Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Advertisements

Dragon Run Special Area Management Plan Photo credits: Teta Kain, FoDR David Fuss, MPPDC.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Merle H. Bishop, FAICP President Florida Chapter American Planning Association.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
Helping Shape the Future of the National Capital Region: COG’s Climate Change and Greater Washington 2050 Initiatives Stuart Freudberg Director, Dept.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Governor’s Housing Conference Baltimore, Maryland September 27, 2013.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Mid-Shore CEDS Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
Quality Growth Communities Presentation to the American Planning Association Utah Chapter Convention September 24, 2004.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
NGA Center for Best Practices: Policy Academy on Land Use and Transportation Planning State of Illinois Team Lynne Padovan—Governor’s Office Randy Blankenhorn—IDOT.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Bowie City Council Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
NATIONAL OCEAN POLICY FRAMEWORK WEALTH CREATION THROUGH A HEALTHY, SECURE AND SUSTAINABLE OCEAN BY: DATO’ DR. SHARIFAH ZARAH SYED AHMAD DEPUTY SECRETARY.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
Achieving Smarter, More Sustainable Growth in Maryland MDP/Office of Smart Growth.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Potomac Watershed Roundtable Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Land Use and Economic Development in Rural Areas Supplemental Module.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
May 20, 2008 Ordinance Affecting the Affordable Housing Advisory Board Amending Article V of Chapter 2 of the Orange County Code Ordinance Affecting the.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Cecil County, Maryland.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
The long, long road to inclusionary zoning Chatham County North Carolina.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
IRP Board Listening Session Results OCTOBER 11, 2011 IDAHO RURAL PARTNERSHIP BOARD MEETING.
N orth C entral W isconsin R egional P lanning C ommission 210 McClellan Street, Suite 210 Wausau, WI (715)
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Gillian Adams FOCUS on Bay Area Housing June 28, 2007.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Updated Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives October 20, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Maryland’s Answer to Urban Sprawl
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Themes in History of California Planning, 1970s-today
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Overview of Present Tasks
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011

Important Planning Issues Today? Uncontrolled Growth Premature Rural Subdivision Loss of Productive Soils Strip Growth Loss of Forest Land Loss of Chesapeake Bay Fisheries Needs for Infrastructure and Capital Improvement Needs to Acquire Forest Land Needs to Set Goals for Preserving Agricultural Land

No, 1938!! Report of Maryland State Planning Commission (1937)

So that’s where Secretary Hall got the idea…

Established by General Assembly in 2007 First convened January 2008 with 21 members from diverse constituencies. MACo represented by one elected official and one planning director. Charged with a range of tasks, from very general to very specific Task Force on the Future for Growth and Development in Maryland ( )

Task Force delivered its initial report, “Where Do We Grow From Here?” to Governor O’Malley in January 2009 Report was foundation for Governor’s Smart, Green & Growing legislation in 2009 Task Force and its workgroups continued through 2010 Task Force on the Future for Growth and Development in Maryland ( )

Revitalization Incentives Workgroup issued Sustainable Maryland report in January 2010, focused on community revitalization incentives. Led to Sustainable Communities Act of 2010 and extension of state historic tax credit as Sustainable Communities Tax Credit.

1. Quality of Life and Sustainability A high quality of life is achieved through universal stewardship of the land, water, and air resulting in sustainable communities and protection of the environment. 2. Public Participation Citizens are active partners in the planning and implementation of community initiatives and are sensitive to their responsibilities in achieving community goals. 3. Growth Areas Growth is concentrated in existing population and business centers, growth areas adjacent to these centers, or strategically selected new centers. The “Twelve Visions” Maryland’s Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Policy * * Maryland Annotated Code, State Finance and Procurement Article §5-7A-01 and Article 66B. § 1.01

4. Community Design Compact, mixed–use, walkable design consistent with existing community character and located near available or planned transit options is encouraged to ensure efficient use of land and transportation resources and preservation and enhancement of natural systems, open spaces, recreational areas, and historical, cultural, and archeological resources. 5. Infrastructure Growth areas have the water resources and infrastructure to accommodate population and business expansion in an orderly, efficient, and environmentally sustainable manner. 6. Transportation A well–maintained, multimodal transportation system facilitates the safe, convenient, affordable, and efficient movement of people, goods, and services within and between population and business centers. The “Twelve Visions” Maryland’s Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Policy

7. Housing A range of housing densities, types, and sizes provides residential options for citizens of all ages and incomes. 8. Economic Development Economic development and natural resource–based businesses that promote employment opportunities for all income levels within the capacity of the State’s natural resources, public services, and public facilities are encouraged. 9. Environmental Protection Land and water resources, including the Chesapeake and coastal bays, are carefully managed to restore and maintain healthy air and water, natural systems, and living resources. “The Twelve Visions” Maryland’s Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Policy

10. Resource Conservation Waterways, forests, agricultural areas, open space, natural systems, and scenic areas are conserved. 11. Stewardship Government, business entities, and residents are responsible for the creation of sustainable communities by collaborating to balance efficient growth with resource protection. 12. Implementation Strategies, policies, programs, and funding for growth and development, resource conservation, infrastructure, and transportation are integrated across the local, regional, state, and interstate levels to achieve these Visions. “The Twelve Visions” Maryland’s Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Policy

Established in 2010 General Assembly Session (SB 278) at the Governor’s initiative, with sunset of 2020 if not reauthorized. Replaced the Task Force and expanded it from 21 to 36 members, with 5-year terms, to represent a wider constituency. Added: –4 state agency representatives – Agriculture, Business and Economic Development, Natural Resources and Education –2 stakeholder organization representatives – environmental community and commercial building and development industry –9 regional representatives – Western Maryland, Southern Maryland, Eastern Shore and Washington and Baltimore Metropolitan areas MACo has 2 representatives directly, with 2 more local government representatives required among regional reps. 3 additional local officials are among members. Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Origins and Organization

Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Statutory Charge The Commission shall: Assess and advise on the progress of State, regional, and local planning in Maryland in achieving the goals of the State economic growth, resource protection, and planning policy, as defined in § 5 ‑ 7a-01 of this title; Make recommendations on the adequacy, coordination, and implementation of funding mechanisms and other State assistance for planning activities and infrastructure and land preservation needs, consistent with the State economic growth, resource protection, and planning policy; Promote planning coordination and interjurisdictional cooperation among the State and local jurisdictions and recommend mechanisms to facilitate voluntary joint planning;

Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Statutory Charge Advise on the content and preparation of the State development plan, State transportation plan, and State housing plan and the implementation of these plans, including the relationship of these plans with local land use plans; Promote and make recommendations regarding efficient and predictable model State and local development regulations to achieve the goals of the State economic growth, resource protection, and planning policy; Evaluate the continuing viability and effectiveness of the State and local government smart growth indicators contained in Article 66B, § 3.10 of the Code, and make recommendations for amendments or additions to the indicators; Review the reports of local jurisdictions on adequate public facilities development restrictions required by Article 66B, § of the Code, and assess whether and to what extent adequate public facilities ordinances affect the achievement of the goals of the State economic growth, resource protection, and planning policy;

Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Statutory Charge Develop and assist in the implementation of educational and outreach programs about smart growth; Review periodically the educational requirements for members of planning boards and Commissions and boards of appeals required by Article 66B, §§ 3.02 and 4.07 of the Code, and evaluate compliance rates for the members; Make recommendations for changes in State law, regulations, policies, and procedures, if any, that the Commission believes are necessary to achieve the State’s economic growth, resource protection, and planning policy; and Serve as an advisory board to the Governor’s Smart Growth Subcabinet, providing advice and guidance.

Commission Workgroups Concentrating Growth Education PlanMaryland Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Indicators Adequate Public Facilities (APFO) Funding Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission

Commission Web-Portal located at Planning.Maryland.gov Membership & Charge Planning & Smart Growth Resources Schedule of Upcoming Meetings Summaries of Prior Meetings