System Validation and Verification Testing for LISA Preliminary Concepts Jeffrey Livas, Nicholas Jedrich, Stephen M. Merkowitz, Robin T. Stebbins NASA/Goddard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radio over fiber.
Advertisements

1 Feasibility of measuring the Shapiro time delay over meter-scale distances Peter Shawhan (University of Maryland), Stefan Ballmer (LIGO - Caltech), Szabolcs.
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
1 Measurement of the Gravitational Time Delay Using Drag-Free Spacecraft and an Optical Clock Neil Ashby, Dept. of Physics, UCB 390, University of Colorado,
Earth System Science Teachers of the Deaf Workshop, August 2004 S.O.A.R. High Earth Observing Satellites.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Optics of GW detectors Jo van den Brand
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Antennas Lecture 9.
LISA 1 LISA/GAIA/SKA Birmingham. LISA A Mission to detect and observe Gravitational Waves O. Jennrich, ESA/ESTEC LISA Project Scientist.
Laser Interferometer Space Antenna Satellite Description  Three spacecrafts forming a triangle flying 5 million km apart  Placed in an elliptical plain.
LIGO-G E LIGO Laboratory1 Simulating the LIGO Laser Phase Change Resulting from Gravitational Waves Simulate GW generation and detection Make.
Gravitational waves LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory ) in Louisiana. A laser beam is.
Louis J. Rubbo Neil Cornish and Olivier Poujade. The LISA Simulator Capabilities –Valid for an arbitrary gravitational wave at any frequency in the LISA.
Matthew Evans, Ph237 April Application of Simulation to LIGO Interferometers  Who am I? »Matthew Evans, Ph.D. from Caltech on Lock Acquisition 
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
Stefan Hild For the GEO-team March 2008, ILIAS WG1, Pisa Projection of small angle scattering.
Transmission Media / Channels. Introduction Provides the connection between the transmitter and receiver. 1.Pair of wires – carry electric signal. 2.Optical.
Fundamental of Fiber Optics. Optical Fiber Total Internal Reflection.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Current progress of developing Inter-satellite laser interferometry for Space Advanced Gravity Measurements Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 GW Interferometry at Goddard Space Flight Center Jordan Camp NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center Jan.
Current Progress of Development of Laser Interferometry for LISA-type Mission in China Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University of Science &
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
1 LISA Science and Concept Robin T. Stebbins. 2 May 13, 2003 LISA Overview The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a joint ESA- NASA mission.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
The Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope Mission
Z B Zhou, Y Z Bai, L Liu, D Y Tan, H Yin Center for Gravitational Experiments, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science.
08/31/2006 ~ Mission specific challenges: Data Analysis GRS Interferometry.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 Design Assessment of Lunar, Planetary and Satellite Ranging Applied to Fundamental Physics Jonathan Fitt Friday,
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Guidance and Navigation
Squeezed light and GEO600 Simon Chelkowski LSC Meeting, Hannover.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
UPenn NROTC Unit, dtd Fall 2004 Naval Weapons Systems Energy Fundamentals.
1. G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 2 New Budget Initiatives for NASA in FY04.
Possibility of detecting CHRISTODOULOU MEMORY of GRAVITATIONAL WAVES by using LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) Thus, the final form of the memory.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Gravitational Wave Workshop Linthicum, MD Dec This presentation contains no ITAR protected information Group 1: No Drag Free Subsystem (also.
Gravitational Waves.
Comparison of Laser Interferometry and Atom Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Observations in Space Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado Boulder.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
Part 3  Transmission Media & EM Propagations.  Provides the connection between the transmitter and receiver. 1.Pair of wires – carry electric signal.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
1 Initial Study Task Mark Herring / Jordan Camp. 2 May 13, 2003 Topics Purpose of Initial Study Task Schedule and Format Task Description.
Seth Timpano Louis Rubbo Neil Cornish Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Background using LISA.
RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 Status of LISA Jordan Camp LISA Deputy Project Scientist NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center Jan. 19,
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
High power fibered optical components for gravitational waves detector Matthieu Gosselin, PhD Student at EGO ELiTES : 3 rd general meeting February 10.
Calva update Nicolas Leroy for the CALVA group (LAL, ESPCI, LAPP, LMA) Main Laser Cavity 1Cavity 2 Aux. Laser L1 L2 M1M2M3.
LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: The Mission Mike Cruise For the LISA Team.
Maxim Pathfinder Prework 16 August 1999
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99
Systems Engineering Management
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Laser Interferometry for a future GRACE follow-on mission
Presentation transcript:

System Validation and Verification Testing for LISA Preliminary Concepts Jeffrey Livas, Nicholas Jedrich, Stephen M. Merkowitz, Robin T. Stebbins NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Abstract The Laser Interferometry Space Antenna (LISA) mission is a set of 3 spacecraft that fly in a heliocentric orbit in an equilateral triangle formation to detect gravitational waves. Each side of the triangle is 5 million km long, and the formation detects passing waves by closely monitoring the distance between spacecraft. The ideal for system-level testing of instruments and spacecraft is to “test as you fly”. Given that the inter-spacecraft distance is approximately 13 times the distance between the earth and the moon, ground testing for the LISA instrument will not be able to meet this ideal in a number of areas, so a combination of testing, simulation, and analysis will be needed instead. This paper will outline some of the areas where direct testing on the ground will not be possible, and discuss some of ideas, concepts and methods to meet that challenge. The focus of the discussion will be on the optical and system- level aspects of the testing, as many of the issues associated with the proof masses and drag-free spacecraft are covered by the LISA Pathfinder mission. Launch Stack Testing The LISA spacecraft are mounted in a vertical stack for launch, and may spend some time in that configuration waiting for launch or for other launch systems to be tested. A “stop light” configuration could allow at least simplified testing of the payload in the launch configuration, with communications over normal telemetry links. Simplified testing could include verifying at least low power transmitter operation as well as some alignment checks on the optical bench. Free Flying Proof Masses The requirement for a freely floating mass to serve as a proof mass for a gravitational wave detector is that it be free of residual forces to to a level of 3 x m/s 2 /√Hz. In a 1-g environment this amounts to isolating the mass by a factor of ~ a difficult task. Therefore ground testing to date has focused on developing a detailed noise model of some of the anticipated noise sources through testing of a torsion pendulum [Carbone, L., et al.; “Upper limits to surface force disturbances on LISA proof-masses and the possibility of observing galactic binaries”, arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/ ]. The LISA Pathfinder mission is an additional opportunity to validate that we understand how to do ground testing that results in working flight hardware as well as reducing risk by testing the short arm interferometer (explained below). In general, the Pathfinder mission will: - validate the detailed noise model developed from torsion pendula - validate the optical bench construction and testing techniques - demonstrate six-degree of freedom operation near LISA required sensitivity The Pathfinder mission is led by ESA and scheduled for launch in Currently all subsystems are undergoing CDR, with system-level CDR scheduled for June For more information see Primary Testing Challenges Most of the validation and verification testing for the LISA mission IS possible on the ground, but there are two major challenges for ground testing that will require atypical methods: 1)Testing a freely floating proof mass in a 1-g environment 2)Testing a very long arm interferometer without a long baseline Inter-spacecraft Measurement Concept The distance measurement is divided into three parts - a “long arm” interferometer which is the distance between the optical benches in the near and far spacecraft, and two “short arm” interferometers. The short arm interferometer is fully verified by ground testing for LISA Pathfinder, as well as flight tested. The short arm for LISA can also be fully verified on the ground. Long arm testing will require a unique approach. Overview of the Mission The LISA mission studies gravitational waves by detecting the strain they produce with a laser interferometer that measures the distance between pairs of freely floating proof masses arranged in a 5 x 10 6 km equilateral triangle constellation that orbits the sun 20º behind Earth’s orbit. The plane of the triangle is angled at 60º with respect to the ecliptic. Each of the three spacecraft are in independent orbit around the sun, so no station-keeping is required to keep the constellation together. The proof masses are isolated from disturbances by using drag-free satellite technology that keeps a spacecraft centered around the proof mass as it moves. Large Spacecraft Separation The LISA arm length is 5 x 10 6 km, or about 400 times the diameter of the earth, or 13 x the distance from the earth to the moon. The nominal transmission loss is 100 dB, which means for every 1 Watt of transmitter power only 100 pW is received. If we were to use single mode optical fiber to simulate this same distance, the loss would be approximately 1 million dB. Long Delay Simulation Instead of propagating the light (a delay) and then digitizing the phase, we can digitize the phase first and then delay the signal. Experiments at the University of Florida have already demonstrated proof of concept [Thorpe, J. I. PhD Thesis] 5 x 10 6 km 50 x 10 6 km 60º 5 x 10 6 km LISA Orbit LISA Pathfinder Spacecraft LISA Constellation (not to scale) LISA Spacecraft Long Arm Simulator Although it is not physically possible to build a 5 x 10 6 km test bed on the ground, it is certainly possible to mimic some of the properties of such a test bed. One idea is to focus on the functional properties: 1) Delay:  t = d/c = 16.7 sec one way, implemented digitally 2) Optical properties Low received power (simple attenuation) Spatial Power profile: Transmit beam is gaussian Receive beam is a “top hat” Wavefront flatness Polarization Point-ahead angle Pointing jitter Secular variation in pointing due to orbits 3) Optical frequency spectrum Carrier frequency - relative and absolute Frequency noise Clock noise transfer sidebands Inter-spacecraft communications sidebands Time-varying doppler shifts Each of these properties is relatively easy to simulate with established laboratory techniques. It may not be necessary to simulate all of them simultaneously, simplifying the design. Full Constellation Testing Constellation testing can be achieved using just one corner of the triangle for physical testing of one spacecaft at a time and using simulators for the rest. Below is a partial list of constellation functions that could be tested in such a set-up. Sun Constellation Function (partial list)Brief Description Constellation ManagementExperiment control/coordination of various modes and transitions between modes. Constellation processing and samplingCollection and analysis of data of at least two kinds: 1) Housekeeping/sciencekeeping 2) Phasemeter (baseline is no on-board analysis) Constellation performance validationMonitoring and validating the performance of the constellation. Includes defining and checking/detecting the conditions necessary to transition into/out of a particular mode, such as science mode. Constellation failure detection and recovery Set of functions for conditions in which the constellation is only partially lost - such as loss of a single link. Includes transitions into possible safe modes, recovery scenarios, continuing operation, etc. Acquisition - spatialEstablishment of the optical link between spacecraft. Proper pointing and orientation in space, as well as the exchange of optical power. Acquisition - frequencyEstablishment of laser frequency locking between spacecraft. Includes both pre-stabilization and arm-locking. Frequency ManagementFunction for maintaining in-band beat notes on the photodetectors of each spacecraft. Time ManagementTime distribution among spacecraft. Inter-spacecraft communicationsexchange of data and control/command information between spacecraft. Inter-spacecraft communications Time distribution among spacecraft.Time Management Function for maintaining in-band beat notes on the photodetectors of each spacecraft.Frequency Management Establishment of laser frequency locking between spacecraft. Includes both pre-stabilization and arm-locking.Acquisition - frequency Establishment of the optical link between spacecraft. Proper pointing and orientation in space, as well as the exchange of optical power.Acquisition - spatial Functions associated with monitoring and maintaining arm lengths, arm length change rates, etc.Orbit placement and maintenance Set of functions for conditions in which the constellation is only partially lost - such as loss of a single link. Includes transitions into possible safe modes, recovery scenarios, continuing operation, etc.Constellation failure detection and recovery Monitoring and validating the performance of the constellation. Includes defining and checking/detecting the conditions necessary to transition into/out of a particular mode, such as science mode.Constellation performance validation 2) Phasemeter data. Current baseline has no onboard processing of phasemeter data, and the amount of onboard processing of other data is TBD. Constellation processing and sampling (2) Collection and analysis of data. At least two kinds: 1) Housekeeping/sciencekeeping data. Constellation processing and sampling (1) Experiment control/coordination of various modes and transitions between modes.Constellation Management Brief DescriptionConstellation Function exchange of data and control/command information between spacecraft. Time distribution among spacecraft. Function for maintaining in-band beat notes on the photodetectors of each spacecraft. Establishment of laser frequency locking between spacecraft. Includes both pre-stabilization and arm-locking. Establishment of the optical link between spacecraft. Proper pointing and orientation in space, as well as the exchange of optical power. LaunchStack Configuration PropModule “StopLight” GSE 5 x 10 6 km simulator Inter-spacecraft optical beams ~ 20 ft Science Module ~ 24 ft “StopLight” GSE 5 x 10 6 km simulator Just use this part Top View of Vacuum chamber showing a possible LISA constellation testing layout Transmit Beam Receive Beam Point ahead angle LISA Spacecraft Far Field Test Simulator Fiber coupled