New Corrector System for the Fermilab Booster E.J. Prebys, C.C. Drennan, D.J. Harding, V. Kashikhin, J.R. Lackey, A. Makarov, W.A. Pellico Fermilab, Batavia,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Advertisements

5/18/2015J-PARC1 High Level Physics Applications Magnets & Beams Day ?, Lecture ? Accelerator View from the Physicist.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
Booster Corrector Upgrade October William Pellico.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Accelerator Physics Issues Shekhar Mishra Sept 17-19, 1996 Main Injector DOE Review.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
F Booster Long Straight Corrector Upgrade Technical Status and Schedule for Installation Craig Drennan DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Extending FETS with a Ring Electron models are not sufficient for simulating the beam.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
F AAC Review, May 10, Prebys 1 Answer to Question  What is the analysis backing up the claim that the losses will be reduced with the new corrector.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Proton Plan PMG 9/27/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status Eric Prebys.
Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Proton Planning – Major Projects, Schedule, Decisions, and Projections Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan Expectations Eric Prebys AD/Proton Source.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Proton Plan PMG 5/25/06 David Harding Booster Correctors Status and CR David Harding.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys Proton Plan Answers to Questions Director’s Review August 2006 Eric Prebys.
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
The nonlinear dynamics of SIS100 at injection G. Franchetti Beam dynamics meet Magnets II 18/4/2012G.Franchetti1 Magnet multipoles: Dipole: Akishin et.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev AAC Workshop 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York , USA
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Magnetic axis tolerances for the SSS magnets
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Alternative Ion Injector Design
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

New Corrector System for the Fermilab Booster E.J. Prebys, C.C. Drennan, D.J. Harding, V. Kashikhin, J.R. Lackey, A. Makarov, W.A. Pellico Fermilab, Batavia, IL MiniBooNE-neutrinos from 8 GeV Booster proton beam (L/E~1): absolutely confirm or refute the LSND result: Running since fall To date has taken >8E20 protons: more protons than all other experiments in the 35 year history of the lab combined! NuMI/Minos – neutrinos from 120 GeV Main Injector proton beam (L/E~100): precision measurement of    oscillations as seen in atmospheric neutrinos. Began running in March, Will ultimately use numbers of protons similar to MiniBooNE The Fermilab Booster The Booster takes the 400 MeV Linac beam and accelerates it to 8 GeV. Runs at an instantaneous 15 Hz repetition rate From the Booster, beam can be directed to the Fermilab Main Injector or directly to an 8 GeV beam line currently servicing the MiniBooNE Experiment 400 Mev Beam from Linac 8GeV Beam to Main Injector and MiniBooNE 472m in circumference 24-fold periodic lattice Each period contains 4 combined function magnets. Magnets cycle in a 15 Hz offset resonant circuit. LATTICE Increasing Proton Demand NEUTRINO PROGRAM ANTIPROTON PRODUCTION 8E12 protons sent to the Main Injector every 2.2 seconds, to be accelerated to 120 GeV and delivered to the antiproton production trarget ~1E16 protons per hour Small compared to… ABSTRACT We present an ambitious ongoing project to build and install a new corrector system in the Fermilab 8 GeV Booster. The system consists of 48 corrector packages, each containing horizontal and vertical dipoles, normal and skew quadrupoles, and normal and skew sextupoles. Space limitations in the machine have motivated a unique design, which utilizes custom wound coils around a 12 pole laminated core. Each of the 288 discrete multipole elements in the system will have a dedicated power supply, the output current of which is controlled by an individual programmable ramp. This poster describes the physics considerations which drove the design, as well as issues in the control of the system. Nova – Same beam line as Minos, but detector built off axis. Would like 2-4 times the protons of Minos. Existing Corrector System Corrector Packages (x48): Corrector Package BPM Horizontal chromaticity Vertical chromaticity 3 rd order resonance correction Shortcomings of Existing System Orbit motion:Tune variation: Orbits shown relative to injection at 5 ms intervals Predicted and measured tunes New Corrector System Motivations:  Dipoles  Must produce ± 1cm of beam motion at all momenta  Sufficient slew rate to correct for observed beam motion  Quadrupoles  Maintain tunes arbitrarily close to upper integer resonance throughout cycle to mitigate space charge tune shift  Capable of slewing anywhere from half integer to integer resonance in 1 ms at transition  Sextupoles  Same integrated strength as existing system.  Capable of slewing between extrema in 1 ms at transition Magnetic specifications Unique design - laminated core - 12 poles - wound for 6 discrete multipoles Fabrications details - water cooled - all coils potted in place - alignment keyways for BPM Sextupole System  Horizontal chromaticity controlled by sextupoles at all odd short straights  Vertical chromaticity controlled by sextupoles at long straights in 4, 10, and 18  Third order corrections controlled by skew and normal sextupoles at long straights in periods 4,5,6,7 Dipoles  Ramped in high-beta periods  DC control in low-beta periods Quadrupoles:  Ramped in groups: long normal, long skew, short normal, short skew  Individual DC correction for harmonic control Features of New System:  Increased strength of dipole and quadrupole elements  Normal and skew sextupoles at all 48 sub-periods  Individual, ramped current control of all 6x48=228 elements  Emulation of existing hardware  Dramatically improved alignment Fabrication and installation:  First 24 magnets being fabricated now  These will be installed in the long straight (vertical high-beta) regions in August and September, 2007  Remaining correctors will be fabricated and installed in 2008 Total proton output limited by beam loss (radiation in Booster) -> Must improve efficiency!

Dominant Resonances Arbitrary harmonic corrections These will improve with new sextupole system Magnet current ratios Time Breaks Time Dependent Dipole Control Initial System (identical to present) Closed Orbit Correction Orbit correction sequence Orbit deviations: Corrections to magnet currents: Harmonic Correction Correct with normal sextuples Correct with skew sextuples New sextupole system can correct for all potential third order resonances Corrected with existing system Time dependent dipole control:  Used for existing system  Dipoles only have time-dependent current ramps at high beta regions ­ Verticals at long straights, horizontals at short straights  Straightforward to modify for new correctors  Will now have control of all dipoles Closed orbit control:  Finds optimum magnet currents to reproduce desired orbit  Can select from a variety of algorithms  Commissioning with existing corrector system  Insufficient strength to control position throughout cycle  Being modified to accommodate new correctors Control of Corrector System Tune Control  Correctors grouped by type  Long normal, long skew, short normal, short skew  Ramps superimposed on harmonic (DC) terms  New system will be strong enough to allow tune control feedback  In development Related Posters  “Design and Fabrication of a Multi-element Corrector Magnet for the Fermilab Booster”  D. Harding, et al  MOPAS006, Monday June 25, 2-4PM, Southwest Hall  Describes details of the magnet design and fabrication  “Using a Slowly Rotating Coil System for AC Field Measurements of Fermilab Booster Correctors”  G. Velev, et al  MOPAS021, Monday June 25, 2-4PM, Southwest Hall  Describes the system used to qualify the magnet design and test the production units.  “System Overview for the Multi-Element Corrector Magnets and Controls for the Fermilab Booster”  C.C. Drennan, et al  MOPAS005, Monday June 25, 2-4PM, Southwest Hall  Details of the hardware implementation of the corrector system Work supported under DOE contract DE-AC02-76CH03000 Corrections calculated according to the algorithm: Plans  Initial operation will focus on establishing acceptable performance for the ongoing laboratory physics program as quickly as possible  Will run new system in a mode which will emulate existing system, even if this means limiting some of the capability of the new system.  The new corrector system will allow a great deal more versatility in the control of the accelerator  Individual ramped control of every channel  Among other things, this will allow for time dependent harmonic corrections.  Fully exploiting the capabilities of the new system will represent challenges to both accelerator physics and application development for some time.