idea A MDOF (Multi-DOF) system is described by a system of simultaneous 2 nd order differential equations Coupling between differential equations can be dynamic and/or static The solution approach Decouple the simultaneous differential equation (assume “p” of them) Outcome: a set of independent differential equations, very easy to solve Decoupling done exclusively based on the modal matrix [u] p £ p Last time we discussed that the principal generalized coordinates are defined like {q} =[u] -1 {x} This leads to a decoupled set of second order differential equations: 7

[New Topic] Influence Coefficients Recall the expression of the generalized linear m-c-k problem we derive at the beginning of Chapter 5: 8 The nomenclature we used: [k] – the stiffness matrix [c] – the damping matrix We introduce a new concept: the flexibility matrix Someties called “compliance” matrix By definition, (it kind of makes sense…): Some more nomenclature: elements k ij, c ij, a ij are called stiffness, damping, and flexibility influence coefficients, respectively

[Meaning Of] Flexibility Influence Coefficients First of all, recall that the concept of influence coefficients is married to the set of generalized coordinates you use to capture the dynamics of your system To see that this is the case… Recall that for the principal generalized coordinates, the flexibility matrix (which is the inverse of the stiffness matrix) is diagonal However, for other choices of generalized coordinates the off-diagonal elements are not zero So, given a set of generalized coordinates that you are stuck with, regard the flexibility influence coefficient a ij as the displacement that a unit force applied at station “j” produces on the coordinate “i”. In other words, push on “j” and note by how much “i” moves 9

[Cntd] Flexibility Influence Coefficients Recall that we are dealing with a linear problem Superposition at work (twice in the same expression!): The total change in generalized coordinate “i” that comes out of the applied forces F 1, F 2, …,F p is simply 10 Now do this for each of the “p” generalized coordinates x 1,…,x p to get Matrix-Vector notation:

[Meaning Of] Stiffness Influence Coefficients Given a set of generalized coordinates that you are stuck with, regard the stiffness [influence] coefficient k ij as the force “felt” at point “i” due to a unit displacement at point “j” when all the other generalized coordinates except “j” are kept fixed. In other words, move “j” by 1.0 and measure the force felt at “i” but recall that all the generalized coordinates except “j” are fixed 11

[Cntd] Stiffness Influence Coefficients Recall that we are dealing with a linear problem Superposition at work (twice in the same expression!): The total force at point “i” that comes out of the displacements X 1, X 2, …, X p is simply 12 Now do this for each of the “p” generalized coordinates to get Matrix-Vector notation:

[Concluding Remarks] Flexibility and Stiffness Coefficients In summary… 13 Easy to see that our original claim holds… Why is this relevant? Because rather than obtaining [k] and working with it, sometimes it is easier to obtain [a]. Maybe we should work with [a] if that’s the case… Please see Example 6.6, pp.465 of textbook Examples where computing the flexibility (compliance) matrix is easier: Beams, rods, cables

Introduce notation: [D] is called dynamical matrix, in general not symmetric [Short Detour (Story)] The Universe, According to [a] How can we go about finding the eigenvalues (natural frequencies) and eigenvectors (vibration modes) if we insist on using [a] instead of [k]? The problem at hand (free undamped vibration): 14 Solution will be harmonic in nature: Then by using the harmonic nature of the solution (after some massaging),

[Short Detour (Story Cntd)] The Universe, According to [a] Then, the “characteristic equation” becomes: 15 In other words, first solve for the equation… … and then compute the natural frequencies as Finally, compute the eigenvectors (the modal vectors) that together will make up the modal matrix [u]

Examples, Easy Stiffness Matrix For examples below, computing stiffness matrix is straightforward 16

[AO] Example Find the stiffness matrix of the system below How easy is it to find the flexibility matrix for this system? 17

[AO] Example, Computing the Stiffness Matrix Derive EOMs 18

[AO, from text] Example, Computing the Stiffness Matrix Derive EOMs 19

[New Topic. Short Detour] Semidefinite Systems Under certain circumstances the flexibility coefficients are infinite Consider the following example: 20 If a unit force F 1 =1 is applied, there is nothing to prevent this system from moving to the right for ever… Therefore, a 11 = a 21 = a 31 = 1 In this situation, fall back on the stiffness matrix approach This situation will correspond to the case when at least one of the eigenvalues is zero there is a zero natural frequency there is a rigid body motion embedded in the system We’ll elaborate on this later…