FGC Upgrades in the SPS V. Kain, S. Cettour Cave, S. Page, J.C. Bau, OP/SPS April 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stéphane Gabourin TE/MPE-EP 21 st March 2014 BIS & SMP changes for Run 2 SPS – Extractions – Injections – LHC.
Advertisements

Safe Machine Parameters General Machine Timing Cross-Check Safe Machine Parameters General Machine Timing Cross-Check 9 th May v3.
Industrial Control Engineering Industrial Controls in the Injectors: "You (will) know that they are here" Hervé Milcent On behalf of EN/ICE IEFC workshop.
CERN Machine Protection – A Future Safety System? Introduction 1 SMP = Safe Machine Parameters System which receives accelerator.
Technical review on UPS power distribution of the LHC Beam Dumping System (LBDS) Anastasia PATSOULI TE-ABT-EC Proposals for LBDS Powering Improvement 1.
W. Sliwinski – eLTC – 7March08 1 LSA & Safety – Integration of RBAC and MCS in the LHC control system.
Distribution of machine parameters over GMT in the PS, SPS and future machines J. Serrano, AB-CO-HT TC 6 December 2006.
V. Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet AB/OP1Nov 08, 2007 LHC Injection System V.Kain, G.H. Hemelsoet, AB/OP Input from: E. Carlier, B. Goddard, J. Wenninger What do.
Timing upgrades after LS1 Jean-Claude BAU BE-CO-HT1.
Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on.
Design and operation of existing ZS B.Balhan, J.Borburgh, B.Pinget B.BalhanDesign and operation of existing ZS SPS ZS Electrostatic Septum Upgrade Review.
Accelerator Consolidation Workshop TE/EPC consolidation plan 2 Jean-Paul Burnet ACC consolidation day, 12/09/2013.
LHCOP / SPS Cycling for LHC1 SPS cycling for LHC injection J. Wenninger AB/OP Introduction to the timing system. Timing and settings constraints.
WWWWhat timing services UUUUsage summary HHHHow to access the timing services ›I›I›I›Interface ›N›N›N›Non-functional requirements EEEExamples.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
LHC Utilities & Facilities WAO Daejeong 12/04 – 16/04/2010 Markus Albert on behalf of LHC Operations.
The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice Pablo Alvarez Jean-Claude Bau Stephane Deghaye Ioan Kozsar Julian Lewis Javier Serrano.
23/08/20081 RBI.816 Operation First aid on RBI.816 converter control J. Wenninger.
SPS RESTARTING AFTER LS1 05/03/2015 Stéphane Cettour Cavé.
The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice
Status Report – Injection Working Group Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities after long stops.
1 Interlock logic for LHC injection: intensity limitations Jörg Wenninger AB-OP-SPS Outcome of the join Machine-Experiments Workshop on Machine Protection.
V. Kain AB/OP1Sep 12, 2007 Summary of Discussion on Injection Protection Issues Injection Protection Issues – meeting 22 nd of June V. Kain, A. McPherson,
LHC BLM Software revue June BLM Software components Handled by BI Software section –Expert GUIs  Not discussed today –Real-Time software  Topic.
Monday h00: End of fill #1640: 3.7 pb h14: RB S12 and S23 tripped before loading rampdown table, active filter. MPE piquet. Fip_Com_Lost.
SPS Timing. Outline Timing table Modes of operation Mode switch mechanism External events Creating a timing table Timing event cleaning.
1 LTC Timing AB/CO/HT Central timing hardware layout Telegrams and events Postmortem, XPOC LHC Central Timing API Fill the LHC Use Case Julian Lewis.
The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice Pablo Alvarez Jean-Claude Bau Stephane Deghaye Ioan Kozsar Julian Lewis Javier Serrano.
Nominal Workflow = Outline of my Talk Monitor Installation HWC Procedure Documentation Manufacturing & Test Folder Instantiation – NC Handling Getting.
Scrubbing Run: TDI, MKI and MKE interlocks Chiara Bracco, Jan Uythoven ABT/BTP Acknowledgments: T. Baer, M. Barnes, E. Carlier.
‘Review’ of the machine protection system in the SPS 1 J. Wenninger BE-OP SPS MPS - ATOP 09.
LHC OP Tools - Applications (1) o2 new timing users, new dynamic destination oPower converters – settings (for base optics):  Parameters, optics, beam.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Last night Lhc closed 15:00 Beam on Ti 8 /Ti2 Prepulse check synchronisation ok with LHCb /RF 17:00 Open Point 4 PC’s and RF 19:00 LBDS energy tracking.
CERN Timing Overview CERN timing overview and our future plans with White Rabbit Jean-Claude BAU – CERN – 22 March
CLIC - CDR Status (Volume 2) Hermann Schmickler, ILCW2010.
V. Kain – eLTC – 7March08 1 V.Kain, S. Gysin, G. Kruk, M. Lamont, J. Netzel, A. Rey, W. Sliwinski, M. Sobczak, J. Wenninger LSA & Safety - RBAC, MCS Roled.
MPP 4 th March - 1v0 CERN MPP CERN MPP SMP Team 3.
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
18, 19, 20 February 2002 Power Converters for magnets (PBS 1.2.3) R. GENAND SL/PO 1 Power Converters for Magnets –Introduction –Specification Magnet characteristics.
CO Timing Review: The OP Requirements R. Steerenberg on behalf of AB/OP Prepared with the help of: M. Albert, R. Alemany-Fernandez, T. Eriksson, G. Metral,
TE/TM 30 th March - 0v1 CERN MPP SMP 3v0 - Introduction 3 *fast *safe *reliable *available generates flags & values.
Interfacing the FMCM for additional protection in the LHC and the SPS- LHC/CNGS Transfer Lines to the CERN controls system Cristina Gabriel Casado, Interlock.
PC Current Interlocking for the SPS Fast Extractions. 1 J. Wenninger July 2009.
Emergency dump update 2. M. Solfaroli – 23/10/2015 Goal 2 GENERAL STRATEGY Force open the BIS loop Generate an internal fault in the LBDS Scrape the beam.
LSA Core overview 6 / 11 / 2007 Wojciech Śliwiński (AB-CO-AP) on behalf of LSA team.
23/06/2011 Linac4 BCC meeting. 23/06/2011 Linac4 BCC meeting Watchdog = Machine protection element whose function is to cut the beam if losses exceed.
SPS availability K. Cornelis Acknowledgments : A. Rey and J. Fleuret.
CERN Marc Magrans de Abril MPP – RBI DCCT Incident Beam Lost in TI2 Event Analysis and Proposed Mitigations SPS and LHC MPP
AWAKE p+ beam line HWC C. Bracco, J. Schmidt Acknowledgment: MCS, EPC, MPE, SPS-OP, BI, ABP (survey),STI, EA, ACE, RP.
LEIR re-commissioning and other operational aspects First ideas for new tools and organization First draft re-commisisoning plan H. Bartosik, A. Huschauer,
H2LC The Hitchhiker's guide to LSA Core Rule #1 Don’t panic.
SPS Partial Economy 1 J. Wenninger BE-OP-SPS April 2009 The partial economy team: S. Page, M. Jonker, S. Cetour Cave, L. Pereira, J.C. Bau, I. Kozsar,
Timing Review Evolution of the central and distributed timing How we got where we are and why What are its strengths and weaknesses.
Outcome of BI.DIS Fast Interlocks Peer Review
LHC Beam Commissioning Meeting V. Kain & R. Alemany
DRY RUNS 2015 Status and program of the Dry Runs in 2015
Timing Review FESA Requirements with respect to the current Timing implementation FESA Team FE section TimingReview FESA Requirements.
About Interlocks, Timing Systems and how to send SPS beams to the LHC
Injection BIS – next iteration
ATLAS-AFP interlock validation
LHCCWG Meeting R. Alemany, M. Lamont, S. Page
BLM settings management in LSA
Dry Run 0 Week 13: BI test of...everything circulating beam: all fixed displays and BI applications OP directories for 2009, concentrators running Need.
LHC BLM Software audit June 2008.
Interlocking strategy
New page for summary of test status
SPS Injection BIS - Draft requirements
Presentation transcript:

FGC Upgrades in the SPS V. Kain, S. Cettour Cave, S. Page, J.C. Bau, OP/SPS April

Introduction – FGC for the SPS During LS1 the SPS power converter controls framework ROCS was replaced by the more powerful FGCD framework ROCS was relying on obsolete products such as SL_Equip and LynxOS FGC: new standard across the CERN accelerator complex FGCD follows the FGC power converter state model. Function generation and state are coupled together. FGCs will be used by the power converters and RF. RF will have additional RFFG card for more resolution (FGC limited to 1 kHz). April

FGCD state model April

FGC states for the main operation of SPS power converters During the main operation of the SPS as a multi-cycling machine, the power converters will be in state CYCLING April

Other aspects…  Power converters that are connected to the interlock system will remove the permit if not in an operational state: –on_standby or to_cycling e.g. are not operational states.  Automatic polarity switching is supported –Dynamic switching between dipole chain in TI 8 and TT41 not for the time being. April

FGCD opened the door to significant improvements The new SPS COAST Improvements to SPS Economy All the changes were only possible with some significant upgrade of the injector timing system and LSA for the SPS April

CONCEPT OF THE NEW SPS COAST April

The main features of the new SPS COAST - 1  A cycle with the same timing user can be “cycling" or in COAST.  The difference is made with the introduction of machine modes in the timing system: CYCLE, COASTPRE, COAST, COASTREC  A single timing table exists for all machine modes for a given timing user.  But the sending of an event is conditioned with machine mode –E.g. if in mode COAST, the beam dump events do not come out  In mode COASTPRE the timing event SX.S-COAST-CTM is sent out. –It is configured in the timing table at the time of a coast plateau.  Upon reception of this event the FGCs and RF freeze their functions. April

The main features of the new SPS COAST - 2  The FGCs are then in state IDLE.  From then on operation à la LHC. –Trims no more on function, but “actual beam process”  Generated when entering COAST –“Actual beam process”= time slice of function containing single point. –During COAST use NON-PPM property of the FGCs.  In mode COASTREC (= Coast Recover) –Beam dump events are sent out and then the event SX.E-COAST.CTM –SX.E-COAST.CTM sends FGCs to TO_CYCLING –All changes from “Actual beam process” are incorporated into the function April FGC states in COAST For all the different steps we will make heavy use of the SPS sequencer.

IMPROVEMENTS TO SPS ECONOMY April

3 Types of Economy Goal: SPS should not pulse if there is no beam; can be disabled for testing  Full Economy –EDF demand for power consumption reduction or external condition –Will be set on the telegram and FGCs react to it –FGCs will stay on last point of last cycle (=13.5 GeV)  Dynamic Economy –No beam detected by BCTs: generation of timing event  Check implemented in FESA class by OP/SPS –FGCs play special dynamic economy function upon reception of event –Different for different power converters and different cycles  Pulsing on correct dynamic destination only –Concerns power converters associated with the fast extractions and transfer lines for LHC and HiRadMat April

Full Economy vs. Dynamic Economy April Full Economy Dynamic Economy t1t1 FGC builds dynamic economy function with parameter t 1. Corresponds to the time when the economy function should join the original one again. FGC builds dynamic economy function with parameter t 1. Corresponds to the time when the economy function should join the original one again.

FIRST TEST RESULTS - COAST April

First Tests & Status of Upgrades  All new timing features are available since March  All power converters in the SPS are now FGC –Almost all features are available –Can test power converter controls in SIMULATION –Still missing:  Upgrade to new timing events  Economy on dynamic destination  Increase of number of points for function to 5000  Allow dynamic economy if dI/dt != 0, within limits –All missing FGC features will be finished during May  RFFG still under implementation –OP testing not started April

Sequence Manager – Set cycle “coastable" Rule: only one cycle in supercycle, spare uncoupled “coastable = true” in generation for cycle type April

Test of COAST – 1  Request coast on sequence manager: software button April

Test of COAST – 2 April

Test of COAST – 3 April

COAST – still to be tested/prepared  Concept of “actual beam processes” from LSA  Trim during COAST via LSA and execution of trim with timing event  Incorporation  Sequence to enter and exit COAST April

FIRST TEST RESULTS - ECONOMY April

Dynamic Economy - 1  FESA class: BCTECO running  Triggers timing event SX.APECO-CT if BCT4 or 3 below threshold April

Dynamic Economy - 2  Trigger comes fast enough even for the shortest cycles –E.g. LHCPILOT(max time allowed 60 ms after injection) April ms LHCPILOT SFTPRO

Full Economy April Still to come for FGCs: reaction to telegram

Other stuff to come  New application to look after FEI interlocks for power converters for fast extraction to LHC and HiRadMat  Sequences  SIS interlock update for FGCs  New application to manage economy April

Summary  During LS1 the SPS power converter control with ROCS has been replaced with the FGCD framework  This upgrade opened the door for wide ranging improvements and modifications. The most significant changes: –New SPS COAST –Improvements for SPS Economy  To fully exploit the flexibility with the FGCs, new features were necessary in the timing system and LSA  Many of the new features are already available and test results look very promising. –All timing features are available since March and fully functional.  Details are being finalized and testing continues until end of the summer. April