Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2001 PLACE, DATE (1) Cow Fertility and Effect on Longevity PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Advertisements

Modeling nuisance variables for phenotypic evaluation of bull fertility M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
Effects of complex vertebral malformation gene on production and reproduction M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and C. P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Fertility Trait.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Assessment of voluntary waiting period and frequency of estrus synchronization among herds R.H. Miller, 1, * H.D. Norman, 1 M.T. Kuhn, 1 and J.S. Clay.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Genetic Base and Trait Definition Update.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Methodology for Prediction of Bull Fertility from Field Data M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Prediction of Service Sire Fertility M.T. Kuhn 1 *, J.L. Hutchison 1, and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agriculture Research Service,
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 NAAB Update : Base Change, Udder Health, Longevity,
Minimum Dry Period Length to Maximize Performance M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
Paul VanRaden 1, Mel Tooker 1, Mahinda Dematawewa 2, and Ron Pearson 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA 2 Virginia Polytechnic.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
A National Sire Fertility Index
Extent of sexed-semen usage
M.T. Kuhn* and P. M. VanRaden USDA-AIPL, Beltsville, MD
Measures of Fertility: Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Abstract M INTRODUCTION ◆ AIPL began receiving data on individual breedings, including heifer breedings, in  Oct ◆ Literature on U.S. heifer fertility appears to be sparse ◆ Information on factors affecting heifer fertility, as well as genetic and phenotypic parameters, could be useful for: Heifer management (e.g., age at breeding) Mating programs (e.g., inbreeding effects) Feasibility of combining heifer and cow breedings OBJECTIVES ◆ Assess impact of various factors on heifer conception rate (CR) ◆ Estimate heritability (h 2 ) of heifer fertility and correlation with first lactation cow fertility and milk yield MATERIALS & METHODS Factors Affecting Heifer CR ◆ Fixed, linear model: y= 1 (conception), 0 (no conception) ◆ Holstein heifers with confirmed outcomes only ◆ 383,972 AI breedings on 258,890 heifers ◆ Factors (all fit as categorical variables): Herd AI month AI year AI age Service sire (SSR) age at breeding and birth year Inbreeding: heifer, SSR, mating (embryo) SSR Inbreeding x SSR age Stud Parent average breeding value for DPR Parameter Estimation ◆ Linear animal and threshold sire models to estimate h 2 ◆ Linear model to estimate correlation of number of services to conception (NS) for heifers and cows ◆ In addition to the genetic term, models included only Herd-Yr and Yr-State-Month of breeding RESULTS Factors Affecting CR Importance of factors (based on mean square) 1) AI yr 2) Age 3) Parent avg. DPR 4) AI mo 5) Herd 6) Stud 7) SSR Inbreeding x SSR age 8) SSR birth yr 9) Inbreeding: Mating, SSR, Heifer 10) SSR age Overall Mean CR:58.2% Year effects: Only 3 years included; no general trend Age (of heifer) at Breeding ◆ Mean breeding age = 15.7 mo ◆ Breeding heifers at less than 8 mo of age lowers CR 20% ◆ Best CR when heifers are bred between 14 and 16 mo ◆ CR was also lower for heifers bred at ages > 16 mo, e.g., 7% lower for heifers bred at 26 mo of age Similar result was obtained using first service only Parent Average DPR ◆ Difference of 3.2% in CR from lowest DPR group to highest ◆ Linear regression indicated.5% increase in heifer CR with every 1% increase in DPR Month of Breeding ◆ Maximum difference in CR among months = 3.3% ◆ Best CR in July and August ◆ Lowest CRs were in April and May ◆ Better CR in warmer months is in contrast to cow fertility. Perhaps more heat expression or better heat detection for heifers in summer months Stud ◆ Although 9% difference in heifer CR amongst all NAAB stud codes included, there was only a 2.6% maximum difference among the 5 major US studs Factors Affecting CR SSR Inbreeding and Interaction with SSR age Main Effect of SSR Inbreeding ◆ Main effect indicated consistently lower CR with higher inbreeding except at the highest level of inbreeding ◆ However, for breedings at 1.5 yr of age for SSRs, the mean CR (%) for the 4 levels of SSR inbreeding were 56.9, 50.5, 49.4, and 47.1 ◆ Perhaps the low CR for the higher inbred bulls is noticed early on by the AI organization and is compensated for with higher sperm concentrations Inbreeding of the Heifer and of the Mating (embryo) ◆ CR steadily decreased, with increased inbreeding, for both ◆ Most highly inbred heifers had 5.1% lower CR than least inbred heifers ◆ 2.7% lower CR for highest inbred matings vs lowest Parameter Estimates ◆ h 2 of heifer CR =.8%, for both the linear and threshold models ◆ Genetic correlation between NS for heifers and NS for cows = 92% ◆ Genetic correlation of NS in heifers with 1st lactation milk yield = 10% CONCLUSIONS ◆ Average CR for U.S. Holstein heifers is about 58% ◆ Herd, year, month, and age at breeding are all factors affecting heifer CR ◆ Breeding at 14 to 16 mo appears to maximize CR ◆ Heifer CR decreases with inbreeding in the animal itself, in the embryo and with inbreeding in the SSR, although the reduction in SSR fertility caused by inbreeding can apparently be compensated for with higher sperm dosages ◆ Heritability of heifer CR is quite low and is not genetically identical to cow fertility. Nonetheless, selection for DPR will improve CR in heifers as well. Table caption GroupInbreeding %Heifer CR 1  to to to