Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Workshop Overview Douglas Mahone, Partner The H ESCHONG M AHONE G ROUP for Pacific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 Development and Evolution of User Interface
Advertisements

Development of the Smart Grid Implementation of the Board’s Policies Smart Grid Working Group November 29, 2012.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
1 WGA Clean and Diversified Energy Advisory Committee Briefing Brian Horii Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc
SCE To-Code Pilot Proposal
IEPR Staff Workshop – ZNE Buildings
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
Numbers 6, 7, 12 Review session: Monday 6:30-7:30 Thomas 324
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
European Livestock Policy Evaluation Network: development of a livestock policy decision support system.
DOE OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY The Importance of a Good Plan 1.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
Energy efficiency cost-effectiveness CEC IEPR Workshop on 2030 Efficiency Goals July 6, 2015 Snuller Price.
Benchmarking State Buildings Karen Herter, Heschong-Mahone Group (HMG) Mike Langley, Dept. of General Services (DGS) April 8, 2008.
SCCAP is a program of Strategic Energy Innovations “PG&E” refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company. A subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. © 2012 Pacific.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Facilitator Training Program. Day One Agenda – Day One Welcome Getting Started Activity Course Objectives Overview of Facilitation Skills Facilitation.
“informed fleet decisions made easy”. Overview About Us ECO, Inc. is the world's leading engine and vehicle emissions certification consulting firm,
Community Choice Energy In San Mateo County County CCE Advisory Committee May 28, 2015.
Methodology for Energy Savings claim for Incentive Programs and Codes & Standards(C&S) accounting Presented by: Armen Saiyan P.E. For the California Technical.
Demand Response Opportunities in Codes & Standards Prepared by: Amanda Gonzalez, Energy Solutions Energy Solutions| 1610 Harrison Street | Oakland, CA.
Stakeholder Engagement during Implementation of Universal MSI Screening in a Large Healthcare System Stakeholder Engagement during Implementation of Universal.
CALRES Update Phase 1 Progress Report April 22, 2009 Bruce Wilcox Phil Niles Ken Nittler.
0 CPUC / CEC Workshop Reporting and Tracking GHG Emissions for a Load Based Cap PG&E Reporting Emissions and Estimating Emissions from Unspecified Purchases.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
CPUC’s CSI Program and SB1 Report. 2 2 CPUC Ruling on SB1 Report CPUC issued ruling 1/15/08 that outlines SB1 Guidelines Report implementation for the.
Standard Information Workbook (SIW) Update Proposal Regional Technical Forum May 13, 2014.
1 Summary of C&S Savings Changes Due to New Findings for Standards Douglas Mahone Heschong Mahone Group Inc.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
April, 2002Energy Audits1 April, 2002 Ryan Stroupe, Pacific Energy Center DeAnza College: ES 76 Energy Reliability and Your Organization Energy Auditing.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 4, 2005.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Energy Analysis Review of Implications Jon McHugh, Sr. Project Mgr. The H ESCHONG M.
Developing an In-House Air Quality Audit Program March 22, 2006 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Model Program Evaluation Guide Marian Brown Southern California Edison
Insert Nonprofit Logo Project Name Discovery Presentation.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved TDV Project Residential TDV HVAC Progress Bruce Wilcox Berkeley Solar Group for Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Implementing the NIHSS In Your Organization January 2008.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1 Demand Response Research Center Research Opportunity Notice February 2, 2007 Mary Ann Piette Research Director, DRRC Rick.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: The Electric Utility of the Future:
1 Is there LNG in California’s Future? “LNG: When East Meets West” Zeus Development Conference Long Beach, CA by David Maul Manager, Natural Gas Office.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative 2.0 Organizational Structure and Work Plan California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
This program is funded by California utility customers under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission and in support of the California.
NetZero Summit HPBA Pacific & HPBA Sacramento, California June 28, 2011.
A Subsidiary of Utilizing Technology in Fund Development Efforts.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
1 “Good Practices in Managing for Results” Workshop Santiago, Chile October 27 th and 28 th, 2010 Benjamin Nelson Managing Director for Quality Office.
Presentation Overview EECAP summary Plan development process GHG inventory results Policy recommendations EAP implementation.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
The Regulatory Assistance Project Vermont ♦ Maine ♦ New Mexico ♦ California National Action Plan for Demand Response and PNDRP PNDRP July 15, 2010 Richard.
Professor Deborah Healey
Western HVAC Performance Alliance (WHPA)
Western HVAC Performance Alliance (WHPA)
Energy Sector Overview Federated States of Micronesia
Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy    16th Session 5-7 July 2017 Room XVII, Palais des Nations, Geneva    Wednesday, 5.
Bay Area Model Solar Photovoltaic Ordinance
Configuration Control and the Standard Nuclear Performance Model
Introduction to Growth Scenario Working Group
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
ICA Methodology Clarifications ICA Working Group 5/18/2016
WECC Scenario Task Force (WSTF)
Root Cause Analysis Identifying critical campaign challenges and diagnosing bottlenecks.
Presentation transcript:

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Workshop Overview Douglas Mahone, Partner The H ESCHONG M AHONE G ROUP for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Codes & Standards Program

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Agenda 10: :30Overview - Mahone 10: :30Economics - Price & Horii 11: :15Nonres. HVAC - Eley & Karels 12: :45Lunch 12:45 - 1:30Residential HVAC - Wilcox 1:30 - 2:30Energy Analysis Results - McHugh 2:30 - 3:00Next steps - Mahone

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Goals of TDV Project New basis for Title 24 standards Abandon old, flat energy valuation Recognize and credit time dependent valuation Update compliance methods New computer analysis methods More accurate performance by time of use Encourage better utilization of utility system Signals to building designers Retain current stringency of Stds. Recognize environmental factors

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Who’s Behind TDV Project? CEC & PG&E jointly funded initial study PG&E Codes & Standards Program funding current work Consultant team: HMG - overall coordination, development of prototype tools E3 - Economics methodology Eley - Nonresidential HVAC and related BSG - Residential methods and attic/duct models Additional support from SCE

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project What We’ve Done Homework on economics & engineering Developed proposed TDV method Developed improved modeling methods Developed prototype compliance tools Explored implications on compliance Began process of involving stakeholders

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Where We’re Headed Demonstrate TDV method and its effects on Title 24 Standards Seek CEC adoption of the method for use in 2004 round of Standards Apply TDV method to CEC economics analysis of measures Develop supporting tools and documents

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Known Issues Fairness to competing fuels Natural gas vs. propane Electricity vs. natural gas Reliability of forecasts Gradual vs. revolutionary change to Stds. Explaining complexity to decisionmakers Policy choices embedded in the TDV method Are the right signals being sent to designers? Are the benefits worth the trouble?

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project What We Need Next Feedback from stakeholders Does TDV do what we want? Is anybody treated unfairly? Further questions to answer? Peer review on technical work Is it correct and repeatable? Can it be improved? Support for moving forward CEC staff & commissioner buy-in Other stakeholders assistance in advocacy

Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project Comments/Suggestions Gary Fernstrom, PG&E (415) Douglas Mahone, HMG (916)