Measurement of the B 0 s Oscillation Frequency: Matter-Antimatter Transformations at 3 THz Prof. Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania UCSD 16 May 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,
Advertisements

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
First CDF II Results on B s Mixing Joseph Kroll (Penn) Franco Bedeschi (INFN-Pisa) for the CDF B s Mixing Group La Jolla, CA – site of CKM2005.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Matter-Antimatter Transformations at 3 Trillion Hertz Prof. Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania Fall 2006.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
B s and Λ b Lifetimes and BRs at the Tevatron Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 25 th September 2006 Beauty 2006,
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations The CDF Collaboration 1 st St. Ocean City, NJ, Feb. 7, 2003, H 2 O 35 0 F Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
1 CDF Results on B Physics Masashi Tanaka (Argonne) The Tevatron Connection June 24th, 2005.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
03/09/2008 Md. Naimuddin 1 Masses, Lifetimes and Mixings of B and D hadrons Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) Fermi National Accl.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
February 28, 2008Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, B States at the Tevatron Matthew Jones Purdue UniversityPurdue University/CDFCDF.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
Aart Heijboer ● Observation of Bs oscilations ● Nikhef special seminar ● 01/08/07 ● slide 1 ● 03:44:44 PM Aart Heijboer University of Pennsylvania.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool University of Edinburgh Seminar October 2006 B s Mixing at CDF 0.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
Working Group 3 Summary: V td, V ts, and Friends Jeffrey Berryhill Laurent Lellouch Mikolaj Misiak Christoph Paus CKM Workshop, UCSD March 18, 2005 K BsBs.
1 Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool CERN, May 15-19th 2006.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Penn CDF B Physics Overview Joseph Kroll – Penn DOE Site Visit – 8 August 2005.
Penn CDF Group Overview & B Physics Activities Joseph Kroll.
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
The Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations The CDF Collaboration 1 st St. Ocean City, NJ, Feb. 7, 2003, H 2 O 35 0 F Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
1 Heavy Flavor Physics At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) Aspen Winter Conference Aspen, Colorado 13 February 2006.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
Aart Heijboer 1 July 7, nikhef colloquium mixing at CDF Aart Heijboer University of Pennsylvania/CDF Outline for today Introduction and motivation The.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 Matter-Antimatter Oscillations Introduction to flavor physics Tevatron and CDF B s Oscillations Conclusion Matthew Herndon, October.
The Observation of B 0 s – B 0 s Oscillations: a 20 Year Perspective 23 Nov 2006, Music Pier, Ocean City, NJ, photo: Tom Welsh Joseph Kroll University.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Hadronic B→DX Decays at LHCb and CDF Laurence Carson, Imperial College on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CIPANP 2012, St. Petersburg,FL.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
2010/09/01cpv from b factories to tevatron and lhcb1 Recent B Physics Results from CDF Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba)
Semi-Leptonic B s Mixing at DØ Meghan Anzelc Northwestern University On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
B s Mixing Results for Semileptonic Decays at CDF Vivek Tiwari Carnegie Mellon University on behalf of the CDF Collaboration.
1 Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy at the Tevatron Ilya Kravchenko MI T.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Evidence for Bs Mixing and measurement of ms at CDF
If not the Standard Model, What?
For the BaBar Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of the B 0 s Oscillation Frequency: Matter-Antimatter Transformations at 3 THz Prof. Joseph Kroll University of Pennsylvania UCSD 16 May 2006

Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 2 Presenting results on  m s and |V td /V ts | Data are from the CDF Collaboration at Fermilab CDF = 60 Institutions, > 700 Physicists All results are preliminary unless indicated otherwise

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 3 Tevatron Performance Typical L = cm -2 s -1 ∫Ldt = 1.5 fb -1 This analysis uses full data set: 1 fb -1

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 4 Neutral Meson Flavor Oscillations (Mixing) Due to phase space suppression: K 0 L very long-lived: 5.2 £ s (K 0 S : £ s) 1954: over 50 years ago

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 5 Long-Lived Neutral Kaon Led to discovery of CP Violation in 1964 (Nobel Prize in 1980) BF(K 0 L !  +  - ) = 0.2% Discovered in 1956 Phys. Rev. 103, 1901 (1956)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 6 Neutral Meson Mixing (Continued)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 7 Neutral B Meson Flavor Oscillations  = 1/  = 1.6 psec Units: We use ~ =1 and quote  m in ps -1 To convert to eV multiply by £ 10 -4

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 8 Until Two Months Ago… at least 3.5 cycles per lifetime

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 9 Basic Measurement Principle Measure asymmetry A as a function of proper decay time t “unmixed”: particle decays as particle For a fixed value of  m s, data should yield Amplitude “A” is 1, at the true value of  m s Amplitude “A” is 0, otherwise “mixed”: particle decays as antiparticle

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 10 Status of Published Results on  m s Results from LEP, SLD, CDF I  m s > 14.4 ps -1 95% CL see Amplitude method: H-G. Moser, A. Roussarie, NIM A384 p. 491 (1997)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 11 Recent Result from DØ Collaboration 17 <  m s < 21 ps 90% CL 1 st reported direct experimental upper bound Probability “Signal” is random fluctuation is 5% V. M. Abazov et al. hep-ex/ submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 12 Recent Result from the CDF Collaboration Probability “Signal” is random fluctuation is 0.5%

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 13 The Flavor Parameters (CKM Matrix) mass eigenstates ≠ weak eigen. weak mass related by Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix V is unitary: V y V = 1Measurements + Unitarity assuming 3 generations PDG: S. Eidelman et al. Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004) Ranges are 90% CL These fundamental parameters must be measured

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 14 Wolfenstein Parametrization Illustrates Hierarchy Original reference: L. Wolfenstein, PRL, 51, p (1983) See also: J. Charles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C41, p. 1 (2005); ibid, hep-ph/ from hep-ph/ Expand matrix in small parameter:  = V us = sin  Cabibbo » £ 3 complex unitary matrix: 3 real & 1 imag. parameters ≡ 3 angles, 1 phase

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 15 Neutral B Meson Flavor Oscillations Flavor oscillations occur through 2 nd order weak interactions e.g. Same diagrams and formula for  m s for B s except replace “d” with “s” All factors known well except “bag factor” £ “decay constant”  m d = § ps -1 (1%) (PDG 2005) from Lattice QCD calculations – see Okamoto, hep-lat/ From measurement of  m d derive |V * tb V td | 2

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 16 B Meson Flavor Oscillations (cont) If we measure  m s then we would know the ratio  m s /  m d Many theoretical quantities cancel in this ratio, we are left with Ratio measures |V td /V ts | This is why  m s is high priority in Run II Using measured  m d & B masses, expected |V ts /V td | Predict  m s » 18 ps -1 We know what to expect M. Okamoto Lattice 2005 hep-lat/ PoS LAT2005 (2005) 013

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 17 Why is this Interesting? Probe of New Physics Supersymmetric particles4 th Generation Additional virtual particles increase  m s Measured value can be used to restrict parameters in models e.g., Harnik et al. Phys. Rev. D (2004) e.g., W. Huo Eur. Phys. J. C (2002)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 18 Experimental Steps for Measuring B s Mixing 1. Extract B 0 s signal – decay mode must identify b-flavor at decay (TTT) Examples: 2. Measure decay time (t) in B rest frame (L = distance travelled) (L00) 3. Determine b-flavor at production “flavor tagging” (TOF) “unmixed” means production and decay flavor are the same “mixed” means flavor at production opposite flavor at decay Flavor tag quantified by dilution D = 1 – 2w, w = mistag probability

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 19 Measuring B s Mixing (cont.) 4. Measure asymmetry these formulas assume perfect resolution for t Asymmetry is conceptual: actually perform likelihood fit to expected “unmixed” and “mixed” distributions

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 20 1 st Evidence: Time Integrated Mixing:   is the time integrated mixing probability In principle, a measurement of  determines  m - 1 st B d mixing measurements were  measurements -  d = § (PDG 2005) - this does not work for B s :  s = 0.5 (the limit as x !1 ) Inclusive measurements at hadron colliders, LEP, SLC yield 1987

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 21 Discovery of Neutral B Flavor Oscillations Implications: m top >50 GeV/c 2 Top quark is heavier than expected Ellis, Hagelin, Rudaz, Phys. Lett. B 192, 201 (1987) UA1 1987: Evidence for B 0 & B 0 s mixing Followed up by observation of B 0 mixing by ARGUS: H. Albrecht et al., (25 June 87) Phys. Lett. B 192, 245 (1987)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 22 Measurement … In a Perfect World what about detector effects? “Right Sign” “Wrong Sign”

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 23 Realistic Effects flavor tagging power, background displacement resolution momentum resolution mis-tag rate 40%  L) ~ 50  m  p)/p = 5%

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 24 All Effects Together

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 25 B Physics at Hadron Machines Strong interaction produces bb pairs Example of lowest order (LO)  s 2 Example of next leading order (NLO)  s 3 NLO contribution comparable to LO contribution see P. Nason, S. Dawson, R. K. Ellis Nucl. Phys. B273, p. 49 (1988) called “flavor creation” “gluon splitting” “flavor excitation” b pairs produced close in y

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 26 B Physics at Hadron Machines (cont.) b quarks then fragment to B hadrons B factories running on Y(4S) only produce lightest B mesons Hadron colliders (and e + e - colliders running above Y(4S)) produce other B’s fragmentation is hard: B hadron gets large fraction of b quark E Many unique B measurements at hadron colliders e.g.,  m s, B s rare decays, observation B c,  b lifetime

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 27 B Production at Tevatron The inclusive b cross-section is enormous: on the order of 100  b For L = cm -2 s -1 (10 32 )   £ L = 1kHz (10kHz) Much of this not useful (trigger, acceptance, analysis selection criteria) The useful cross-section is order 10  b This is still well above production cross-section at B Factories, Z pole The CDF Collaboration, D. Acosta et al., Phys. Rev. D65, (2002) B factory rate: L = cm -2 s -1   £ L = 10 Hz  £ L » 100 Hz

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 28 Trigger Strategy for B Physics Exploit the characteristics of B production and decay 1. B mass relatively large  decay products have relatively high p T require p T > 1.5 – 2.0 GeV/c or larger 2. B decay produces high p T leptons (electron and muon) B !  X, e X & B ! J/  X, J/  !  +  - 3. B’s have long decay distance trigger on displaced tracks B0sB0s D-sD-s ++ -- K-K- K+K+ d0d0 4. Combine lepton & displaced track  b large, but  inelastic » 10 3 larger

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 29 Silicon tracking Drift chamber Lumi monitor Hadronic Calorimetry Muon systems Iron shielding Solenoid and TOF Electromagnetic Calorimetry CDF II Front-end elec. & DAQ: 7.6 MHz clock (132 ns)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 30 Key Features of CDF for B Physics “Deadtime-less” trigger system –3 level system with great flexibility –First two levels have pipelines to reduce deadtime –Silicon Vertex Tracker: trigger on displaced tracks at 2 nd level Charged particle reconstruction – Drift Chamber and Silicon –excellent momentum resolution: R = 1.4m, B = 1.4T –lots of redundancy for pattern recognition in busy environment –excellent impact parameter resolution Particle identification –specific ionization in central drift chamber (dE/dx) –Time of Flight measurement at R = 1.4 m –electron & muon identification

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 31 Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) d0d0 Luciano Ristori, INFN-Pisa

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 32 Example of Specific Trigger for B Physics Hadronic Path – designed for B 0 s ! D - s  + Level XFT tracks with p T > 1.5 GeV - opposite charge -  < 135 o - |p T1 | + |p T2 | > 5.5 GeV Level 2 - confirm L1 requirements - both XFT tracks - SVT  2 <  m< |d 0 | <1mm - 2 o <  < 90 o - Decay length L xy > 200  m Level 3 - confirm L2 with COT & SVX “offline” quality track reco. At Level 3 using trigger criteria

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 33 Semileptonic B 0 s Decay Modes Fully reconstructed better decay time resolution Lower statistics Signal 3,700 Not fully reconstructed poorer decay time resolution Higher statistics Signal 36,000 Hadronic } { }{ Majority of signal collected with displaced track trigger

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 34 Example: Fully Reconstructed Signal Cleanest decay sequence Four charged particles in final state: K + K -  +  - Also use 6 body modes: Used for  m s analysis Signal: 1600 This mode only

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar : First Direct Evidence of B s Signal Well known background poorly known background (small) Signal: 16.0 § 4.3 (  ) 17.0 § 4.5 (K *0 K) D. Buskulic et al. (Aleph) Phys. Lett. B 294, 145 (1992) also: P. Abreu et al. (Delphi) Phys. Lett. B 289, 199 (1992) P. D. Acton et al. (Opal) Phys. Lett. B 295, 357 (1992) Sample: 450K hadronic Z

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 36 The Same Signal at CDF Today 48,000 s Purity: 75% from direct semileptonic B 0 s decay

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 37 Lifetime Measurement production vertex 25  m £ 25  m Decay position Decay time in B rest frame  B 0 s ) = § ps (statistical error only) PDG 2006: § ps

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 38 Aside: Recent  b Lifetime from CDF Uses fully reconstructed  b ! J/   instead of semileptonic:  c + l - l Analysis led by UCSD post-docs M. Neubauer, E. Lipedes Signal 542 § 38

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 39 Unexpected result: Lifetime much larger than previously measured Precision of this measurement comparable to World average Problem with semileptonics? - sample composition - boost correction Measured lifetimes with control modes (B 0, B + ) agree well with other exps. Next step for CDF: use  b !  c 

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 40 Decay Time Resolution: Hadronic Decays = 86 £ s ¼ period for  m s = 18 ps -1 Oscillation period for  m s = 18 ps -1 Maximize sensitivity: use candidate specific decay time resolution Superior decay time resolution gives CDF sensitivity at much larger values of  m s than previous experiments

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 41 Measuring Resolution in Data Use large prompt D meson sample CDF II, D. Acosta et al., PRL 91, (2003) Real prompt D + from interaction point pair with random track from interaction point Compare reconstructed decay point to interaction point

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 42 Semileptonics: Correction for Missing Momentum Reconstructed quantity Correction Factor (MC)Decay Time

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 43 B Flavor Tagging We quantify performance with efficiency  and dilution D  = fraction of signal with flavor tag D = 1-2w, w = probability that tag is incorrect (mistag) Statistical error  A on asymmetry A (N is number of signal) statistical error scales with  D 2

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 44 Two Types of Flavor Tags Opposite side Same sideBased on fragmentation tracks or B ** + Applicable to both B 0 and B 0 s − other b not always in the acceptance − Results for B + and B 0 not applicable to B 0 s + better acceptance for frag. tracks than opp. side b Reminder: for limit on  m s must know D Produce bb pairs: find 2 nd b, determine flavor, infer flavor of 1 st b Calibrate on B +, B 0 data Must rely on MC for D Requires Extensive comparison data and MC

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 45 Types of Opposite Side Flavor Tags Lepton tags Jet charge tag Kaon tag mistags from jet from b (b) has negative (positive) charge on average low  high D high  low D Largest  D B factories Not used in present analysis TOF

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 46 Calibrate with Large Statistics Samples of B + & B 0 Example: semileptonic signals Results:  D 2 = 1.54 § 0.05 [  m d = § (stat) § (syst)] Hadronic signals: B + (D 0  + ) = 26,000 B 0 (D -  + ) = 22,000

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 47 Increase Tagging Power with “Binning” Example: lepton tags  p t rel

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 48 Performance of OST’s is Poor – Why? Part of the problem is acceptance of opposite side b Generator Level study from K. Lannon, Ph. D. Dissertation, Illinois, 2003 Also opposite-side B hadron can mix: D = 1 – 2  = 0.76

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 49 Same Side Flavor Tags Based on correlation between charge of fragmentation particle and flavor of b in B meson TOF Critical (dE/dx too) Decay of P-wave mesons B ** also contributes to B 0, B + (not B 0 s ) Expected correlations different for B +, B 0, B 0 s Ali & Barriero, Z. Phys. C 30, 365 (1986) Gronau, Nippe, Rosner PRD 47, 1988 (1993) Gronau & Rosner, PRD 49, 254 (1994)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 50 Time of Flight Detector (TOF) 216 Scintillator bars, 2.8 m long, 4 £ 4 cm 2 R=140 cm read out both ends with fine mesh PMT (operates in 1.4 T B field – gain down ~ 400) measured resolution  TOF = ps (limited by photostatistics) Kaon ID for B physics Measured quantities: s = distance travelled t = time of flight p = momentum Derived quantities: v = s/t m = p/  v

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 51 Kaons Produced in Vicinity of B’s Larger fraction of Kaons near B 0 s compared to B 0, B +, as expected Ph. D. Thesis, Denys Usynin

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 52 Compare Performance Data and Simulation Check prediction for kaon tag on B +, B 0 Good agreement between data & MC Systematic based on comparisons K K  

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 53 Flavor Tagging Summary Same-side kaon tag increases effective statistics £ 3 – 4  D 2 Hadronic (%)  D 2 Semileptonic (%) Muon 0.48 § 0.06 (stat)0.62 § 0.03 (stat) Electron 0.09 § 0.03 (stat)0.10 § 0.01 (stat) JQ/Vertex 0.30 § 0.04 (stat)0.27 § 0.02 (stat) JQ/Prob § 0.05 (stat)0.34 § 0.02 (stat) JQ/High p T 0.14 § 0.03 (stat)0.11 § 0.01 (stat) Total OST 1.47 § 0.10 (stat)1.44 § 0.04 (stat) SSKT 3.42 § 0.98 (syst)4.00 § 1.02 (syst)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 54 Combining it all unbinned maximum likelihood fit = Before fitting for  m s : test whole procedure by on B d mixing fix  m s integrate over true decay length ct and true k-factor get A(  m s ) k k kkk k=sig,bg sig for each event: pdg

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 55 Amplitude Scan: Hadronic Decays

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 56 Amplitude Scan: Semileptonic Decays

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 57 Combined Amplitude Scan

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 58 Results: Amplitude Scan A/  A = 3.5 Sensitivity 25.3 ps -1

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 59 Measured Value of  m s - log(Likelihood) Hypothesis of A=1 compared to A= 0

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 60 Significance: Probability of Fluctuation Probability of random fluctuation determined from data Probability = 0.5% (2.8  ) Below threshold to claim “observation” Continue improving analysis to increase potential significance

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 61 Determination of |V td /V ts | Previous best result: D. Mohapatra et al. (Belle Collaboration) hep-ex/ CDF

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 62 Summary of CDF Results on B 0 s Mixing First direct measurement of  m s Precision: 2.4% Probability of random fluctuation: 0.5% Most precise measurement of |V td /V ts | All results are preliminary ( 2.76 THz, eV)

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 63 Perspective and Outlook Mixing in Neutral Kaons –led to discovery of CP violation –necessary condition for matter antimatter asymmetry in Universe. Mixing in B 0 mesons –led to possibility of observing CP Violation in another system –validated that SM mechanism for CP Violation is dominant mechanism. Discovery of B 0 mixing pointed to a much heavier top quark: –Results on B 0 s mixing could point to heavier new particles or exclude them Establishing B 0 s mixing sets the stage for the next step: –measuring CP asymmetries in B 0 s decays –could produce unambiguous signals of new physics. We are coming to the end of a long story: –a 20 year quest to measure  m s –a tremendous technical achievement –allows precise measurement of fundamental parameters

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 64 Additional Slides for Reference

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 65 Systematic Uncertainties related to absolute value of amplitude, relevant only when setting limits –cancel in A/  A, folded in in confidence calculation for observation –systematic uncertainties are very small compared to statistical Hadronic Semileptonic

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 66 Systematic Uncertainties on  m s systematic uncertainties from fit model evaluated on toy Monte Carlo have negligible impact relevant systematic unc. from lifetime scale Syst. Unc SVX Alignment0.04 ps -1 Track Fit Bias0.05 ps -1 PV bias from tagging0.02 ps -1 All Other Sys< 0.01ps -1 Total0.07 ps -1 All relevant systematic uncertainties are common between hadronic and semileptonic samples

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 67 Amplitude Scan: Hadronic Period 1 B s ! D s  / D s 

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 68 Amplitude Scan: Hadronic Period 2 B s ! D s  / D s 

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 69 Amplitude Scan: Hadronic Period 3 B s ! D s  / D s 

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 70 Semileptonic Scan: Period 1

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 71 Semileptonic Scan: Period 2

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 72 Semileptonic Scan: Period 3

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 73 The Unitarity Triangles V is unitarity  geometric representation: triangle in complex plane Im Re V i1 V * k1 V i2 V * k2 V i3 V * k3 There are 6 triangles Kaon UT Beauty UT flat n.b. these triangles are rescaled by one of the sides i = 1 is previous page

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 74 The Beauty Unitary Triangle  of Chau & Keung parametrization is 

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 75 J. Charles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C41, p. 1 (2005); ibid, hep-ph/ Results from CKM Fitter with recent CDF  m s result

16 May 2006Joseph Kroll - UCSD Seminar 76 J. Charles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C41, p. 1 (2005); ibid, hep-ph/