L. Bobb 1, 2, T. Aumeyr 1, M. Billing 3, E. Bravin 2, N. Chritin 2, P. Karataev 1, T. Lefevre 2, S. Mazzoni 2 1.John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
Advertisements

R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
Bunch shape monitor for Linac-4 A.V.Feschenko Institute For Nuclear Research (INR), Moscow , Russia.
R. Nagaoka, A. Nadji, M.E. Couprie, O. Marcouillé
A. Aryshev 1, T. Aumeyr 2, M. Billing 3, L. Bobb 2,4, B. Bolzon 4,5,6, E. Bravin 4, P. Karataev 2, K. Kruchinin 2, T. Lefevre 4, S. Mazzoni 4, M. Shevelev.
Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
R. M. Bionta SLAC November 14, 2005 UCRL-PRES-XXXXXX LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurements Workshop Use of FEL Off-Axis Zone Plate.
Matching and Synchrotron Light Diagnostics F.Roncarolo, E.Bravin, S.Burger, A.Goldblatt, G.Trad.
Philip Burrows BDS, LCWS08 Chicago, 17/11/081 BDS Instrumentation Philip Burrows John Adams Institute, Oxford University Thanks to: Mike Woods, Manfred.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Cavity Optimization for Compact Accelerator- based Free-electron Maser Dan Verigin TPU In collaboration with A. Aryshev, S. Araki, M. Fukuda, N. Terunuma,
Beam Instrumentation for Linear Colliders What is special about the beam instrumentation of a Linear Collider ? What are the main Instruments ? LC school.
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *
Ultra-thin Gas Jet for Non-Invasive Beam Halo Measurement Adam Jeff CERN & University of Liverpool Workshop on Beam Halo Monitoring 19th September 2014.
LC Beam Diagnostics Key Issues – Existing and Future Tests in Test Facilities – Thibaut Lefevre Manfred Wendt CERN.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMBINED TR/DR EMITTANCE STATION FOR FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS T. Aumeyr 1, M. Bergamaschi 2, E. Bravin 2, P. Karataev 1, R. Kieffer 2,
LINEAR COLLIDER BEAM INSTRUMENTATION T. LEFEVRE, CERN ON THE BEHALF OF THE LC BEAM INSTRUMENTATION COMMUNITY.
SPS Synchrotron Light Monitor -BSR- Status G. TRAD E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, F. Roncarolo.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Transverse beam size measurement High energy micron electron beam non-invasive diagnostics based on diffraction radiation G.Naumenko*, A.Potylitsyn, L.Sukhikh.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Pavel Karataev John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science At Royal Holloway, University of London oPAC Advanced School on Accelerator Optimisation 7-11.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Non-invasive profile monitors for energy-frontier machines Adam Jeff CERN & University of Liverpool.
27 MAY 2008NANOBEAM A laser-wire scanner for the ATF extraction line Alexander Aryshev, Stewart Boogert, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman a Lawrence.
SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF NON- INVASIVE BEAM PROFILE MONITORBASED ON OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION A.P. Potylitsyn Tomsk Polytechnic University, , pr.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Christoph Gabor, ASTeC HIPPI—Meeting (WP 5) 26 th – 28 th September 2007 Non—destructive transverse emittance measurement device The Front End Test Stand.
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Hao Zhang University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute.
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
CLIC-UK Collaboration CERN, May 9 – 11, 2012 Pavel Karataev John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science at Royal Holloway, University of London.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
R&D on non-invasive beam profile measurements Adam Jeff CERN & University of Liverpool.
T. Aumeyr 1, L. Bobb 1, 2, M. Billing 3, E. Bravin 2, P. Karataev 1, T. Lefevre 2, S. Mazzoni 2, H. Schmickler 2 1.John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway,
BEAM INSTRUMENTATION AND DIAGNOSTICS FOR HIGH LUMINOSITY LHC Rhodri Jones CERN Beam Instrumentation Group.
P. Karataev John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway, University of London Coherent Diffraction Radiation and its Application at CTF3 and CLIC Potential.
Accelerator Laboratory of Tsinghua University Generation, measurement and applications of high brightness electron beam Dao Xiang Apr-17, /37.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
I could be brief… 8 th Ditanet Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam size Measurement for Hadrons Accelerators, CERN, th April 2013 Optical Diffraction Radiation.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
Instrumentation for Accelerators Technologies for the HL-LHC
Gas jet based diagnostics for beam monitoring
THz Radiation using Cherenkov Diffraction Radiation
at Royal Holloway Univ. London
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Laserwire: high resolution non-invasive beam profiling
Lebanese Teacher Programme 18/04/2017
ODR/OTR emittance station at ATF2 (KEK)
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
UV/X-ray Diffraction Radiation for Non-Intercepting Beam Size Diagnostics Pavel Karataev Thibaut Lefevre.
FCC ee Instrumentation
High resolution profile measurements
Proton Beam Diagnostics
CLIC Beam Instrumentation
Beam size diagnostics using diffraction radiation
PLANNED EXPERIMENT ON INVESTIGATION OF ‘HALF-BARE’ ELECTRON TRANSITION RADIATION PROPERTIES ON 45-MeV CLIO FACILITY S. Trofymenko1,2), N.
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

L. Bobb 1, 2, T. Aumeyr 1, M. Billing 3, E. Bravin 2, N. Chritin 2, P. Karataev 1, T. Lefevre 2, S. Mazzoni 2 1.John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom 2.CERN European Organisation for Nuclear Research, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 3.Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

 Motivation  Aim  Diffraction Radiation  Experimental preparation for Phase 1  Simulations  Vacuum assembly  Optical system  Future work  Outlook for Phase 2 L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

 E. Chiadroni, M. Castellano, A. Cianchi, K. Honkavaara, G. Kube, V. Merlo and F. Stella, “Non-intercepting Electron Beam Transverse Diagnostics with Optical Diffraction Radiation at the DESY FLASH Facility”, Proc. of PAC07, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, FRPMN027.  A.H. Lumpkin, W. J. Berg, N. S. Sereno, D. W. Rule and C. –Y. Yao, “Near-field imaging of optical diffraction radiation generated by a 7-GeV electron beam”, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, (2007).  P. Karataev, S. Araki, R. Hamatsu, H. Hayano, T. Muto, G. Naumenko, A. Potylitsyn, N. Terunuma, J. Urakawa, “Beam-size measurement with Optical Diffraction Radiation at KEK Accelerator Test Facility”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004). σ y = 14 µm measured L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Motivation Section of machine Beam Energy [GeV] Beam size [µm] Requirement PDR (H/V) /10 Micron-scale resolution DR (H/V)10/1 RTML (H/V) /1 Drive Beam Accelerator Non-invasive measurement Transverse beam size requirements for the Compact Linear Collider (Table 5.62 CDR Volume 1, 2012): Baseline high resolution non- interceptive beam profile monitor: Laser Wire Scanners S. T. Boogert et al., “Micron-scale laser-wire scanner for the KEK Accelerator Test Facility extraction line”, Phys. Rev. S. T. – Accel. and Beams 13, (2010) L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

E (GeV)σ H (µm)σ V (µm) CesrTA ∼ ∼ 65 Project aim: To design and test an instrument to measure on the micron-scale the transverse (vertical) beam size for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) using incoherent Diffraction Radiation (DR) at UV/soft X-ray wavelengths. D. Rubin et al., “CesrTA Layout and Optics”, Proc. of PAC2009, Vancouver, Canada, WE6PFP103, p Cornell Electron Storage Ring Test Accelerator (CesrTA) beam parameters: L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Principle: 1.Electron bunch moves through a high precision co-planar slit in a conducting screen (Si + Al coating). 2.Electric field of the electron bunch polarizes atoms of the screen surface. 3.DR is emitted in two directions:  along the particle trajectory “Forward Diffraction Radiation” (FDR)  In the direction of specular reflection “Backward Diffraction Radiation” (BDR) θ0θ0 θyθy e-e- DR Angular distribution Generally: DR intensity ⇧ as slit size ⇩ h L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

P. Karataev et al. Vertical polarisation component of 3-dimensional (θ x, θ y, Intensity) DR angular distribution. PVPC is obtained by integrating over θ x to collect more photons. Visibility (I min /I max ) of the PVPC is sensitive to vertical beam size σ y. L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

To compare with TR intensities: Measureable visibility for initial test at parameters: λ = nm a = 0.5, 1 mm σ y = 50 µm L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

M. Billing, "Introduction to Beam Diagnostics and Instrumentation for Circular Accelerators", AIP Conference Proc. 281, AIP 1993, pg.75 ff. target slit size [mm] vertical beam size [µm] beam lifetime [min] (max) (max) Errors due to beam jitter are reduced by including turn-by-turn vertical position measurements of the bunch in the target aperture. a target ≥ 5∙σ y, preferably a target = 7-10∙σ y Large aperture = low DR intensity Multiple turns of a single bunch through the target aperture L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Technical drawings by N. Chritin Requirements: High precision slit size Coplanarity ≤ 10% ∙ λ High reflectivity at λ Aperture sizes a: 0.5 mm, 1 mm Material: Si L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Source of backgroundContribution SR from beamline opticsHigh Camera noise Low Residual background SR + DR interference SR suppression P. Karataev et al., Proc. of EPAC 2004, THPLT067 θ0θ0 θyθy e-e- Use a mask upstream of target to suppress SR contribution. E = 2.1 GeV λ = 400 nm a = 0.5 mm MaskTarget OTRODR L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Technical drawings by N. Chritin Electron beam direction DR experiment L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Technical drawings by N. Chritin Simulations by A. Nosych E-field magnitude of a single bunch pass in time domain (Gaussian bunch, length = [-4 ,4  ],  = 10mm) H-field surface tang complex magnitude (Loss map) Mode Fr = 1.19 GHz, Q = 3309, Ploss = W Total power loss for single bunch = 0.6 W L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Images taken during assembly at CERN and current testing at Cornell.

1.Alignment of the electron beam with the target aperture:  BPMs for centering (~10 microns resolution)  Target imaging to look for OTR from beam halo  Correlate with BLMs: 2.DR vertical beam size measurement Quadrupole Dipole Virtual BLMs Si μm off center +400μm off Virtual Detector 3 Virtual Detector 4 Simulations by A. Apyan L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

2.1 GeV5 GeV 200 nm0.54 m3.18 m 400 nm1.08m6.37 m Bi-convex lens required with camera in back focal plane. Far-field zone Dual purpose: 1.Image target 2.Image DR angular distribution DR observation wavelengths: λ = 200 nm, 400 nm In footprint of target mechanism ( < 1m)Determined by L and spatial constraints. L = distance from source of DR to detector. Compact optical system is in the prewave zone (Pre-wave zone effect in transition and diffraction radiation: Problems and Solutions -P. V. Karataev). L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

E = 5.3 GeV a target = 0.2 mm  DR at soft X-ray wavelengths:  More complex optical system.  Grazing target tilt angle  Aperture size determined by impact parameter for given wavelength Main requirement: Micron-scale resolution Must use shorter wavelengths nm ≈ 2x nm L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

I would like to thank J. Barley, J. Conway, J. Lanzoni, Y. Li, T. O'Connell, M. Palmer, D. Rice, D. Rubin, J. Sexton, C. Strohman and S. Wang for all technical contributions and advice. In addition, O.R. Jones and H. Schmickler for organisation of the collaboration, A. Apyan, S. Burger, A. Jeff, A. Nosych and S. Vulliez  Simulations have demonstrated the feasibility of vertical beam size measurements at CesrTA. The preliminary phase 1 experiment will take place at the end of December  The design must account for the experiment location in a circular machine. This introduces some advantages and disadvantages not applicable for linacs.  Preliminary simulations for the phase 2 test aiming for the soft x-ray spectral range have been presented. L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Thank you for your attention Questions? L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

Extra slides L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

E-field + B-field magnitude of a single bunch pass in time domain (Gaussian bunch, length = [-4 ,4  ],  = 10mm) GHz 1.26 GHz 1.19 GHz Ploss_total = 0.6W Simulations by A. Nosych H-field surface tang complex magnitude (Loss map) Fork OUT, Chamber IN GHz 1.19 GHz 1.26 GHz L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

 LHC also has γ ≈ 4000 E = 4000 GeV)  Using proton beam:  Reduced SR background  Larger beam size  Wavelengths in the infrared spectral range Main requirement: Non- invasive measurement Must use large target aperture L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

A. Cianchi et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14 (10) (2011) Aperture sizesInterference a mask = a target Complete destructive interference of FDR + BDR (blue) a mask ≈ 2∙a target Measureable interference (green) a mask ≥ 4∙a target Negligible interference (red) E = 2.1 GeV λ = 400 nm a mask = 2 mm a target = 1 mm σ y = 50 µm Using non-collinear slits (i.e. centres of mask + target do not coincide) allows measurement of beam size, beam offset from the target centre and angular divergence. L. Bobb, BI Day, December 6, 2012, Centre de Convention d'Archamps

ODR movements  There are 2 stepping motors: o 1x linear movement of the fork o 1x angular movement of the fork  There is 1 DC (+24V) motor that drives a linear movement for the replacement chamber  The linear (stepping) movement of the fork and the linear (DC) movement of the replacement chamber have to be interlocked one with respect to the other to avoid collision (see next slide)  Cabling of stepping motors has to be adapted to available driver (unipolar/bipolar) CERN were performed with bipolar driver and cabling) S. Burger

Replacement Chamber (linear movement) OUT IN Burndy 12M Socket M ODR fork (linear movement) OUT IN OUT switch 5 COM switches 8 IN switch 11 Motor + 9 NO NC NO NC Stepping switches cabling Motor - 10 Burndy 4M Socket Burndy 4F Socket Interlock ODR movement Cable Burndy 4M/F 1 to 1 (as connected with CERN screen instrumentation ‘standard’ driver) Hardware INTERLOCK logic: ODR fork can not move if replacement chamber not OUT Replacement chamber can not move if ODR fork not OUT DC motor 24V Cornell connection S. Burger